| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee

Joined: 25 May 2003
|
Posted: Sat Jan 31, 2004 8:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Homer wrote: |
| Quote: |
| Big chains are making a killing. And the laws are the way they are probably because they want them that way. There is nothing wrong with doing privates. |
Joop...thats funny.
How dare schools (private businesses) want to make money!
Thats scandalous....
As for your link between pvts laws and big chains its no link at all.
Bobster made an excellent point in this thread about the fact that if pvts were legalized then fees would go down.
Kiwi, I noticed that bobster did indeed answer my Q about market value, its all good then. |
But a lot of times they use the ignorance of teachers to get teachers. And then lock them in with contracts.
And I would be quite sure that the reason the laws of the Korean government are the way they are is because of the influence of the hogwons.
Nothing wrong with stiffing the Korean government or the big chains. They are out to use you � use them back.
They are unscrupulous very understandable if you return the favor.
2 wrongs don't always make a right but sometimes they do. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Homer Guest
|
Posted: Sat Jan 31, 2004 9:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
Joo,
Your statement about the laws and hakwons is much too general and sweeping for it to have credibility.
It is true the hakwon industry needs reforming because some bad employers cheat.
However the hakwon lobby you are refering too is not very credible. I am sure the bigger chains must have influence on the government (like most big corporations do). However, it is a very big (an quite untenable) logical leap to say that the laws currently in place are the direct result of hakwon influence on the government.
Why is there nothing wrong with stiffing the Korean government or your employer?
What if your particular emplyer is not stiffing you? How would you justify your actions then?
This 'they' you use seems to imply that the hakwons are one monolithical entity with bad intentions that applies a concerted policy of cheating.
In reality thats not the case at all as the hakwon industry is not that coordinated and is mostly independently owned and operated schools (except for the big boys).
As for 2 wrongs sometimes making a right, perhaps this is true in certain circumstances. However your examples of two wrongs is not it.
What you say is that because you assume that all hakwons cheat their employees you are justified in cheating yourself. This cannot be taken very seriously at all. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee

Joined: 25 May 2003
|
Posted: Sat Jan 31, 2004 3:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Unless you are stealing their students you are not cheating anyone. Hogowns that treat their employees well are not going to have a big problem with privates.
I think the big boys are a major reason (not the only reason) why Korean E-2 laws are the way they are.
I agree with the rest of what you said - sort of. If you are at a good school that treats you well and allows you ample OT at a decent rate - there is no reason for you to be doing privates. on the other other hand The big chains like YBM and the others who pay so little deserve to have their teachers doing privates. Doing privates balances it out. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kiwiboy_nz_99

Joined: 05 Jul 2003 Location: ...Enlightenment...
|
Posted: Sat Jan 31, 2004 9:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I agree with Joo that it's likely that the Hagwons do have influence with the government regarding the private laws. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
TheUrbanMyth
Joined: 28 Jan 2003 Location: Retired
|
Posted: Sun Feb 01, 2004 3:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
| kiwiboy_nz_99 wrote: |
| I agree with Joo that it's likely that the Hagwons do have influence with the government regarding the private laws. |
Weren't privates made illegal before hakwons became so popular? I believe that privates were outlawed to prevent the rich from hiring private English tutors and thus giving their children a unfair advantage over those who didn't have rich parents. This is what I've heard anyway. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Homer Guest
|
Posted: Sun Feb 01, 2004 5:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
It is true indeed that the laws about pvts predate the rise of the hakwon industry. They were put on the books in an effort to stop the two speed education system (this did not work in the end of course!).
The E-2 visa is an immigration policy initiative. Its tailored around the basic idea that the Korean government has about foreign workers.
Agian, the hakwons are not dictating policy or law here, some of the bigger ones may have a some influence but the 'industry' as a whole.
Finally, doing pvts balances what out Joo?
If a person signs with a school-chain that pays less then others well then thats his or choice to do so. The balancing out implies that the school did something wrong here. What did they do? They offered what they feel was a good contract (of course many times these contracts are not so great compared with others as far as pay) and the person chose to sign it. No cheating here hence no balancing out needed.
As for the school deserving its teachers doing pvts thats not a very good argument.
The better argument seem to be that the person doing pvts does so because he or she just wants more money. Now thats a solid argument because its the basis of it all.
Now, what if you are hired by a decent school and make a good wage. The school does not give you 'ample OT' because it doesn't have any to give. Now, you as a teacher there (like many have pointed out in this very thread) have signed a contract that states you will respect the laws of the country. Yet, you do pvts anyway, what does that balance out?
Just keep it to the plain simple truth: its a money grab. As long as thats in the open there is no problem. Its the whole 'they' deserve it or I was shafted argument thats often used as a justification that gets annoying.
A person could even argue that if you sign a contract and your employer does not live up to it, it still does not justify pvts because in reality you should just get your release and move on to a better place without resorting to illegal pvts. But thats taking it to extremes of course....  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee

Joined: 25 May 2003
|
Posted: Sun Feb 01, 2004 6:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
The big chains get people who don�t know any better �notice YBMS tricky advertising about 90 hours a month . Then they lock them in. with E-2s.
The Korean government is creepy and so are the big chains. Privates and second location work balance what they do out.
And getting release letters has not always been so easy and it still probably isn't. A few years ago you employers were refusing to give them out and the Korean government was not forcing employeers who refused to give them out. And also for a time the Korean government was not even accepting release letters.
and the whole E-2 system (not just the part about private teaching ) is very likely influenced by the hogwons.
As I said privates help balance what they do out. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Homer Guest
|
Posted: Sun Feb 01, 2004 9:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
Joo,
Statements like this do not help you make your point. In fact they take away from the credibility of what your are trying to say.
| Quote: |
| The Korean government is creepy and so are the big chains. |
Creepy??...What is this some mafia movie?
The Korean government does have its problems as do some hakwons but your statement might need a bit of 'balancing out'...
Also:
| Quote: |
| and the whole E-2 system (not just the part about private teaching ) is very likely influenced by the hogwons. |
How? Examples...?
Finally:
| Quote: |
The big chains get people who don�t know any better �notice YBMS tricky advertising about 90 hours a month . Then they lock them in. with E-2s.
|
So people who don't know better sign these contracts and thats the school's fault???
How does that work?
Its called research and basic common sense. Its just basic sense to look up your employer and to carefully read the contract (any contract) before signing it.
Someone doing pvts under these conditions is not balancing out anything esle except their lazyness and-or lack of common sense.
If a school does not live up to its end then thats a different story of course.
An E-2 does not 'lock you in', its just the way the work visas are done. Its unfortunate they are so restrictive but thats the game for now. The structure of the E-2 is not something that you need to 'balance out' by doing pvts. You do pvts because you want more money (nothing wrong with that in itself) not to balance out some cosmic injustice....
The basic fact here Joo is that if a person signs a contract and the school respects it there is no call, except to make a money grab, to balance thinsg out. You are not getting shafted by a school that respects the contract you signed. Thats kind of basic. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee

Joined: 25 May 2003
|
Posted: Sun Feb 01, 2004 9:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
Homer: Are 3d workers who run away from their Korean employers immoral?
| Quote: |
So people who don't know better sign these contracts and thats the school's fault???
How does that work |
The big chains are at fault for the system that is in place.
| Quote: |
| An E-2 does not 'lock you in', its just the way the work visas are done. Its unfortunate they are so restrictive but thats the game for now. The structure of the E-2 is not something that you need to 'balance out' by doing pvts. You do pvts because you want more money (nothing wrong with that in itself) not to balance out some cosmic injustice |
The E-2 in the past has locked teachers in as I said above. It may still be that way.
And someone would be much better off working at several locations (as in the case of two or three company jobs. ) But this is very hard or impossible under the E-2 visa rules.
The E-2 visa rules hold down wages. Way down from what the market rates are.
The Korean government and the big chains for the most part are creepy and unworthy of much respect. Privates balance out their system |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kiwiboy_nz_99

Joined: 05 Jul 2003 Location: ...Enlightenment...
|
Posted: Sun Feb 01, 2004 10:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
Creepy??...What is this some mafia movie?
|
I certainly hope so, then when I finally get 'made' I can whack my boss and no one can touch me!
Homer, you started out stating simply that you don't do privates and don't have a problem with people who do them as long as they are prepared to face the consequences. Then you went on to write about 1000 words throwing up a whole bunch of secondary arguments against privates. That shows that your first statement is disingenuous. The reality, though you don't have the balls to come out and say it, is that you are against other people doing privates under any circumstances, and if you had your way they would all stop. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Homer Guest
|
Posted: Sun Feb 01, 2004 10:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
Oh boy..here we go again...
I am not getting into this useless debate with you kiwiboy.
Also thanks for taking yet further lower with your insults. It truly shows your quality. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kiwiboy_nz_99

Joined: 05 Jul 2003 Location: ...Enlightenment...
|
Posted: Sun Feb 01, 2004 11:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
| It's true though. A real man would stand up for his beliefs. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Homer Guest
|
Posted: Sun Feb 01, 2004 2:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Keep it up kiwiboy...your realy showing how much class you have and what kind of person you are.
Well done. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Gord

Joined: 25 Feb 2003
|
Posted: Sun Feb 01, 2004 3:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| kiwiboy_nz_99 wrote: |
| It's true though. A real man would stand up for his beliefs. |
Why are you choosing to attack the man instead of discussing the opinion? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kiwiboy_nz_99

Joined: 05 Jul 2003 Location: ...Enlightenment...
|
Posted: Sun Feb 01, 2004 4:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
OK fair call about the personal comment, I'd hardly call it a viscious attack, but I take it back and I apologise, hope that makes people feel better. All I'm doing is trying get get Homer to admit that he is actually against anyone doing privates, even though he said earlier that he doesn't care as long as they are prepared to face the risks and don't let their students down. If he is against anyone doing privates, that's as valid as any position to have on the topic, I'm just confused by how he says he doesn't care, and then posts so much about it.
I see this thread as an opinion topic that can never result in a clear answer, as it's about morals. Aside from that latest dig at Homer which I took back I've just been posting my opinion, same as anyone else. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|