|
Korean Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Trevor
Joined: 16 Nov 2005
|
Posted: Sun Jan 03, 2010 6:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
So what's your solution?
| peppermint wrote: |
I think the guys are missing the point a little bit. The problem isn't that you're sexually aroused by hawt chicks. That's just normal.
It's that when you're aroused, you want to do words I'm not allowed to say here to those women rather than with them. You guys are seeing these women as objects to be enjoyed rather than as people who just might enjoy doing things I'm not allowed to say here to you as well. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Deep Thirteen
Joined: 18 Jun 2009 Location: Swamp Land
|
Posted: Sun Jan 03, 2010 7:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Adventurer wrote: |
Sex sells, and since the early 1980s it has been pushed very heavily in music, especially in the late 80s. Now, it's rather mainstream. |
Damn that George Michael. I preferred sex when it was underground. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Marc Ravalomanana
Joined: 15 May 2007
|
Posted: Sun Jan 03, 2010 9:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
| peppermint wrote: |
I think the guys are missing the point a little bit. The problem isn't that you're sexually aroused by hawt chicks. That's just normal.
It's that when you're aroused, you want to do words I'm not allowed to say here to those women rather than with them. You guys are seeing these women as objects to be enjoyed rather than as people who just might enjoy doing things I'm not allowed to say here to you as well. |
Men sometimes think about a woman, "man, I bet she's great in the sack." Sometimes they share this thought with other men, who agree.
If your statement were true, this observation, and others (such as, some men like to receive oral sex from women) would be false.
Whatever regions of the male brain may or may not light up when men are aroused, men still see women as sentient beings--not inanimate objects--and sex as an interactive process. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bacasper

Joined: 26 Mar 2007
|
Posted: Sun Jan 03, 2010 11:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Fox wrote: |
| I strongly suspect Mrs. Fiske got the exact results she wanted from this test, both with regards to the brain data, and with regards to the sexism questionaire. |
Yes, I suspect the same.
I'd like to see these results replicated by others. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mises
Joined: 05 Nov 2007 Location: retired
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Adventurer

Joined: 28 Jan 2006
|
Posted: Sun Jan 03, 2010 1:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Deep Thirteen wrote: |
| Adventurer wrote: |
Sex sells, and since the early 1980s it has been pushed very heavily in music, especially in the late 80s. Now, it's rather mainstream. |
Damn that George Michael. I preferred sex when it was underground. |
I was actually a George Michael fan, though not the stuff he did in public. His music was pretty decent. I just get annoyed with hearing "Last Christmas". George's songs about sexuality was really in just one major song, and it was more about sensuality. It wasn't about objectifying women. I think Big Bird is talking about the idea of how women can be objectified. But can't also men be objectified? I mean I think both men and women can get exploited for their sexuality, desire for violence, and all kinds of pleasure. Sensuality entails sharing between men and women.
With pornography, it's simply a selfish, though pleasurable act.
I am sure women objectify men in many ways, too. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Trevor
Joined: 16 Nov 2005
|
Posted: Sun Jan 03, 2010 6:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Here is an interesting article on the modern dating/marriage thang.
http://www.singularity2050.com/2010/01/the-misandry-bubble.html
Some key 'graphs:
Executive Summary : The Western World has quietly become a civilization that undervalues men and overvalues women, where the state forcibly transfers resources from men to women creating various perverse incentives for otherwise good women to conduct great evil against men and children, and where male nature is vilified but female nature is celebrated. This is unfair to both genders, and is a recipe for a rapid civilizational decline and displacement, the costs of which will ultimately be borne by a subsequent generation of innocent women, rather than men, as soon as 2020.
The Primal Nature of Men and Women : Genetic research has shown that before the modern era, 80% of women managed to reproduce, but only 40% of men did. The obvious conclusion from this is that a few top men had multiple wives, while the bottom 60% had no mating prospects at all. Women clearly did not mind sharing the top man with multiple other women, ultimately deciding that being one of four women sharing an 'alpha' was still more preferable than having the undivided attention of a 'beta'. Let us define the top 20% of men as measured by their attractiveness to women, as 'alpha' males while the middle 60% of men will be called 'beta' males. The bottom 20% are not meaningful in this context.
Research across gorillas, chimpanzees, and primitive human tribes shows that men are promiscuous and polygamous. This is no surprise to a modern reader, but the research further shows that women are not monogamous, as is popularly assumed, but hypergamous. In other words, a woman may be attracted to only one man at any given time, but as the status and fortune of various men fluctuates, a woman's attention may shift from a declining man to an ascendant man. There is significant turnover in the ranks of alpha males
As a result, women are the first to want into a monogamous relationship, and the first to want out. This is neither right nor wrong, merely natural. What is wrong, however, is the cultural and societal pressure to shame men into committing to marriage under the pretense that they are 'afraid of commitment', while there is no longer the corresponding traditional shame that was reserved for women who destroyed the marriage, despite the fact that 90% of divorces are initiated by women. Furthermore, when women destroy the commitment, there is great harm to children, and the woman demands present and future payments from the man she is abandoning. A man who refuses to marry is neither harming innocent minors nor expecting years of payments from the woman. This double standard has invisible but major costs to society. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Gopher

