Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

California VS> Iraq
Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
sundubuman



Joined: 04 Feb 2003
Location: seoul

PostPosted: Fri Apr 21, 2006 1:08 am    Post subject: California VS> Iraq Reply with quote

the power of media spin.........


The American Enterprise Online
Eye of the Beholder
By Victor Davis Hanson
April 12, 20006

War-torn Iraq has about 26 million residents, a peaceful California perhaps now 35 million. The former is a violent and impoverished landscape, the latter said to be paradise on Earth. But how you envision either place to some degree depends on the eye of the beholder and is predicated on what the daily media appear to make of each.

As a fifth-generation Californian, I deeply love this state, but still imagine what the reaction would be if the world awoke each morning to be told that once again there were six more murders, 27 rapes, 38 arsons, 180 robberies, and 360 instances of assault in California - yesterday, today, tomorrow, and every day. I wonder if the headlines would scream about "Nearly 200 poor Californians butchered again this month!" How about a monthly media dose of "600 women raped in February alone!" Or try, "Over 600 violent robberies and assaults in March, with no end in sight!" Those do not even make up all of the state's yearly 200,000 violent acts that law enforcement knows about. Iraq's judicial system seems a mess. On the eve of the war, Saddam let out 100,000 inmates from his vast prison archipelago. He himself still sits in the dock months after his trial began. But imagine an Iraq with a penal system like California's with 170,000 criminals - an inmate population larger than those of Germany, France, the Netherlands, and Singapore combined. Just to house such a shadow population costs our state nearly $7 billion a year - or about the same price of keeping 40,000 Army personnel per year in Iraq. What would be the image of our Golden State if we were reminded each morning, "Another $20 million spent today on housing our criminals"? Some of California's most recent prison scandals would be easy to sensationalize: "Guards watch as inmates are raped!" Or "Correction officer accused of having sex with underaged detainee!" And apropos of Saddam's sluggish trial, remember that our home state multiple murderer, Tookie Williams, was finally executed in December 2005 - 26 years after he was originally sentenced.

Much is made of the inability to patrol Iraq's borders with Iran, Jordan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, Syria, and Turkey. But California has only a single border with a foreign nation, not six. Yet over 3 million foreigners who snuck in illegally now live in our state. Worse, there are about 15,000 convicted alien felons incarcerated in our penal system, costing about $500 million a year. Imagine the potential tabloid headlines: "Illegal aliens in state comprise population larger than San Francisco!" or "Drugs, criminals, and smugglers given free pass into California!"

Every year, over 4,000 Californians die in car crashes - nearly twice the number of Americans lost so far in three years of combat operations in Iraq. In some sense, then, our badly maintained roads, and often poorly trained and sometimes intoxicated drivers, are even more lethal than Improvised Explosive Devices. Perhaps tomorrow's headline might scream out at us: "300 Californians to perish this month on state highways! Hundreds more will be maimed and crippled!"

In 2001, California had 32 days of power outages, despite paying nearly the highest rates for electricity in the United States. Before complaining about the smoke in Baghdad rising from private generators, think back to the run on generators in California when they were contemplated as a future part of every household's line of defense.

We're told that Iraq's finances are a mess. Yet until recently, so were California's. Two years ago, Governor Schwarzenegger inherited a $38 billion annual budget shortfall. That could have made for strong morning newscast teasers: "Another $100 million borrowed today - $3 billion more in red ink to pile up by month's end!"

So is California comparable to Iraq? Hardly. Yet it could easily be sketched by a reporter intent on doing so as a bankrupt, crime-ridden den with murderous highways, tens of thousands of inmates, with wide-open borders. I myself recently returned home to California, without incident, from a visit to Iraq's notorious Sunni Triangle. While I was gone, a drug-addicted criminal with a long list of convictions broke into our kitchen at 4 a.m., was surprised by my wife and daughter, and fled with our credit cards, cash, keys, and cell phones. Sometimes I wonder who really was safer that week.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
On the other hand



Joined: 19 Apr 2003
Location: I walk along the avenue

PostPosted: Fri Apr 21, 2006 2:29 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Oh, for Christ's sake.

The US invaded and occupied Iraq, to the tune of a few thousand lives, under the pretence of making life better for the Iraqi people.

Therefore, in judging the Iraqi quality of life, we are justified in using a higher bar than we would use in judging the California quality of life. The American and Iraqi people were promised that certain things would happen in Iraq as a result of the invasion. If those things don't happen, then the architects of the invasion should be held to account.

Quote:
Every year, over 4,000 Californians die in car crashes - nearly twice the number of Americans lost so far in three years of combat operations in Iraq. In some sense, then, our badly maintained roads, and often poorly trained and sometimes intoxicated drivers, are even more lethal than Improvised Explosive Devices. Perhaps tomorrow's headline might scream out at us: "300 Californians to perish this month on state highways! Hundreds more will be maimed and crippled!"


Let's say Russia had invaded California for the stated purpose of reducing car accidents there. Three years and zillions of rubles later, California stands on the brink of civil war, dozens of people are dying every day from car bombs in the LA/SF corridor, Russian troops have been photographed sexually abusing Californian prisoners, and the car accident rate remains the same!! Would anyone be impressed to hear Putin say that the car accident rate in California is no worse than the one in Vladivastok?

Quote:
Much is made of the inability to patrol Iraq's borders with Iran, Jordan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, Syria, and Turkey. But California has only a single border with a foreign nation, not six. Yet over 3 million foreigners who snuck in illegally now live in our state. Worse, there are about 15,000 convicted alien felons incarcerated in our penal system, costing about $500 million a year. Imagine the potential tabloid headlines: "Illegal aliens in state comprise population larger than San Francisco!" or "Drugs, criminals, and smugglers given free pass into California!"


Of course, they used to tell us that the foreign fighters sneaking into Iraq were the ones responsible for all the chaos and violence that was ruining Iraqi democracy. Now they're telling us that foreigners sneaking into Iraq pose about the same threat as Mexicans sneaking into the USA.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
TheUrbanMyth



Joined: 28 Jan 2003
Location: Retired

PostPosted: Fri Apr 21, 2006 4:41 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

On the other hand wrote:
.

(1) The US invaded and occupied Iraq, to the tune of a few thousand lives, under the pretence of making life better for the Iraqi people.

(2) (a)Therefore, in judging the Iraqi quality of life, we are justified in using a higher bar than we would use in judging the California quality of life. The American and Iraqi people were promised that certain things would happen in Iraq as a result of the invasion. (b)If those things don't happen, then the architects of the invasion should be held to account.

[SA.


I just wanted to comment on these two points.

1. You sure about that? I was under the impression that that rationale only became the main argument AFTER the invasion.

2(a) If my number one holds true, that kind of invalidates your "higher bar" argument since the "Iraqi quality of life" was not the main reason.

2.(b) "If those things don't happen...." YET. There have been some encouraging signs as The Economist (hardly an avid Bush backer) notes. Chief among them the elections. It's still far too early to tell.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
sundubuman



Joined: 04 Feb 2003
Location: seoul

PostPosted: Fri Apr 21, 2006 5:11 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

On the Other Hand said, for the sake of Christ apparently.....


The US invaded and occupied Iraq, to the tune of a few thousand lives, under the pretence of making life better for the Iraqi people.

Therefore, in judging the Iraqi quality of life, we are justified in using a higher bar than we would use in judging the California quality of life



No, let's just judge it as it is. Before Saddam was deposed, Iraqis were not allowed to speak their minds, get a cell phone, use the interenet, or start a blog. Now they can,


I suppose living in absolute slavery in a SAFE dictatorship is preferable to chaotic and unpredictable freedom for you.

Some of us would rather die than be trapped in bondage. I guess people like you prefer bondage, as long as its more comfy than chaotic freedom.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Alias



Joined: 24 Jan 2003

PostPosted: Fri Apr 21, 2006 5:17 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

...and lets not forget that over 2300 police officers have been killed in California trying to maintain the peace.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
On the other hand



Joined: 19 Apr 2003
Location: I walk along the avenue

PostPosted: Fri Apr 21, 2006 7:12 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

TUM wrote:

Quote:
On the other hand wrote:
.

(1) The US invaded and occupied Iraq, to the tune of a few thousand lives, under the pretence of making life better for the Iraqi people.

(2) (a)Therefore, in judging the Iraqi quality of life, we are justified in using a higher bar than we would use in judging the California quality of life. The American and Iraqi people were promised that certain things would happen in Iraq as a result of the invasion. (b)If those things don't happen, then the architects of the invasion should be held to account.

[SA.


I just wanted to comment on these two points.

1. You sure about that? I was under the impression that that rationale only became the main argument AFTER the invasion.

2(a) If my number one holds true, that kind of invalidates your "higher bar" argument since the "Iraqi quality of life" was not the main reason.



Well, I remember numerous pro-war arguments being bandied about in the buildup to the invasion, one of them being that invading Iraq would make Iraqis better off. But it's quite possible that the "quality of life" argument rose to its current prominence post-invasion.

Nevertheless, it is Victor Davis Hanson, not me, who chose to address the quality-of-life argument in the first place. So I assume that HE at least thinks it's an important argument.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
On the other hand



Joined: 19 Apr 2003
Location: I walk along the avenue

PostPosted: Fri Apr 21, 2006 7:43 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Sundubuman wrote:

Quote:
I suppose living in absolute slavery in a SAFE dictatorship is preferable to chaotic and unpredictable freedom for you.


Hey, if that "chaotic and unpredictable freedom" involves the right to sit in my living room and watch Girls Gone Wild videos with a cold beer on the table while the drag queens next door do a Britney Spears tribute on the front lawn, count me in.

Unfortunately, however, the "chaotic and unpredictable freedom" currently on offer in Iraq seems to be the kind that involves car-bombing guerillas duking it out with shadowy quasi-government militias who leave piles of corpses lying in the street on a daily basis. So no, I can't say that that kind of freedom really puts a smile on my face and a song in my heart.

