View previous topic :: View next topic |
Would you like to trade healthcare systems? |
Yes, I'm not from the US, but I'll trade my country's system for that of the US. |
|
5% |
[ 2 ] |
Yes, I'm from the US, but I'd like to trade systems with another country. |
|
47% |
[ 18 ] |
No, I'm not from the US and I'd keep my healthcare before trading to the US one. |
|
34% |
[ 13 ] |
No, I'm from the US, but I'd rather keep my healthcare than trade for another country's system. |
|
13% |
[ 5 ] |
I like to complain about not enough poll options. Purple is a fabulous color. |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
|
Total Votes : 38 |
|
Author |
Message |
Nowhere Man

Joined: 08 Feb 2004
|
Posted: Tue Nov 10, 2009 7:05 am Post subject: Let's trade healthcare systems |
|
|
I'm not talking anything now being voted on. I mean the status quo. Feel free to mention which country you'd trade for. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
RufusW
Joined: 14 Jun 2008 Location: Busan
|
Posted: Tue Nov 10, 2009 7:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
The British will probably never give up the NHS.... the French, switch to the U.S. system? Ha! You guys just don't know how good we've got it :) |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jvalmer

Joined: 06 Jun 2003
|
Posted: Tue Nov 10, 2009 8:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
No way that any rational person from a country with public healthcare would trade for the US system. Despite all the faults with Canada's system, at least we don't have 10% of the population uninsured. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ontheway
Joined: 24 Aug 2005 Location: Somewhere under the rainbow...
|
Posted: Tue Nov 10, 2009 8:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
People from the socialized medicine countries all feel safe and smug until the day they actually face a major, life-threatening illness that is only treated adequately in the USA.
Then, if they are wealthy, they board the quickest flight for America and get the best treatment available in the world - as tens of thousands of people from every socialized medicine country do every year. And of course, we see very often that it is the high level government leaders and officials of these countries who lead this midnight run for the best health care.
If they are poor, they sing their national anthem - and die. But, since most of these poor bastards have been educated and lied to by their home governments, taught not to question the lies and propaganda they've been fed in the government indoctrination centers (mislabled as "schools") that they were forced to attend in their youth, they are blissfully ignorant that better medical care is available elsewhere. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
RufusW
Joined: 14 Jun 2008 Location: Busan
|
Posted: Tue Nov 10, 2009 8:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
ontheway wrote: |
And of course, we see very often that it is the high level government leaders and officials of these countries who lead this midnight run for the best health care. |
They go to the US because they can afford the best healthcare.
As a society, Eupean countries have better healthcare than the US (higher average life expectancy); we also pay a lot less.
ontheway wrote: |
...government indoctrination centers (mislabled as "schools") that they were forced to attend in their youth |
It's worth coming here just for this type of stuff. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ontheway
Joined: 24 Aug 2005 Location: Somewhere under the rainbow...
|
Posted: Tue Nov 10, 2009 8:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
RufusW wrote: |
ontheway wrote: |
And of course, we see very often that it is the high level government leaders and officials of these countries who lead this midnight run for the best health care. |
They go to the US because they can afford the best healthcare.
As a society, Eupean countries have better healthcare than the US (higher average life expectancy); we also pay a lot less.
ontheway wrote: |
...government indoctrination centers (mislabled as "schools") that they were forced to attend in their youth |
It's worth coming here just for this type of stuff. |
Sorry, but the life expectancy figures are not adjusted to compare the same things.
One example of thousands: In the socialized medicine countries, babies with severe birth defects are aborted at a far higher rate than in the US, so they are never born. In addition, babies that die from such defects in these countries immediately after birth are not counted. But, in the US these babies are born, they survive, and they are counted. This means that the US faces that challenge of having better medical care but because of that better care and the fact that being able to save and continue the lives of those who are the weakest has the ironic effect of making the infant mortality rate look higher and the life expectancy rate look lower.
When you adjust the figures to account for the actual medical conditions in each country and region and to account for the ethnicity of the country and region you will find the US comes out at or near the top.
In other words, for people with the same ethnicity, health status, age, sex, lifestyle etc, they will have a longer life expectance in the US and lower infant mortality in the US.
The stats you have based your opinions on were designed by the socialists to fool the ignorant and they have succeeded. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
RufusW
Joined: 14 Jun 2008 Location: Busan
|
Posted: Tue Nov 10, 2009 9:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
European healthcare costs less - this is pretty definite, I'll Google it if you really want.
We have an equal/higher life expectancy, I'll Google this as well.
However, source for your claims?
Regardless - we cover all of our population and we're proud of this. You don't seem to care that a large population of American citizens don't have long-term healthcare. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ontheway
Joined: 24 Aug 2005 Location: Somewhere under the rainbow...
|
Posted: Tue Nov 10, 2009 9:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
RufusW wrote: |
European healthcare costs less - this is pretty definite, I'll Google it if you really want.
We have an equal/higher life expectancy, I'll Google this as well.
However, source for your claims?
Regardless - we cover all of our population and we're proud of this. You don't seem to care that a large population of American citizens don't have long-term healthcare. |
Even the US government does not deny that its regulations have caused the price of health care in the US to be double what it should be.
Life expectancy numbers for different countries do not compare the same things. International comparisons with these numbers are bogus. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
RufusW
Joined: 14 Jun 2008 Location: Busan
|
Posted: Tue Nov 10, 2009 9:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
I'm glad you can comment ontheway, but as I said, any proof, or evidence?
I know the UK spends 10% GDP on healthcare. I know the US spends 16%. I know European countries have the same or better life expectancy. As I said, I will cite sources if you really want, but these are pretty common facts.
Want to provide evidence for your comments? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Nowhere Man

