|
Korean Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
languistic
Joined: 25 Nov 2009
|
Posted: Sun Dec 05, 2010 3:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
There is no future-proof computer shopping. Its a ruse.
If you want to play games, then just stick with your 775 socket and O/c the heck out of your current chip. Or get a Q series (depending on the prices, of which I am not sure) like the Q9550. It destroys an i3 (dual core) and when OCed (and they do O/C very well on air alone) it will compete with most i5 series CPUs. The i7 wipes the floor with everything, but really not for gaming. The GPU is the main concern for gaming right now. Your C2D may have some legs yet. I am unaware of which C2D you have, but...O/c the heck out of it.
The problem with the i series is they force you to make some pretty locked-in decisions right now. The mobos are not cheap yet and what with the range of sockets, things kinds suck. I have a Q9550 with an aging 775 mobo and have no intention of upgrading anything but the GPU, to a 6870 this winter. That will keep me gaming happily for a time yet. When prices for mobos (X58) come down, then it will be a good upgrade. For me, moving to anything but an i7 is silly, as I don't do any video encoding or the like. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Nuggets
Joined: 23 Nov 2009
|
Posted: Sun Dec 05, 2010 4:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| languistic wrote: |
There is no future-proof computer shopping. Its a ruse.
If you want to play games, then just stick with your 775 socket and O/c the heck out of your current chip. Or get a Q series (depending on the prices, of which I am not sure) like the Q9550. It destroys an i3 (dual core) and when OCed (and they do O/C very well on air alone) it will compete with most i5 series CPUs. The i7 wipes the floor with everything, but really not for gaming. The GPU is the main concern for gaming right now. Your C2D may have some legs yet. I am unaware of which C2D you have, but...O/c the heck out of it.
The problem with the i series is they force you to make some pretty locked-in decisions right now. The mobos are not cheap yet and what with the range of sockets, things kinds suck. I have a Q9550 with an aging 775 mobo and have no intention of upgrading anything but the GPU, to a 6870 this winter. That will keep me gaming happily for a time yet. When prices for mobos (X58) come down, then it will be a good upgrade. For me, moving to anything but an i7 is silly, as I don't do any video encoding or the like. |
EXACTLY! This is what I always tell people. I'm all about squeezing dry all the value of slightly older tech. Like Languistic and I said, the gpu is usually the limiting factor these days when it comes to gaming. Why spend more money when you don't have to? Your current rig with a gpu upgrade will probably last atleast a few more generations - especially with a good OC. When the CPU really starts outliving it's usefulness, THEN upgrade. By that time newer tech will be cheaper and you can carry your gpu over and save money from not being too antsy. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
vDroop
Joined: 25 Aug 2010
|
Posted: Sun Dec 05, 2010 5:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Disagree. Future-proofing is real. But perhaps mis-named, and mis-understood. Everyone knows that the speed at which hardware advances makes it impossible to be future "proof."
Futureproofing is the ability of your rig to be upgraded in the future, piece by piece to suit your personal usage, instead of buying a brand new computer.
Motherboard - should be sli/crossfire enabled, have extra ram slots
PSU - should provide far more power than your current rig needs
GPU - the highest clocked single card solution you can afford is the most future proof, it allows for the addition of a 2nd one later without performance loss compared to the future cards
Case - big enough to allow for longer graphics cards, wide enough to add an aftermarket CPU cooler, provide lots of cable management and airflow incase you suddenly get into overclocking
All of the above were things I didn't consider when building my first gaming computer. I wanted to kick myself in the ass many times for some of those mistakes. My rig was stuck and had to be sold, if I wanted to upgrade I would have needed a new mobo, psu, and case just to handle the addition of 1 graphics card. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
eamo

Joined: 08 Mar 2003 Location: Shepherd's Bush, 1964.
|
Posted: Sun Dec 05, 2010 6:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Intel are making it essentially impossible to be future-proof if you're talking about CPU's. They seem to be changing sockets almost every 'tick' of their 'tick-tock' cycle.
Another new CPU coming up in January, Sandy Bridge, guess what?! Another new socket! LGA-1155.
Of course, you'll be fine for a bit longer if you have 1156 or 1366 CPU's/mobo's........but you'll start to feel the pressure to upgrade later in 2011 when the Sandy Bridge stuff comes down in price.
All of this only applies to power-users, of course.
