View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Julius

Joined: 27 Jul 2006
|
Posted: Mon Nov 27, 2006 12:51 am Post subject: The tale of the turtle and the rabbit. |
|
|
Oh what have you Americans done to our wonderful language, English??
This is a TORTOISE, by the way. It walks slowly, on land. It is not the same as a turtle. It retains a different name from its swimming cousin, to distinguish it. It symbolizes slowness and liesurely pace, as well as determined methodical persistence: it also has a long lifespan and could be seen as wise, old and experienced, which is why it is the correct ingredient in our centuries old folktale.
Ok. This is a TURTLE. It swims. It lives in the ocean. It has flippers, not legs. It is actually very, extremely different from a tortoise. Which is why it actually has a different name. It is the very image of grace and speed underwater: try swimming after and catching one if you want to test out the analogy.
OK. Now, this is a HARE, as featured in our ancient fairy tale. It is has long legs and is very fast, which is why it was chosen to illustrate speed in our ancient folklore.
And this is a RABBIT. it is smaller, and much, much,much slower than a hare. Which is why it would not be given the same name as a hare, or be included in a story designed to illustrate speed.
What other words of ours have you changed and rendered meaningless?
Last edited by Julius on Mon Nov 27, 2006 3:59 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Julius

Joined: 27 Jul 2006
|
Posted: Mon Nov 27, 2006 1:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
Another one!
This is a TAP. Not a faucet. I don't even know what a faucet is or how it is pronounced. fawcett? fossit?
And this is a CUPBOARD. not a closet. "Closet" is just another dumb made-up word. maybe you misheard someone say ' close it" one day and decided the thing was called a closet.
 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
simpleminds

Joined: 04 May 2006
|
Posted: Mon Nov 27, 2006 1:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
When I saw the title of the thread I thought; crikey, another mutilation of the English lingo! I thought I was the only one who gets peeved!
How about 'trolley cart' for 'tram'? A trolley cart is what you put your groceries in, a tram is the steet car on railroad-like tracks. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
VanIslander

Joined: 18 Aug 2003 Location: Geoje, Hadong, Tongyeong,... now in a small coastal island town outside Gyeongsangnamdo!
|
Posted: Mon Nov 27, 2006 1:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
So you are saying you can catch a rabbit?
And I never had a pet turtle?
This is so confusing. Is the difference really that clear? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Julius

Joined: 27 Jul 2006
|
Posted: Mon Nov 27, 2006 2:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
[quote="VanIslander"]
Quote: |
So you are saying you can catch a rabbit? |
I couldn't catch one, but they're still slower than hares. Hares have been used in sport for so long because they're so athletic. Rabbits are slow by comparison. Hares are larger and longer legged than rabbits. Different species.Rabbits have burrows, hares sleep in grass nests. Hares live in open country with few people, rabbits could survive in your back garden or the park.
Hare coursing: most times the greyhound cannot even catch the hare.
Quote: |
And I never had a pet turtle? |
What you probably had was a terrapin: a small freshwater reptile: commonly kept as pets. Turtles aren't kept as pets as far as I know.
Anyway. I think English was originally more varied, specific, refined and descriptive in its homeland. Americanism changed that by misusing what were originally very precise terms. Just my thoughts.
But of course, American english did introduce plenty of new words to describe new things it brought to the culture I guess.
*ahem..what prompted this post was the story of "the turtle and the rabbit" in my American-style textbook this morning. And the fact that my korean co-teacher insists that this is correct because the Americans say so.
Last edited by Julius on Mon Nov 27, 2006 4:01 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
laogaiguk

Joined: 06 Dec 2005 Location: somewhere in Korea
|
Posted: Mon Nov 27, 2006 3:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
Julius wrote: |
And this is a CUPBOARD. not a closet. "Closet" is just another dumb made-up word. maybe you misheard someone say ' close it" one day and decided the thing was called a closet.
 |
Not that many cups in that cupboard. Maybe it should be changed. Other than the tortoise and the hare, most of this is just your preference, which I doubt anyone cares about (nor do they care about mine). Still, Harry Potter and the Sorceror's Stone??? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jennateacher
Joined: 21 Nov 2006 Location: Nonsan, Land of strawberries and rice
|
Posted: Mon Nov 27, 2006 4:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
I am American and I know of the story of the Tortise and Hare. I have seen many bastardisations of clasic tales here in Korea.
In the dialect of English I use the cupboard is where you would keep dishes or food, Above or below the counter. A closet is a very small room used for storing clothing or coats. A pantry is a small room like a closet but for keeping food items.
We all use the same laguage a bit differently. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Julius

Joined: 27 Jul 2006
|
Posted: Mon Nov 27, 2006 4:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
jennateacher wrote: |
I am American and I know of the story of the Tortise and Hare. I have seen many bastardisations of clasic tales here in Korea.
In the dialect of English I use the cupboard is where you would keep dishes or food, Above or below the counter. A closet is a very small room used for storing clothing or coats. A pantry is a small room like a closet but for keeping food items.
We all use the same laguage a bit differently. |
thanks for clearing that up.
What then is a water closet? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
passport220