Quote:
Some of us would rather die than be trapped in bondage.


Eloquent stuff, coming from a guy who risks life and limb in defense of freedom on Dave's cafe every month.


Last edited by On the other hand on Fri Apr 21, 2006 7:49 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
On the other hand



Joined: 19 Apr 2003
Location: I walk along the avenue

PostPosted: Fri Apr 21, 2006 7:46 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Alias wrote:

Quote:
...and lets not forget that over 2300 police officers have been killed in California trying to maintain the peace.


This pretty much sums up the whole problem with Victor Davis Hanson's argument.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Bulsajo



Joined: 16 Jan 2003

PostPosted: Fri Apr 21, 2006 8:32 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

On the other hand wrote:

Of course, they used to tell us that the foreign fighters sneaking into Iraq were the ones responsible for all the chaos and violence that was ruining Iraqi democracy. Now they're telling us that foreigners sneaking into Iraq pose about the same threat as Mexicans sneaking into the USA.

I'm going to have to put that in the quotable quotes thread, it's just too good to not get more exposure.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Bulsajo



Joined: 16 Jan 2003

PostPosted: Fri Apr 21, 2006 8:37 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

On the other hand wrote:

Eloquent stuff, coming from a guy who risks life and limb in defense of freedom on Dave's cafe every month.

This one too, I think.

Sundubu, stop reading Victor Davis Hanson for a moment and pick up a copy of this:
http://www.metacritic.com/books/authors/packergeorge/assassinsgate?q=assassin

Honestly, I'm not trying to feed you propaganda, and you won't regret reading it.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
sundubuman



Joined: 04 Feb 2003
Location: seoul

PostPosted: Sat Apr 22, 2006 6:16 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'll stick with Hanson tyvm.

And even if Iraq does not evolve quietly or quickly into a modern democracy with full civil rights.....it certainly has a better shot now that Saddam (and his dead sons) has been removed from the picture.

Ummm....let's remember that we are currently in a country "liberated" by the United States in 45 and again in 53, and there were several episodes in S. Korea's history that would have lead one to believe that occupying the southern half of the peninsula in 45 and then defending it against Communist agression in the early 50's was a major mistake (think Jeju, Yeosu, Kwangju).

Yet here we all are living in a prosperous democratic free land.

Those of you so anxious to berate Bush/America for removing Saddam are going to look like gigantic ignoramuses in 10 years time. Saddam & Sons were set to maintain absolute control over Iraq for another 3 or 4 decades at least. How could we not have removed them? What was the alternative?????
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Ya-ta Boy



Joined: 16 Jan 2003
Location: Established in 1994

PostPosted: Sat Apr 22, 2006 7:40 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
Some of us would rather die than be trapped in bondage. I guess people like you prefer bondage, as long as its more comfy than chaotic freedom.


It's always so inspiring to hear a war wimp, safe in his/her shoe box apartment, spout off about how other people should spend their blood defending the war wimp's political views. Put up or shut up.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
David76



Joined: 15 Jun 2003
Location: U.S.

PostPosted: Sat Apr 22, 2006 8:05 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
Those of you so anxious to berate Bush/America for removing Saddam are going to look like gigantic ignoramuses in 10 years time. Saddam & Sons were set to maintain absolute control over Iraq for another 3 or 4 decades at least. How could we not have removed them? What was the alternative?????


I'll take the bait. . . or at least a piece of it.

Why is the U.S. government supporting dictators in the first place? Until that stops, is anyone really so stupid as to think it is really interested in spreading freedom and democracy? It does not even respect the rights of its own citizens. Not that it should be "freedom and democracy," which seems like mob rule, but more like liberty and a republican (small "r") form of government. Do you think Sharia in Iraq in ten years time will make you look well-informed?

The alternative is for the U.S. government to stop its imperialism, wars, and support of terrorism and to start governing according to its constitution.

---
The tragedy of modern war is that the young men die fighting each
other--instead of their real enemies back home in the capitals.
~Edward Abbey
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Bulsajo



Joined: 16 Jan 2003

PostPosted: Sat Apr 22, 2006 11:27 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

sundubuman wrote:
I'll stick with Hanson tyvm.

You'll "stick with"? Of course you will. Heaven forbid you should ever read something which might change your mind...

http://www.eslcafe.com/forums/korea/viewtopic.php?t=55802
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
caniff



Joined: 03 Feb 2004
Location: All over the map

PostPosted: Sun Apr 23, 2006 11:14 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yeah, the Iraq invasion was stupid and most smart people knew that ahead of time. They also knew why it was inevitable, and why it is being conducted in the way it is. And so forth.

I started this stupid thread before about posters with handles that end in numbers. Are they real people, or a Dave's manifestation? Socks? Only one appearance by 'Buttboy 1794739', then nothing. I want more insight provided by the experienced.

Sorry for the hijack, and I know it is innane. If I get one good answer this time I'll never mention it again.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
Page 1 of 3

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International