Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Agnostic about atheism
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Off-Topic Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
ED209



Joined: 17 Oct 2006

PostPosted: Fri May 30, 2008 5:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hello Tomato

We're both kinda right.

Scientists' Belief in God Varies Starkly by Discipline

Quote:
About two-thirds of scientists believe in God, according to a new survey that uncovered stark differences based on the type of research they do.

The study, along with another one released in June(2005), would appear to debunk the oft-held notion that science is incompatible with religion.

Those in the social sciences are more likely to believe in God and attend religious services than researchers in the natural sciences, the study found.

The opposite had been expected.

Nearly 38 percent of natural scientists -- people in disciplines like physics, chemistry and biology -- said they do not believe in God. Only 31 percent of the social scientists do not believe....

Some stand-out stats: 41 percent of the biologists don't believe, while that figure is just 27 percent among political scientists.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Rteacher



Joined: 23 May 2005
Location: Western MA, USA

PostPosted: Fri May 30, 2008 6:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

If God does exist, the onus is on you (and all of us) to follow His laws - and all nations are under God whether they acknowledge it or not.

Here's some background information about the adding of "under God" to the Pledge of Allegiance:

The Knights of Columbus in New York City felt that the pledge was incomplete without any reference to a deity. Appealing to the authority of Abraham Lincoln, the Knights felt that the words "under God" which were from Lincoln�s Gettysburg Address were most appropriate to add to the Pledge. In New York City on April 22, 1951, the Board of Directors of the Knights of Columbus adopted a resolution to amend their recitation of Pledge of Allegiance at the opening of each of the meetings of the 800 Fourth Degree Assemblies of the Knights of Columbus by addition of the words "under God" after the words "one nation." In the following two years, the idea spread throughout Knights of Columbus organizations nationwide... On August 21, 1952, the Supreme Council of the Knights of Columbus at its annual meeting adopted a resolution urging that the change be made universal and copies of this resolution were sent to the President, the Vice President (as Presiding Officer of the Senate) and the Speaker of the House of Representatives...

Bills to get the government to amend the pledge stalled for a couple years until a Presbyterian minister from Scotland, Rev. George MacPherson Doherty, gave a sermon that he knew would be attended by President Eisenhower.

Docherty�s message began with a comparison of the United States to ancient Sparta. Docherty noted that a traveler to ancient Sparta was amazed by the fact that the Spartans� national might was not to be found in their walls, their shields, or their weapons, but in their spirit. Likewise, said Docherty, the might of the United States should not be thought of as emanating from their newly developed Atomic weapons, but in their spirit, the "American way of life". In the remainder of the sermon Docherty sought to define as succinctly as possible the essence of the American spirit and way of life. To do so, Docherty appealed to those two words in Lincoln�s Gettysburg Address. According to Docherty, what has made the United States both unique and strong was her sense of being the nation that Lincoln described: a nation "under God."

Paraphrasing Docherty�s sermon, Eisenhower said

These words [�under God�] will remind Americans that despite our great physical strength we must remain humble. They will help us to keep constantly in our minds and hearts the spiritual and moral principles which alone give dignity to man, and upon which our way of life is founded.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pledge_of_Allegiance

During the Cold War, Eisenhower's Secretary of State, John Foster Dulles regularly condemned "atheistic" Communism.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
Rteacher



Joined: 23 May 2005
Location: Western MA, USA

PostPosted: Fri May 30, 2008 6:29 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I might as well tack this on here (to help remedy the problems attendant with both atheism and agnosticism...)

National Public Radio (NPR) just did a show on the beliefs and lifestyle of Hare Krishna monks (which I was for a long time - and pretty much still am - though I've been independent from the organization for over ten years...)
www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=90639998
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
Justin Hale



Joined: 24 Nov 2007
Location: the Straight Talk Express

PostPosted: Sat May 31, 2008 2:47 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

merkurix wrote:
Justin Hale wrote:

Your conceptions of atheism and antitheism are wrong. I routinely describe myself as an atheist because it's just easier, but really I'm an anti-theist (and a Biblical/Koranic God atheist).


