View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Gord

Joined: 25 Feb 2003
|
Posted: Mon Jan 19, 2004 12:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
Gwangjuboy wrote: |
He is using the word in a legal sense. For an action under international law the territory must be "disputed." Thus, it is quite possible to claim it is not "disputed" land in a legal context. |
http://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/geos/ks.html#Issues
The CIA suggests that Korea has been properly notified by Japan that the islands are in dispute. That, and all the shooting years ago. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
matko

Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Location: in a world of hurt!
|
Posted: Mon Jan 19, 2004 1:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
On a practical note,
The Koreans effectively control the islands and refuse to go to an international court to settle the issue.
Does Japan have any recourse? Can they 'sue' the Korean government in a court that is binding? If not, the issue is dead. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
My 2 Cent

Joined: 03 Jun 2003
|
Posted: Mon Jan 19, 2004 4:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
There is a similar dispute going on (with much less volume, and pissyfits) in Europe over a big piece of quartz grantite, known simply as "Rockall".
Ireland, the UK, Iceland, and even Denmark claim the territory, and the British moved to annex it in 1972.
Greenpeace even occupied it in 1997.
A boundary agreement was drawn up between Ireland and the UK, but the matter is still unresolved.
The dispute is striking in similarity to the Tokdo dispute, but the way it's handled is quite different.
Rockall lies in the Atlantic, and it's waters are actually in prime territory for gas and oil exploration. A good agruement could be made about Irish claims, as it's closer to Ireland than any other of the above nations -- especially Denmark(?!).
Also, with respect to Korea, Ireland has more reason to be bitter and twisted over continued 800+ years of colonial rule, losing a quarter of it's population in one the world's worst humanatarian disasters of the 19th century, and even losing it's own historical language (that took 700 years to wipe out). However it hasn't turned out that way.
Although Irish nationalism is still strong today, I think there is now a certain maturity in our dealing with it compared to the Koreans.
Why don't Koreans focus on closer economic ties, and co-operation instead of petty squabbles over rocks, and sea titles, which have no real bearing on the big picture?
This flag for Rockall would keep everyone happy
Maybe we could design a Tokdo one for the Koreans and Japanesse? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
yodanole
Joined: 02 Mar 2003 Location: La Florida
|
Posted: Mon Jan 19, 2004 12:36 pm Post subject: France |
|
|
The old French maps also show the surrounding body of water as the "Sea of Japan". That settles it for me. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
kiwiboy_nz_99

Joined: 05 Jul 2003 Location: ...Enlightenment...
|
Posted: Mon Jan 19, 2004 12:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
As I understand, Dok do is currently Korean land.
So, why talk about it?
|
Because it's disputed by Japan, and they periodically bring it up as an unresolved issue. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Gwangjuboy
Joined: 08 Jul 2003 Location: England
|
Posted: Mon Jan 19, 2004 4:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Gord wrote: |
Gwangjuboy wrote: |
He is using the word in a legal sense. For an action under international law the territory must be "disputed." Thus, it is quite possible to claim it is not "disputed" land in a legal context. |
http://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/geos/ks.html#Issues
The CIA suggests that Korea has been properly notified by Japan that the islands are in dispute. That, and all the shooting years ago. |
I wasn't arguing whether the lands are legally in dispute. It was only a response to another post arguing the word was used incorrectly. I am not informed enough to take a stand on the subject of ownership of the islets. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
The Lemon

