Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

People's Climate March: Busan Sat. 5pm; Seoul Sun. 10am
Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> General Discussion Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
julian_w



Joined: 08 Sep 2003
Location: Somewhere beyond Middle Peak Hotel, north of Middle Earth, and well away from the Middle of the Road

PostPosted: Fri Sep 19, 2014 2:05 am    Post subject: People's Climate March: Busan Sat. 5pm; Seoul Sun. 10am Reply with quote

If you can't make the Seoul 350.org People's Climate March action on Sunday morning at 10am because you're too far from Seoul,
http://act.350.org/event/peoples_climate/7679

... then think about coming to join the Busan Beach Boys and Girls on Saturday night,
on Gwangali Beach from 5-7pm!
http://busanclimateaction.com

We'll have signs to share, and time for food, drink, and catch up after. All welcome: the more the merrier!

For inspiration, check it out:
http://watchdisruption.com

... then book a train or bus, or dust off your bike and come and be a part of the turning tide.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
cdninkorea



Joined: 27 Jan 2006
Location: Seoul

PostPosted: Sun Sep 21, 2014 3:05 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

"Let's not only stop traffic, but end civilisation entirely!" Rolling Eyes
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Steelrails



Joined: 12 Mar 2009
Location: Earth, Solar System

PostPosted: Sun Sep 21, 2014 4:57 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Between Mannam and the lads to the North, any event with the word "People's" makes me leery.

Even "People's Elbow" might be a bit much.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
KimchiNinja



Joined: 01 May 2012
Location: Gangnam

PostPosted: Sun Sep 21, 2014 5:13 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

While it's one of the most important topics facing humans, it is just a symptom of the root problem.

Just rewrite the laws that dictate how "the corporation" as a machine functions. Write into law that 'the estimated cost of all externalities must be deducted from net profit' on the income statement. And 'if the resulting number is negative the corporate charter will be suspended until a plan is submitted to correct their operations'.

Problem solved, not just this one but all problems solved at once. Marching doesn't do anything, because nobody cares what the masses think.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
KimchiNinja



Joined: 01 May 2012
Location: Gangnam

PostPosted: Sun Sep 21, 2014 5:32 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Oh and population control, you've got to have a central alliance of governments that starts working together on how to decrease the Earth's population back from 7B, to 1B or whatever the ideal number is...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Died By Bear



Joined: 13 Jul 2010
Location: On the big lake they call Gitche Gumee

PostPosted: Sun Sep 21, 2014 8:12 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

KimchiNinja wrote:
While it's one of the most important topics facing humans, it is just a symptom of the root problem.

Just rewrite the laws that dictate how "the corporation" as a machine functions. Write into law that 'the estimated cost of all externalities must be deducted from net profit' on the income statement. And 'if the resulting number is negative the corporate charter will be suspended until a plan is submitted to correct their operations'.

Problem solved, not just this one but all problems solved at once. Marching doesn't do anything, because nobody cares what the masses think.



You cannot stop the system/machine. It runs on it's own. You can try to tame it, but it is like a wild animal.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Weigookin74



Joined: 26 Oct 2009

PostPosted: Sun Sep 21, 2014 10:18 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hey I have a great idea relating to climate and pollution. How about we regulate all industry to an extreme instead of moderately and drive it out of Europe and North America? Then let it go to China and pollute with infinitity in a way the world has not seen since the Industrial Revolution during 19th century England. Yeah, way to help the earth. At least with moderate pollution in the west, it would have been far less than in China and there could have been jobs for blue collar workers.

Brilliant!!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
KimchiNinja



Joined: 01 May 2012
Location: Gangnam

PostPosted: Sun Sep 21, 2014 10:24 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Died By Bear wrote:
You cannot stop the system/machine. It runs on it's own. You can try to tame it, but it is like a wild animal.


That's the point of my post! Humans designed the machine the way they designed it, and now it runs on its own. They could redesign it, and then it would run on its own in that new way.

But since nobody at these functions is capable of grasping root cause, I would never show up.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Beeyee



Joined: 29 May 2007

PostPosted: Mon Sep 22, 2014 1:27 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

KimchiNinja wrote:
Oh and population control, you've got to have a central alliance of governments that starts working together on how to decrease the Earth's population back from 7B, to 1B or whatever the ideal number is...


You have to be kidding. You're basically calling for a world government working toward genocide.

Are you willing to be slaughtered in order to decrease the Earth's population?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
KimchiNinja



Joined: 01 May 2012
Location: Gangnam

PostPosted: Mon Sep 22, 2014 1:33 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Beeyee wrote:
KimchiNinja wrote:
Oh and population control, you've got to have a central alliance of governments that starts working together on how to decrease the Earth's population back from 7B, to 1B or whatever the ideal number is...


You have to be kidding. You're basically calling for a world government working toward genocide.

Are you willing to be slaughtered in order to decrease the Earth's population?


WTF? Population control is not killing people dummy, it's placing positive/negative incentives on child birth so that over the course of hundreds of years population is managed to some calculated ideal number.

Discussing the environment without discussing population is pointless, hence why I would never show up to these silly hippy meetings.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Beeyee



Joined: 29 May 2007

PostPosted: Mon Sep 22, 2014 2:26 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

KimchiNinja wrote:
Beeyee wrote:
KimchiNinja wrote:
Oh and population control, you've got to have a central alliance of governments that starts working together on how to decrease the Earth's population back from 7B, to 1B or whatever the ideal number is...


You have to be kidding. You're basically calling for a world government working toward genocide.

Are you willing to be slaughtered in order to decrease the Earth's population?


WTF? Population control is not killing people dummy, it's placing positive/negative incentives on child birth so that over the course of hundreds of years population is managed to some calculated ideal number.

Discussing the environment without discussing population is pointless, hence why I would never show up to these silly hippy meetings.


Ahh, so 'soft' genocide is okay. Gotcha.

The world as it is now is entirely sustainable.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
KimchiNinja



Joined: 01 May 2012
Location: Gangnam

PostPosted: Mon Sep 22, 2014 2:33 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Beeyee wrote:

Ahh, so 'soft' genocide is okay. Gotcha.

The world as it is now is entirely sustainable.


Riiight, because people who aren't ever born are "killed".

And because the population is sustainable, and when it is 12B it will be too, and when it is 24B it will be too...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Cave Dweller



Joined: 17 Aug 2014
Location: Seoul

PostPosted: Mon Sep 22, 2014 1:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The number 4 billion has been floating around as the maximum number of people that are sustainable on Earth. Not 7, Not 11, as they're predicting for 2100.

Apparently most of those extra 4 billion people expected to be living are Africans. I know one thing about that. JRs pub will not welcome them.

KimchiNinja wrote:
Beeyee wrote:

Ahh, so 'soft' genocide is okay. Gotcha.

The world as it is now is entirely sustainable.


Riiight, because people who aren't ever born are "killed".

And because the population is sustainable, and when it is 12B it will be too, and when it is 24B it will be too...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
KimchiNinja



Joined: 01 May 2012
Location: Gangnam

PostPosted: Mon Sep 22, 2014 4:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Cave Dweller wrote:
The number 4 billion has been floating around as the maximum number of people that are sustainable on Earth. Not 7, Not 11, as they're predicting for 2100.


I've seen the population forecast models and they are wrong, specifically they do not extend far enough in the future to see the pattern which has repeated for the last 10K years. They assume time will stop in 2050 or 2100, and that technology will not advance. The population problem will never "self manage", at least not in a way that is favorable for humans.

Where did this 4B number come from? Is this a calc of "ideal population", or is this a forecast of what the population will be forced to over time by nature? I'm sincerely interested in the topic and would like to review their reasoning.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Cave Dweller



Joined: 17 Aug 2014
Location: Seoul

PostPosted: Mon Sep 22, 2014 9:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The number 4 billion was the maximum number of people that can live on Earth without Earth basically being destroyed, deforested, erosion, desertification, and the such.

As it is, how many people on Earth live without clean water, etc? At least a billion, probably closer to 2 or 3 billion.

KimchiNinja wrote:
Cave Dweller wrote:
The number 4 billion has been floating around as the maximum number of people that are sustainable on Earth. Not 7, Not 11, as they're predicting for 2100.


I've seen the population forecast models and they are wrong, specifically they do not extend far enough in the future to see the pattern which has repeated for the last 10K years. They assume time will stop in 2050 or 2100, and that technology will not advance. The population problem will never "self manage", at least not in a way that is favorable for humans.

Where did this 4B number come from? Is this a calc of "ideal population", or is this a forecast of what the population will be forced to over time by nature? I'm sincerely interested in the topic and would like to review their reasoning.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> General Discussion Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
Page 1 of 3

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International