So my conceptions of both A.) atheism and B.) anti-theism are both wrong, but rather than explain why I am wrong on both counts it seems like you have inadvertently contradicted this statement by confirming you are both A.) and B.) as described. Okay. I will wait for a better explanation explaining why I am wrong.


One can be an antitheist without being an atheist. One can be an atheist without being an antitheist. In any case, your original assertion about atheists and antitheists ("An atheist doesn't believe in God, very simply perhaps because the concept hasn't been satisfactorily proven to him/her through tangible, empirical, and objective means. Period. There is no additional expenditure of energy required to be in this condition. An "anti-theist" on the other hand, it one who like the fervent Bible Christian, expends a considerable amount of time and energy developing, strengthening, educating, and training themselves to continue being atheists") was incorrect and, even if it were correct, unimportant and benign.

Merkurix wrote:
I am not looking to start a debate or anything, (especially not on this issue for obvious reasons) but I would like to be more enlightened as to what the right conceptions are according to you.


I explained here....

Justin Hale wrote:
Einstein has the same position towards God as me. He completely disbelieved in God as dictator, disbelieved in afterlife, but subscribed to naturalistic pantheism, particularly with respect to abstract entities such as laws of nature and mathematical phenomena. Professor Hawking also refers to "God" as "a series of mathematical equations".

Abstract, rational phenomena that governs as well as merely is naturally lends itself to some kind of theism, but not celestial despotism, not divine rewards and punishments, not God-men like Jesus and not chosen people like the Jews.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Rteacher



Joined: 23 May 2005
Location: Western MA, USA

PostPosted: Sat May 31, 2008 5:26 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I agree that the Judeo-Christian-Islamic conceptions of God are not very appealing - but those are just misconceptions (utilized largely for social control purposes). They lack information of the qualities that make the Supreme Person the most completely attractive to all living beings.

I think it's also a philosophical misconception that the completely perfect source of everything - including all personalities - would lack personality.

The external, impersonal aspect of God is a type of spiritual realization available to material scientists and speculators, but the highest personal stage is realized only by pure devotional service (beginning with hearing and chanting transcendental Holy Names)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
Omkara



Joined: 18 Feb 2006
Location: USA

PostPosted: Sat May 31, 2008 8:03 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Supreme personality. . .follow that concept and find the contradictions. All things that can possibly be attributed to personality are a consequence of mortality.

Show me even one attribute of personality which is not connected with death, and I'll respect the concept.

I bet you pass this one over.

As for the scientists believing in god, I suppose it matters which science they practice and what they mean by that ever-so-flexible word: God.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Rteacher



Joined: 23 May 2005
Location: Western MA, USA

PostPosted: Sat May 31, 2008 1:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Basically, the more that consciousness is developed, the more personality is exhibited - even in animals (eg: a dog has more personality than a worm.) Since God is unlimitedly conscious, He possesses all personal qualities to an unlimited degree.

This excerpt is from a very comprehensive article titled "Who is Sri Krishna?" and quotes Rupa Goswami, who was personally instructed in the science of God realization by Chaitanya Mahaprabhu - Krishna Himself appearing as a devotee:

Many of the Gosvamis of Vrindavana who had personally realized the attractive features of the Supreme wrote many books about the transcendental personality of God. One of the greatest of these saints was Rupa Gosvami (1489-1564 A.D.) who wrote a list of Krishna�s characteristics in his book, Bhakti rasamrita-sindhu. This list describes 64 different qualities of God that are mentioned in the Vedic literature. This again confirms that the Lord is not merely an impersonal force, but a person who interacts in every way with the creation and the living entities that are within the creation that manifests from Him.