Joined: 14 Jun 2006 Location: Gyeongsangbuk-do province
|
Posted: Mon Nov 27, 2006 4:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
What? You are suggesting there is a significant difference in the use of English in North America compared to how it is used in England. I need to sit down and catch my breath my head is reeling! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
endofthewor1d

Joined: 01 Apr 2003 Location: the end of the wor1d.
|
Posted: Mon Nov 27, 2006 5:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
if a turtle has flippers, then it would even be slower in a land race. at any rate, i never liked that story. even when i was a kid i had a problem with it. if the idiot hare didn't decide to take a nap at the finish line, he would have won the race. slow and steady didn't win the race at all. extreme arrogance and oversleeping won the race.
i can see that story crushing the confidence of a lot of children. what happens after the first few times they try their best and come out dead last because the other kids opted to not sleep at the finish line?
maybe it would have been better if instead of going to sleep, the hare started running backwards, mocking the tortoise, and tripped in a hole or something, and was unable to finish the race. seems a little more feaseable to me. maybe that's how i'll tell it to my daughter. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Qinella
Joined: 25 Feb 2005 Location: the crib
|
Posted: Mon Nov 27, 2006 5:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
Julius, it sounds to me like you just got done reading a story that has been dumbed down for EFL students. (do a comparison of "the turtle and the rabbit" and "the tortoise and the hare" on google, with quotations. I always heard tortoise and hare. But I bet if you ask any of your students what either of those animals are, you would be met with blank looks. Really, what is the difference? Could a rabbit not beat a turtle in a race? Must you be a zoologist in order to glean the moral of the story?
Also, I would not call that thing a closet. Don't know anyone who would look at that and say 'closet'. I would call it a pantry or a cupboard, since it has foodstuffs inside. Maybe some dummy out there posted that picture on the internet and labeled it 'closet', or maybe you googled 'cupboard' and decided that some people call it a closet; I do not know. But I do know if you google 'closet', you will not find a picture like that, at least not in the first 5 pages of results.
Finally, if you do not know the word 'faucet', that is just absurd. You don't know how to even say it? Hopefully you do not teach phonics.  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Qinella
Joined: 25 Feb 2005 Location: the crib
|
Posted: Mon Nov 27, 2006 5:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
endofthewor1d wrote: |
slow and steady didn't win the race at all. extreme arrogance and oversleeping won the race. |
I always thought that WAS the moral of the story!  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
endofthewor1d

Joined: 01 Apr 2003 Location: the end of the wor1d.
|
Posted: Mon Nov 27, 2006 5:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
Qinella wrote: |
endofthewor1d wrote: |
slow and steady didn't win the race at all. extreme arrogance and oversleeping won the race. |
I always thought that WAS the moral of the story!  |
oh. maybe you're right. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
sock

Joined: 07 Oct 2006
|
Posted: Mon Nov 27, 2006 6:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
What then is a water closet? |
For being such a Mr. Know-it-all regarding how the Americans have ruined God's own tongue, the Queen's English, I'm surprised you don't know about this. "Water Closet" is an old BRITISH word that predates today's common term, "toilet." I've never heard toilets referred to as "water closets" in the US, but I have heard watercloset (albeit infrequently) in England and Wales, and in France I've heard "le W.C."
From Wikipedia, "Flush Toilet" (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flush_toilet)
Quote: |
A flush toilet or water closet (WC) is a toilet that disposes of the waste products by using water to send them through a drainpipe to another location.
1860: The first watercloset was installed on the European continent and was imported from England. It has been installed in the rooms of Queen Victoria in castle Ehrenburg (Coburg, Germany) and she was the only one who was allowed to use it.
The first popularized water closets were exhibited at Crystal Palace and they became the first public toilets, they had attendants dressed in white and they charged only a penny coining the term "To spend a penny."
1880s: Thomas Crapper's plumbing company built flush toilets. After the company received a royal warrant, Crapper's name became synonymous with flush toilets. Although he was not the original inventor, Crapper popularized the siphon system for emptying the tank, replacing the earlier floating valve system which was prone to leaks. Some of Crapper's designs were made by Thomas Twyford. The similarity between Crapper's name and the much older word crap is merely a coincidence. |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
frankly speaking
Joined: 23 Oct 2005
|
Posted: Mon Nov 27, 2006 5:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I too was raised in America and I have always called the story, "the Tortoise and the Hare.
Since it was originally a greek story and the greek translation for rabbit and hare are the same word, then it really doesn't matter if someone calls it the rabbit and the turtle.
The picture you should is typically called a cabinet or cupboard. I have never in my life as an american heard any americans call it a closet.
But I guess the british are right about everything and how dare any nation modify the language to fit their culture.
It sounds that the OP is just pissed off that more people don't talk like him. You really need to adjust. I don't get upset when you say plaster instead of adhesive bandage. Do you really put plaster on a wound.
British didn't invent the language they modified it from the many vernaculars of Latin. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|