Joined: 11 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Mon Jan 19, 2004 5:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
He didn't say "disputed in a legal context". He said "disputed". Both South Korea and Japan lay claim to it. Thus, it's disputed, regardless of whether it's currently before any international court or arbitrator.
The South Koreans are playing a game with the word - if they admit the islands are "disputed" - which they are - they'll have to defend their claim, and they know their claim isn't quite as airtight as they profess. Instead they're using the "la la la I can't hear you" strategy, in the hopes that eventually the Japanese will give up.
Actually, the dispute is politically useful for some on both sides. It's a couple rocks - and yes, fishing rights - that have been elevated into symbols of national dignity. Nationalism for political purposes. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Gwangjuboy
Joined: 08 Jul 2003 Location: England
|
Posted: Mon Jan 19, 2004 6:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The Lemon wrote: |
He didn't say "disputed in a legal context". He said "disputed". Both South Korea and Japan lay claim to it. Thus, it's disputed, regardless of whether it's currently before any international court or arbitrator. |
But he did. In a literal sense, how could he deny that there isn't a dispute? There obviously is. But, as you said, if the Koreans concede that there is a legal dispute they would have to defend their position in an international court. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
peppermint

Joined: 13 May 2003 Location: traversing the minefields of caddishness.
|
Posted: Tue Jan 20, 2004 7:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yesterday I had a class of middle schoolers, and because it was close to the holidays and we'd been working hard, I let them try a little freetalking.
Their first question: "Teacher, who owns Dokdo?"
my answer : "Canada does, silly."
I've gotta ask what sort of propaganda are they teaching these kids? My university students can't seem to get passionate about anything or anyone, yet this group got pretty heated over what ammounts to a border dispute. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Gord

Joined: 25 Feb 2003
|
Posted: Tue Jan 20, 2004 8:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Oceania has always been at war with Eurasia. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Ilsanman

Joined: 15 Aug 2003 Location: Bucheon, Korea
|
Posted: Thu Jan 22, 2004 5:23 am Post subject: yes |
|
|
Korea won't go to a world court because they have no confidence in their own case. They know they will lose.
I would say most of the dispute comes from the bitter feelings from Japan.
They feel disrespected by Japan (rightfully so) and envious at times (also rightfully so). Losing even a tiny piece of land would enrage the whole Korean population. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mithridates

Joined: 03 Mar 2003 Location: President's office, Korean Space Agency
|
Posted: Thu Jan 22, 2004 6:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
I do the same thing; I tell them that Dokdo is mine, and that historically, geographically, as well as spiritually, that it is my land, uncontested. Otherwise we fight. I also made some fake documents to prove it. Here they are:
�ﱹ�� ���ϸ�, ������ 13�� 6�� �︪���� �ڸ��ϰ� �ִ� ��걹�� ���̺��� ���踦 �Ҵ� �Ŷ� �ͼӵǾ� �ظ��� ��깰�� ���� ������ �� ���� �ִ�. ��걹 ������� �� ���� �� ������� ���� �ݾ�ݳ������ ��Ȱ�� �Ͽ� ������, �������� ������ȭ �����̾�����, �� �پ ���̺� �������� �Ŷ� ����� �� ���ϰ� �շ��� ���� ���ϴ�.
.......
���� ������ ������ ���̺������Ͽ��� ��걹�� �Ϻο��ٰ� ������ 13��(512��) �︪���� ���Ҿ� �Ŷ� ���� ����ȭ�Ǿ���.
��, �߱����� 400� ����� �� �̷� ����� �־���:
�����������ߣ���
��ߣ������������������������
��
���Ҵ��
�������������
��ߣ���� ����
��
����� �������ߣ������
��(day)+��(��) = ���̺�
�и��� �� ���ε� �ƹ��� �� ��� ��...������ |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
tokki

Joined: 26 Jul 2003
|
Posted: Thu Jan 22, 2004 5:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Seriously, this is another case of Japanese evil. They think the whole world is theirs. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Gwangjuboy
Joined: 08 Jul 2003 Location: England
|
Posted: Fri Jan 23, 2004 2:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
tokki wrote: |
Seriously, this is another case of Japanese evil. They think the whole world is theirs. |
One step ahead of the Koreans, who think that Korea is the world. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
tokki

Joined: 26 Jul 2003
|
Posted: Fri Jan 23, 2004 2:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
Korea never launched any invasions. Japan is evil. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|