|
Korean Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Real Reality
Joined: 10 Jan 2003 Location: Seoul
|
Posted: Sat Mar 15, 2003 4:31 am Post subject: Do Uni. Prof. really prepare students for jobs? |
|
|
Are you preparing your students for work? Is your class more important than the weekend "MT"?
Do Koreans really go to university to train and prepare for work? Do Koreans more often go to university to build relationships that will help get a job?
The survey, released by the Korea International Trade Association (KITA), showed that nearly 87 percent of polled CEOs at 67 foreign firms doing business in Korea said that Korea's higher educational system seldom offers relevant teaching that is useful or applicable to the base of knowledge and skills required for today's job market.
Only 13.4 percent said Korean universities provided sufficient levels of education for entry-level employees. In response as to whether CEOs felt it necessary for multinational companies in Korea to train brand-new, entry-level, university-educated Korean employees from scratch, nearly half, or 49.3 percent, agreed that such on-the-job training was necessary.
The respondents also expressed dissatisfaction with the Korean labor market in terms of a lack of flexibility, which was cited by 28.8 percent of all respondents; unstable labor-management relationships (27.1 percent); an insufficient source of professional workforce (18.1 percent); and the lack of basic English proficiency (17.5 percent). |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Tiger Beer

Joined: 07 Feb 2003
|
Posted: Sat Mar 15, 2003 5:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
What if you took this all the words that say "KOREAN" and replace them with "AMERICAN" or "CANADIAN".. I'm wondering if the other facts would be pretty be about the same?
well.. except maybe for the last line.. thats debateable if americans/canadians would be lacking basic English proficiency ... or.. or.. just a minute.. IS IT? (enter suspenseful twilight zone music here)
Wait a second! What kind of trick topic is this!! You actually searched and replaced all the American or Canadian references and put in Korean!! Then we were suppose to be flabbergasted!! Right? Right?
Then once we all shred apart the ol' Korean education system.. then down it comes.. the old WHAMMO!! hahaha.. its not "Korean" after all trick.. its the Americans/Canadians! OH MAN! GOOD ONE!!
SMART MAN!! You almost got me there! Heh heh...... heh... oh man oh man... heh heh... good one!
Last edited by Tiger Beer on Sat Mar 15, 2003 5:35 am; edited 2 times in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Dan

Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Location: Sunny Glendale, CA
|
Posted: Sat Mar 15, 2003 5:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
absolutely it does not. but i think the system is just completely antiquated. wait, that's not the right word..... what's that word that means run out of usefulness? starts with ob...
anywho, korean college professors get like $300-400 per class per semester. that is just completely disgusting. i'm sure the curriculums aren't exactly state of the art either. there's just so many problems with the korean educational system and i see it in my students every day.
obsolete! there we go
i think this system works for somethings like Math and Science, but in areas of language, business, etc, free and creativity thinking is more important.
ever teach a child that can recite his ABCs, but pick out a letter, ask him to say it, and he has no idea. i try to teach away from this method as much as possible, but the society is not helping out at all. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Real Reality
Joined: 10 Jan 2003 Location: Seoul
|
Posted: Sat Mar 15, 2003 6:02 am Post subject: Membership Training |
|
|
Is your class more important than the weekend "MT"?
"MT" (Membership Training: an orientation trip to strengthen relationships between members of a club or a department), drinking, games, singing rooms, studying, and club activities.
How important are classes? How important is the weekly English class with the foreign professor? How much influence do you have at your university? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Tiger Beer

Joined: 07 Feb 2003
|
Posted: Sat Mar 15, 2003 6:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
Generally, I find that the classes I sat in on during university wasn't what taught me for the real world.
Generally, university life is what teaches you about the world. How to go about doing just the right things, taking the right classes, meeting the right people, doing this and doing that.. that is what university teaches you..
Plus it teaches you how to better socialize.. these are the things that universities do for people..
But I don't think the actual classes themselves were anywhere near as important as the 'how to exist within an institutional setting'
The classes themselves.. hmm.. y'know what? I took classes like statistics and math along with other stuff.. then I decided maybe grad school is a good choice.. I bought a GRE Study Book.. and found out that I don't remember anything from any of the math classes except that at that time I knew how to do the formulas and junk..
Anyhow, looking back on university.. there are only a few things I remember from my actual classes.. but there is A TON of things I remember socially.. almost everything..
Anyhow, thats how university prepares people for the real world - 4 years of advanced social skills, and teaching you how to think and how to analyze and look at things in every kind of different way and stuff like that..
The classes themselves? nah.. not unless you actually studied engineering or something that was actually used for your post-college life.. but i sure didn't.. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jsmac
Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Location: Gangwon-do
|
Posted: Tue Mar 18, 2003 2:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
University is not and never was supposed to prepare students for a job. That is what technical colleges and trade schools are for. It has recently become true (esp. of industrialized nations) that the most desirable and prestigious jobs are only open to those who have attended and succeeded at university, but that is not its raison d'etre, nor has it ever been.
Aside from this, I have heard that Korean universities are especially poor in world or asian rankings. This may be related: the Korean university system was only invented after the Korean war: when the aristocracy was killed off, the society desperately needed a new way to make class distinctions, and in the absence of blue blood there was only money and education. So if the uni system here was born not out of a search for higher education but higher social status, it should come as no surprise that this is what it truly succeeds at. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Tiger Beer

