|
Korean Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Ya-ta Boy
Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Location: Established in 1994
|
Posted: Mon Dec 28, 2009 2:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
There isn't much info yet about how Ali Mousavi was killed, but one report (I don't know if confirmed or not) says he was run down by a military vehicle in front of his home, then 5 people got out and shot him.
Steve Clemons reports: "But as Iran expert Barbara Slavin just wrote to me, things don't look good for Khamenei and his government. She wrote to me via Facebook: "[Khamenei] is stuck. If he begins to compromise, he's lost -- and if he doesn't, he's lost."
http://www.thewashingtonnote.com/
That sounds about right. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ya-ta Boy
Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Location: Established in 1994
|
Posted: Mon Dec 28, 2009 1:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
On the unrest in Iran: Don't just do something, stand there!
Here are some cautionary lessons to bear in mind. First, we do not know enough about internal dynamics in Iran to intervene intelligently, and trying to reinforce or support the Green Movement is as likely to hurt them as to help them. So our official position needs to measured and temperate, and to scrupulously avoid any suggestion that we are egging the Greens on or actively backing them with material aid.
Second, this is an especially foolish time to be rattling sabers and threatening military action. Threatening or using force is precisely the sort of external interference that might give the current regime a new lease on life. If you�d like to see a new government in Tehran, in short, we should say relatively little and do almost nothing. I don�t object to making it clear how much the U.S. government deplores the regime�s repressive measures, but this is one of those moment where we ought to say less than we feel.
http://walt.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2009/12/27/on_the_unrest_in_iran_dont_just_do_something_sit_there |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ya-ta Boy
Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Location: Established in 1994
|
Posted: Mon Dec 28, 2009 2:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Here's a piece on the under-reported strategy of civil disobedience in Iran:
"But the green movement is far more than simply sporadic eruptions. This is the most vibrant and imaginative civil disobedience campaign in the world.
There�s the currency campaign, for starters. Thousands of rial notes have been stamped with a simple green �V� for victory. Others bear handwritten slogans that echo the public chants denouncing the regime. Some have even been reprinted with pictures: one is a cartoon of President Ahmadinejad with �people�s enemy� written underneath. Another carries a picture from the mobile phone images of Neda Agha Soltan as she lay dying on the street from a sniper�s bullet. Underneath is written �death to the dictator� � a common public chant against Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.
The currency campaign even denounces the regime�s foreign policy. �Khamenei the non-believer is the servant of [Russian leader Vladimir] Putin,� declares one slogan, written in green, on a 20,000-rial note. Another chastises: �They stole money and give it to [Venezuelan President Hugo] Chavez.� Some messages simply appeal for others to join the campaign to write anti-regime messages on one billion banknotes. The Government reportedly tried to take the marked notes out of circulation, but found there were too many to replace."
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/middle_east/article6969094.ece
There are several other examples in the article. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Privateer
Joined: 31 Aug 2005 Location: Easy Street.
|
Posted: Fri Jan 01, 2010 12:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
| thecount wrote: |
Ah yes, the time-tested Chamberlain approach.
"Let's wait an see. Maybe the #1 state-sponsor of terrorism, led by a man calling for the complete destruction of a U.N. member-state, doesn't mean anyone harm."
Iran flies in bomb experts. Builds top-secret 3,000-centrifuge facilities hidden in mountains (Qom, anyone?) - the perfect number needed to make a bomb - when it takes 50,000 for a commercial power plant.
Their memos reveal a barely-concealed strategy of deception and delay that has stretched on over seven years just on this particular issue.
This may be "news," but they sure haven't fooled anyone. Or have they?
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/8412733.stm |
I get tired of these ignorant historical comparisons.
The Iranian army are not the Wehrmacht. Consider how many years they spent fighting Iraq, and consider how long the Iraqi army lasted against the US.
Moreover, even if Iran did develop a nuclear bomb they would be vaporized the instant they tried to use it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
caniff
Joined: 03 Feb 2004 Location: All over the map
|
Posted: Fri Jan 01, 2010 12:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Privateer wrote: |
Moreover, even if Iran did develop a nuclear bomb they would be vaporized the instant they tried to use it. |
Similar to NK: It's not just the state of Iran having nukes, it's also who Iran might possibly share them with.
You've considered this, correct? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Observe
Joined: 28 Nov 2008
|
Posted: Fri Jan 01, 2010 1:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
--
Last edited by Observe on Sun Jan 03, 2010 5:35 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ya-ta Boy
Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Location: Established in 1994
|
Posted: Fri Jan 01, 2010 10:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
"Iranian hard-liners have called for the execution of Mousavi and other opposition figures, while a previously unknown group claimed in an online posting that suicide squads were ready to assassinate opposition leaders should the judiciary fail to punish them within a week.
Iran's state prosecutor on Thursday warned opposition leaders could be put on trial if they don't denounce this week's anti-government protests.
"I explicitly and clearly state that an order to execute, murder and imprison (opposition leaders) ... won't resolve the problem," Mousavi said in a statement on his Web site, Kaleme. "I'm not afraid to be one of the martyrs people have offered in the struggle for their just demands."
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100101/ap_on_re_mi_ea/ml_iran
I suppose suicide bombers are the next step in Iran. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bacasper

Joined: 26 Mar 2007
|
Posted: Sat Jan 02, 2010 12:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| For the current government to accuse the opposition of being "anti-Allah," as a Syrian friend recently informed me, sounds like a desperation move. We may see some major change coming very soon. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ya-ta Boy
Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Location: Established in 1994
|
Posted: Sun Jan 03, 2010 4:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Call it what it is: Iran's revolution
"It has taken seven months and countless victims for the word "revolution" to be used to describe the protests in Iran. Why? There has been a tireless campaign, including by some Iranians outside Iran, to reduce the Green Movement to a call for "reforms" that keep the current government in place, with a few changes here and there.
Not so. What we are witnessing on the streets of Tehran and other cities is nothing short of a revolution - a carefully orchestrated, years-in-the-making attempt to overthrow a corrupt and repressive regime and replace it with something fundamentally more free, democratic and secular...
On Quds Day, chants of "Death to Israel" turned into "Neither Gaza nor Lebanon, I will give my life for Iran." On the anniversary of the hostage-taking at the American Embassy, "Death to America" became "Death to Russia."
The only question now is how long it will take."
http://www.nydailynews.com/opinions/2010/01/03/2010-01-03_call_it_what_it_is_irans_revolution.html
Iran could be in a pre-revolutionary state. I think for a revolution to occur, there has to be an organized opposition with a developed idea of what they are aiming for. This writer says that has been achieved.
I keep thinking back to Tiannamen Square. Repression really can work, but it has failed so far in Iran, as the Ashura demonstrations showed. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Kuros
Joined: 27 Apr 2004
|
Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2010 1:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
Here are some intemperate words on Iran:
| Hitchens wrote: |
The existence of theocratic regimes that have illegally acquired weapons of mass destruction, that are war with their own people, that are exporting their violence to neighboring countries, sending death squads as far away as Argentina to kill other people as well as dissident members of their own nationality--the existence of such regimes is incompatible with us. If there is going to be a confrontation, we should pick the time, not them. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Kuros
Joined: 27 Apr 2004
|
Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2010 2:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
Don't Bet on Regime Change in Iran
I've cut this up to comply with TOS, please visit the original article.
| Quote: |
History shows that a revolutionary movement triumphs only when two vital factors merge: it is supported by a coalition of different social classes . . .
Today, the key question is: have the recent street protests, triggered by the rigged presidential poll of last June, drawn in one or more of those segments of society which originally ignored the electoral fraud or dismissed the claims to that effect?
What has remained unchanged is the social background of the participants. They are largely young, university educated, and well dressed, equipped with mobile phones, and adept at using the Internet, YouTube, Facebook, and Twitter.
So, have bazaar merchants begun to shut their shops in solidarity with the protestors - as they did during the anti-shah movement? No again. |
I don't agree with all the analysis in the article. But the rule is sound: revolution only succeeds when embraced by a broad spectrum of society.
[This is why Tiananmen failed, it was student-led and had middle-class sympathizers, but the middle-class then was anemic and the nongmin apathetic. Moreover, troops could be brought from elsewhere to quell the uprising (China is big enough to exploit such regional divisions).]
But I agree with the article that compromise and reform are more likely than revolution. Although many of the urban youth, and the youth are many (estimated 70%), seem more secular and worldly, they don't seem to have any connection with the military being used to suppress their unrest.
But I don't know Iran very well and could be wrong. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Gopher

Joined: 04 Jun 2005
|
Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2010 6:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| What has remained unchanged is the social background of the participants. They are largely young, university educated, and well dressed, equipped with mobile phones, and adept at using the Internet, YouTube, Facebook, and Twitter. |
Internet effect, we might call this. How much power does it reflect in the real world?
| Quote: |
| So, have bazaar merchants begun to shut their shops in solidarity with the protestors -- as they did during the anti-shah movement? No again. |
Exactly.
Iran, today, is not analogous to eastern Europe 1989. More like, in the most hopeful terms, Hungary 1956 -- or better yet, Beijing 1989.
The Iranian govt is not going to fall or even embrace meaningful reform anytime soon. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|