Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

a few questions about my new computer
Goto page Previous  1, 2
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Technology Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
bassexpander



Joined: 13 Sep 2007
Location: Someplace you'd rather be.

PostPosted: Wed Dec 26, 2007 3:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The difference in the HD would bug me if the cache size were smaller than I originally ordered. That can have a significant effect on speed.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
ttompatz



Joined: 05 Sep 2005
Location: Kwangju, South Korea

PostPosted: Fri Dec 28, 2007 1:53 am    Post subject: Re: a few questions about my new computer Reply with quote

Demophobe wrote:
ttompatz wrote:
Beej wrote:
I had a computer built at yongsan yesterday. It was supposed to have a 500gig SEAGATE Sata HD. But he put in a Western Digital. Should I be concerned?
I also specified 4 gigs of Ram. But only 3.5 gigs show up when I look under system properties. Is this usual as HD space shows up as less than the disks actually are.

Thanks.


In my opinion the difference in price and quality between those 2 brands of HDD are negligible. No worry.

The RAM thing is a windows issue. You are running 32 bit windows and it can only address 3.5 gigs of RAM. IF you want to use all 4 gigs you will have to switch to a 64 bit version of windows (XP-64 bit or VISTA 64 bit).


It's not a Windows issue, its a hardware issue.


OK... let me rephrase to be more precise.

It is an O/S issue. WinXP-pro 32 bit is NOT capable of addressing more than about 3.5 GB of RAM (even if it is installed and the hardware supports it.)

Switching to a 64 bit O/S will solve his problem. Options are: UNIX, LINUX (64 bit), WinXP-64 bit or VISTA (64 bit).

And that makes it a SOFTWARE / Operating System issue, NOT a hardware issue.

.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Demophobe



Joined: 17 May 2004

PostPosted: Fri Dec 28, 2007 2:22 am    Post subject: Re: a few questions about my new computer Reply with quote

ttompatz wrote:
Demophobe wrote:
ttompatz wrote:
Beej wrote:
I had a computer built at yongsan yesterday. It was supposed to have a 500gig SEAGATE Sata HD. But he put in a Western Digital. Should I be concerned?
I also specified 4 gigs of Ram. But only 3.5 gigs show up when I look under system properties. Is this usual as HD space shows up as less than the disks actually are.

Thanks.


In my opinion the difference in price and quality between those 2 brands of HDD are negligible. No worry.

The RAM thing is a windows issue. You are running 32 bit windows and it can only address 3.5 gigs of RAM. IF you want to use all 4 gigs you will have to switch to a 64 bit version of windows (XP-64 bit or VISTA 64 bit).


It's not a Windows issue, its a hardware issue.


OK... let me rephrase to be more precise.

It is an O/S issue. WinXP-pro 32 bit is NOT capable of addressing more than about 3.5 GB of RAM (even if it is installed and the hardware supports it.)

Switching to a 64 bit O/S will solve his problem. Options are: UNIX, LINUX (64 bit), WinXP-64 bit or VISTA (64 bit).

And that makes it a SOFTWARE / Operating System issue, NOT a hardware issue.

.


Its a hardware issue.

32 bit versions of Windows support 4GB of RAM.

Code:
232 = 4,294,967,296

4,294,967,296 / (1,024 x 1,024) = 4,096


You lose with memory mapping for other IO (one graphics card alone will cost you about .5GB), thus 3.2 ~ 3.5 shows up. This IO hole is invisible to the OS: it cannot be used, so it isn't there but that doesn't mean that your 4GB isn't there or being utilized.

64 bit hole explained (PDF)

Another view:

Enable the /PAE switch, AWE and maybe the /SOS switch (in Server 2000) and all is well, but then crappy drivers become problems. Thus MS decided to write the 32 bit address limits into the kernel, making it appear a Windows thing. It's not. Or at least, it doesn't have to even appear that way. Also, you need the supporting chipset...beware.

If it is a Windows thing, why do the latest Intel Core Duo-based iMacs have the same issue?

Linux supports more because it uses the /PAE switch, at a 3 ~ 6% performance hit.

This may seem to support your position, but when you spend $80,000, the software and drivers will indeed support both PAE and AWE. No Firefox on that baby!

Here is another article that supports the hardware making it look like a software issue. Hardware supports a hack, then blames software when it doesn't. And, by the way, it isn't Windows that doesn't support 36 bit addressing. Wink

This IS a hardware problem and if you insist otherwise, proof will be necessary and interesting.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Technology Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2
Page 2 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International