Joined: 07 Feb 2003
|
Posted: Tue Mar 18, 2003 3:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
one thing to point out is although korean universities may lack comparitively to the west, the K-12th grade system defintely overcompensates. I think most korean by the time they graduate from High School have studied more than most Westerners have throughout university. Or so it seems..
When I was in High School, I don't ever recall every bring a book home. In fact, I was quite proud of that fact. The classes were SO easy and every teacher I had gave ALOT of in-class time to either do homework or study.. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
kimcheeking Guest
|
Posted: Tue Mar 18, 2003 4:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
[quote="Tiger Beer"] I think most korean by the time they graduate from High School have studied more than most Westerners have throughout university. Or so it seems..
quote]
Studied yes, learned something NO! memorization does not include sythesis of knowledge. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Tiger Beer

Joined: 07 Feb 2003
|
Posted: Tue Mar 18, 2003 5:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
kimcheeking wrote: |
Tiger Beer wrote: |
I think most korean by the time they graduate from High School have studied more than most Westerners have throughout university. Or so it seems..
|
Studied yes, learned something NO! memorization does not include sythesis of knowledge. |
This is the typical foreign argument that they know nothing. But I like to give them the benefit of the doubt. I mean, they are communicating to us in a whole other language, so often times it seems like they 'don't know anything' because of the language factor.
The other aspect as well, is they are learning the world from the Korean and Asian point-of-view. So, so often, as Westerners we aren shocked they aren't as aware of the Middle East as we are, or European History, or this and that.. well.. we certainly weren't educated within their culture and world either.
For example, while us Westerners are well aware of Hitler and Nazi Germany. Almost no one in the West is aware of the nearly same exact atrocities that Japan was inflicting on its neighbors. Everyone in Asia, however does know this. Everyone in the West, seems.. completely unaware of this.
Anyhow, its true that Koreans in High School have SO MUCH TOO LEARN that they can't absorb it all.. but generally, overall, I think they do quite better than most Westerners give them credit for - which generally, most Westerners give them zero credit, and a big fat "O" assuming that each Korean should know everything that we know and be able to communicate and argue on the subject in our language on top of that.
I'm not saying they are genuises, but I'm just going beyond the general stereotypical viewpoint the the majority of Westerners project on Koreans. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Circus Monkey
Joined: 10 Jan 2003 Location: In my coconut tree
|
Posted: Tue Mar 18, 2003 8:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
Tiger Beer wrote: |
For example, while us Westerners are well aware of Hitler and Nazi Germany. Almost no one in the West is aware of the nearly same exact atrocities that Japan was inflicting on its neighbors. Everyone in Asia, however does know this. Everyone in the West, seems.. completely unaware of this. |
So? Time is limited therefore a typical high school student will usually be aware of the history that has the most effect on their country. That's not surprising. But the key difference I think is the desire to learn beyond what you've been taught in school, i.e. critical analysis. That's usually the crux of the issue when it comes to comparing education systems, no?
CM |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Tiger Beer

Joined: 07 Feb 2003
|
Posted: Tue Mar 18, 2003 3:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Circus Monkey wrote: |
Tiger Beer wrote: |
For example, while us Westerners are well aware of Hitler and Nazi Germany. Almost no one in the West is aware of the nearly same exact atrocities that Japan was inflicting on its neighbors. Everyone in Asia, however does know this. Everyone in the West, seems.. completely unaware of this. |
So? Time is limited therefore a typical high school student will usually be aware of the history that has the most effect on their country. That's not surprising. But the key difference I think is the desire to learn beyond what you've been taught in school, i.e. critical analysis. That's usually the crux of the issue when it comes to comparing education systems, no?
CM |
Sure.. but you can't say ONLY westerners are capable of 'critical analysis' specifically when they are only westerners who happen to be living in another country and being critical of it.
If you go back home to your western country.. you will see that the majority of westerners really aren't much better at 'critical analsys' or 'being anal'.. i mean think back to when we were growing up in our home country.. we basically just took everything in blindly.. i took my blindness right out of the university believing that i would get a good job with a college education.. i wasn't prepared for the fact i wasn't.. i guess hadn't 'critically analyzed' the situation well enough..
I don't think its fair to put a bunch of college-educated westerners in a foreign country.. have them 'critically analyze' it all to hell.. and then judge the locals as unable to be able to do the same..
when it comes to education systems.. most koreans already acknowledge and say all the same things we are saying about their education system already.. so it seems as if they already are being critical of it (if being critical is the path to enlightenment).. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Circus Monkey
Joined: 10 Jan 2003 Location: In my coconut tree
|
Posted: Tue Mar 18, 2003 4:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Tiger wrote: |
Sure.. but you can't say ONLY westerners are capable of 'critical analysis' specifically when they are only westerners who happen to be living in another country and being critical of it. |
Strawman. I never said only westerners are capable of critical analysis, but it seems to be in a lesser degree in the Korean educational system. Take a look at the following comments from a Korean mathematician:
Quote: |
"The main purpose of attending school should be for a student to acquire knowledge to prepare for his or her life but it seems Koreans go to school to prepare for entrance examinations in higher level schools," he observed. "The main method of preparation for entrance examinations is rote memorization. (This method) continues to be perpetuated and has taken a front seat in the educational system. The teachers interpret questions from students as a personal offense towards the integrity of the teachers rather than a healthy sign of curiosity ... discussions between students and teachers rarely occur. ...Therefore, the Korean educational system tends to destroy the curiosity and the creativity of the students. (It) produces excellent followers and imitators." |
http://www.koreanquarterly.org/Fall1998/kihang3.asp
Tiger wrote: |
If you go back home to your western country.. you will see that the majority of westerners really aren't much better at 'critical analsys' or 'being anal'.. i mean think back to when we were growing up in our home country.. we basically just took everything in blindly.. i took my blindness right out of the university believing that i would get a good job with a college education.. i wasn't prepared for the fact i wasn't.. i guess hadn't 'critically analyzed' the situation well enough.. |
Proof? Besides, being �critical� and �anal� is not necessarily the same so stop trying to make a connection. As well, for anyone to expect university to guarantee you a job missed the point of the whole experience. Yes, getting that piece of paper should help in getting a better kind of job but in no way is it a promise.
Tiger wrote: |
I don't think its fair to put a bunch of college-educated westerners in a foreign country.. have them 'critically analyze' it all to hell.. and then judge the locals as unable to be able to do the same.. |
If there is little to no change in how things are currently run, then what can one conclude? Coming from the outside does tend to grant a different insight that what a local may view. It takes an open-minded local to try to understand the outsider, and hence reflect upon the local situation. I�ll agree that the approach that the outsider adopts should sometimes be less confrontational.
Tiger wrote: |
when it comes to education systems.. most koreans already acknowledge and say all the same things we are saying about their education system already.. so it seems as if they already are being critical of it (if being critical is the path to enlightenment).. |
Maybe, but it could merely be observations based on the current economic situation. In other words, Koreans seem to view a university education as guaranteeing a good job and are upset when that isn�t happening. I think a critical analysis is more than just saying "this is bad" because it should involve the reasoning behind it. If many Koreans acknowledge that the present system is bad, then why perpetuate it?
CM |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Tiger Beer

