| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee
Joined: 25 May 2003
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Octavius Hite
Joined: 28 Jan 2004
Location: Househunting, looking for a new bunker from which to convert the world to homosexuality.
|
 Posted: Tue May 30, 2006 7:31 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
| Just after 9/11 there was a great doc on TLC and Discovery and they covered all the info from this website. The twin towers were the perfect buildings to hit with planes because of their construction, height and age. Bin Laden had expert engineers working for him (Most of whom went to US and British schools) and they would have known all this just from doing basic internet research or watching mega builders type shows. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
igotthisguitar
Joined: 08 Apr 2003
Location: South Korea (Permanent Vacation)
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee
Joined: 25 May 2003
|
| Posted: Wed May 31, 2006 5:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
9/11 Stock Options Update
The FBI has closed its investigation into the "put" options that sold UAL and AMR short just before the attacks, saying there is no evidence of foreknowledge in the trading:
On Sept. 10, 2001, put options on AMR were 17 times their average volume of 269 contracts. On Sept. 6, 2001, UAL put options were traded at more than four times their average volume of 711 contracts.
At the same time, some experts cautioned that because of the light volume in most option contracts, an increase can seem eye-popping.
London regulators thought they had something in the short-selling of big airline stocks before Sept. 11, but traced the activity to one of their small competitors.
Hmm. Finally, someone adds some context to the "17 times their average volume" claim. I doubt this will satisfy the moonbats, though.
http://mckinneysucks.blogspot.com/ |
Anyway Al Qaeda benefited from 9-11. And Jeff Rense and his followers benefited from 9-11.
Keep Jeff Rense and his followers from getting US visas. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
some waygug-in
Joined: 25 Jan 2003
|
| Posted: Wed May 31, 2006 6:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
So you are quoting some right wing nut case's entry in an anti- Mckinney blog as evidence. 
Sounds like the case is solved.
Send Joo the prize.
And now ....the rest of the story...
http://www.oilempire.us/demolition.html |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee
Joined: 25 May 2003
|
| Posted: Wed May 31, 2006 8:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| some waygug-in wrote: |
So you are quoting some right wing nut case's entry in an anti- Mckinney blog as evidence.
Sounds like the case is solved.
Send Joo the prize.
And now ....the rest of the story...
http://www.oilempire.us/demolition.html |
a ) What makes you say he is a right wing nut? Why don't you back it up?
b ) He is a lot better than your sources- I mean Michael Rivero and company.
c) The FBI backs his story. ( oh they are part of the conspiracy  )
Your conspiracy world is getting smaller and smaller , as once said before you've had it pal. You guys are finished.
Here is the real conspiracy a group of whackos and extremists who want the US weakened or destroyed deceive , slander and make conspiracy theories for their own sick and cruel political and social agenda. This theory unlike theirs is true. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
some waygug-in
Joined: 25 Jan 2003
|
| Posted: Thu Jun 01, 2006 2:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
It's a blog. People can say whatever they like. That hardly proves anything. I'm just giving you a taste of your own medicine.
What has my site got to do with Rivero? Nothing, again if you want to start complaining about sources...why don't you back up yours?
You frequently post articles with no reference as to where they came from and or who wrote them. Then you rant on as if they are factual.
Look in the mirror dude. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
thepeel
Joined: 08 Aug 2004
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee
Joined: 25 May 2003
|
| Posted: Thu Jun 01, 2006 3:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| some waygug-in wrote: |
It's a blog. People can say whatever they like. That hardly proves anything. I'm just giving you a taste of your own medicine.
What has my site got to do with Rivero? Nothing, again if you want to start complaining about sources...why don't you back up yours?
You frequently post articles with no reference as to where they came from and or who wrote them. Then you rant on as if they are factual.
Look in the mirror dude. |
far better then your own sources see Micheal Rivero. and the other nonsense (worse than that) you put up
There is the answer to the stock options theory. If you got something better well then show it.
your sources are from are just no one there are from those with an agenda to cause disorder for their evil political and social aims. Better a blog than enemy propaganda.
What he says is backed by the FBI. Oh since they are part of the huge conspiracy
| Quote: |
You frequently post articles with no reference as to where they came from and or who wrote them. Then you rant on as if they are factual. |
Like when ?
Let me answer what you are about:
9-11 conspiracy lies are not a legitimate form of protest or opposition to US policies.
you conspiracy mongers had your day , now your number is up.
http://www.911myths.com/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
tiger fancini
Joined: 21 Mar 2006
Location: Testicles for Eyes
|
| Posted: Thu Jun 01, 2006 3:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
 Idea for todays dialogue
Mike: My sources are better than yours Su-Jin
Su-Jin: Sorry Mike, you've made a mistake. My sources are better than yours.
Mike: I don't think so. My sources are so good, they simply have to be better than yours.
Su-Jin: Mike, you've got it all wrong. My sources are the best in the whole wide world.