The list includes the following qualities: 1) beautiful features of the entire body; 2) marked with all auspicious characteristics; 3) extremely pleasing; 4) effulgent; 5) strong; 6) ever youthful; 7) wonderful linguist; Cool truthful; 9) talks pleasingly; 10) fluent; 11) highly learned; 12) highly intelligent; 13) a genius; 14) artistic; 15) extremely clever; 16) expert; 17) grateful; 1Cool firmly determined; 19) an expert judge of time and circumstances; 20) sees and speaks on the authority of the scriptures--the Veda; 21) pure; 22) self-controlled; 23) steadfast; 24) forbearing; 25) forgiving; 26) grave; 27) self-satisfied; 2Cool possessing equilibrium; 29) magnanimous; 30) religious; 31) heroic; 32) compassionate; 33) respectful; 34) gentle; 35) liberal; 36) shy; 37) protector of surrendered souls; 3Cool happy; 39) well-wisher of devotees; 40) controlled by love; 41) all-auspicious; 42) most powerful; 43) all-famous; 44) popular; 45) partial to devotees; 46) very attractive to all women; 47) all-worshipable; 4Cool all-opulent; 49) all-honorable; and 50) the Supreme controller.

These fifty qualities, however, may also be found in varying degrees in some of the jivas or common living entities in this universe. But they are found in Lord Krishna to an unlimited degree. But besides these 50 qualities, there are five more which may also be manifested at times in the forms of Lord Brahma and Shiva. These are: 51) changeless; 52) all-cognizant; 53) ever-fresh; 54) sat-cid-ananda-vigraha--possessing a transcendental form of eternity, full of knowledge and absolute bliss; and 55) possessing all mystic perfection.

Beyond the above mentioned qualities, which may be seen in other forms of Divinity such as the demigods, Lord Krishna has the following exceptional qualities which are also manifested in the form of Narayana or Vishnu, His form as the Lord of Vaikuntha. These are: 56) inconceivable potency; 57) uncountable universes are generated from His body; 5Cool the original source of all incarnations; 59) the giver of salvation to the enemies He kills; and 60) the attractor of liberated souls.

Besides the above-mentioned traits, Lord Krishna has four more qualities that are found only in Him, and not even in His forms of Vishnu, not to mention any of the demigods. These are: 61) the performer of wonderful pastimes (especially his childhood pastimes); 62) surrounded by devotees endowed with unsurpassed love of Godhead; 63) the attractor of all living entities in all universes through the expert playing of His flute; and 64) possessor of unexcelled beauty without rival. All of these qualities are those of someone who has a highly developed form and personality.

http://www.stephen-knapp.com/sri_krishna.htm

The question is answered from another angle - along with a definition of God - in this article:
http://www.davidicke.com/forum/archive/index.php/t-10505.html
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
merkurix



Joined: 21 Dec 2006
Location: Not far from the deep end.

PostPosted: Sun Jun 01, 2008 4:38 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

[quote="Justin Hale"]
merkurix wrote:
Justin Hale wrote:

Your conceptions of atheism and antitheism are wrong. I routinely describe myself as an atheist because it's just easier, but really I'm an anti-theist (and a Biblical/Koranic God atheist).


So my conceptions of both A.) atheism and B.) anti-theism are both wrong, but rather than explain why I am wrong on both counts it seems like you have inadvertently contradicted this statement by confirming you are both A.) and B.) as described. Okay. I will wait for a better explanation explaining why I am wrong.


Justin Hale wrote:
One can be an antitheist without being an atheist. One can be an atheist without being an antitheist.


Um . . . . you have just contradicted yourself (again), by supporting (perhaps inadvertently) that you can either be A.) atheist and not B.) anti-theist, or vice versa. I don't see how I could be wrong when your objections somewhat seems to be supporting my observations. And this is all the explanation I get?

