Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Attention Breatharians:
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Off-Topic Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
JMO



Joined: 18 Jul 2006
Location: Daegu

PostPosted: Fri Oct 24, 2008 6:28 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Noetic sciences and parapsychology? That list has the opposite effect to what you intended.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Rteacher



Joined: 23 May 2005
Location: Western MA, USA

PostPosted: Fri Oct 24, 2008 7:06 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The Skeptical Investigations website is organized by the Association for Skeptical Investigation, the purpose of which is to promote genuine skepticism, the spirit of enquiry and doubt, within science. This includes an open-minded investigation of unexplained phenomena, a questioning of dogmatic assumptions, and a skeptical examination of the claims of self-proclaimed skeptics.
http://www.skepticalinvestigations.org/aboutsi/index.htm

Sounds like a closed-minded, dogmatic assumption, "JMO", et al - especially since there are distinguished professors and universities listed...

Appears to be more good skeptical analysis on Randi here:
http://www.skepticalinvestigations.org/exam/index.htm
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
mindmetoo



Joined: 02 Feb 2004

PostPosted: Fri Oct 24, 2008 7:39 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Rteacher wrote:
"Mindmetoo's" remark gives the impression that the article on (the late) James Randi is presented by some nondescript bozos lacking academic credentials.


Randi isn't dead. As Cremo demonstrates, even someone with a phd can write any crap. Who cares what letters they have?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Rteacher



Joined: 23 May 2005
Location: Western MA, USA

PostPosted: Fri Oct 24, 2008 8:54 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Well, in addition to his Ph.D, Brian Josephson (one of the Associates/Advisors of the Association for Skeptical Investigation) is a Nobel Prize-winning physicist and retired professor at the University of Cambridge.

Josephson is one of the more well-known scientists who say that parapsychological phenomena may be real, and is also interested in the possibility that Eastern mysticism may have relevance to scientific understanding.[3] He has said that one of his guiding principles has been nullius in verba (take nobody's word), saying that "if scientists as a whole denounce an idea, this should not necessarily be taken as proof that the said idea is absurd; rather, one should examine carefully the alleged grounds for such opinions and judge how well these stand up to detailed scrutiny."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brian_David_Josephson

Another affilialte, mathematician Ralph Abraham, is also a noted scholar on the cutting edge.

Ralph Abraham earned his Ph.D. from the University of Michigan in 1960, and held positions at Berkeley, Columbia, and Princeton. He has also held visiting positions in Amsterdam, Paris, Warwick, Barcelona, Basel, and Florence.

He founded the Visual Math Institute[1] at UC Santa Cruz in 1975, at that time it was called the "Visual Mathematics Project". He is editor of "World Futures" and for the "International Journal of Bifurcations and Chaos". Abraham is a member of cultural historian William Irwin Thompson's "Lindisfarne Association".

Abraham has been involved in the research frontier and the development of dynamical systems theory in the 1960s and 1970s. He has been a consultant on chaos theory and its applications in numerous fields, such as medical physiology, ecology, mathematical economics, psychotherapy, etc.[2]

Another interest of Abraham's concerns alternative ways of expressing mathematics, for example visually or aurally. He has staged performances in which mathematics, visual arts and music are combined into one presentation...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brian_David_Josephson

Great scientists tend to be open-minded - not closed-minded or dogmatic

Of course, there are fake pyschics - but they're often not much different from magicians (like Randi) who get paid for providing entertainment.

Whenever something is perceived as valuable - like diamonds - there is sure to be some fakes.

There may be lots of "fool's gold", but only a fool would conclude on that basis that there is no real gold.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
JMO



Joined: 18 Jul 2006
Location: Daegu

PostPosted: Fri Oct 24, 2008 3:30 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

It doesn't matter if he won a nobel prize.

Unless he won a Nobel prize demonstrating that elements of parapsychology actually exist, then it is irrelevant.

I agree with this quote.

Quote:
"if scientists as a whole denounce an idea, this should not necessarily be taken as proof that the said idea is absurd; rather, one should examine carefully the alleged grounds for such opinions and judge how well these stand up to detailed scrutiny."


This is fair. I have examined all your posts and none hold up to scientific scrutiny. They are opinion pieces as you have yet to display any evidence for your beliefs. I remain open minded, but at this point very skeptical towards these ideas.

So in that spirit, please present your evidence that ancient mystics lived for hundreds or thousands of years. Your sources should be credible scientific papers. You should stick to the point. I'm not interested in your opinion.

Also please present evidence that there are real psychics. In fact for any claim you make, present evidence from credible scientific journals. If you are going to play scientist, play by the rules.

In these two cases also the scientific consensus is overwhelmingly against you. Therefore your evidence should be massive.

