| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Kuros
Joined: 27 Apr 2004
|
Posted: Sun Jun 09, 2013 4:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
NSA Whistleblower comes forward
| Quote: |
Asked whether he believed his disclosures would change anything, he said: �I think they already have. Everyone, everywhere now understands how bad things have gotten� and they�re talking about it. They have to power to decide for themselves whether they are willing to sacrifice their privacy to the surveillance state.�
Snowden also expressed the hope that the NSA surveillance programs would now be open to legal challenge for the first time. Earlier this year, in Amnesty International v. Clapper, the Supreme Court dismissed a lawsuit against the mass collection of phone records because the plaintiffs could not prove exactly what the program did or that they were personally subject to surveillance.
�The government can�t reasonably assert the state secrets privilege for a program it has acknowledged. The courts can now allow challenges to be heard on that basis,� Snowden said. |
Its ironic that the dismissal of the NSA surveillance case factored into Snowden's decision to leak information concerning the program.
| Quote: |
| Snowden is currently holed up in Hong Kong and plans to seek asylum in "countries that believe in free speech and oppose the victimization of global privacy." Iceland is mentioned as a possibility. |
I think the United States believes in free speech, it just believes that national security almost always constitutes a compelling interest mitigating the freedom the speech. Like Snowden, I disagree that our courts should hold national security interests as so sacrosanct.
Last edited by Kuros on Sun Jun 09, 2013 4:22 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Fox

Joined: 04 Mar 2009
|
Posted: Sun Jun 09, 2013 4:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| "Countries that believe in free speech and oppose the victimization of global privacy." Growing up, I would have believed America was such a country. I was certainly taught such. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Unposter
Joined: 04 Jun 2006
|
Posted: Sun Jun 09, 2013 5:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Of course, I was taught that, too, but American history shows a different story.
There has always been limits to free speach. Remember when yelling fire in a crowded theater was an example of the limits. That was not overturn I think somewhere around the 60s/70s when some KKK guy on TV said he was going to overthrow the country - and as it turned out - he has a right to say anything as long as he doesn't actually do it. Even burning the flag is now considered protected speach but that was not American history and it certainly upsets more people than who like it.
And as my constituational prof taught, "Show me in the constitution where it says you have a right to privacy?" According to him, we don't have one.
Anyway, you look at the Red Scare, the House Committee for Un American Activities, FBI spying/blackmailing of politicians and general wire taping (I had a prof whose fun was regularly tapped).
It has always been there. We just don't talk about it.
The only reason we are talking about it now is because Obama is President. And, when he isn't, chances are, we won't be talking about it anymore. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
caniff
Joined: 03 Feb 2004 Location: All over the map
|
Posted: Sun Jun 09, 2013 6:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Unposter wrote: |
| The only reason we are talking about it now is because Obama is President. And, when he isn't, chances are, we won't be talking about it anymore. |
I can't speak for anyone else, but I for one could care less which variety of puppet happens to be occupying the WH. The simple fact is that the trajectory my country is on is not good, and this has been the case through the last several administrations so clearly this goes beyond Obama (although he is undoubtedly complicit). |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Fox

