|
Korean Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
definitely maybe
Joined: 16 Feb 2008
|
Posted: Wed Jul 27, 2011 9:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| isisaredead wrote: |
| definitely maybe wrote: |
| isisaredead wrote: |
| eamo wrote: |
| South Africans are educated fully in English......so although some of them have the Afrikaans accent, an accent being something all us native speakers have too, they qualify for teaching here in Korea. |
that's the funniest thing i've ever read.
while this is only anecdotal, i have yet to come across a SA who has decent ability befitting an english instructor. they have ALL had truly horrendous grammar, both with writing and speaking. for some reason they all get positions at publich schools. i guess i know now why korea wants to start cutting back on "native" ESL teachers in public schools.
that said, i know of a few kiwis that use english as their second language, yet they don't have such massive difficulties with it as the SAs do.
if i were korea, i'd be hiring people who use english exclusively, to the point where they aren't bilingual. or at least just don't hire SAs. |
Nice sweeping generalization. I've met and worked with some incredibly articulate South Africans, as well as some barely coherent Americans, Aussies, Brits, and Canadians. The fact of the matter is that South Africans suffer from a stigma in Korea that often results in less than desirable hiring practices regardless of qualifications.
I don't know why, but there seems to be a large South African population in Gangneung. A number of them that I met seemed to be just fine as well. |
it's because their english isn't as good as someone from an exclusively english-speaking nation.
there, done. |
Wrong. It's because they're from a place with "Africa" in the name. I trust most of them would do just as well in the classroom as you. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
metalhead
Joined: 18 May 2010 Location: Toilet
|
Posted: Wed Jul 27, 2011 10:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Someone certainly has a chip on their shoulder about South Africans. I suppose that we should include Canadians as being bad teachers seeing as how they are not from an 'exclusively English-speaking nation', or perhaps Americans, too.
I also had no idea us South Africans were being paid less, unless 2.3 a month is not the norm and is considered low these days? Also, as mentioned, not paying pension gives the ole salary a boost (on a monthly basis at least, I have no idea how much other nationalities get back from paying pension). |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
isisaredead
Joined: 18 May 2010
|
Posted: Thu Jul 28, 2011 2:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
| metalhead wrote: |
Someone certainly has a chip on their shoulder about South Africans. I suppose that we should include Canadians as being bad teachers seeing as how they are not from an 'exclusively English-speaking nation', or perhaps Americans, too.
I also had no idea us South Africans were being paid less, unless 2.3 a month is not the norm and is considered low these days? Also, as mentioned, not paying pension gives the ole salary a boost (on a monthly basis at least, I have no idea how much other nationalities get back from paying pension). |
i couldn't care less where an instructor comes from, as long as they can do the job properly. as i prefaced in my initial post, IN MY EXPERIENCE i have yet to meet or see a SA who has more than a delicate grasp of the finer points of the english language. considering SA has eleven official languages, i can see why. for all intents and purposes, america, canada et al ARE exclusively english-speaking nations.
this same argument applies to anyone from SEA - yeah, they can speak english, and i guess they could teach here. but is that really what you want? wouldn't korea prefer someone who has grown up completely and utterly socialised and educated specifically and exclusively in english, rather than a bilingual?
yeah, that's exactly what korea wants, and i guess that's why SAs aren't highly sought after. though you wouldn't know it looking at my city.
as to the pension situation: well, yeah you "gain" an extra percentage of your wage each month by not paying into a scheme. you also lose the opportunity of doubling that percentage by not having your employer match your pension contribution. that's illegal anyhow, as even if you can't claim the pension back in a lump sum when you leave the country, both you and your employer need to be paying into it anyway.
so you tell me who comes out on top. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ddeubel

Joined: 20 Jul 2005
|
Posted: Thu Jul 28, 2011 4:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
ddeubel wrote:
It might surprise the OP that there are many qualified Korean native speakers teaching English here! O my, how shocking!
Nothing personal - just making a point. I think the issue could have been introduced or framed differently, that's all.
DD
http://eflclassroom.com
everything-is-everything wrote:
They may be qualified, but that doesn't mean they're good. I've worked with and taught many Koreans native speakers who teach English and they weren't very goog at all.
I really hope I didn't make any spelling and grammar mistakes on this post
exactly. providing the english instructor is actually TRAINED, you'll never have a better teacher than a native speaker. |
This is interesting. I have been a teacher trainer for many years. Graduated a lot of teachers at both certificate and graduate level. However, there is no research, no proof and my own experience says to me also - that training will always make a better teacher. In fact, I've met so many great teachers who day one in their class outperform "trained" teachers that I'm even thinking that qualifications are "perceptual" and even can detrain a teacher - make them worse off.
I'll throw some of the research out there in a blog post when I get the time - long term studies showing that teachers with credentials even underperform those who don't have them (but the research isn't TEFL specific, I'll note).
Do I think what I do is hopeless? No. But I don't think it solves everything and it is one small piece of the puzzle whereas you and many others see training and credentials as a total solution. I see it more as a chocolate Jesus.
DD
http://eflclassroom.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
PatrickGHBusan
Joined: 24 Jun 2008 Location: Busan (1997-2008) Canada 2008 -
|
Posted: Thu Jul 28, 2011 6:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
| isisaredead wrote: |
| everything-is-everything wrote: |
| ddeubel wrote: |
It might surprise the OP that there are many qualified Korean native speakers teaching English here! O my, how shocking!
Nothing personal - just making a point. I think the issue could have been introduced or framed differently, that's all.
DD
http://eflclassroom.com |
They may be qualified, but that doesn't mean they're good. I've worked with and taught many Koreans native speakers who teach English and they weren't very goog at all.
I really hope I didn't make any spelling and grammar mistakes on this post  |
exactly. providing the english instructor is actually TRAINED, you'll never have a better teacher than a native speaker. |
That truly depends on the invidividual. There are noticeable advantages to hiring a non-native speaker of English to teach English. Providing they are well trained and that their English is up to par, they have a concrete knowledge of what it takes to learn another language. They will know the pitfalls and challenges that come with this. Combine that with training in education and you can certainly get a superior teacher who is not a native speaker of English (ie was not raised in English as a primary language).
Add to this the possibility that this teacher is Korean in origin and they have (with proper training and sufficient proficiency in English) the inside track with Korean students and an insight that no native English speaker can hope to have initially or even after a few years.
So basically, it depends.... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ZIFA
Joined: 23 Feb 2011 Location: Dici che il fiume..Trova la via al mare
|
Posted: Thu Jul 28, 2011 6:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
| metalhead wrote: |
That said, there are a large number of Afrikaners that botch up the English language and should not be teaching it to anyone save themselves but considering how much they loathe white English-speakers in South Africa I doubt that they'd even bother with trying to improve their horrendous English.
That's right folks, the biggest rift ... between the white speakers of English and the Afrikaners. |
My father was an english south african so I spent holidays in the country.
I can back up what you say about the small-minded snobbishness of many afrikaaners towards anyone not of their blood.
They should not be teaching english I think considering how they hate speaking it when in SA.
This does not apply to south africans of english descent though. Most of them have better english than the english. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
isisaredead
Joined: 18 May 2010
|
Posted: Thu Jul 28, 2011 5:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| PatrickGHBusan wrote: |
| isisaredead wrote: |
| everything-is-everything wrote: |
| ddeubel wrote: |
It might surprise the OP that there are many qualified Korean native speakers teaching English here! O my, how shocking!
Nothing personal - just making a point. I think the issue could have been introduced or framed differently, that's all.
DD
http://eflclassroom.com |
They may be qualified, but that doesn't mean they're good. I've worked with and taught many Koreans native speakers who teach English and they weren't very goog at all.
I really hope I didn't make any spelling and grammar mistakes on this post  |
exactly. providing the english instructor is actually TRAINED, you'll never have a better teacher than a native speaker. |
That truly depends on the invidividual. There are noticeable advantages to hiring a non-native speaker of English to teach English. Providing they are well trained and that their English is up to par, they have a concrete knowledge of what it takes to learn another language. They will know the pitfalls and challenges that come with this. Combine that with training in education and you can certainly get a superior teacher who is not a native speaker of English (ie was not raised in English as a primary language).
Add to this the possibility that this teacher is Korean in origin and they have (with proper training and sufficient proficiency in English) the inside track with Korean students and an insight that no native English speaker can hope to have initially or even after a few years.
So basically, it depends.... |
good point. however, i have yet to meet a korean english teacher who can satisfyingly explain the concept of "irony" to a student.
by being raised in an exclusively english-speaking environment, we're privy to language peculiarities that a non-native speaker is not.
i agree, though. it's entirely up to the individual. were i to own a hagwon, however, i know what the bulk of my staff would be. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Weigookin74
Joined: 26 Oct 2009
|
Posted: Thu Jul 28, 2011 10:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| everything-is-everything wrote: |
| ddeubel wrote: |
It might surprise the OP that there are many qualified Korean native speakers teaching English here! O my, how shocking!
Nothing personal - just making a point. I think the issue could have been introduced or framed differently, that's all.