Mike: You don't know what you're talking about. My sources are the best EVER
Su-Jin: I don't want to talk to you anymore Mike. Stick your sources up your a$$ |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
some waygug-in
Joined: 25 Jan 2003
|
| Posted: Thu Jun 01, 2006 4:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
You wanted it...here it is.
http://www.copvcia.com/free/ww3/10_09_01_krongard.html
And as a pre-emptive strike against Joo's next post, what has this site or the last site I posted got to do with Rivero?
Again..........nothing. Back up your claims.
and as a further pseudo-Joo response:
[Quote: Joo}
a ) What makes you say he is a right wing nut? Why don't you back it up?
You posted it. That's proof enough for me. Guilt by association you know.
b ) He is a lot better than your sources- I mean Michael Rivero and company.
See above.
c) The FBI backs his story. ( oh they are part of the conspiracy )
No, but certain people who control the FBI may be.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee
Joined: 25 May 2003
|
| Posted: Thu Jun 01, 2006 6:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
[quote="some waygug-in"]
| Quote: |
And as a pre-emptive strike against Joo's next post, what has this site or the last site I posted got to do with Rivero?
Again..........nothing. Back up your claims. |
another nonsense site
| Quote: |
and as a further pseudo-Joo response:
[Quote: Joo} |
| Quote: |
You posted it. That's proof enough for me. Guilt by association you know.
|
I am not right wing I voted for Clinton 2x and Gore 1x.
You on the other hand have used sites by holocaust deniers. Who is the extemist?
| Quote: |
| See above. |
the fact is you have used those sites again and again.
| Quote: |
No, but certain people who control the FBI may be.
:lol |
not that you have any proof.
Dishonest conspriacy theories are not a legitmate form of protest.
I have got your number .
Focus on the accusers
Last edited by Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee on Thu Jun 01, 2006 6:32 pm; edited 2 times in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee
Joined: 25 May 2003
|
| Posted: Thu Jun 01, 2006 6:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| SUPPRESSED DETAILS OF CRIMINAL INSIDER TRADING LEAD DIRECTLY INTO THE CIA's HIGHEST RANKS |
| Quote: |
| which has left a $2.5 million prize unclaimed -- the firm used to place the "put options" on United Airlines stock was, until 1998 |
2.5 million that is not huge money to Bush or many Americans.
| Quote: |
9/11 Stock Options Update
The FBI has closed its investigation into the "put" options that sold UAL and AMR short just before the attacks, saying there is no evidence of foreknowledge in the trading:
On Sept. 10, 2001, put options on AMR were 17 times their average volume of 269 contracts. On Sept. 6, 2001, UAL put options were traded at more than four times their average volume of 711 contracts.
At the same time, some experts cautioned that because of the light volume in most option contracts, an increase can seem eye-popping.
London regulators thought they had something in the short-selling of big airline stocks before Sept. 11, but traced the activity to one of their small competitors.
Hmm. Finally, someone adds some context to the "17 times their average volume" claim. I doubt this will satisfy the moonbats, though |
.
http://mckinneysucks.blogspot.com/
Charge answered.
Now focus on the accuser.
Answer up time - FOR YOU.
http://www.911myths.com/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
some waygug-in
Joined: 25 Jan 2003
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee
Joined: 25 May 2003
|
| Posted: Thu Jun 01, 2006 7:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
The story...
There was very high trading in "put options" on American Airline and United Airlines, immediately before 9/11. These were effectively gambles that their share prices would fall, which of course is what happened once the attacks took place. This shows the traders must have had advance knowledge of 9/11.
Our take...
This is a complex story, but the reality is a little different from the claims.
Although there were high volumes traded on these days, for instance, they weren�t as exceptionally high as some sites like to claim. Here�s one analysis.
There were very good reasons to sell American Airlines shares, too, as they�d just announced a string of bad news. Read more here.
United Airlines stocks were falling in price, too. If investors anticipated they were about to release bad results then their put options would also be worth buying (although keep in mind that the UAL put volumes weren�t the highest in the year anyway). Here�s our thoughts.
Some point to stories like the �unclaimed millions� from UAL puts as having a sinister explanation, but we disagree. Here�s why.
There was plenty of talk about potential insider dealings in other stocks, too. We haven�t researched these in any depth, but it�s worth pointing out that some people believe the claims were overblown.
What about most of the options being put through a CIA-linked bank? We weren�t convinced.
The 9/11 Commission Report mentions this issue in its notes to Chapter 5:
"A single U.S.-based institutional investor with no conceivable ties to al Qaeda purchased 95 percent of the UAL puts on September 6 as part of a trading strategy that also included buying 115,000 shares of American on September 10...
Similarly, much of the seemingly suspicious trading in American on September 10th was traced to a specific U.S.-based options trading newsletter, faxed to its subscribers on Sunday, September 9, which recommended these trades".
Some suggest they should have paid more attention to it, but we�re not entirely sure why. As you can see from the other links here, the UAL trades weren�t exceptional, and there was news to justify the sale of American Airlines shares. Foreknowledge of 9/11 isn�t required to explain these trades. |
http://www.911myths.com/html/put_options.html
GAME OVER |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