Justin Hale wrote:
In any case, your original assertion about atheists and antitheists ("An atheist doesn't believe in God, very simply perhaps because the concept hasn't been satisfactorily proven to him/her through tangible, empirical, and objective means. Period. There is no additional expenditure of energy required to be in this condition. An "anti-theist" on the other hand, it one who like the fervent Bible Christian, expends a considerable amount of time and energy developing, strengthening, educating, and training themselves to continue being atheists") was incorrect and, even if it were correct, unimportant and benign.


This is so not a satisfactory answer to the question I originally asked. You keep saying how I am incorrect, but without explaining the 'how' part. Why?Confused

Anywho,

Justin Hale wrote:
In any case, your original assertion about atheists and antitheists . . . . was incorrect and, even if it were correct, unimportant and benign.


You are the only one in the presumably large group of atheist/anti-theist posters who objects to my observation. But because the detail I ask for is "unimportant and benign" can I expect to still get an adequate explanation/rationale why I am still wrong?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Underwaterbob



Joined: 08 Jan 2005
Location: In Cognito

PostPosted: Sun Jun 01, 2008 5:57 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Rteacher wrote:
...
Since God is unlimitedly conscious, He possesses all personal qualities to an unlimited degree.
...


Well, I for one am glad I'm not personally acquainted with this infinitely moody god.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
Omkara



Joined: 18 Feb 2006
Location: USA

PostPosted: Sun Jun 01, 2008 3:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Rteacher wrote:
Basically, the more that consciousness is developed, the more personality is exhibited - even in animals (eg: a dog has more personality than a worm.) Since God is unlimitedly conscious, He possesses all personal qualities to an unlimited degree.

This excerpt is from a very comprehensive article titled "Who is Sri Krishna?" and quotes Rupa Goswami, who was personally instructed in the science of God realization by Chaitanya Mahaprabhu - Krishna Himself appearing as a devotee:

Many of the Gosvamis of Vrindavana who had personally realized the attractive features of the Supreme wrote many books about the transcendental personality of God. One of the greatest of these saints was Rupa Gosvami (1489-1564 A.D.) who wrote a list of Krishna�s characteristics in his book, Bhakti rasamrita-sindhu. This list describes 64 different qualities of God that are mentioned in the Vedic literature. This again confirms that the Lord is not merely an impersonal force, but a person who interacts in every way with the creation and the living entities that are within the creation that manifests from Him.

The list includes the following qualities: 1) beautiful features of the entire body; 2) marked with all auspicious characteristics; 3) extremely pleasing; 4) effulgent; 5) strong; 6) ever youthful; 7) wonderful linguist; Cool truthful; 9) talks pleasingly; 10) fluent; 11) highly learned; 12) highly intelligent; 13) a genius; 14) artistic; 15) extremely clever; 16) expert; 17) grateful; 1Cool firmly determined; 19) an expert judge of time and circumstances; 20) sees and speaks on the authority of the scriptures--the Veda; 21) pure; 22) self-controlled; 23) steadfast; 24) forbearing; 25) forgiving; 26) grave; 27) self-satisfied; 2Cool possessing equilibrium; 29) magnanimous; 30) religious; 31) heroic; 32) compassionate; 33) respectful; 34) gentle; 35) liberal; 36) shy; 37) protector of surrendered souls; 3Cool happy; 39) well-wisher of devotees; 40) controlled by love; 41) all-auspicious; 42) most powerful; 43) all-famous; 44) popular; 45) partial to devotees; 46) very attractive to all women; 47) all-worshipable; 4Cool all-opulent; 49) all-honorable; and 50) the Supreme controller.

These fifty qualities, however, may also be found in varying degrees in some of the jivas or common living entities in this universe. But they are found in Lord Krishna to an unlimited degree. But besides these 50 qualities, there are five more which may also be manifested at times in the forms of Lord Brahma and Shiva. These are: 51) changeless; 52) all-cognizant; 53) ever-fresh; 54) sat-cid-ananda-vigraha--possessing a transcendental form of eternity, full of knowledge and absolute bliss; and 55) possessing all mystic perfection.

