Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

The sleaze that shames Seoul
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> General Discussion Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
TheUrbanMyth



Joined: 28 Jan 2003
Location: Retired

PostPosted: Tue Feb 07, 2012 1:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

atwood wrote:
[
]So the majority are bid on. The growth in single source contracts and their greater possibility for fraud has already been addressed by the DOD.
And unlike what the post I was replying to implied, contracts, even single source ones, are not just handed out willy-nilly:


Quote:
Subpart 6.3�Other Than Full and Open Competition
6.300 Scope of subpart.

This subpart prescribes policies and procedures, and identifies the statutory authorities, for contracting without providing for full and open competition.
6.301 Policy.


You are aware that posting articles longer than 300 words is frowned upon by the moderators of this site? Post the link with a brief excerpt.

As for the subpart policy there are plenty of cases in which the rules are not followed or bent...which was part of what the link was pointing out.
The Pentagon claims that the level of competition has remained steady, yet over the past decade the number of sole-sources contracts has tripled and now amounts to about 40% of the value of all contracts.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
atwood



Joined: 26 Dec 2009

PostPosted: Tue Feb 07, 2012 3:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

TheUrbanMyth wrote:
atwood wrote:
[There's no we here. I stated consequences. You've shifted the argument to the 1% blah, blah, blah.

]


Actually you were the one that shifted the argument to corporations. I was responding to the poster who started out by talking about Kim Seung-youn, Jeong-Mong Koo and Lee Gun Hee.

People not corporations. And people who are in the top 1% in Korea.

When I pointed out that their counterparts in America seem to be getting off scot-free...that is when you suddenly shifted the argument to corporations.

No. I started off with individuals, namely Randy Cunningham.

Regarding corporations, though, that's a good point because it goes back to your contention of apples and oranges. The Korean miscreants were robbing their companies, the government or their shareholders. American banks have been accused of taking on too much risk in an effort to earn out-sized profits and then getting a bail-out and of misleading some clients. Capitalism run amok but not exactly criminal behavior.

And scot-free? That's not true, as I've already pointed out.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> General Discussion Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
Page 8 of 8

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International