|
Korean Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Nowhere Man

Joined: 08 Feb 2004
|
Posted: Fri May 19, 2006 2:53 am Post subject: Let's talk about the US deficit |
|
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S._public_debt
This link should make you relatively familiar with the situation if you're not already.
We're about $8 trillion in debt.
I want to lead off with a simple question:
Is our deficit a concern or not? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Wangja

Joined: 17 May 2004 Location: Seoul, Yongsan
|
Posted: Fri May 19, 2006 3:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
There are two deficits: the current account deficit - the trade balance if you like - and the budget deficit, the givernment spends more than it receives. The latter leads to an increase in government debt, to the present level.
In both percentage and absolute terms, the administration has increased the debt more than any previous administration. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Octavius Hite

Joined: 28 Jan 2004 Location: Househunting, looking for a new bunker from which to convert the world to homosexuality.
|
Posted: Fri May 19, 2006 3:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
Im a Canadian and the American debt and deficets (sp) scare the hell out of me. American right-winger/nutbars don't acknowledge the danger but if any major economic event hits like super high inflation or recession, it will spell disaster for the US and most other countries in the world. The Bush crime family has really screwed the pooch here and now generations of Americans will have to pay this with higher taxes. There is no possible way to pay for this without a new tax (like the Canadian GST) or raising taxes. Goddess, please let the Dem's win back all branches of the government and save the world. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Kuros
Joined: 27 Apr 2004
|
Posted: Fri May 19, 2006 4:03 am Post subject: It's ugly |
|
|
All figures come from this monstrosity, although be warned, it requires Adobe Acrobat reader to open. It's from the Heritage Foundation and in many cases I've just copied what they've written. To see the graphs you'll have to click the link, though. I've left commentary out, because the numbers speak for themselves. Enjoy.
Heritage Foundation
Spending abounds
- Spending has increased by 8% in 2005 and is up 33% since 2001.
- In 2005, inflation-adjusted federal spending reached $22,000 per household, the highest level since WWII, however, the government only has taxed $19,062 per household, leaving a budget deficit of $2,816 per household.
- Federal spending has grown twice as fast under President Bush as President Clinton
- Military spending has jumped from $305,000million to $535,000million from 2001 to 2006, a 76% increase over five years
- Federal education funds have more than doubled in the past 5 years under the No Child Left Behind Act, from $35,000million to well over $80,000million.
Needless Discretionary Spending surges
- Discretionary spending went up 49% since 2001, a whopping 35% after accounting for inflation. Discretionary spending that excludes Defense/Homeland Security/Katrina relief still increased by 34%, or by 23% after adjustments for inflation
Entitlement Crisis
- Entitlement spending consumes over 50% of our spending and over 10% of our GDP. The big entitlements are Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security.
- The unfunded liability for Social Security is 3.7 trillion dollars, but the unfunded liability for Medicare Drug entitlement is 8.1 trillion dollars. Our taxes are going directly to ensure pharmaceutical companies' profit figures.
- Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid entitlements are expected to jump from tying up 8.4% of our GDP in 2005 to 18.9% of our GDP in 2050. If taxes were collected to correspond to these costs, they would have to be raised every year until they became 60% higher than they are today, in other words household tax burden would increase by $11,000.
Welfare State
- Under the Bush administration, anti-poverty spending has risen by 39% to become a record 16% of all spending. (Under the Bush senior administration it never topped 10%, during the height of the war against poverty led by LBJ, it never topped 4%)
- From 2001 to 2005, Medicaid rolls have increased by 10 million and Food Stamp rolls by 8 million. Benefit levels on average have outpaced inflation.
Pork, Pork, Pork
- Today, Congress actually determines for itself who will receive government grants by 'earmarking' grant money to specific recipients. Before, federal and state agencies would select individual recipients through a competitive application process. Lobbyists gain money by securing these earmarks for their clients, who once having attained such earmarks, do not need to engage in a competitive bidding process or have to endure any other such oversights.
- The recent highway authorization bill included around 6,370 earmarks for a total cost of $25 billion dollars. Such pork projects include the Rock and Roll Hall of fame, a therapeutic horseback riding program, a grant to combat teen "goth" culture in Missouri, an indoor rainforest in Iowa, and everyone's favorite, Alaska's bridge to nowhere.
Waste
- The Defense Department wasted $100 million on unused flight tickets, and though they were refundable, never collected the refunds.
- The Federal government cannot account for $24.5 billion spent in 2003.
- Washington annually spends $60 billion on corporate welfare, as opposed to $43 billion on Homeland Security
- HUD's $3.3 billion in overpayments in 2001 accounted for over 10% of their budget
- The Advanced Technology Program alots $150 million annually to subsidize private businesses, and 40% of that goes to Fortune 500 companies
- Food stamp overpayments total $600 million annually, and Veterans' programs overpayments total $800 million annually. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Nowhere Man

Joined: 08 Feb 2004
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Kuros
Joined: 27 Apr 2004
|
Posted: Fri May 19, 2006 4:21 am Post subject: Re: ... |
|
|
Kamchatka has joined the Axis of Evil!?!?!? Oh, dear lord... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Nowhere Man

Joined: 08 Feb 2004
|
Posted: Fri May 19, 2006 4:34 am Post subject: ... |
|
|
That about wipes it up, doesn't it?
Next time you call for military action, I'll stay out of your way.
Thanks for your valuable contribution. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee

Joined: 25 May 2003
|
Posted: Fri May 19, 2006 6:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
IF the US is under threat then it will have a negative effect on the US economy. Less money for social programs and less tax revenue period. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Nowhere Man

Joined: 08 Feb 2004
|
Posted: Fri May 19, 2006 9:16 am Post subject: ... |
|
|
Please include your favorite statistics, Joo.
The deficit isn't that big because why? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
bucheon bum
Joined: 16 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Fri May 19, 2006 9:27 am Post subject: Re: ... |
|
|
while I'm all for a balanced budget and think the money we give our military is insanely high, I have to say one thing:
money won't fix education. That being said, I admit I'd rather have our tax dollars go towards that than the military. I'd rather have $1,000 toilets in our schools instead of in the pentagon . |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
rollo
Joined: 10 May 2006 Location: China
|
Posted: Fri May 19, 2006 1:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Personal debt rather than government debt is the real danger. But I think the U.s. economy is very strong. Around 70% of Americans own a home so some of the "debt" is actually investment in a mortage. But the weak dollar and a growing trade imbalance with China need to be dealt with. Foreign Direct Investment is still strong in the U.S. Another big problem is that China has not allowed the Yuan to appreciate. If I was investing, right now I would bet big on U.S. stocks. Real estate market is about over. So profits from real estate boom will be plowed in to equities. U.s. could be the edge of a boom as China becomes a consumer sodiety and needs more high end products. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee

Joined: 25 May 2003
|
Posted: Fri May 19, 2006 3:38 pm Post subject: Re: ... |
|
|
Nowhere Man wrote: |
Please include your favorite statistics, Joo.
The deficit isn't that big because why? |
about the same as it was under Reagan. Sure the defict is big and the national debt is big.
but what is the cause?
anyway the graph below gives a more accurate picture
from Yahoo finance. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Kuros
Joined: 27 Apr 2004
|
Posted: Fri May 19, 2006 8:06 pm Post subject: Re: ... |
|
|
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee wrote: |
Nowhere Man wrote: |
Please include your favorite statistics, Joo.
The deficit isn't that big because why? |
about the same as it was under Reagan. Sure the defict is big and the national debt is big.
|
Its not a good thing, though. Reagan may at least have had a plausible excuse, he was bankrupting the Soviets. I know some posters have had it out on the usefulness of his tactic, but all I'm suggesting is that while Reagan arguably had a good reason, Bush doesn't. Even taking Iraq as a given (and much of the funding to Iraq is needlessly wasted), why is Bush giving tax cuts? Income on taxes has yet to meet the level of the cuts, meanwhile waste and pork go higher and higher.
But, Nowhere Man, one cannot unfortunately proscribe fiscal responsibility to Congress. Its not their money. Actually, it is their money, insofar as pork is currency with which to advance their policy aims. In some cases, see 'The Hammer', Congressmen don't even have policy aims but just seek to stay in power and advance their party for its own sake. This is the problem, the government is broken when citizens on both sides of the political spectrum are disgusted by the fiscal irresponsibility (I believe Congress' approval rating is lower than Bush's) but nothing can be done to stop it. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee

Joined: 25 May 2003
|
Posted: Fri May 19, 2006 10:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
why is Bush giving tax cuts? Income on taxes has yet to meet the level of the cuts, meanwhile waste and pork go higher and higher. |
Questionable economic theory .
Bush was a believed tax cuts pay for themselves. I don't but there are many respected people who would agree with Bush on this matter.
Nothing sinister just questionable economic theory.
Last edited by Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee on Sat May 20, 2006 2:01 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
igotthisguitar

Joined: 08 Apr 2003 Location: South Korea (Permanent Vacation)
|
Posted: Fri May 19, 2006 11:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Nowhere Man wrote: |
I want to lead off with a simple question:
Is our deficit a concern or not? |
Has there been any discussion yet of WHO exactly is doing business with the int'l banking community BUYING UP the U.S. debt? Doesn't seem like it.
Here then is another relatively straight-forward question:
Can U NAME the 3 TOP NATIONS buying up U.S. debt  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|