Korean Job Discussion Forums

[Pligganease]

By H. JOSEF HEBERT, Associated Press Writer
1 hour, 36 minutes ago



WASHINGTON - The chiefs of five major oil companies defended the industry's huge profits Wednesday at a Senate hearing where lawmakers said they should explain prices and assure people they're not being gouged.

There is a "growing suspicion that oil companies are taking unfair advantage," Sen. Pete Domenici, R-N.M., said as the hearing opened in a packed Senate committee room.

"The oil companies owe the country an explanation," he said.

Lee Raymond, chairman of Exxon Mobil Corp., said he recognizes that high gasoline prices "have put a strain on Americans' household budgets" but he defended his companies huge profits, saying petroleum earnings "go up and down" from year to year.

ExxonMobil, the worlds' largest privately owned oil company, earned nearly $10 billion in the third quarter. Raymond was joined at the witness table by the chief executives of Chevron, ConocoPhillips, BPAmerica and Shell Oil USA.

Together the companies earned more than $25 billion in profits in the July-September quarter as the price of crude oil hit $70 a barrel and gasoline surged to record levels after the disruptions of Hurricanes Katrina and Rita.
Raymond said the profits are in line with other industries when profits are compared to the industry's enormous revenues.

Democrats had wanted the executives to testify under oath, but Republicans rejected the idea. "If I were a witness I would demand to be put under oath," said Sen. Daniel Inouye, D-Hawaii. The soaring prices have sent shivers through a Congress worried about political fallout.

The White House said President Bush was concerned about energy prices.

"Energy prices have been too high and energy companies have realized significant increases in profits," said spokesman Scott McClellan. "It's important that the private sector be good corporate citizens and invest in the energy infrastructure and support those who are in need."

A number of Democrats, joined by a few Republicans, have called for a windfall profits tax on oil companies.

Domenici said he opposed such a move saying "it didn't work before and probably won't work again." The government imposed taxes on oil company windfall profits in the 1970s, resulting in a drop in investment in oil development.

The executives hoped to dampen any further momentum for calls for taxing windfall oil company profits, something still viewed as a longshot but also no longer out of the question. Such a tax could inhibit investment in refineries or oil exploration and production, the industry argues.

James Mulla, chairman of ConocoPhillips, said "we are ready open our records" to dispute allegations of price gouging. ConocoPhillips earned $3.8 billion in the third quarter, an 89 percent increase over a year earlier. But he said that represents only a 7.7 percent profit margin for every dollar of sales. "We do not consider that a windfall," said Mulva.

David O'Reilly, chairman of Chevron, attributed the high energy prices to tight supplies even before the Gulf hurricanes hit and said his company is "investing aggressively in the development of new energy supplies."

The oil executives said their companies spend tens of billions of dollars in investments.

Shell earned $9 billion in the third quarter, said John Hofmeister, president of Shell Oil Co., but he said over the last five years the company's investment in U.S. operations was equal to its income from U.S. sales.

The oil industry's record third-quarter profits — at a time when motorists were reeling from unprecedentedly high gasoline costs and warned of huge heating bills this winter — have caught the attention of both Republicans and Democrats in Congress. Some analysts predict the 29 largest oil companies will earn $96 billion this year.

"Consumers need relief from high energy prices," Sen. Byron Dorgan (news, bio, voting record), D-N.D., said, reiterating his call for a windfall profits tax on oil companies. "Talk is cheap. The price of energy is not. Congress needs to act."

By most accounts, the hearing Wednesday was to have much rhetoric and result in little action.

Lawmakers, especially on the Republican side, "need some cover in the face of record-breaking profits," said Christine Tezak, an energy analyst for Stanford Washington Research Group. "Expect a lot of criticism ... but there is far more rhetoric than votes in support of windfall profits taxes."

The industry argues that the run-up of gasoline prices, which began earlier in the year, stems from high global crude oil costs and growing demand for gasoline this past summer, followed by a disruption of gasoline supplies when the hurricanes shut down more than a dozen refineries on the Gulf Coast.

Prices since have retreated from more than $3 a gallon to an average nationwide last week of $2.37, according to the Energy Department.

While the loudest calls for action against oil companies have come from Democrats, some Republicans have expressed similar frustrations.

"They are unhappy with the behavior of the oil companies," said Republican pollster David Winston, who advises GOP congressional leaders. "These are free market guys. They believe the market works. But in this case they are concerned that the consumer was clearly taken advantage of ... and they're pretty angry about it."

[Bulsajo]

Alternative energy solutions can't come soon enough.
The wrong administration to push and fund initiatives on them site in the White House.
How does Bush reconcile the need to reduce oil dependency with his relationships with big oil and the Saudis?
That issue probably keeps him awake at night more than Iraq.

[khyber]

http://www.comedycentral.com/shows/the_daily_show/videos/most_recent/index.jhtmljon stewart makes a good news story outta this...actually... a bit depressing.

[bucheon bum]

it is just like all other industries, their profits go up and down.

Lst time they had low profits you ask? Late 90s.

Don't buy oil co. stocks now. They won't go up much more, and they'll go down in a year or two. So says history at least.

[4 months left]

[4 months left]

[bucheon bum]

[4 months left]

[4 months left]

Kuwait's biggest field starts to run out of oil

http://www.ameinfo.com/71519.html

[Kuros]

This is populist chicanery. The article above references how taxing windfalls on oil profits in the 70s only resulted in a diminution of oil investments, which is the kind of policy that only turns around and reduces supply. I'm no defender of corporate interests, and apparenty these oil companies contributed none of their profits to Katrina victims. And as always, Ted Stevens is slime. But, the politicians only want to respond to a major irritant to the American people without actually implementing the kind of solution that might make the American people have to do something.

A gas tax is no simple solution, and there may well be short-term drawbacks. Done well, however, the resulting higher prices on gasoline can stimulate investment in gas conservation and the revenues could be diverted to later disasters. It is only natural that given the destruction of so many refineries on the coast (I remember vaguely a freak fire only a month or two before Katrina at most that destroyed a major Texas refinery) that the prices would go up. The government needs to respond to these disasters better, and also keep themselves financed. I think both 4 months and Bucheon Bum would agree despite their differences that this oil problem is not going to go away. So, we need to implement long-term solutions for moderating consumption rather than pillory oil executives for profits.

[igotthisguitar]

"A car that can go from zero to 60 in four seconds and get more than 50 miles to the gallon would be enough to pique any driver's interest.

So who do we have to thank for it. Ford? GM? Toyota? No — just Victor, David, Cheeseborough, Bruce, and Kosi, five kids from the auto shop program at West Philadelphia High School."

-- CBS News, 2/17/06

http://www.wanttoknow.info/060303carenginebreakthrough

[Ya-ta Boy]

Back in the days when air conditioning was new, inefficient and very expensive. the Government decided to help out by placing big orders with the fledgling companies. The result was a kind of investment in the little companies. Economies of scale were suddenly achieveable, technological innovation was stimulated, thriving new companies hired new employees. Pretty good bang for the buck.

This is the kind of investment Congress should be studying now, only directed at various alternative energy sources. It would promote oil conservation, build up new industries, create serious competition for the oil giants (no bad thing) and encourage energy independence.

[khyber]

[Kuros]

[mithridates]

Gas taxes are one thing, but the small perks that hybrid vehicle users get seem to be fun too: