| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
blackjack
Joined: 04 Jan 2006
Location: anyang
|
 Posted: Mon Feb 16, 2009 4:19 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
| Temporary wrote: |
| Joe666 wrote: |
| Gentlemen - I belive the single family home is partly correct. It goes much further than that. Men are losing their masculinity due to multiple cultural aspects of our lovely planet. Men are slowly becoming obsolete due to equality of females, womens lib. etc. Women can have children without a male partner. Less males in the workforce (women taking positions that men would have acquired) leading to possibly these males staying at home, doing the chores etc. The equality aspect is a major contributor. I do not mean to sound sexist at all, just a fact. Plus the Y chromosome is a piece of shit. It's a decay product. Has been decaying for thousands of years. There will come a point in time (if humans don't self-extinguish) that there will be no male conterparts in the animal kingdom. It is already happening in some fish species. Since all of the animal kingdom originated in the seas, that would most likely be the place to first see the loss of the sexual male conterpart of a species. also, no more lands to conquer. A lot less wars are prevelent. There are a shit load of reasons for your comments!! |
Also the Y chromosone is much more suceptible to mutigens. Lots of chemicals harmless to females are very harmful to males.
I for 1 hope the human race becomes extinct. Imho it doesn't deserve to survive. But just like the roach or the rat we will most likely find a way. |
Like what? This is rubbish, sperm is susceptible as it is stored in a highly absorbent bag. But the y chromsome itself; going to have to ask for evidence here
Last edited by blackjack on Mon Feb 16, 2009 5:49 pm; edited 2 times in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
michaelambling
Joined: 31 Dec 2008
Location: Paradise
|
| Posted: Mon Feb 16, 2009 4:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| ReeseDog wrote: |
Every now and then, I like to go into the woods, kill something, eat its heart raw (tradition), make a fire, and cook and eat its flesh out there, washing it down with quantities of beer. Afterward, satiated by the fresh meat and the thrill of the hunt, lying under the stars by the dying fire, I like to read a little Hemingway as I drift off to sleep.
Now I ask, is that gay? |
Depends--are balls touching? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ReeseDog
Joined: 05 Apr 2008
Location: Classified
|
| Posted: Mon Feb 16, 2009 5:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| michaelambling wrote: |
| ReeseDog wrote: |
Every now and then, I like to go into the woods, kill something, eat its heart raw (tradition), make a fire, and cook and eat its flesh out there, washing it down with quantities of beer. Afterward, satiated by the fresh meat and the thrill of the hunt, lying under the stars by the dying fire, I like to read a little Hemingway as I drift off to sleep.
Now I ask, is that gay? |
Depends--are balls touching? |
Certainly not! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
aboxofchocolates
Joined: 21 Mar 2008
Location: on your mind
|
| Posted: Mon Feb 16, 2009 6:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| blackjack wrote: |
Like what? This is rubbish, sperm is susceptible as it is stored in a highly absorbent bag. But the y chromsome itself; going to have to ask for evidence here |
Just curious: what about this particular assertion among the dozens of assertions presented inspires your desire for evidence? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
aboxofchocolates
Joined: 21 Mar 2008
Location: on your mind
|
| Posted: Mon Feb 16, 2009 6:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Joe666 wrote: |
| Your fish story still does not explain why at this point in time, male fish of some species are gone and the females of these species are providing offspring asexually. |
I'm not clear on that, either. Are asexually reproducing fish feminized male fish or butchified female fish? What do you think?
[quote="Joe666"]Your statement sounds like these facts happened thousands of years ago. quote]
You got me, fossils are pretty old, or so I've heard.
[quote="Joe666"] And the opening statement "near the end of the male fish reign" makes it sound like there are no more male fish. /quote]
Oops, I didn't make it very clear, but I was referring to one specific species of fish. Butchtemonius Pansiphius. You can google it, but I may have gotten the spelling wrong.
| Joe666 wrote: |
| I believe this hermaphroditic scenario is fairly new to scientists. |
Hey, that belonged with the sentence before last! Ah well- so you're saying these events are happening again? Is history repeating itself? What a tragedy for these newer species of fish.
You sound like a cowboy! Now there is nothing sadder in our society than the gayification of the cowboy. Brokeback Mountain was an excellent piece of cinema and did a lot to reveal the deep rooted gayness pervasive in the cowboy circles (Midnight Cowboy was a little too subtle for the masses) but there is something tragic to know that the role models of so many young men have turned out to be flamers. Chances are most midwest cowboy types will be "coming out" in droves now. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ReeseDog
Joined: 05 Apr 2008
Location: Classified
|
| Posted: Mon Feb 16, 2009 6:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| aboxofchocolates wrote: |
| Chances are most midwest cowboy types will be "coming out" in droves now. |
Somehow I doubt that. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
aboxofchocolates
Joined: 21 Mar 2008
Location: on your mind
|
| Posted: Mon Feb 16, 2009 6:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| ReeseDog wrote: |
| aboxofchocolates wrote: |
| Chances are most midwest cowboy types will be "coming out" in droves now. |
Somehow I doubt that. |
You're probably right. It's safer to stay in. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Temporary
Joined: 13 Jan 2008
|
| Posted: Mon Feb 16, 2009 7:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| blackjack wrote: |
| Temporary wrote: |
| Joe666 wrote: |
| Gentlemen - I belive the single family home is partly correct. It goes much further than that. Men are losing their masculinity due to multiple cultural aspects of our lovely planet. Men are slowly becoming obsolete due to equality of females, womens lib. etc. Women can have children without a male partner. Less males in the workforce (women taking positions that men would have acquired) leading to possibly these males staying at home, doing the chores etc. The equality aspect is a major contributor. I do not mean to sound sexist at all, just a fact. Plus the Y chromosome is a piece of shit. It's a decay product. Has been decaying for thousands of years. There will come a point in time (if humans don't self-extinguish) that there will be no male conterparts in the animal kingdom. It is already happening in some fish species. Since all of the animal kingdom originated in the seas, that would most likely be the place to first see the loss of the sexual male conterpart of a species. also, no more lands to conquer. A lot less wars are prevelent. There are a shit load of reasons for your comments!! |
Also the Y chromosone is much more suceptible to mutigens. Lots of chemicals harmless to females are very harmful to males.
I for 1 hope the human race becomes extinct. Imho it doesn't deserve to survive. But just like the roach or the rat we will most likely find a way. |
Like what? This is rubbish, sperm is susceptible as it is stored in a highly absorbent bag. But the y chromsome itself; going to have to ask for evidence here |
Mutigens via pollutants already are impacting the y chromosome.
http://www.treehugger.com/files/2007/09/manmade_chemica.php
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
agoodmouse
Joined: 20 Dec 2007
Location: Anyang
|
| Posted: Mon Feb 16, 2009 7:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| OP, what's it to you? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
tiger fancini
Joined: 21 Mar 2006
Location: Testicles for Eyes
|
| Posted: Mon Feb 16, 2009 7:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| agoodmouse wrote: |
| OP, what's it to you? |
The OP is obviously racist AND homophobic, as this is Daves. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
blackjack
Joined: 04 Jan 2006
Location: anyang
|
| Posted: Mon Feb 16, 2009 7:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Temporary wrote: |
| blackjack wrote: |
| Temporary wrote: |
| Joe666 wrote: |
| Gentlemen - I belive the single family home is partly correct. It goes much further than that. Men are losing their masculinity due to multiple cultural aspects of our lovely planet. Men are slowly becoming obsolete due to equality of females, womens lib. etc. Women can have children without a male partner. Less males in the workforce (women taking positions that men would have acquired) leading to possibly these males staying at home, doing the chores etc. The equality aspect is a major contributor. I do not mean to sound sexist at all, just a fact. Plus the Y chromosome is a piece of shit. It's a decay product. Has been decaying for thousands of years. There will come a point in time (if humans don't self-extinguish) that there will be no male conterparts in the animal kingdom. It is already happening in some fish species. Since all of the animal kingdom originated in the seas, that would most likely be the place to first see the loss of the sexual male conterpart of a species. also, no more lands to conquer. A lot less wars are prevelent. There are a shit load of reasons for your comments!! |
Also the Y chromosone is much more suceptible to mutigens. Lots of chemicals harmless to females are very harmful to males.
I for 1 hope the human race becomes extinct. Imho it doesn't deserve to survive. But just like the roach or the rat we will most likely find a way. |
Like what? This is rubbish, sperm is susceptible as it is stored in a highly absorbent bag. But the y chromsome itself; going to have to ask for evidence here |
Mutigens via pollutants already are impacting the y chromosome.
http://www.treehugger.com/files/2007/09/manmade_chemica.php
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez |
The first link, well sorry I just can't trust any site called treehugger. The second doesn't link to any article
had a quick google and there does not seem to be any real evidence to support the claim that lots of chemicals are more damaging to the y chromosome |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Bucheonguy
Joined: 23 Oct 2008
Location: Bucheon
|
| Posted: Mon Feb 16, 2009 9:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| wasn't there a post about the gay agenda a few months ago? Have we considered this possibility yet? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
