View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
laogaiguk

Joined: 06 Dec 2005 Location: somewhere in Korea
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
corroonb
Joined: 04 Aug 2006
|
Posted: Fri Nov 17, 2006 8:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I doubt it. Most of these drugs have only been on the market for a relatively short while and the long term effects are still unknown. This guy sound like he's abusing the drug because it enhances his mood. Cocaine and heroin both do this but are illegal and far more dangerous. But even if its safe and legal, taking meds you don't need seems unethical and a complete waste of money. Very decadent and western indeed.
Even the drug companies warn that anti-depressants can impair the grieving process and affect the way the patient deals with bereavement. This guy sounds like a happy, happy jackass. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Hollywoodaction
Joined: 02 Jul 2004
|
Posted: Sun Nov 19, 2006 3:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
Looks to me like an excuse to stay away from the gym. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
cwemory

Joined: 14 Jan 2006 Location: Gunpo, Korea
|
Posted: Sun Nov 19, 2006 4:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
This isn't a particularly new idea is it? One of the authors mentioned in the article, Peter D. Kramer, wrote on this subject in 1993 in Listening to Prozac. He wrote of the possibility (and ethics) of "cosmetic" uses of antidepressants.
From wikipedia:
Quote: |
Listening to Prozac: A Psychiatrist Explores Antidepressant Drugs and the Remaking of the Self is a book written by psychiatrist Peter D. Kramer. Written in 1993, the book discusses how the advance of the anti-depressant drug Prozac might change the way we see personality, the relationship between body and soul.
Kramer coined the term "cosmetic psychopharmacology", and in this book he discusses the philosophical, ethical and social consequences of using psychopharmacology to change your personality. He asks if it is ethically defensible to treat a healthy individual to, for instance, help him climb a career, or on the other hand, if it is ethically defensible to deny him that possibility. |
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Listening_to_Prozac
I'm curious as to why they are discussing this now. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jajdude
Joined: 18 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Sun Nov 19, 2006 4:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
Well, the guy said he feels happier. Experts say, "We don't know long-term effects" and things like that, but I don't think it's foolish to take something that can make you happier. Maybe he'll find out after another 20 years if it was a bad idea. If he has 20 years happier than he would have been, is there a downside? Sounds like a worthwhile risk.
Granted, he's not exactly saving himself from misery, and there's no question these drugs have saved many, many lives, but I wouldn't call him a fool. I'd reserve that insult for people doing a lot more dumb things.
Last edited by jajdude on Sun Nov 19, 2006 4:39 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
laogaiguk

Joined: 06 Dec 2005 Location: somewhere in Korea
|
Posted: Sun Nov 19, 2006 4:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
jajdude wrote: |
Well, the guy said he feels happier. Experts say, "We don't know long-term effects" and things like that, but I don't think it's foolish to take something that can make you happier. Maybe he'll find out after another 20 years if it was a bad idea. If he has 20 years happier than he would have been, is there a downside? Sounds like a worthwhile risk. |
Ever seen Equilibrium (bit of Matrix, 1984, few other things thrown in)??? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
cwemory

Joined: 14 Jan 2006 Location: Gunpo, Korea
|
Posted: Sun Nov 19, 2006 6:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
laogaiguk wrote: |
Ever seen Equilibrium (bit of Matrix, 1984, few other things thrown in)??? |
I think it might have been in Listening to Prozac (but it could have been another work) where the author writes about what could happen if governments ever decided to add antidepressants to water supplies or food in order to sedate the population. If everyone is a chemically ehanced good mood, they'd be more receptive to harmful policies. scary, scary stuff.
Speaking of which, in 2004 Prozac was found in Britian's drinking water.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/3545684.stm |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
corroonb
Joined: 04 Aug 2006
|
Posted: Sun Nov 19, 2006 10:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
The thing is people are not supposed to be happy all the time, sadness is inevitable both biologically and emotionally. Happiness cannot exist without sadness. His attiude towards ectasy reveals his true reasons for taking this drug, he's simply afraid of feeling sad and/or bored.
I've taken anti-depressants for prolonged periods and I was unhappy with how they affected my feelings and responses to events. I felt utterly unconcerned by anything, therefore I was happy. However this also affected my drive, I didn't care about failing or succeeding because I was already 'happy'. When people are truly sad, its is because they are angry and confused, their depression is their mind's way of telling them that something has to change. Just taking drugs will not help with solve depressions that are anything other than chemical imbalances. Its basically a lazy and cowardly way of coping with emotions for this guy who is not depressed but it also robs him of the ability to learn from and express those emotions.
How much art would be lost if every artist who felt sad or depressed took drugs to alleviate their suffering? Great art is often born out of suffering and a desire to change the world for the better.
Other forms of mental illness such a schizophrenia and bipolar disorder do need medication almost all the time. Depressions are a normal emotional reaction to circumstance, past and present. I'm not against using medication in the short-term but it won't fix anything permanently.
The actions of this guy trivialise others' use of such medications and the difficulty people often have in paying for them. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jajdude
Joined: 18 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Mon Nov 20, 2006 12:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
corroonb wrote: |
Happiness cannot exist without sadness.
Just taking drugs will not help with solve depressions that are anything other than chemical imbalances.
Depressions are a normal emotional reaction to circumstance, past and present.
|
I don't know. Maybe happiness exists only when there is no sadness. They are very different feelings, very different states of mind. I don't know if it's possible to be both happy and sad at the same time.
Nobody really knows. Clinical depression is a very unclear thing. Calling it a chemical imbalance raises arguments and theories to suggest it may or may not be just brain chemistry that affects mood.
I don't know how normal depression is. A lot of people have it, and are debilitated by it. Many people need the medicine. Some will argue there are other ways to deal with the problem, but the drugs have helped many.
It may not be a solution, but it helps. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
igotthisguitar

