Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

The UK's 'tiny minority of extremists'
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 9, 10, 11, 12  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Nowhere Man



Joined: 08 Feb 2004

PostPosted: Wed Aug 06, 2008 9:10 am    Post subject: ... Reply with quote

Quote:
And when have I ever said countries couldn't or shouldn't have immigration standards? Never. I just don't see religion as being a litmus test for immigration worthiness.


Yeah, I think that's the crux of it. What is your solution to sorting out who should and shouldn't be allowed to immigrate?

BigV, I don't want anyone to hijack your baby (pun intended), so I ask for you to grab the flag and lead off.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
contrarian



Joined: 20 Jan 2007
Location: Nearly in NK

PostPosted: Wed Aug 06, 2008 9:31 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

In allowing immigrants into any country, one of the main considerations should be to get those who will contribute the most and cause the least strain upon the existing state of the society.

As unfair as it may be to say so, people as much like us as possible.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Nowhere Man



Joined: 08 Feb 2004

PostPosted: Wed Aug 06, 2008 10:02 am    Post subject: ... Reply with quote

Well, see, this is why I wanted Biggy to lead off and not the guy who taunted a Muslim in some hidden Burger King alcove and saw Korean police make a guy lick his own spit off the street in front of the Itaewon mosque.

Part of the US's bizarre citizenship test involves questions like "Who was Old Hickory?" and "Where did the Continental Army hunker down for winter?" If you've ever seen Jay Walking, my guess is you'd doubt such questions establish how "normal" our immigrants might be. Yet, we seem to be getting a cut above the rest (which serves to contradict the original BigV line about literal translation of the Koran), but OK...

We ask them, "Are you normal like us?"

Prefer those who can break dance?

Ask what they're packing their hookah with?

Please elaborate.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
contrarian



Joined: 20 Jan 2007
Location: Nearly in NK

PostPosted: Wed Aug 06, 2008 10:46 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

My brother in law, his wife and our kids, all blue eyed blondes emmigrated to the US from Canada.

The question for the parents for immigration was: How do you spell you last name.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Nowhere Man



Joined: 08 Feb 2004

PostPosted: Wed Aug 06, 2008 11:02 am    Post subject: ... Reply with quote

Excellent?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
contrarian



Joined: 20 Jan 2007
Location: Nearly in NK

PostPosted: Wed Aug 06, 2008 1:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The immigration officer knew what he wanted. It also seems one of the two girls is working as am aeronautical engineer with a Masters from Cal Tech.

All such choices made everywhere are subjective. Anyone who thinks they should be logical and open is deluding themselves.

We like people who are "just like us'.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
huffdaddy



Joined: 25 Nov 2005

PostPosted: Wed Aug 06, 2008 5:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

contrarian wrote:
In allowing immigrants into any country, one of the main considerations should be to get those who will contribute the most and cause the least strain upon the existing state of the society.


I guess that part about the tired, poor, huddled masses, and wretched refuse is just for show.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
contrarian



Joined: 20 Jan 2007
Location: Nearly in NK

PostPosted: Wed Aug 06, 2008 6:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The huddled masses were good for the time. The US (and for that matter Canada) got mosty Europeans. That wanted to "become like us" and they were willing to work a generation of two to get it.

One the other hand Muslims in Europe and to a lesser degree in the US have become a large indigestible lump that causes more trouble than it is worth.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
TheUrbanMyth



Joined: 28 Jan 2003
Location: Retired

PostPosted: Wed Aug 06, 2008 10:24 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

huffdaddy wrote:
contrarian wrote:
One of the tests might be the reactions of the "Islamic" community. We say not all Muslims are terrorists, but nearly all terrorists are Muslim. That is very true.


Only because of the way you define terrorist. If a Muslim straps a bomb on his back and blows up a wedding party, he's a terrorist. But what is someone who drops a bomb from a plane and blows up a wedding party?



Intent and knowledge also matters though. Only if it was deliberately targeting the wedding party and KNEW that it WAS just a wedding party could the bomb-dropper be considered a terrorist.

Regardless it is a terrible thing either way, but one is a terrorist act while the other could be just be a tragic accident.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
huffdaddy



Joined: 25 Nov 2005

PostPosted: Wed Aug 06, 2008 10:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

contrarian wrote:
The huddled masses were good for the time. The US (and for that matter Canada) got mosty Europeans. That wanted to "become like us" and they were willing to work a generation of two to get it.

One the other hand Muslims in Europe and to a lesser degree in the US have become a large indigestible lump that causes more trouble than it is worth.


Ahh. The Age of Romanticism. Oh how we miss the lovable Irish and the respected Chinese. Those were the days.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
postfundie



Joined: 28 May 2004

PostPosted: Thu Aug 07, 2008 3:39 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
I just don't see religion as being a litmus test for immigration worthiness.


what if their religious belief tells some of them to hide and then kill you when the opportunity arises? Or if the belief is to call a truce until ready for war?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger
RJjr



Joined: 17 Aug 2006
Location: Turning on a Lamp

PostPosted: Thu Aug 07, 2008 5:27 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

contrarian wrote:
I am a Jew because my mother and her mother were Jews, long lapsed Jews. I even have an Israeli passport.


contrarian wrote:
Had a been born in Germany in 1940, rather than Canada I would have been given free room in Auschwitz. My mother was a Jew.


contrarian wrote:
Islam is an indigestible lump in western culture. We are better off wihtout them.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
contrarian



Joined: 20 Jan 2007
Location: Nearly in NK

PostPosted: Thu Aug 07, 2008 6:11 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Your point RJ, is?

My little bit of Jewish ancestry is a point of pride to me, as is the much more dominant strain of Dane and Scots. By religion I am an active Mormon.

The latter sure did get me a unique insight into Korea. I was accepted, as a matter of course into Korean homes.

The hard working Chinese and the Irish were certainly good choices for immigrants as were the eastern European Jews and in western Canada the Sihks and Japanese. Is that a religous choice or a cultrual one. It is the latter.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
huffdaddy



Joined: 25 Nov 2005

PostPosted: Thu Aug 07, 2008 6:39 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

contrarian wrote:
The hard working Chinese and the Irish were certainly good choices for immigrants as were the eastern European Jews and in western Canada the Sihks and Japanese. Is that a religous choice or a cultrual one. It is the latter.


Hindsight is grand. But I doubt that people in the 18th, 19th, and early 20th centuries felt that much different than you do about Muslims. If one was so inclined (which I'm not, especially since I'm leaving on vacation on Saturday), I'm sure you could find editorials with exactly the same tone and sentiment as your posts here.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
contrarian



Joined: 20 Jan 2007
Location: Nearly in NK

PostPosted: Thu Aug 07, 2008 6:44 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yes, you probably could. On the other hand the people already in any given country should have the big part of the choice who joins them.

If the Brits don't want any more Muslims that, in a democracy, should be their choice.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 9, 10, 11, 12  Next
Page 10 of 12

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International