This is a basic tenet of science. It is open to new ideas but those ideas will be attacked and dissected to see if they hold water. If you present a new idea that is truly breathtaking, like ancient mystics lived for thousands of years, your evidence must be overwhelming. I look forward to seeing it.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mindmetoo



Joined: 02 Feb 2004

PostPosted: Fri Oct 24, 2008 4:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Rteacher wrote:
Well, in addition to his Ph.D, Brian Josephson (one of the Associates/Advisors of the Association for Skeptical Investigation) is a Nobel Prize-winning physicist and retired professor at the University of Cambridge.


Argument from improper authority. I would trust him to devise an adequate experiment for PK. But his opinion about the reality of PK is pointless until he demonstrates such in the lab and it's independently repeated.

Quote:
Of course, there are fake pyschics - but they're often not much different from magicians (like Randi) who get paid for providing entertainment.


Which is why PK researchers NEED someone like Randi. Josephson may be a smart man but he's not a magician. Randi used to confound Richard Feynman, a Nobel winner himself. Feynman was smart enough to know he knew what he knew but he didn't know sleight of hand.

Quote:
There may be lots of "fool's gold", but only a fool would conclude on that basis that there is no real gold.


If you keep looking for gold and only find fool's gold, you begin to conclude the safe bet is probably there is only fool's gold. Even you, Rteacher, if you ordered from Amazon.com and didn't get what you ordered and then you tried it again and again didn't get what you ordered and then tried it again and didn't get what you ordered, might after the third time conclude the safe money bet is that Amazon.com is incapable of delivering what it promises. Sure maybe they'll get the order right the next time or the next time but you're going to stop. You're going to demand very good evidence that Amazon.com can fulfill orders to give it a fourth try.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Rteacher



Joined: 23 May 2005
Location: Western MA, USA

PostPosted: Fri Oct 24, 2008 4:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

(Maybe that's why Amazon.com's stock has nosedived ... Surprised )

This forum is for the expression of opinion as well as fact, and I've stated my opinion - based on careful study of Vedic scriptures and philosophy - that there is no compelling reason not to accept ancient accounts of mystic yoga feats as factual.

The Vedic model of different cosmic ages appearing in cycles, with this age being the least advanced in terms of pyschic abilities of humans, is consistent with the observation that such things are certainly very rare in the modern context.

I think the point of that quote - which you [JMO] claim to agree with - is that the alleged grounds for rejecting evidence of extraordinary paranormal and pyschic phenomena given by scientists should also be scrutinizingly studied in detail to uncover any strong biases (philosophical or otherwise).

I don't agree that the burden of proof for testing such extraordinary claims should be "massive" - that seems like an unnecessary filter to protect status quo ideas.

Anyway, I've got to write up about 20 lesson plans by Thursday, so I won't have much time to research this topic in the meantime...


Last edited by Rteacher on Sat Oct 25, 2008 5:44 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
Underwaterbob



Joined: 08 Jan 2005
Location: In Cognito

PostPosted: Fri Oct 24, 2008 5:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Rteacher wrote:
"Mindmetoo's" remark gives the impression that the article on (the late) James Randi is presented by some nondescript bozos lacking academic credentials.
...

Aah, I see. They're not not nondescript bozos, they're distinguished bozos. A mathematician and a bunch of psychic "scientists", sheesh.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
JMO



Joined: 18 Jul 2006
Location: Daegu

PostPosted: Fri Oct 24, 2008 6:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Rteacher wrote:

I don't agree that the burden of proof for testing such extraordinary claims should be "massive" - that seems like an unnecessary filter to protect status quo ideas.



Of course, it should be massive. You make an extraordinary claim, then the evidence should be likewise.

You can't tell me mystics lived for thousands of years and then back that up, with for example, turtles live long and they breathe less. That is insufficient evidence for the claim by a long, long way.

I don't think you have that evidence, which is why you complain about the filter. This filter is applied to everyone.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mindmetoo



Joined: 02 Feb 2004

PostPosted: Sat Oct 25, 2008 4:44 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Rteacher wrote:
I don't agree that the burden of proof for testing such extraordinary claims should be "massive" - that seems like an unnecessary filter to protect status quo ideas.


Then you would try a fifth time with amazon.com? No. You missed my analogy. Geez. If you keep failing, you're going to demand a very high level of evidence the next time.

Science is the process of detroying the status quo. Do you seriously think science is just holding "we were right" parties? Scientists make their name on showing why our current knowledge is wrong or inaccurate. You have, admittedly, zero knowledge of working science but you always feel free to make grand claims about how science operates. Again, that's like me having almost zero knowledge of your religion but making sweeping claims you're all wife swapping satan worshipers. You must be an immoral person to believe in such a bizarre and immoral religion. Right?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Leslie Cheswyck



Joined: 31 May 2003
Location: University of Western Chile

PostPosted: Sat Oct 25, 2008 5:28 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Oh hell, I'll be the first to post it.

http://au.youtube.com/watch?v=FFG--wvb9Xo&feature=related
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Rteacher



Joined: 23 May 2005
Location: Western MA, USA

PostPosted: Sat Oct 25, 2008 6:24 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

No one on this thread has attempted to discredit this apparently good evidence that a human can indeed servive for extended periods without any food or water.