Joined: 04 Jun 2005
|
Posted: Sun Jan 03, 2010 7:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
You are relying on sociobiology/evolutionary psychology and "the immortal gene."
And Peppermint, playing off the so-called study's objectives, is behaving like a feminist, moving to speak for what all women want and thus introduces ideology and even politicizes sex. Please do not do that. Some women, and many women at least sometimes, for example, love strong men doing things to them in bed. (Some men even prefer it the other way around.) Do you speak for all women (and men)? Why would you do this to sex and reproduction? Why must we always have sex with each other and never to each other?
Sexual totalitarianism and feminist prudishness out of control. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Trevor
Joined: 16 Nov 2005
|
Posted: Sun Jan 03, 2010 8:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| [quote="Gopher"]You are relying on sociobiology/evolutionary psychology and "the immortal gene." |
Good Job on the bibliography, Goph. Listen, I've been looking for a beta man to do some of my clerical work around here. I'm gonna need you to run a grammar check on all my posts, and see if you can get me a biblio on those, too. Okay? Hop to it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Manner of Speaking

Joined: 09 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Sun Jan 03, 2010 10:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| peppermint wrote: |
I think the guys are missing the point a little bit. The problem isn't that you're sexually aroused by hawt chicks. That's just normal.
It's that when you're aroused, you want to do words I'm not allowed to say here to those women rather than with them. You guys are seeing these women as objects to be enjoyed rather than as people who just might enjoy doing things I'm not allowed to say here to you as well. |
One could assume this is true only if, in this study, the males were presented with a live female in a bikini, rather than simply a photograph, and the results of the brain scans were identical. I suspect it would not be the case. Photographs, by their very nature de-personalize and de-personify living human beings, placing them in the category of something that is safe to manipulate.
If I were presented with a photograph of a snarling tiger, I might be tempted to look at it more closely. Presented with a live animal, I'd be less inclined to do so. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Manner of Speaking

Joined: 09 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Sun Jan 03, 2010 10:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Gopher wrote: |
| Are you referring to sociobiology/evolutionary psychology? |
Yes.
| Quote: |
| Even if you are not, your critique is dead on. Again, psychologists do not typically study foreign areas or foreign languages, let alone conduct studies in non-Western nations. At best they study statistics. In any case, their thinking remains fatally Western-ccentric, if not Eurocentric. |
Exactly. Some non-Western ones are starting to make a storied career by debunking these so-called studies. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Adventurer

Joined: 28 Jan 2006
|
Posted: Sun Jan 03, 2010 10:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Manner of Speaking wrote: |
| peppermint wrote: |
I think the guys are missing the point a little bit. The problem isn't that you're sexually aroused by hawt chicks. That's just normal.
It's that when you're aroused, you want to do words I'm not allowed to say here to those women rather than with them. You guys are seeing these women as objects to be enjoyed rather than as people who just might enjoy doing things I'm not allowed to say here to you as well. |
One could assume this is true only if, in this study, the males were presented with a live female in a bikini, rather than simply a photograph, and the results of the brain scans were identical. I suspect it would not be the case. Photographs, by their very nature de-personalize and de-personify living human beings, placing them in the category of something that is safe to manipulate.
If I were presented with a photograph of a snarling tiger, I might be tempted to look at it more closely. Presented with a live animal, I'd be less inclined to do so. |
1)Obviously, if someone simply sees sexually suggestive images of a woman then s/he will only think about satisfying his sexual urges.
2)What effect do pictures or pornography have on people? I know both sexes watch pornography and images.
3)In order to know that, we would need a control group that never watches or has never watched it and make a comparison. That would entail a qualitative study. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Manner of Speaking

Joined: 09 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Mon Jan 04, 2010 2:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
| No argument here. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
geldedgoat
Joined: 05 Mar 2009
|
Posted: Mon Jan 04, 2010 3:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
| I saw no pictures of sexy women. That article fails. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
NovaKart
Joined: 18 Nov 2009 Location: Iraq
|
Posted: Mon Jan 04, 2010 3:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
I wonder how many women look at pornography. I have a female friend who regularly looks at porn. Of course she's the kind of girl who will stand up when we're at a bar and say, "I need to get some weed." So she's not exactly shy about her thoughts.
I've known other women who say they masturbate and I've certainly seen women objectify men. These are women who are much more open about their sexual thoughts. I've also known women who say they could never have sex with a man they didn't love and are much more traditional. They seem to be more into romance and flowers than sex, at least openly.
So, I wonder how much of this is women conforming to traditional sexual ideas. We're at a point now in western culture where women can play sports and be non-traditional in some ways. But for women to openly talk about masturbating and looking at porn, a lot of women would still be bothered to admit that. But I'm sure we all know some women who will talk about things like oral sex and dildos in public without any shame. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|