Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Left Behind and the White House
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
mindmetoo



Joined: 02 Feb 2004

PostPosted: Sun Aug 27, 2006 10:35 pm    Post subject: Left Behind and the White House Reply with quote

Kinda scary stuff, thinking the White House might be using end times stuff to plan foreign policy. Isn't the president of Iran doing the exact same thing?

To think I was scared back when the big wigs in the White House during Reagan/Bush used to read Tom Clancy to get their hard on.

People who think the world is going to end have a way of bringing about the end. Heaven's Gate, Jonestown, Branch Davidians...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
On the other hand



Joined: 19 Apr 2003
Location: I walk along the avenue

PostPosted: Sun Aug 27, 2006 11:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

There is a hefty contingent of secular Jews among the neo-con foreign policy poobahs, and I doubt very much that they subscribe to a Christian ideology which preaches that Israel is neccessary to facilitate the return of Christ and the destruction of all Jews who refuse to convert. (Which is what the Left Behind crowd believes.) And I doubt that even the non-Jewish technocrats like Rumsfeld swallow this stuff.

But apocalypse-minded evangelical Christians are a big part of the GOP voting bloc these days, and I would guess that the main point in inviting this writer to address White House staffers was to give them some idea about what an average member of the Christian coalition thinks about foreign policy, so they can better tailor their message for that demographic.

Plus, it doesn't hurt Bush among evangelical voters if some right-wing Christian bigwig is going around telling his flock how he got invited to the corridors of power.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Kuros



Joined: 27 Apr 2004

PostPosted: Mon Aug 28, 2006 1:22 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

On the other hand wrote:
There is a hefty contingent of secular Jews among the neo-con foreign policy poobahs, and I doubt very much that they subscribe to a Christian ideology which preaches that Israel is neccessary to facilitate the return of Christ and the destruction of all Jews who refuse to convert. (Which is what the Left Behind crowd believes.) And I doubt that even the non-Jewish technocrats like Rumsfeld swallow this stuff.

But apocalypse-minded evangelical Christians are a big part of the GOP voting bloc these days, and I would guess that the main point in inviting this writer to address White House staffers was to give them some idea about what an average member of the Christian coalition thinks about foreign policy, so they can better tailor their message for that demographic.

Plus, it doesn't hurt Bush among evangelical voters if some right-wing Christian bigwig is going around telling his flock how he got invited to the corridors of power.


Bingo, I don't think they smoke this dope but they do peddle it.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Ya-ta Boy



Joined: 16 Jan 2003
Location: Established in 1994

PostPosted: Mon Aug 28, 2006 4:47 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
People who think the world is going to end have a way of bringing about the end. Heaven's Gate, Jonestown, Branch Davidians...


Yes, they do, although not exactly in the way they were thinking. And having any of them walking in the corridors of power is enough to scare the bejeezus out of me.

Can't we just skip 2007 and to to the Election of '08 now?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
EFLtrainer



Joined: 04 May 2005

PostPosted: Mon Aug 28, 2006 9:13 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Scary stuff, indeed.

Quote:
Imad Moustapha , the Syrian ambassador to the United States, writes in a Los Angeles Times op-ed: "Although the media have reported that no contacts have been made between the two countries over the last three weeks, administration officials have sent vague signals that this might be happening through back channels.

"But no communication whatsoever has taken place. U.S. policy remains to ignore the Syrian government. And it remains fundamentally wrong. . . .

"Currently, the White House doesn't talk to the democratically elected government of Palestine. It does not talk to Hezbollah, which has democratically elected members in the Lebanese parliament and is a member of the Lebanese coalition government. It does not talk to Iran, and it certainly does not talk to Syria.

"Gone are the days when U.S. special envoys to the Middle East would spend hours, if not days, with Syrian officials brainstorming, discussing, negotiating and looking for creative solutions leading to a compromise or settlement. Instead, this administration follows the Bolton Doctrine: There is no need to talk to Syria, because Syria knows what it needs to do. End of the matter."


Quote:
"Q I think he did say that he thought civil war was a possibility.

" MR. SNOW: Okay. Well, I don't think the President is going to quibble with his generals on their characterizations."

Incidentally, there are objective characteristics that all modern civil wars share. Harvard political science professor Monica Toft lists six commonly accepted criteria. And guess what? Iraq meets all of them.

Thomas L. Friedman writes in his New York Times opinion column today (subscription required): "It is now obvious that we are not midwifing democracy in Iraq. We are baby-sitting a civil war. . . .

"[T]he administration now has to admit what anyone -- including myself -- who believed in the importance of getting Iraq right has to admit: Whether for Bush reasons or Arab reasons, it is not happening, and we can't throw more good lives after good lives."


Quote:
"In addition, three of the committee's leading Democrats announced that they would block the confirmation of a senior Justice Department official in protest of a recent move by President Bush. The president effectively stopped a probe into the NSA program by denying security clearances to Justice Department investigators. . .


Quote:
Matt Stearns writes for McClatchy Newspapers that even with two parts of the report complete: "That leaves unfinished three reports in the so-called Phase II investigation, including the potentially explosive one that compares the pre-war public statements of government officials to the intelligence they had at the time. Opponents of the war have said the administration routinely exaggerated the menace presented by Iraq."


Quote:
The Tribune wrote: "Congress and the courts must rein in this presidential power grab. [b]To do otherwise would be to court tyranny."[/b]

And yes, in 2004, the Tribune endorsed Bush.


Ah, yet I am so shrill!!!!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
fiveeagles



Joined: 19 May 2005
Location: Vancouver

PostPosted: Thu Aug 31, 2006 2:58 am    Post subject: Re: Left Behind and the White House Reply with quote

mindmetoo wrote:
Kinda scary stuff, thinking the White House might be using end times stuff to plan foreign policy. Isn't the president of Iran doing the exact same thing?

To think I was scared back when the big wigs in the White House during Reagan/Bush used to read Tom Clancy to get their hard on.

People who think the world is going to end have a way of bringing about the end. Heaven's Gate, Jonestown, Branch Davidians...


What do you know about eschatology? How does the writer know what Bush thinks? As usual, a bunch of bullshyte assumptions.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
mindmetoo



Joined: 02 Feb 2004

PostPosted: Thu Aug 31, 2006 5:17 am    Post subject: Re: Left Behind and the White House Reply with quote

fiveeagles wrote:
As usual, a bunch of bullshyte assumptions.


You're not a christian.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
On the other hand



Joined: 19 Apr 2003
Location: I walk along the avenue

PostPosted: Thu Aug 31, 2006 8:38 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Five Eagles wrote:

Quote:
What do you know about eschatology? How does the writer know what Bush thinks? As usual, a bunch of bullshyte assumptions.


Five Eagles, would you care to point out where exactly on this thread people have misrepresented the eschatology of the Left Behind books?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
guangho



Joined: 19 Jan 2005
Location: a spot full of deception, stupidity, and public micturation and thus unfit for longterm residency

PostPosted: Thu Aug 31, 2006 3:29 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

It rubs me the wrong way when people say that Jews and Christian conservatives are allies. We are not. Evangelicals don't see Jews as allies or even full human beings- merely as objects ripe for conversion. The choices offered- live in Israel, convert, or burn in hell- marry religiosity and the segregationist instincts Southern Baptists (in particular) are raised on. Their parents wanted segregation on Earth- they, being more politically savvy, want segregation in Heaven.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger