Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

What's gone wrong for America's right
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Wangja



Joined: 17 May 2004
Location: Seoul, Yongsan

PostPosted: Thu Oct 06, 2005 8:52 pm    Post subject: What's gone wrong for America's right Reply with quote

Quote:
George Bush's Republicans are in trouble, but if he has the will and the wit he can fix their problems


Quote:
The news from Iraq continues to be grim. Hurricane Katrina—and his initial cluelessness in dealing with it—sent his approval ratings to new lows. ......

... the White House's top procurement official was indicted. Then the Securities & Exchange Commission announced an investigation into share dealing by Bill Frist, the Senate majority leader. Now—and most seriously—the House majority leader, Tom DeLay, has been indicted in a Texan corruption probe. The Hammer has been forced to step down ��temporarily��. ..... Yet there is plainly more going on than just one bad month. Mr Bush's domestic programme—notably his plan to overhaul Social Security—lies in tatters; .........


http://www.economist.com/displaystory.cfm?story_id=4456317

Only 1,200 days to go.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Yu_Bum_suk



Joined: 25 Dec 2004

PostPosted: Thu Oct 06, 2005 8:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

What I find interesting is a few American right-wingers I've met saying things like 'I really like Bush; I agree with him on abortion and gay rights, blah blah blah, but I really wish he hadn't invaded Iraq'. They seem to think this will in the end spoil what could otherwise be a great moral agenda and mandate. They're a small minority of his supporters, to be sure, but I think this attitude says a lot and will grow. I also think that many of Bush's supporters are feeling this but don't want to say it out loud. In the end, however, I think that loyalty to Bush's moral agenda will help keep them loyal on Iraq.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Octavius Hite



Joined: 28 Jan 2004
Location: Househunting, looking for a new bunker from which to convert the world to homosexuality.

PostPosted: Thu Oct 06, 2005 9:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Its only going to get worse, rumour has it that after Rove testifies in the CIA leak scandal there will be dozens of indictments so watch out Bush Crime Family!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Tiger Beer



Joined: 07 Feb 2003

PostPosted: Thu Oct 06, 2005 9:08 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yu_Bum_suk wrote:
What I find interesting is a few American right-wingers I've met saying things like 'I really like Bush; I agree with him on abortion and gay rights, blah blah blah, but I really wish he hadn't invaded Iraq'. They seem to think this will in the end spoil what could otherwise be a great moral agenda and mandate. They're a small minority of his supporters, to be sure, but I think this attitude says a lot and will grow. I also think that many of Bush's supporters are feeling this but don't want to say it out loud. In the end, however, I think that loyalty to Bush's moral agenda will help keep them loyal on Iraq.

That pretty much sums it up.

Fiscal conversatives jumped ship long, long, long ago.. everyone concerned with the economy did.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Pligganease



Joined: 14 Sep 2004
Location: The deep south...

PostPosted: Thu Oct 06, 2005 9:30 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I was never a "Bush Fan" back home. I usually voted Democrat, and I am a registered Democrat. However, over the past few years (Prior to 9/11) I supported some Republicans based solely on financial principles. I didn't like the Republicans' stance on social issues, so if there was a moderate Republican running, I would occasionally vote for them.

Then came 9/11.

I'll be honest. I was one of the people that wanted to see bombs dropping on someone. I didn't really care who. Planes didn't crash into a building in Toronto, Vancouver, London, Sydney, Dublin, or Cape Town. These attacks happened in the US. If you don't understand why people in the US were ready for war, then realize that you have to be an American in order to. There were millions of people like me. That's why Iraq was such an easy sell to the American people.

Truthfully, I have come to dislike the Bush administration for the lies they have told and the embarassment that they have brought to my country. These lies weren't the little lies like "I did not have sexual relations with that woman" or "Read my lips: No new taxes." These lies were lies that led to war.

However, I don't know if Bush went to war on a pretense of lies or a pretense of bad intelligence. We probably never will know. I do know this, though: Something had to, and still has to, be done in the Middle East. I don't know if Bush is doing the right thing, but I have to give him credit for trying something.

I do know this... The Bush presidency could go down in history as the era of American Shame. I'm not saying that Bush has caused the jihadists' hatred for America. Look at all the bad things that happened during Clinton's presidency. Even 9/11 was planned before Bush ever took office.

What Bush has done, though, is made us look bad in they eyes of our Allies. All this "You're either with us or against us" crap succeeded in nothing but alienating us. But, he had the balls, or lack of brains, to say it.

I know that, because I am starting to think this way, there are many others in the States that are also starting to feel this way. I have come to the opinion that Bush is going to fock up our world image as much as possible before he leaves.

With all of the benefits that the Bush administration and friends got from 9/11 and subsequent actions, with all of the supposed intelligence that there was saying 9/11 ws going to happen, and with all of the watchlists that those terrorists were supposed to be on, it kinda makes you wonder whether it was allowed to happen.

Where's Igotthisconspiracytheory when you need him?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Tiger Beer



Joined: 07 Feb 2003

PostPosted: Thu Oct 06, 2005 9:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Pligganease wrote:
However, I don't know if Bush went to war on a pretense of lies or a pretense of bad intelligence. We probably never will know. I do know this, though: Something had to, and still has to, be done in the Middle East.

Actually it wasn't bad intelligence. Intelligence already knew there was absolutely no connection whatsoever between Saddam Hussein and Osama Bin Ladin. The fact the current administration worked so hard to make it appear there was is the interesting part.

Also funny how it took about a week to replace the Taliban, but replacing Saddam is going to take decades upon decades into the future.

And with all this, the main question remains.. what ever happened to that war on Osama Bin Ladin?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
mithridates



Joined: 03 Mar 2003
Location: President's office, Korean Space Agency

PostPosted: Thu Oct 06, 2005 10:39 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yeah, even those aluminum tubes for the centrifuges were dismissed as being unsuitable for a nuclear reactor until Cheney realized that there was about a 1% chance that it could have been used for something nuclear-related and that pressing that every day could lead to enough doubt that people would start to assume it was true.

With the lower support numbers, does that mean that less people believe that WMD was found than before? I should hope so.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
supernick



Joined: 24 Jan 2003
Location: Seoul

PostPosted: Thu Oct 06, 2005 11:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
I was never a "Bush Fan" back home. I usually voted Democrat, and I am a registered Democrat. However, over the past few years (Prior to 9/11) I supported some Republicans based solely on financial principles. I didn't like the Republicans' stance on social issues, so if there was a moderate Republican running, I would occasionally vote for them.

Then came 9/11.

I'll be honest. I was one of the people that wanted to see bombs dropping on someone. I didn't really care who. Planes didn't crash into a building in Toronto, Vancouver, London, Sydney, Dublin, or Cape Town. These attacks happened in the US. If you don't understand why people in the US were ready for war, then realize that you have to be an American in order to. There were millions of people like me. That's why Iraq was such an easy sell to the American people.

Truthfully, I have come to dislike the Bush administration for the lies they have told and the embarassment that they have brought to my country. These lies weren't the little lies like "I did not have sexual relations with that woman" or "Read my lips: No new taxes." These lies were lies that led to war.

However, I don't know if Bush went to war on a pretense of lies or a pretense of bad intelligence. We probably never will know. I do know this, though: Something had to, and still has to, be done in the Middle East. I don't know if Bush is doing the right thing, but I have to give him credit for trying something.

I do know this... The Bush presidency could go down in history as the era of American Shame. I'm not saying that Bush has caused the jihadists' hatred for America. Look at all the bad things that happened during Clinton's presidency. Even 9/11 was planned before Bush ever took office.

What Bush has done, though, is made us look bad in they eyes of our Allies. All this "You're either with us or against us" crap succeeded in nothing but alienating us. But, he had the balls, or lack of brains, to say it.

I know that, because I am starting to think this way, there are many others in the States that are also starting to feel this way. I have come to the opinion that Bush is going to fock up our world image as much as possible before he leaves.

With all of the benefits that the Bush administration and friends got from 9/11 and subsequent actions, with all of the supposed intelligence that there was saying 9/11 ws going to happen, and with all of the watchlists that those terrorists were supposed to be on, it kinda makes you wonder whether it was allowed to happen.

Where's Igotthisconspiracytheory when you need him?


I really hear what you are saying, and Tiger made a good point about the intelligence.

If Bush and the boys would have waited for the weapon inspectors to finish the job, the war could have been avoided, yet somehow I feel that the U.S. did not want confirmation that there were no WMD as that would leave them with no reason to invade.

Something had to be done though I would say that Bush's actions were at the wrong time and in the wrong direction.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
TheUrbanMyth



Joined: 28 Jan 2003
Location: Retired

PostPosted: Fri Oct 07, 2005 8:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Tiger Beer wrote:
Pligganease wrote:
However, I don't know if Bush went to war on a pretense of lies or a pretense of bad intelligence. We probably never will know. I do know this, though: Something had to, and still has to, be done in the Middle East.

Actually it wasn't bad intelligence. Intelligence already knew there was absolutely no connection whatsoever between Saddam Hussein and Osama Bin Ladin. ?



Untrue.

http://www.usatoday.com/news/opinion/editorials/2004-06-17-hadley_x.htm

One knows that this is a favorite claim among the Left on this board. Unfortunately for them, it's not true.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Tiger Beer



Joined: 07 Feb 2003

PostPosted: Fri Oct 07, 2005 9:49 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

TheUrbanMyth wrote:
Tiger Beer wrote:
Pligganease wrote:
However, I don't know if Bush went to war on a pretense of lies or a pretense of bad intelligence. We probably never will know. I do know this, though: Something had to, and still has to, be done in the Middle East.

Actually it wasn't bad intelligence. Intelligence already knew there was absolutely no connection whatsoever between Saddam Hussein and Osama Bin Ladin. ?

Untrue.

http://www.usatoday.com/news/opinion/editorials/2004-06-17-hadley_x.htm

One knows that this is a favorite claim among the Left on this board. Unfortunately for them, it's not true.


Your citation listed three connections:
1) Osama considered contacting Saddam once while he was in Sudan.
2) An Iraqi intelligence officer went to Sudan three times meeting Osama on a third and final trip in 1994.
3) Contacts between Saddam and Al-Qaeda occurred when Bin Ladin was in Afghanistan.

First off.. considering contact 15 years ago? I once considered contacting an author of a good book I read 15 years ago.. but it doesn't mean I conspired to throw airplanes into buildings with him.

Second one.. an Iraqi intelligence officer who met Osama 11 years ago. Must have planned the 9-11 airplane incident at that moment.. must have been an amazing coffee drinking day.

Three.. Saddam and al-Qaeda.. one of which is a massive political movement throughout the Middle East and another which is a president of a large country in the same region. Hey, I heard that Bush once met another person of a large political movement once.. must be co-conspirators in something much greater.

Considering they are both have extremely large presenses in the Middle East.. those three connections are extremely extremely miniscule to say the least. Particularly when you consider the many pictures out there of Saddam with Bush Sr, Wolfowitz, etc. and the keys of the City of Detroit given to Saddam, etc and everything else in the political world where more conspiracy theories are laughingly (and should be) written off then those 3 remote links cited in the 9-11 commission report alluding to some greater conspiracy with Saddam and 9-11.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Pligganease



Joined: 14 Sep 2004
Location: The deep south...

PostPosted: Fri Oct 07, 2005 10:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Tiger Beer wrote:
Actually it wasn't bad intelligence. Intelligence already knew there was absolutely no connection whatsoever between Saddam Hussein and Osama Bin Ladin.


Tiger Beer wrote:
Your citation listed three connections:
1) Osama considered contacting Saddam once while he was in Sudan.
2) An Iraqi intelligence officer went to Sudan three times meeting Osama on a third and final trip in 1994.
3) Contacts between Saddam and Al-Qaeda occurred when Bin Ladin was in Afghanistan.

First off.. considering contact 15 years ago? I once considered contacting an author of a good book I read 15 years ago.. but it doesn't mean I conspired to throw airplanes into buildings with him.

Second one.. an Iraqi intelligence officer who met Osama 11 years ago. Must have planned the 9-11 airplane incident at that moment.. must have been an amazing coffee drinking day.

Three.. Saddam and al-Qaeda.. one of which is a massive political movement throughout the Middle East and another which is a president of a large country in the same region.


There are three "extremely extremely miniscule" connections between Osama and Saddam. You said it yourself.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Tiger Beer



Joined: 07 Feb 2003

PostPosted: Sat Oct 08, 2005 1:02 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Pligganease wrote:
Tiger Beer wrote:
Actually it wasn't bad intelligence. Intelligence already knew there was absolutely no connection whatsoever between Saddam Hussein and Osama Bin Ladin.


Tiger Beer wrote:
Your citation listed three connections:
1) Osama considered contacting Saddam once while he was in Sudan.
2) An Iraqi intelligence officer went to Sudan three times meeting Osama on a third and final trip in 1994.
3) Contacts between Saddam and Al-Qaeda occurred when Bin Ladin was in Afghanistan.

First off.. considering contact 15 years ago? I once considered contacting an author of a good book I read 15 years ago.. but it doesn't mean I conspired to throw airplanes into buildings with him.

Second one.. an Iraqi intelligence officer who met Osama 11 years ago. Must have planned the 9-11 airplane incident at that moment.. must have been an amazing coffee drinking day.

Three.. Saddam and al-Qaeda.. one of which is a massive political movement throughout the Middle East and another which is a president of a large country in the same region.


There are three "extremely extremely miniscule" connections between Osama and Saddam. You said it yourself.

Yes I did.. extremely extremely miniscule.. there are significant more connections with say the State of Florida or the city of London between 9-11/Al-Qaeda/Osama Bin Ladin.. but you don't see me wanting to bomb, destroy and rebuild Florida and London with orphanages, infrastruture and whatever else thinking it'll help us find Osama.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
RokofKangnam



Joined: 20 Sep 2005
Location: Between a ROK and a Hard Place

PostPosted: Sat Oct 08, 2005 1:42 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Pligganease wrote:
I was never a "Bush Fan" back home. I usually voted Democrat, and I am a registered Democrat. However, over the past few years (Prior to 9/11) I supported some Republicans based solely on financial principles. I didn't like the Republicans' stance on social issues, so if there was a moderate Republican running, I would occasionally vote for them.

Then came 9/11.

I'll be honest. I was one of the people that wanted to see bombs dropping on someone. I didn't really care who. Planes didn't crash into a building in Toronto, Vancouver, London, Sydney, Dublin, or Cape Town. These attacks happened in the US. If you don't understand why people in the US were ready for war, then realize that you have to be an American in order to. There were millions of people like me. That's why Iraq was such an easy sell to the American people.

Truthfully, I have come to dislike the Bush administration for the lies they have told and the embarassment that they have brought to my country. These lies weren't the little lies like "I did not have sexual relations with that woman" or "Read my lips: No new taxes." These lies were lies that led to war.

However, I don't know if Bush went to war on a pretense of lies or a pretense of bad intelligence. We probably never will know. I do know this, though: Something had to, and still has to, be done in the Middle East. I don't know if Bush is doing the right thing, but I have to give him credit for trying something.

I do know this... The Bush presidency could go down in history as the era of American Shame. I'm not saying that Bush has caused the jihadists' hatred for America. Look at all the bad things that happened during Clinton's presidency. Even 9/11 was planned before Bush ever took office.

What Bush has done, though, is made us look bad in they eyes of our Allies. All this "You're either with us or against us" crap succeeded in nothing but alienating us. But, he had the balls, or lack of brains, to say it.

I know that, because I am starting to think this way, there are many others in the States that are also starting to feel this way. I have come to the opinion that Bush is going to fock up our world image as much as possible before he leaves.

With all of the benefits that the Bush administration and friends got from 9/11 and subsequent actions, with all of the supposed intelligence that there was saying 9/11 ws going to happen, and with all of the watchlists that those terrorists were supposed to be on, it kinda makes you wonder whether it was allowed to happen.

Where's Igotthisconspiracytheory when you need him?


This describes the way I feel as well. Good post.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee



Joined: 25 May 2003

PostPosted: Sat Oct 08, 2005 1:50 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

But it would be true to say there were contacts between Saddam and Al Qaida.

Anyone who cooperates with Al Qaida deserves to be bombed.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Red



Joined: 05 Jul 2004

PostPosted: Sat Oct 08, 2005 2:55 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Does that include the state of Florida and the city of London then? SOMEONE must have been serving those 9/11 hijackers their Happy Meals. Or Rummy Rumsfeld's house since we have documented proof he worked with Saddam.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International