Korean Job Discussion Forums

Yo!Chingo · Joined: 06 Dec 2005 Location: Seoul Korea

I personally say that there would be absolutely no problem recruiting new soldiers not only in the US but worldwide to go wup up on some terrorists, and this time there would be no half-a$$ing it!

gang ah jee · Joined: 14 Jan 2003 Location: city of paper

Yup, it'd be just the kick in the ass that 'MErica needs to get the job done properly.

Julius · Joined: 27 Jul 2006

Bin laden and his operatives were recorded discussing using a dirty bomb in the US.

Bin laden said it was better to avoid it, as "things might get out of hand".
The Al Quadea plan is about wearing down and overstretching America gradually, not triggering massive retaliation instantly by using a nuclear device.

I don't doubt they had the capability though (at least formerly, if not now).

Hank Scorpio · Joined: 18 Jan 2003 Location: Ann Arbor, MI

Soldiers? Recruiting? We don't need to recruit ICBMs, which would be the only military unit used in response to such an attack. Regardless of the consequences or the international opinion fallout (pun intended) we'd vaporize the middle east, Israel be damned, and a good portion of SE Asia just to be sure.

We've played nuclear chicken before, with someone far better equipped to play along (although they also had the benefit of being sane).

gang ah jee · Joined: 14 Jan 2003 Location: city of paper

Hank Scorpio · Joined: 18 Jan 2003 Location: Ann Arbor, MI

Beej · Joined: 05 Mar 2005 Location: Eungam Loop

It would go something like this. US president addresses the world in a televised speech. He says something along the lines of " as a world community, we must ask ourselves what we will really miss about Islam. Is the cure for cancer coming from Islam? Will an Islamic nation be the first to land on Mars? Didnt think so". This speech will be followed by the complete nuclear destruction of every city in every Islamic country. You can take this to the bank.

Moldy Rutabaga · Joined: 01 Jul 2003 Location: Ansan, Korea

djsmnc · Joined: 20 Jan 2003 Location: Dave's ESL Cafe

"Shock and awe baby"

"Let's bomb them sand-ni...ers!"

"Make love not war!"

"Make manlove not war!"

"We supply you! Let us stay!"

"Bombs kill animals!"

"There was a bomb? We tried to tell you guys the cure for the world's problems man!"

"I'd uh, just like to say to the president, uh, that my opinion matters too"

"No draft you aging fascists!"

"Damn it, I know I paid my last bill, and I'll make sure they bomb you too if you keep calling me"

SuperFly · Joined: 09 Jul 2003 Location: In the doghouse

Bush would try to nuke Mecca. Then he'd realize, after checking the map, that Mecca is in S/A and so he'd settle for Tehran.

happeningthang · Joined: 26 Apr 2003

Hank Scorpio · Joined: 18 Jan 2003 Location: Ann Arbor, MI

Yo!Chingo · Joined: 06 Dec 2005 Location: Seoul Korea

Personally I think the US using a nuclear weapon in response to nukes being used on American soil would be a death sentence for the rest of the world. Violence would only escalate to the point of our extinction. No, we and the rest of the Western world would just go to the terrorists home countries with about 10 million soldiers and bomb the hell of them.

Hank Scorpio · Joined: 18 Jan 2003 Location: Ann Arbor, MI

ChopChaeJoe · Joined: 05 Mar 2006 Location: Seoul

It's a pretty stupid question. What kind of nuke are you even talking about? What was the delivery system?

A dirty bomb could involve zero casaulties, a megaton nuke several million. The response is somehow going to be the same for either?