| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
regicide
Joined: 01 Sep 2006
Location: United States
|
 Posted: Fri Feb 29, 2008 3:15 am Post subject: |
 |
|
| huffdaddy wrote: |
| regicide wrote: |
Well gollee--- no I haven't. I guess that is really interesting (for the umpteenth time) now that you mention it. Thanks Sarge |
Now maybe you know how we feel about all of your assassination threads. If not, I'll continue to drive the point home. |
I get your point and then some.
| JMO wrote: |
Wait a minute! So this means, Oswald didn't act alone..oh my god!
In all honesty, I would like to see more of the methodology used and these results repeated. It does just look like science correcting itself..you know what its supposed to do. |
Understand?
When I can read discussions on this forum and not run into this:
| stevemcgarrett wrote: |
stillnotking dropped more poop as he sprinted away:
| Quote: |
Buckley bears more responsibility than any other single person for the creation of the military-industrial complex that Eisenhower warned against. He single-handedly began the strain of modern conservatism that reached its apotheosis in George W. Bush. In his later years he grew to distrust and dislike his creation, but by then it was too late and his disciples were no longer listening to him.
He successfully challenged the dominant liberal orthodoxy of his day, only to find that what replaced it was infinitely worse. |
You sound suspiciously like EFL Trainer aka BLT aka keane. Come clean, Nowhere Man. We promise not to snicker--much.
A little bit of chronology for you: Eisenhower's admonition predates Buckley's rise to public influence. You should be a staffer for the Regicide Center on Government Conspiracies. |
I will go straight. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
JMO
Joined: 18 Jul 2006
Location: Daegu
|
| Posted: Fri Feb 29, 2008 4:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
double post
Last edited by JMO on Fri Feb 29, 2008 4:10 am; edited 4 times in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
JMO
Joined: 18 Jul 2006
Location: Daegu
|
| Posted: Fri Feb 29, 2008 4:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
So...? 1, 2 or 3?
In terms of all the JFK threads, I love them(I'm a 3) so keep them coming Regi. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
regicide
Joined: 01 Sep 2006
Location: United States
|
| Posted: Fri Feb 29, 2008 4:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
| JMO wrote: |
So...? 1, 2 or 3?
In terms of all the JFK threads, I love them(I'm a 3) so keep them coming Regi. |
| JMO wrote: |
Based on the following scale Regi, how happy would you be if Obama got shot?
1> Semi-erect.
2> Erect.
3> Humping your homemade JFK head model in the exit wound.
People need to know. |
Quoted for the mod team. This has gone too far. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
JMO
Joined: 18 Jul 2006
Location: Daegu
|
| Posted: Fri Feb 29, 2008 4:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
Yea, yea..I know..
But..1, 2 or 3?
Come on, think of all that righteous anger against the system. All those conspiracies to be conjured up...My god man, it would be conspiracy theorist christmas.
What about if Obama was killed in a fire that resulted from a plane crash in another 911 style tragedy, in a building made of steel? Steel!!
I think that would probably break the scale. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Intrepid
Joined: 13 May 2004
Location: Yongin
|
| Posted: Fri Feb 29, 2008 4:38 am Post subject: Post will be deleted but... |
|
|
| JMO wrote: |
Based on the following scale Regi, how happy would you be if Obama got shot?
1> Semi-erect.
2> Erect.
3> Humping your homemade JFK head model in the exit wound.
People need to know. |
JMO, Nice 1 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