Joined: 08 Apr 2003 Location: South Korea (Permanent Vacation)
|
Posted: Mon Nov 20, 2006 1:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
If the "DRUG" companies had their way the ENTIRE world would be consuming their product
btw- if for whatever reason you ARE taking anti-depressants stay away from ST. JOHN's WORT.
On its own it's fine, but together the two can lead to further serious health problems. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
corroonb
Joined: 04 Aug 2006
|
Posted: Mon Nov 20, 2006 4:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
Maybe happiness exists only when there is no sadness. |
I think you misunderstood me here, I was speaking philosophically. I don't think someone can know happiness without knowing sadness. I didn't mean that thay co-exist.
I was really speaking about sadness here and not depression. I think sadness is a slight and temporary depression.He was saying that he never feel sad or down
Quote: |
I don't know how normal depression is. A lot of people have it, and are debilitated by it. Many people need the medicine. Some will argue there are other ways to deal with the problem, but the drugs have helped many.
It may not be a solution, but it helps. |
I absolutely agree, they help very much in the short term and I would not judge anyone who chooses to use them long term to deal with a real problem. The guy in the article the OP posted is not sick and has never been depressed and I was mainly responding to this articles. If I came across as judgemental or dogmatic, I apologise, that was definitely not my intention.
It can be argued that any pyschological state that occurs with the frequency of depression is a normal state. Its really a question of intensity as to whether a depression is clinical or not. Animals can show all the symptoms of depression too, when they are in unpleasant cages or environments. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jajdude
Joined: 18 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Mon Nov 20, 2006 1:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yeah, I knew what you meant. Mine was kind of a philiosophical standpoint too. Who knows? These are tough questions, but good ones to ask. I don't think you were ever dogmatic or judgmental, just expressing your thoughts like I did.
Normal is a tough one. If one is too depressed to function at an adequate level, that isn't normal. Life, other people, work, and other things just demand too much for a really depressed person to deal with. We can all agree, if we have any sense, that for such a person, medication can be a godsend.
It makes me wonder about the people who need the stuff but cannot afford it, or else believe it is somehow wrong to take it. What about so many truly poor people in really poor countries? They cannot afford to be depressed! Strangely, it seems to afflict more people from wealthy countries, though I don't really know if that's true.
Sometimes I think, in the past, before good medicines existed, what was it like for some afflicted with any serious mental problem?
This has gone astray, since the original post was about a guy who was functioning fine, but wanted to be even happier. I just find the whole thing interesting. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
EFLtrainer

Joined: 04 May 2005
|
Posted: Tue Nov 21, 2006 7:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
corroonb wrote: |
Very decadent and western indeed. |
Now, that's a pretty silly comment. Only Westerners use drugs they don't need. Can't imagine why there are so many pharmacies in Korea... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
corroonb
Joined: 04 Aug 2006
|
Posted: Wed Nov 22, 2006 4:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
Now, that's a pretty silly comment. Only Westerners use drugs they don't need. Can't imagine why there are so many pharmacies in Korea... |
Not really, I should have said "first world" but you'd probably object to that too. The fact is that most people in 3rd or 2nd world couldn't afford expensive pharmceuticals even if they needed them.
Pretty pointless and silly comment, contributes nothing to the discussion. Did you read the rest of my comments? Come back when you have an opinion. No right wingers around to taunt?
 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|