DD
http://eflclassroom.com |
They may be qualified, but that doesn't mean they're good. I've worked with and taught many Koreans native speakers who teach English and they weren't very goog at all.
I really hope I didn't make any spelling and grammar mistakes on this post  |
Ditto for most Filipinos I've met. They always screw it up. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
northway
Joined: 05 Jul 2010
|
Posted: Fri Jul 29, 2011 12:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
| All the South Africans I've known have been Afrikans speakers, yet they've all spoken English at a higher level than plenty of my American countrymen that I've encountered over here. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
PatrickGHBusan
Joined: 24 Jun 2008 Location: Busan (1997-2008) Canada 2008 -
|
Posted: Fri Jul 29, 2011 3:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
Were I to own a hakwon isisaredead the bulk of my teaching staff would be the people I find most qualified to teach Korean students English.
Being a native speaker certainly is not a qualification on its own (we agree on that I think).
As for Korean teachers not being able to explain irony. Great. Then again if they are able to teach English effectively in most other areas, what do I care if they cannot explain irony! Especially in lower level classes. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
isisaredead
Joined: 18 May 2010
|
Posted: Fri Jul 29, 2011 4:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
| PatrickGHBusan wrote: |
| Were I to own a hakwon isisaredead the bulk of my teaching staff would be the people I find most qualified to teach Korean students English. |
me too. nine times out of ten, that will be a native english-speaker.
| Quote: |
| Being a native speaker certainly is not a qualification on its own (we agree on that I think). |
you're quite right - but it's a pretty good indication that they'll probably know the intricacies of the language better than someone who isn't a native speaker.
| Quote: |
| As for Korean teachers not being able to explain irony. Great. Then again if they are able to teach English effectively in most other areas, what do I care if they cannot explain irony! Especially in lower level classes. |
i used this to demonstrate the ability of non native-speakers. you're right again regarding a lower level of class; but i'd prefer someone who could explain such a concept at any time regardless of level. again, nine times out of ten, that will be a native speaker. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Vimfuego
Joined: 10 Apr 2009
|
Posted: Fri Jul 29, 2011 5:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
what a stupid thread. Non native speakers are more than capable of teaching English. I'd employ a CELTA qualified non native speaker over a native joker with a degree in social science any day.
As for the guy above that reckons native speakers have a better ability to explain the language, you try walking down main street and asking the average joe to explain the difference between the Present Perfect and the Past Simple. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rainism
Joined: 13 Apr 2011
|
Posted: Fri Jul 29, 2011 6:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
the term "native speaker" can be misleading.
Let me give you the following example.
Immigrant comes over with his family before say age 12., or say age 10.
(studies show most people cannot lose original accent after age 12)
English is not his "first" language. It may be Italian, or Spanish, or Russian what have you.
He/She will still probably speak their "first language" at home with their parents.
HOWEVER.
As the child is involved in the American/Canadian school system, and has American/Canadian friends, their English becomes their "dominant" language within 3-5 years. By the time they finish high school, much less college, they are far far more fluent and 'educated' in English than their original language.
are they "native speakers"?
in my mind yes, especially if you cannot tell by their accent that English wasn't the first language they learned. (and i know many immigrants that fit this bill)
Their English is far far far better than the English of "native speakers" like Billy Joe Jim Bob, Elmer and their northern white trash cousins, not to speak of ebonics and ghettoized offshoots.
this also holds for people with accents, even hideously strong/strange ones like that of Arianna Huffington though I'd never allow my kids to learn pronunciation from Arianna. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
The Great Toad
Joined: 12 Jun 2004
|
Posted: Fri Jul 29, 2011 7:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
| I met a very kind SA fellow who was well liked at his school - and he insulted himself talking about how his English was poor - and he also spoke that funny Dutch stuff to his friend who also was from the Sammuel Rohdes crushed land - anyhow I have met a lot of South Africans soem are good at English and some talk worse then Germans I met on vacation ion Euro Lands... This reminds me of the story of a Canada frog girl who spoke Frog lingo of love 24/7 then got a English teaching job in Korea and was forgetting it in class... On the other hand some guys from the Deep South speak garbage English as well - I think Korea would be well served to fire most native speakers and hire trained exp Brit English India guys for half the price- but they would have to mantain me as I have a perfect American voice - although I like to break into red neck speech once in a while to impress the children how the hill billies done talk |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
PatrickGHBusan
Joined: 24 Jun 2008 Location: Busan (1997-2008) Canada 2008 -
|
Posted: Fri Jul 29, 2011 9:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
To isisaredead defense here...
I think he meant qualified Korean English teachers vs qualified native speakers who are teachers.
If not then his argument would sink faster than the Titanic. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|