Joined: 04 Mar 2009
|
Posted: Sun Jun 09, 2013 6:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| caniff wrote: |
| Unposter wrote: |
| The only reason we are talking about it now is because Obama is President. And, when he isn't, chances are, we won't be talking about it anymore. |
I can't speak for anyone else, but I for one could care less which variety of puppet happens to be occupying the WH. The simple fact is that the trajectory my country is on is not good, and this has been the case through the last several administrations so clearly this goes beyond Obama (although he is undoubtedly complicit). |
I think by "we" he meant the national media and broader society, not our little clique of cynics here on Current Events. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
caniff
Joined: 03 Feb 2004 Location: All over the map
|
Posted: Sun Jun 09, 2013 7:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Fox wrote: |
| caniff wrote: |
| Unposter wrote: |
| The only reason we are talking about it now is because Obama is President. And, when he isn't, chances are, we won't be talking about it anymore. |
I can't speak for anyone else, but I for one could care less which variety of puppet happens to be occupying the WH. The simple fact is that the trajectory my country is on is not good, and this has been the case through the last several administrations so clearly this goes beyond Obama (although he is undoubtedly complicit). |
I think by "we" he meant the national media and broader society, not our little clique of cynics here on Current Events. |
I would submit that the outrage (this time, surprisingly) extends beyond the "fringe". However, Dancing With The Stars may again prove me wrong.
I'm the eternal optimist, what can I say? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
young_clinton
Joined: 09 Sep 2009
|
Posted: Sun Jun 09, 2013 9:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Unposter wrote: |
And as my constituational prof taught, "Show me in the constitution where it says you have a right to privacy?" According to him, we don't have one.
|
Remember the days of party phones. The ever occurring *click* on the phone while you were talking to someone. I don't remember of course, but people that had them used to talk about them all the time. Although if there is no right to privacy then why are people allowed to sue for invasion of privacy? Also the main instigating force in the American Revolution was the British quartering troops in homes of Americans. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Kuros
Joined: 27 Apr 2004
|
Posted: Mon Jun 10, 2013 6:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I never could embrace Bradley Manning. I didn't see an indiscriminate dump of diplomatic data as anything to admire, even if there were pockets of shit uncovered from the legitimately privileged information that he revealed. But Snowden is different. He is a true whistleblower, revealing precisely as much as he should, and doing it in the right way.
I cannot wait to see how they try to destroy the poor bastard. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
caniff
Joined: 03 Feb 2004 Location: All over the map
|
Posted: Mon Jun 10, 2013 8:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
From what I'm reading on the "blog-o-sphere" (I canceled my cable long ago as TV is full of shit), the MSM has largely been tripping all over itself to send the message that this is all a "no-biggie", and I heard there was a PEW report that something like 56% of Americans are cool with the NSA's antics. What?! Astounding.
Seriously, it's hard to respect people here sometimes and I've just about had it with the US. I've tried (really) and I have been successful here in most measurable respects during the last few years since my return, but what with the spiraling taxes and countless other instances of nonsense (now Obamacare rearing its head), I'm about done. I guess a citizenry does get the government it deserves. The mouth-breathers can own this mess - it sure has nothing to do with me.
I hear the hills of Papua New Guinea are lovely this time of year (just make sure you don't end up as the main course at a local feast, and it's all good). |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rollo
Joined: 10 May 2006 Location: China
|
Posted: Mon Jun 10, 2013 9:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Sadly I can remember the time when Snowden would have been hailed as a hero. Now he is being hunted.
Disgusting! the whole thing. Caniff is about right. The big picture here is that if the U.S. can do it and is doing it then everyone else is too. Do not be naive.
Some one wrote that Orwell had it wrong that the box will not watch us but when we can not stop watching the box Big Brother wins. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ttompatz

Joined: 05 Sep 2005 Location: Kwangju, South Korea
|
Posted: Mon Jun 10, 2013 10:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Is this the birth or perhaps more of a resurgence of the ideology in America that militarism should dominate the political and social life of the nation, and that the strength of the military is equal to the strength of a nation?
. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Fox

Joined: 04 Mar 2009
|
Posted: Mon Jun 10, 2013 10:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| caniff wrote: |
| From what I'm reading on the "blog-o-sphere" (I canceled my cable long ago as TV is full of shit), the MSM has largely been tripping all over itself to send the message that this is all a "no-biggie", and I heard there was a PEW report that something like 56% of Americans are cool with the NSA's antics. What?! Astounding. |
And bear in mind that is, in reality, an under-estimation. 56% explicitly approve, but many of the remaining 44% are actually casually indifferent to such policies on a day-to-day basis (as opposed to within the context of a simple questionnaire), which makes them functionally no different from a political perspective.
| caniff wrote: |
| I guess a citizenry does get the government it deserves. |
The only solution is to hop on your water buffalo and ride on out of the country. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rollo
Joined: 10 May 2006 Location: China
|
Posted: Tue Jun 11, 2013 5:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
What is amazing is that some seemed surprised about this.
Well Snowden has stated that his problem was that the security personell had too much liberty to do as they pleased. So is this a few rogues or a policy.
Yeah being able to defend your nation is pretty much a good thing, depending on others not so much. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bucheon bum
Joined: 16 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Tue Jun 11, 2013 5:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
So what can a person do? I voted against Feinstein twice (even though I'm sure her opponents would have also suported such crap). I currently live in a place that has no representation in Congress. I can write letters to congressmen, but I might as well piss in the wind.
Any suggestions? Sincere question.
| Quote: |
| What is amazing is that some seemed surprised about this. |
Ha, yeah. I really am not surprised by this "revelation". It is amusing (yet depressing) that the Obama administration and the MSM is acting like Snowden reveled some big secret program that no one knew about. Spare me... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Leslie Cheswyck

Joined: 31 May 2003 Location: University of Western Chile
|
Posted: Tue Jun 11, 2013 2:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| bucheon bum wrote: |
| So what can a person do? |
Here's something for shits & giggles.
www.trollthensa.com
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|