Of course, hard-core materialistic skeptics under the cloak of science would probably prefer to disect him like a frog before conceding that any supernatural component is involved.

Others will likely just ignore it, content to make puns like the fakir is a faker (despite no real evidence of that - as far as I could ascertain...)

Fasting fakir flummoxes physicians

By Rajeev Khanna
BBC correspondent in Ahmedabad


Doctors and experts are baffled by an Indian hermit who claims not to have eaten or drunk anything for several decades - but is still in perfect health.

Mr Prahlad Jani under surveillance in hospital

Prahlad Jani, a holy man, or fakir, who is over 70 years old, has just spent 10 days under constant observation in Sterling Hospital, in the western Indian city of Ahmedabad.

During that time, he did not consume anything and "neither did he pass urine or stool", according to the hospital's deputy superintendent, Dr Dinesh Desai.

Yet he is in fine mental and physical fettle, say doctors.

Most people can live without food for several weeks, with the body drawing on its fat and protein stores. But the average human can survive for only three to four days without water.

Followers of Indian holy men and ascetics have often ascribed extraordinary powers to them, but such powers are seldom subject to scientific inspection.

Mouthwash

"A series of tests conducted on him show his body mechanism is that of a normal person," said Dr Desai.

Mr Jani spends most of his time in a cave near the Ambaji temple in Gujarat state.

He has never fallen ill and can continue to live like this

Bhiku Prajapati, Mr Jani's devotee

He spent his 10 days in hospital in a specially prepared room, with a sealed-off toilet and constant video surveillance.

To help the doctors verify his claims, Mr Jani agreed to avoid bathing for his time in hospital.

The only fluid he was allowed was a small amount of water, to use as mouthwash.

One hundred millilitres of water were given to him, and then collected and measured in a beaker when he spat it out, to make sure none had been drunk.

Thank goddess

A statement from Ahmedabad's Association of Physicians says that despite no water entering his body, urine nonetheless appeared to form in his bladder - only to be re-absorbed by the bladder walls.


Hungry for blessings: Mr Jani receives a devotee in hospital

At the end of his confinement, doctors noted no deterioration in his condition, other than a slight drop in his weight.

"I feel no need for food and water," says Mr Jani, who claims he was blessed by a goddess at the age of eight and has lived in caves ever since.

He grew up in Charod village in Mehsana district and wears the dress of a devotee of the goddess Ambaji - a red sari-like garment, nose ring, bangles and crimson flowers in the hair.

He also wears the vermilion "tika" mark on his forehead, more often seen on married Hindu women.

His followers call him "mataji" or goddess.

More tests

He says he has survived several decades without food or water because of a hole in his palate.

Drops of water filter through this hole, he says, sustaining him.

"He has never fallen ill and can continue to live like this," said Bhiku Prajapati, one of Mr Jani's many followers.

"A hole in the palate is an abnormal phenomenon," says Dr Desai.

His colleague, Dr Urman Dhruv, told the BBC a full medical report is being prepared on Mr Jani's 10 days under observation.

Doctors say they cannot verify his claim to have not eaten or drunk for decades - but by observing his feat under laboratory conditions, they hope to learn more about the human body.

It is likely that doctors will want to examine Mr Jani again in order to solve the medical mystery he has presented them with.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/3236118.stm

The amazing thing is that in India most people have seen, heard, or personally encountered so many real - as well as so many fake - yogis and mystics that an account like this is just taken in stride ...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
Underwaterbob



Joined: 08 Jan 2005
Location: In Cognito

PostPosted: Sat Oct 25, 2008 8:23 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Rteacher wrote:
No one on this thread has attempted to discredit this apparently good evidence that a human can indeed servive for extended periods without any food or water.


A newspaper article is not evidence.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
Rteacher



Joined: 23 May 2005
Location: Western MA, USA

PostPosted: Sat Oct 25, 2008 2:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

It also requires critical thinking to weigh what's presented in a news report, including the credibility of the source and how quotes are referenced.

Most people rely on journalists for factual news accounts - regardless of whether they (the journalists) are experts in that particular field or not. The main thing is that they get the basic facts straight and present them objectively.

I think that only a fool - or an extremely biased person - would totally reject a clearly written report by a local BBC correspondent in a major Indian city.

Of course, a conspiracy-theorist might suspect an elaborate hoax - or a plot to discredit the materialistic world view...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
mindmetoo



Joined: 02 Feb 2004

PostPosted: Sat Oct 25, 2008 4:49 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Randi tested one. They saw the guy leave his motel room and buy a bag of hot dogs. He claimed he only intended to smell them. Test over.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Off-Topic Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Page 2 of 4

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International