Languistic is definitely right that anyone who doesn't game heavily or video edit heavily should go with very good value LGA-775 stuff right now and be damned with future-proofing.......staying one generation behind the curve is a no-brainer for the casual user. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
singerdude
Joined: 18 Jul 2009
|
Posted: Sun Dec 05, 2010 9:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I agree that you can never be future-proof and that there is always something new around the corner. However, when you have a brand new socket and chipset coming out in a month and at about the same price as the current processors, I think it would be best to wait. If you want AMD, you also have a new socket and processors coming out in a couple of months. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
languistic
Joined: 25 Nov 2009
|
Posted: Mon Dec 06, 2010 3:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| vDroop wrote: |
Disagree. Future-proofing is real. But perhaps mis-named, and mis-understood. Everyone knows that the speed at which hardware advances makes it impossible to be future "proof."
Futureproofing is the ability of your rig to be upgraded in the future, piece by piece to suit your personal usage, instead of buying a brand new computer.
Motherboard - should be sli/crossfire enabled, have extra ram slots
PSU - should provide far more power than your current rig needs
GPU - the highest clocked single card solution you can afford is the most future proof, it allows for the addition of a 2nd one later without performance loss compared to the future cards
Case - big enough to allow for longer graphics cards, wide enough to add an aftermarket CPU cooler, provide lots of cable management and airflow incase you suddenly get into overclocking
All of the above were things I didn't consider when building my first gaming computer. I wanted to kick myself in the ass many times for some of those mistakes. My rig was stuck and had to be sold, if I wanted to upgrade I would have needed a new mobo, psu, and case just to handle the addition of 1 graphics card. |
All of this proves my point. By your definition, my P5K-C is still future proof. I have 4GB of RAM, with 2 open slots. It is crossfire ready and there are still socket 775 chips above the one I have. My PSU is more than I currently need and I have a full size ATX case capable of housing the latest graphics cards.
I am not trying to start something, but as I said, your post strengthens my words. Buy smart, for sure and I think we are both ultimately saying just that. The main thrust of my post was that if the OP can't go for an i7 right now, then skip the full overhaul for a bit until Intel move forward with more chips for the high-end socket. Why would anyone buy an i5 when it is doomed? It is already a limited choice; the socket may have some more chips come out, but it is forever delegated to the mainstream. The i7 socket however, has a future ( though again, as eamo points out, a perhaps limited one) simply due to it being the flagship right now. Why buy the crippled brother who will forever be on at least one crutch (if you can forgive the non-pc analogy [and the pun in my apology])? It seems like the old Celerons; imagine of Intel had made a different socket for that chip; who in their right mind would have bought it? The only reason the Celerons had appeal was the option to move to a full-fledged P4 without a new mobo, which is currently not the case. The i5 is the Celeron of the true on-die memory controller quad-core i7 CPU but Intel have gone with a different socket, thus trapping us in mediocrity.
The OP would be smart to sink money into a strong GPU and overclock the CPU until the next gen, high-end Intel parts emerge. Frankly, and to re-state what eamo said, what Intel are doing right now sucks for the consumer; we have many choices still, but those choices will have a longer-lasting effect on the future of our machines. I have been a high-end buyer since 1998; I spent 700,000 on the 256MB Radeon 9800 when it came out, but those days are gone. Sure, my circumstances have changed and that is a big factor in my decision-making, but nonetheless, I would like to think that I have become a wiser shopper as tech has evolved. I am no longer forced to go top-shelf to get great performance that has a future.
I agree that "future-proof" may be simply the wrong term. Let's call it 'intelligent' or 'forward-thinking' then, as I think that is what we are both really saying. I will take a small issue with eamo's idea that a heavy gamer needs the i series CPUs; they just haven't shown enough of a significant gain in gaming to warrant the expenditure of moving away from a Q series 775 chip, as the memory bus speed has yet to make a huge impact in gaming (it may enhance loading times and any significant HDD I/O function though). Very few games are CPU-reliant, and even fewer truly multi-threaded, despite it being a very mature technology. Of course this will change very, very soon (maybe changing is the right tense), but gaming is currently a GPU's concern; even a C2D overclocked will power a rig with a strong GPU. My Q9550 @ 3.6 on air with a 1GB 6870 will pull just as well as an i7. No, not totally equal, but in terms of value, it will rock with a negligible difference overall.
We should also start blathering on about SSDs...they will also make a difference as games become larger and larger. Sure, much of this will be loaded into RAM, which takes us back to the i series CPUs which finally caught up to AMD and their putting the memory controller on-die, but any HDD I/O will be significantly bumped by SSDs.
