|
Korean Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Lao Wai

Joined: 01 Aug 2005 Location: East Coast Canada
|
Posted: Tue Aug 29, 2006 7:23 am Post subject: Gonna, sorta, shoulda, woulda, hafta... |
|
|
Hey people,
I just saw George W. Bush on t.v. speaking at a press conference. I wasn't really paying attention to what he said, but to how he said it. I noticed that he speaks rather informally and uses a lot of slang-ish contractions. I don't necessarily have a problem with this but I'm wondering what the American public thinks. On the one hand, I can see people liking this way of speaking because it makes the President seem more 'down-to-earth'. On the other hand, I can see others who might think that as the leader of the country, he should set an example.
This brings me to my next point. When I teach ESL I don't really use slang like 'gonna, shoulda, woulda, etc.' because it might confuse students, at least beginners anyway. I would explain the slang though. But, I also don't use it when I teach Canadian kids either (I was (am?) a public school teacher in Canada, now teaching ESL in a public school in Hong Kong). When I was doing my BEd. the faculty supervisors were quick to pick up on some of the teaching interns who were using a lot of slang when they were teaching and told them they should try to be a bit more formal in their speech (not stiff, but saying 'going to' instead of 'gonna'. I personally didn't have a problem with this after having taught in Korea for two years I was used to speaking clearly, but I know some of my friends continued to speak the way they do in every day life with their students.
What do the rest of you think? Should teachers be held up to a higher standard in the way they speak as compared to the rest of the public. I mean, if the President of the United States doesn't seem to be that concerned, does that give a free pass to all of the teachers in the U.S.? I'm seriously not slamming Bush, but most of the Canadian Prime Ministers I can recall spoke rather formally when I saw them on t.v. I also think Clinton was quite eloquent in his speech as well. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
flotsam
Joined: 28 Mar 2006
|
Posted: Tue Aug 29, 2006 7:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
Why do all sock-trolls employ the same poor elements of style?
Effort, people. Effort. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
kato

Joined: 28 Aug 2006 Location: Tejas
|
Posted: Tue Aug 29, 2006 8:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
He's what we call a "good 'ol boy". He is not very well-spoken at all, nor does he possess much in the way of etiquette. It was even worse when he first got into office. Obviously he has received some coaching...but its still pretty funny (scary?) to watch...that this guy is the leader of the most powerful country in the world. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Lao Wai

Joined: 01 Aug 2005 Location: East Coast Canada
|
Posted: Tue Aug 29, 2006 4:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Flotsam,
I'm hardly a troll. And nothing in my post was sarcastic or made 'tongue in cheek' even. I don't post much on these forums because I don't live in Korea anymore. I would post on the Hong Kong forum, but it's pretty slow and not a lot is talked about. I think if you were to do a search of my posts you'd probably find them all to be rather tame, if not boring. It's funny though, I'm always accused of having a sarcastic tone to my voice when I speak to people even when I'm not being sarcastic. Apparently it comes across in my writing too. I already know that Bush is accused of being an idiot etc. That wasn't my point. My question was whether people in certain positions of authority (the President, teachers, doctors, etc) should speak a certain way. And what the hell is a sock-troll anyway? And what did you think I was trolling about? Bush?
Anyway, I'm not going to go on an on. All I can say is that I honestly wasn't fishing for insults towards Bush. I now wish I had left his name out of the post entirely. It's just that he's the one that got me thinking about the question I put forth which you didn't answer because you were too busy being an asshole.
Last edited by Lao Wai on Tue Aug 29, 2006 4:40 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
VanIslander

Joined: 18 Aug 2003 Location: Geoje, Hadong, Tongyeong,... now in a small coastal island town outside Gyeongsangnamdo!
|
Posted: Tue Aug 29, 2006 4:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Whadaya expect from a guy who used to snort cocaine for years and head across to Mexico for illegals?
He is REAL.
Americans don't like a phony, even if the real thing isn't much (remember the coca-cola campaign: "the real thing")
He lies, but that's different than being a phony. Shouldn't be, but it is. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
RACETRAITOR
Joined: 24 Oct 2005 Location: Seoul, South Korea
|
Posted: Tue Aug 29, 2006 6:07 pm Post subject: Re: Gonna, sorta, shoulda, woulda, hafta... |
|
|
A few months ago I read an interesting article about how uber-intelligent the first presidents of the US were. There were guys that spoke a sackful of languages, could type on a typewriter while playing one hand while playing piano on the other--actually I don't remember any names or what they could actually do, but it was stuff like this. At some point politicians stopped becoming leaders and started becoming followers. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Wangja

Joined: 17 May 2004 Location: Seoul, Yongsan
|
Posted: Tue Aug 29, 2006 6:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Didn't Bush-ee have to go to acting school to rid himself of his Boston/Harvard accent? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
cdninkorea

Joined: 27 Jan 2006 Location: Seoul
|
Posted: Tue Aug 29, 2006 7:34 pm Post subject: Re: Gonna, sorta, shoulda, woulda, hafta... |
|
|
RACETRAITOR wrote: |
A few months ago I read an interesting article about how uber-intelligent the first presidents of the US were. There were guys that spoke a sackful of languages, could type on a typewriter while playing one hand while playing piano on the other--actually I don't remember any names or what they could actually do, but it was stuff like this. At some point politicians stopped becoming leaders and started becoming followers. |
Absolutely right- Thomas Jefferson, for example, was quite an amazing man (you can read up on his many talents and accomplishments here) |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
seoulsucker

Joined: 05 Mar 2006 Location: The Land of the Hesitant Cutoff
|
Posted: Tue Aug 29, 2006 7:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
VanIslander wrote: |
Whadaya expect from a guy who used to snort cocaine for years and head across to Mexico for illegals?
He is REAL.
Americans don't like a phony, even if the real thing isn't much (remember the coca-cola campaign: "the real thing")
He lies, but that's different than being a phony. Shouldn't be, but it is. |
I think you're way off.
I think his "good ol' boy" routine is a way of disarming the American public. Playing dumb makes some of the $hit his administration does seem more like bad policy rather than genuine evil. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
RACETRAITOR
Joined: 24 Oct 2005 Location: Seoul, South Korea
|
Posted: Tue Aug 29, 2006 8:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I found the link I was thinking of.
http://www.pocanticohills.org/presidents/know.htm
This one's my favourite: Both ambidextrous and multilingual, 20th president of the United States James Garfield could write Greek with one hand while writing Latin with the other.
At about what time did the US stop electing presidents like this? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|