Joined: 08 Feb 2004
|
Posted: Tue Nov 10, 2009 9:22 am Post subject: ... |
|
|
Yup, and then there will be no pollution...
Economics is a hard science...
Fiat money is bad, but look at those money bombs!
Can't answer too many questions...
Ontheway, at the end of a week, how many people will have voted to exchange their healthcare for the US version? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Reggie
Joined: 21 Sep 2009
|
Posted: Tue Nov 10, 2009 11:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
I'm an American. If I have an emergency, I'll be treated in the USA obviously. If I have a minor non-emergency, I'll get it treated in the USA. But if I ever end up needing a major surgery that isn't an emergency, I'll probably look into how much it would cost to get it done in Bangkok or somewhere. Although we have good doctors in the USA, the costs are astronomical. American hospitals have so many outrageous fees on things that are cheap. For example, Baptist Hospital in Nashville charges $45 for a jock strap for patients having a vasectomy and it's not even autographed by the Tennessee Titans cheerleading squad. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jvalmer

Joined: 06 Jun 2003
|
Posted: Tue Nov 10, 2009 12:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
IMO a healthcare system is best judged on how they treat the poorest and worst off in society. In Canada if you have a life-threatening situation, you will get treated. You could be a homeless bum, or some CEO earning millions of dollars, but as long as you have that free provincially issued healthcare card you can check into any hospital and get treated.
If you want lasik, or some wart burned off your big toe, that won't be covered. That is where the US really excels in healthcare, for all those non-life threatening issues. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
youtuber
Joined: 13 Sep 2009
|
Posted: Tue Nov 10, 2009 2:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ontheway wrote: |
taught not to question the lies and propaganda they've been fed in the government indoctrination centers (mislabled as "schools") that they were forced to attend in their youth, they are blissfully ignorant that better medical care is available elsewhere. |
I think you are the one who is being indoctrinated.
You like to make a lot of claims, but never have any sources.
The ones who are flying to the Mayo clinic are the rich. That's it. No one else can afford to pay $100,000 for surgery.
No developed country in their right mind would take the US system. The US is alone in that respect.
Things may seem good for you now, ontheway, but there is a high possibility that you will lose your job and be broke and not able to pay for any kind of medical emergency. I am guessing you are under 35 and no major health conditions?
Situations can change very quickly. I would like to hear your opinion when you have grown up and experienced hardship. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Reggie
Joined: 21 Sep 2009
|
Posted: Tue Nov 10, 2009 2:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
All Americans should own some gold if for no other reason than health care costs. The costs here are high enough that it can easily wipe out the life savings of anyone from the upper middle class on down. If you own some gold, you can have some wealth to fall back on after you otherwise get financially wiped out. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Street Magic
Joined: 23 Sep 2009
|
Posted: Tue Nov 10, 2009 3:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'm American and I'd trade our system with just about any other developed country's system. I find it beyond messed up that public education is a widely accepted tax paid service while roughly half of our country seems to believe non-emergency health care is something you should have to earn. If you also believe public education should be done away with, then I don't mind nearly as much what you think about health care.
Also, for people concerned about stifling health care technology innovation, most of the high risk discoveries were made by publicly funded university research efforts. The for profit sector encourages low risk high reward operations like pharmaceuticals that are basically the same as already existing ones with a small twist like extended release delivery or an added ingredient that doesn't actually beat the placebo at anything. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|