Beyond the above mentioned qualities, which may be seen in other forms of Divinity such as the demigods, Lord Krishna has the following exceptional qualities which are also manifested in the form of Narayana or Vishnu, His form as the Lord of Vaikuntha. These are: 56) inconceivable potency; 57) uncountable universes are generated from His body; 5Cool the original source of all incarnations; 59) the giver of salvation to the enemies He kills; and 60) the attractor of liberated souls.

Besides the above-mentioned traits, Lord Krishna has four more qualities that are found only in Him, and not even in His forms of Vishnu, not to mention any of the demigods. These are: 61) the performer of wonderful pastimes (especially his childhood pastimes); 62) surrounded by devotees endowed with unsurpassed love of Godhead; 63) the attractor of all living entities in all universes through the expert playing of His flute; and 64) possessor of unexcelled beauty without rival. All of these qualities are those of someone who has a highly developed form and personality.

http://www.stephen-knapp.com/sri_krishna.htm

The question is answered from another angle - along with a definition of God - in this article:
http://www.davidicke.com/forum/archive/index.php/t-10505.html


Choose one quality. We'll discuss that.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Kuros



Joined: 27 Apr 2004

PostPosted: Sun Jun 01, 2008 5:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

tomato wrote:

Hello, Kuros!

There is a scientific explanation for those near-death experiences.
Children don't know very many people who have passed away, so when they have near-death experiences, they imagine themselves visiting their peers.
That casts serious doubt on the notion that the soul is in Heaven during those experiences.


That's not at all what I was talking about. By near-death experience I simply meant someone who had the experience of almost dying. This has more to do with there being no atheists in the foxholes than any sort of mystical pseudo-scientific experience. I'm simply trying to say that faith and belief tend to arise when one's mortality is at stake.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Omkara



Joined: 18 Feb 2006
Location: USA

PostPosted: Sun Jun 01, 2008 5:59 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

It is rooted then in vulnerability and impotence? Then an omnipotent god is a compensation and reveals more about our psychology than any ontological reality?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Kuros



Joined: 27 Apr 2004

PostPosted: Sun Jun 01, 2008 6:30 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Omkara wrote:
It is rooted then in vulnerability and impotence? Then an omnipotent god is a compensation and reveals more about our psychology than any ontological reality?


I think that we can come to other conclusions than simply that. To say that human beings are weak because they feel frail in the full understanding of their mortality would be more than ungenerous. What separates man from the animals is his consciousness of his mortality.

But yes, belief and faith in an omnipotent God does reveal something about our psychology. It is an intellectual irony that reductionism in the social sciences, led by Marx and Freud and later pursued with more earnest (and academic rigor) by some of the post-moderns, on the one hand wants to talk about man's central motivations on a psychological level, and yet also tends to dismiss the validity of a belief in God and theological concerns so quickly. Exploration of the efficient cause, while a wonderful pursuit, cannot placate man's fear of death, a fear which is both primal and sophisticated in character. That is partly why we see frustrated partisans of the reductionist viewpoint, such as the Dawkins posse, wade into the Culture War so vigorously. Their professional endeavours have failed to persuade very many of the validity of their claims. Ironically, their professional endeavours are far more worthy than their paltry rehashing of enlightenment arguments against the belief in God.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Rteacher



Joined: 23 May 2005
Location: Western MA, USA

PostPosted: Sun Jun 01, 2008 7:34 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

God is forgiving (#25)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
Underwaterbob



Joined: 08 Jan 2005
Location: In Cognito

PostPosted: Sun Jun 01, 2008 7:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Wouldn't the idea of karma be contradictory to forgiveness? Everything good is paid for in equal amounts of bad. In order to reward the good you have to punish the bad, not forgive them.

Last edited by Underwaterbob on Sun Jun 01, 2008 8:44 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Off-Topic Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next
Page 8 of 9

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International