Joined: 07 Feb 2003
|
Posted: Tue Mar 18, 2003 6:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Circus Monkey wrote: |
Tiger wrote: |
I don't think its fair to put a bunch of college-educated westerners in a foreign country.. have them 'critically analyze' it all to hell.. and then judge the locals as unable to be able to do the same.. |
If there is little to no change in how things are currently run, then what can one conclude? Coming from the outside does tend to grant a different insight that what a local may view. It takes an open-minded local to try to understand the outsider, and hence reflect upon the local situation. I�ll agree that the approach that the outsider adopts should sometimes be less confrontational. |
I agree that the outsider with his/her perceptions have ALOT to give to the culture they are inhabiting. But, looking at the USA as I'm from there.. we have TONS & TONS of people from all over the world.. all who see the world drastically differently than how the American people themselves see the world. There is so much knowledge in that country that could be learned from the outsiders. But, generally, its disregarded..
however, interesingly enough.. I do find that Korean people actually are listening to their English teachers and thinking more about how Westerners do things compared to how they do things.. constantly comparing this.. which is interesting.. (something i don't see happening at all in the West)..
Circus Monkey wrote: |
Tiger wrote: |
when it comes to education systems.. most koreans already acknowledge and say all the same things we are saying about their education system already.. so it seems as if they already are being critical of it (if being critical is the path to enlightenment).. |
Maybe, but it could merely be observations based on the current economic situation. In other words, Koreans seem to view a university education as guaranteeing a good job and are upset when that isn�t happening. I think a critical analysis is more than just saying "this is bad" because it should involve the reasoning behind it. If many Koreans acknowledge that the present system is bad, then why perpetuate it? |
Yeah, again coming from the States as an example. Everyone knows that the health care and insurance and a quite a number of things are in serious need of a drastic overhaul. Why do Americans perpetuate what obviously doesn't work? Same applies to the Korean education system.
Koreans aren't incapable of it.. nor are Americans incapable of changing their bad systems.. it just unfortunately takes alot of examining, reflecting, making it a priority, making all the right steps, having the right people in power who will make it a priority, putting in the time and effort and knowledge to come about an adequate system to replace it as well.. that everyone an agree and indeed replace and/or improve something.
While the system isn't as effective today as everyone wants it to be.. it was a system that brought Korea to an economic level that it is today.. so we can't really say its an utter failure either.. and they should be ashamed of themselves for even using such a system..
Anyhow, rote memorization is something that is definetely in the Korean media, academics, national dialog.. so its definetely not something they themselves are completely uncapable of recognizing and only the Westerners here are keen enough to spot it for them to point out their flaw.. we're basically just picking up that up from them who tell us constantly that that is the problem in Korea.. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Tiger Beer

Joined: 07 Feb 2003
|
Posted: Fri Jan 09, 2004 10:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
*Bump* |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Real Reality
Joined: 10 Jan 2003 Location: Seoul
|
Posted: Fri Jan 09, 2004 11:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Students say going to top local colleges no longer guarantees success
Compared to the Korean college entrance examination, the SAT is considered by most Koreans to be a cake-walk. Hwang scored a 1500 with a perfect math score and though he has little opportunity to work on his English at his science school, he scored a 700 on the verbal section.
But he is battling other challenges of the American college admissions game. On Christmas Eve, he is contemplating how to answer an essay question by Johns Hopkins University: "If you had just $10 to plan a day's adventure, where would you go and who would you go with?"
"I have no idea what to write. I asked my mom, but she doesn't know either."
Korean born and bred, Son studied at both Seoul and Yonsei, became a judge, and then went on to become one of the leading labor lawyers in the country. Though he saw the best of the best of what Korea has to offer, a brief stint at UCLA law school convinced him that an American education was radically different, and far superior, than anything offered here. "Having gone to the States for an education is beneficial in getting a job. Companies these days prefer U.S. diplomas," says Lee.
http://www.koreaherald.co.kr/SITE/data/html_dir/2003/12/27/200312270041.asp
Expenses amounted to an average of 3.25 million won for primary students, 4.07 million won for middle school students, and 5.08 million won for high school students. South Koreans individually paid 17.5 percent of the education fees for elementary and middle school, more than double the OECD average of 8.3 percent, according to the research.
http://times.hankooki.com/lpage/nation/200401/kt2004010718400611990.htm
Two 'Exceptional' Students Are Harvard Bound
Both students did not apply to any domestic university and regarding this, Lee said he did not want to take one good chance of admission away from his friends, while Kim said she has been skeptical since middle school about Korean education only emphasizing class ranks.
http://english.chosun.com/w21data/html/news/200212/200212160016.html
One out of four applicants accepted to Seoul National University based only on College Scholastic Ability Test grades this year failed either the English-language ability test or the mathematic skills test that the university requires. Last year, 31 percent of the students failed to meet the English language standard and 14 percent failed the math skills test. The Chinese character examination conducted by the university was "a comedy" according to some who witnessed it.
http://joongangdaily.joins.com/200312/28/200312282250457939900090109011.html |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|