| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
cdninkorea
Joined: 27 Jan 2006
Location: Seoul
|
 Posted: Wed Sep 13, 2006 9:03 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
| eamo wrote: |
| I believe we did this story about 6 months ago which went for pages on the moral implications of having sex with male minors as opposed to female minors. |
Oh. Sorry for the redundancy. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dan The Chainsawman
Joined: 05 May 2005
|
| Posted: Wed Sep 13, 2006 9:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Some freaky crap is never redundant, it always makes for good use of bandwidth. Wait till the loons come out of the closet and start saying that a 14 year old boy getting down with his teacher is all groovy. Then the thread will get all the more interesting. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
eamo
Joined: 08 Mar 2003
Location: Shepherd's Bush, 1964.
|
| Posted: Wed Sep 13, 2006 9:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| cdninkorea wrote: |
| eamo wrote: |
| I believe we did this story about 6 months ago which went for pages on the moral implications of having sex with male minors as opposed to female minors. |
Oh. Sorry for the redundancy. |
Not at all. This is a valid thread. Just because the original thread exists doesn't mean we can't make a new one here. Although mods might disagree. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Doogie
Joined: 19 Jan 2006
Location: Hwaseong City
|
| Posted: Wed Sep 13, 2006 9:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I can give a great quote on this from the legend himself.......George Carlin. In his "Rules for 2006" he said this:
New Rule: Stop saying that teenage boys who have sex with their hot,
blonde teachers are permanently damaged. I have a better description
for these kids: lucky b**tards.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Yu_Bum_suk
Joined: 25 Dec 2004
|
| Posted: Wed Sep 13, 2006 9:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Dan The Chainsawman wrote: |
| Some freaky crap is never redundant, it always makes for good use of bandwidth. Wait till the loons come out of the closet and start saying that a 14 year old boy getting down with his teacher is all groovy. Then the thread will get all the more interesting. |
Well as part of the loony 50% of the male population I'll start by saying that three years house arrest is way over-kill for someone who should just have been fired and forgotten about. She didn't tie the boy up and drive him with a strap-on; she didn't force him to get it up; and dragging it out and making a public spectacle of the case will do the boy far more harm than getting lucky with a hot teacher. And no, it's not the same as if a male techer did that.
There - have at me.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
RACETRAITOR
Joined: 24 Oct 2005
Location: Seoul, South Korea
|
| Posted: Wed Sep 13, 2006 11:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Probably in every case of a hot teacher getting caught sleeping with students, she does something to spurn the student and he gets pissed and turns her in. Or maybe she gives him a bad grade so he goes to the police for revenge. But I'd be very surprised if any of them regret it otherwise. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
animalbirdfish
Joined: 04 Feb 2004
|
| Posted: Thu Sep 14, 2006 1:18 am Post subject: Re: Former teacher: Sex with pupil 'really bad choice' |
|
|
| Quote: |
Former teacher: Sex with pupil 'really bad choice'
POSTED: 10:07 a.m. EDT, September 13, 2006
She told Lauer she never thought she was committing rape when she had sex with the teen but realizes now she "made a really, really, really bad choice."
|
One more "really" and I might just buy the contrition. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
cdninkorea
Joined: 27 Jan 2006
Location: Seoul
|
| Posted: Thu Sep 14, 2006 12:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Yu_Bum_suk wrote: |
| Dan The Chainsawman wrote: |
| Some freaky crap is never redundant, it always makes for good use of bandwidth. Wait till the loons come out of the closet and start saying that a 14 year old boy getting down with his teacher is all groovy. Then the thread will get all the more interesting. |
Well as part of the loony 50% of the male population I'll start by saying that three years house arrest is way over-kill for someone who should just have been fired and forgotten about. She didn't tie the boy up and drive him with a strap-on; she didn't force him to get it up; and dragging it out and making a public spectacle of the case will do the boy far more harm than getting lucky with a hot teacher. And no, it's not the same as if a male techer did that.
There - have at me. |
Okay, I'll take the bait: why? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Qinella
Joined: 25 Feb 2005
Location: the crib
|
| Posted: Thu Sep 14, 2006 2:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
My guess as to why is that you can't really rape a male (at least, a woman without a strap-on can't). So, he must be physically interested in t.
That being said, you could argue she seduced him. It's easy for adults, especially in a position of authority, to influence the minds of young teens. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
mindmetoo
Joined: 02 Feb 2004
|
| Posted: Thu Sep 14, 2006 4:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Leno had a bit of an interview with her. The interviewer was like "some would say this is every 14 year old male's dream" to which she responded with all kinds of indignation. Like, how could someone even think to say that. This coming from a teacher who decided to pork her young teen charge. Yeah, people can think the worst things... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
laogaiguk
Joined: 06 Dec 2005
Location: somewhere in Korea
|
| Posted: Thu Sep 14, 2006 4:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Even if we take away the absurdly immature argument of "He kicks ass, I would have been all over that teacher at that age.", you are forgetting the teacher-student relationship. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
cdninkorea
Joined: 27 Jan 2006
Location: Seoul
|
| Posted: Thu Sep 14, 2006 5:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Qinella wrote: |
My guess as to why is that you can't really rape a male (at least, a woman without a strap-on can't). So, he must be physically interested in t.
That being said, you could argue she seduced him. It's easy for adults, especially in a position of authority, to influence the minds of young teens. |
He's physically interested, I guess. Does this mean that if a 14 year old girl isn't sandpaper dry down there, she's "physically interested in it"? By your logic it would mean that. Does this mean the act is okay with a male teacher 20 years her senior? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
EFLtrainer
Joined: 04 May 2005
|
| Posted: Fri Sep 15, 2006 10:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Doogie wrote: |
I can give a great quote on this from the legend himself.......George Carlin. In his "Rules for 2006" he said this:
New Rule: Stop saying that teenage boys who have sex with their hot,
blonde teachers are permanently damaged. I have a better description
for these kids: lucky b**tards. |
Yup. A lot of the effect of any given experience obviously comes from perception of said event.
How many men feel they are being preyed on when a relatively attractive woman wants to *beep* the shit out of them?
EXACTLY.
How many women feel they are being preyed on when virtually ANY man wants to *beep* the shit out of them?
EXACTLY.
I am not dealing with the ethical/moral issues. Be done, and are obvious. But to say the boy is damaged? Like hell... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