Anyhow...I digress on topic. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
eamo

Joined: 08 Mar 2003 Location: Shepherd's Bush, 1964.
|
Posted: Mon Dec 06, 2010 5:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| I agree that "future-proof" may be simply the wrong term. Let's call it 'intelligent' or 'forward-thinking' then, as I think that is what we are both really saying. I will take a small issue with eamo's idea that a heavy gamer needs the i series CPUs; they just haven't shown enough of a significant gain in gaming to warrant the expenditure of moving away from a Q series 775 chip, as the memory bus speed has yet to make a huge impact in gaming (it may enhance loading times and any significant HDD I/O function though). Very few games are CPU-reliant, and even fewer truly multi-threaded, despite it being a very mature technology. Of course this will change very, very soon (maybe changing is the right tense), but gaming is currently a GPU's concern; even a C2D overclocked will power a rig with a strong GPU. My Q9550 @ 3.6 on air with a 1GB 6870 will pull just as well as an i7. No, not totally equal, but in terms of value, it will rock with a negligible difference overall. |
True. A 775 CPU with a high clock, say, over 3.4ghz, is going to just as well in most games as an i5.
My previous gaming rig, a C2D E8400 @3.6ghz with 4GB 1066mhz DDR2 and the HD5850 was getting the same framerates (maybe even better!) than my current PhenomII x6 @3.5ghz with DDR3@1600mhz and the same HD5850......
I changed to the 6-core Phenom because, well, it was cheap! 180,000! And I game much less these days thanks to the patter of little feet around the house! So, the 6-core is really good for the varied kind of computing I do now......especially for processing all those home movies of the little bundle of joy....
Gaming is almost all about the GPU........a few games really do stretch any CPU though......like GTA4.
If you're a gamer on a budget, put most of your cash into the GPU. Just get a good 775 CPU like Languistic says. The E8400 was a champ for me. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
hanguker
Joined: 16 Mar 2005 Location: Korea
|
Posted: Sun Dec 19, 2010 12:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hey Guys. I'm almost ready to buy but I'm still trying to cut some costs.
What do you think about the Athlon X4 640?
It will lower my price points by 80K and I 'think' it will work just as well as a Phenom x6 for gaming.
I've been reading that no games use the 6 cores so it's essentially useless unless you're a programmer.
Further, by the time games start using 6 cores, this chip will be obsolete (with the coming of Sandy and Bulldozer).
So would I be better off with an x4 and save some cash?
I still want to pair it with a gtx460.
Is there any advantage of having an L3 cache for gaming? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
hanguker
Joined: 16 Mar 2005 Location: Korea
|
Posted: Sun Dec 19, 2010 11:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Do you guys think I'll regret cheaping out with this upgrade?
AMD Athlon x4 640 102K
ASRock 770 Extreme3 80K
(2X= 4GB) G.SKILL DDR3 2GB PC3-10600 CL9 RIPJAWS 72K
EVGA GTX460 768MB 200K
Total: 454K
Notice I went down to an older 4 core AMD and the GTX with 768MB rather than 1GB of RAM. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Nuggets
Joined: 23 Nov 2009
|
Posted: Mon Dec 20, 2010 2:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
Not too sure if it works the same way in Korea, but I'd recommend waiting about half a month before making a purchase as Intel is about to release their new line of CPU's, and that usually means older stuff becomes cheaper.
Not too sure about AMD's line, but you'd get more value out of it when prices are lower.
But, it seems like a good low/mid gaming machine. I think you could up the settings mid/all the way on most modern games with little problems. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
hanguker
Joined: 16 Mar 2005 Location: Korea
|
Posted: Mon Dec 20, 2010 2:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
| and of course I'm going to OC the crap out of the CPU and GPU. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Nuggets
Joined: 23 Nov 2009
|
Posted: Mon Dec 20, 2010 2:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
| hanguker wrote: |
| and of course I'm going to OC the crap out of the CPU and GPU. |
Best way to upgrade for 'free'.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
languistic
Joined: 25 Nov 2009
|
Posted: Mon Dec 20, 2010 3:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
| You never did say specifically what C2D CPU you had, but it may be worth not changing that out. Overclock it, put in a nice GPU. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
hanguker
Joined: 16 Mar 2005 Location: Korea
|
Posted: Mon Dec 20, 2010 3:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
| I've got a kinda crappy e5200. Though I might try the GPU first and see what happens. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Nuggets
Joined: 23 Nov 2009
|
Posted: Mon Dec 20, 2010 4:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
| hanguker wrote: |
| I've got a kinda crappy e5200. Though I might try the GPU first and see what happens. |
Wait, now I remember this thread! Didn't some of us recommend doing that in the first place!?  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|