Nowhere Man
Joined: 08 Feb 2004
|
 Posted: Fri Jul 17, 2009 5:54 am Post subject: ... |
 |
|
Hiya,
This is what I posted:
| Quote: |
| One thing is for sure: some dude claiming to represent the "Black Agenda" flingin' poo that doesn't quite pan out (See bacasper, torture claims) will not, really, pan out. |
To be short: Mr. "Executive Editor" and his Black Panther buddy do not represent the "black agenda". There is a distinct difference between a black "forum", a black "commentator", and claiming to represent a "black agenda".
Would you have me spell out the "white agenda"?
Assuming the posts are still logged, anyone can go back and see how you described an inmate on a hunger strike as tortured.
There ya go, mate. I believe my post preceded yours. I've addressed your concerns even though mine came first.
You appear to have a problem with Obama and Iraq. Here is what I said:
| Quote: |
| Here, very simply, Obama has a campaign promise to reduce the number of troops in Iraq to the point of there not being an ongoing conflict there. He will swing in 2012 if he doesn't come through on this. He's still requesting money because the plan wasn't to suddenly cancel these conflicts on his inauguration day. |
I'd like the input of your "correctometer".
What is incorrect about the above?
Now, the Libertarians are quite an intriguing bunch. I'm not really a democrat so to speak, but it appears that it is the Ron Paul agenda you're espousing. This is the Ron Paul that backed Pat Buchanan in '92.
I'm all for third parties, but Dr. No is insane.
Nevertheless, I'd be fascinated how you reconcile Ron Paul with the positions of the Black Agenda Report.
You'll choose to fling poo instead. |
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
