|
Korean Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
HapKi

Joined: 10 Dec 2004 Location: TALL BUILDING-SEOUL
|
Posted: Wed Jan 26, 2005 7:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I admit, I left myself open and deserve to be raked over the coals, as I was. However, I'd like it if this thread focused on the message, and not the medium. (Albeit, my poor grammar and typing skills in a quickly composed submission supports the case I was making, that those with English degrees are not necessarily masters of the language, as the name of the degree might suggest.) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jinks

Joined: 27 Oct 2004 Location: Formerly: Lower North Island
|
Posted: Wed Jan 26, 2005 8:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| HapKi wrote: |
| (... those with English degrees are not necessarily masters of the language, as the name of the degree might suggest.) |
True
I don't really get why English majors are often stated as preferred candidates for TESL positions, it's one thing to read and write about the place of the novel in C18 America, or knowing which C17 English plays are attributed to which playwrights, but it is not going to be much help in the ESL classroom. As has been pointed out before, it is native English speakers [ or native profficiency] who have majors in a second language that would seem to be the best candidates for language teaching work.
Maybe I'm biased as I did do a couple of Eng/lit papers, but I never quite got what all the fuss was about. Apart from Middle English and modern poetry it all went a bit over my head.
Linguistics man. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Rather_Dashing
Joined: 07 Sep 2004
|
Posted: Wed Jan 26, 2005 8:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| mindmetoo wrote: |
Shouldn't that be "What AN English major really is?", n'est pas?
|
Shouldn't it be "n'est ce pas"?
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Zyzyfer

Joined: 29 Jan 2003 Location: who, what, where, when, why, how?
|
Posted: Wed Jan 26, 2005 8:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Playing Devil's Advocate, my university offered emphases on particular fields within the larger field of English, such as Creative Writing, Technical Writing, Linguistics, Literature, and others. Moreover, if you run with the ball and have a good academic advisor for your department (like I did), you can cheat yourself out of a few Lit. classes and study more of your own particular focus while studying overseas. So, it is possible to turn an English degree into something very useful over here, but not many people really will take notice of these finer points. I took like 3 Lit. Classes or something during my time in Uni.
Generally speaking though, I guess people are just under the assumption over here that English majors wouldn't be English majors unless they felt confident in and enjoyed English? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Chillin' Villain

Joined: 13 Mar 2003 Location: Goo Row
|
Posted: Wed Jan 26, 2005 10:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Rather_Dashing wrote: |
| mindmetoo wrote: |
Shouldn't that be "What AN English major really is?", n'est pas?
|
Shouldn't it be "n'est ce pas"?
 |
"n'est-ce pas"
... I'm a dork. Could be wrong, too. Haha.
-- five years of French in jr high/high school
-- can't speak a damn word... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
HapKi

Joined: 10 Dec 2004 Location: TALL BUILDING-SEOUL
|
Posted: Wed Jan 26, 2005 11:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| "Hey Kettle- You're black!!" said the pot. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
phaedrus

Joined: 13 Nov 2003 Location: I'm comin' to get ya.
|
Posted: Thu Jan 27, 2005 12:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
| At least Koreans are assuming love of English, and aren't focusing on marijuana consumption. Not that these exclude each other or must go together. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Zenpickle
Joined: 06 Jan 2004 Location: Anyang -- Bisan
|
Posted: Thu Jan 27, 2005 6:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Zyzyfer wrote: |
Generally speaking though, I guess people are just under the assumption over here that English majors wouldn't be English majors unless they felt confident in and enjoyed English? |
You know, I agree with all that. What irks me is that it seems that my real world professional experience doesn't count for much. They're more interested in what I did years and years ago in college. Or even worse, they're more interested in SAT scores I made back in the early 1990s while ignoring that I have had a good many years experience as a technical writer and editor with a few books (well, user manuals, really) published under my belt. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bosintang

Joined: 01 Dec 2003 Location: In the pot with the rest of the mutts
|
Posted: Thu Jan 27, 2005 9:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
Even though I think foreign language training and teaching credentials certainly demonstrate a passion and commitment towards it, and even gives you practice and teaches you a few tricks along the way, I'm not convinced that any discipline is discriminatively more well-suited for the job of teaching and managing a classroom of ESL-learners.
This job is not rocket science. I pick rocket science not because of the obvious cliche, but also because there is a huge need for precision. This is not true of ESL-teaching, which is ultimately a skill, and one with a large margin of error. Ultimately an ESL-teacher's personality, passion, energy, intelligence, and innovation will account for more than their book knowledge. For instance: not quite clear on a grammatical concept or question? Look it up. A lesson doesn't go well and you find yourself having a bad lesson? Then learn from your mistakes and improve on it next time. Looking for new ideas, ways of presenting material, or ways of improving yourself? Read books and look on the internet. Watch other teachers and ask for advice.
To take this example to the extreme: Are your own parents and others who have taught you how to speak English, professional linguists?
Anyways, teaching ESL in Korea almost makes this argument moot. Arguing an English major makes a better ESL-teacher here in Korea, is like arguing a commerce major makes a better door-to-door vacuum salesman. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
HapKi

Joined: 10 Dec 2004 Location: TALL BUILDING-SEOUL
|
Posted: Thu Jan 27, 2005 8:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| very well put |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ajuma

Joined: 18 Feb 2003 Location: Anywere but Seoul!!
|
Posted: Fri Jan 28, 2005 5:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
I have a hard enough time teaching "a" "an" and "the" to uni students...and NOW I have to start teaching ENGLIGH majors from the STATES?????  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Smee

Joined: 24 Dec 2004 Location: Jeollanam-do
|
Posted: Fri Jan 28, 2005 12:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| Generally speaking though, I guess people are just under the assumption over here that English majors wouldn't be English majors unless they felt confident in and enjoyed English? |
There are a lot of assumptions made here, too (stateside).
I'm an English major and, granted, this is a relatively small university in Pennsylvania, and it doesn't offer much depth or breadth in any undergraduate program within the department, but I would say that instruction in grammar is lacking. It's assumed that, since we speak English, we know grammar. As a tutor of both native-speakers and EFL students, this assumption misses the mark. Although freshmen receive lower grades if they use poor grammar or demonstrate a misunderstanding of collocations, it seems that in general these threats do nothing to really help students understand what grammar is. Even papers by so-called "skilled" writers can be quite laborious to read.
However, as others have said, there are undergrad courses which focus on "The Structure of English," phonetics, semantics, and other subjects that make mention of grammar. But, most professors here believe in the "global" characteristics of language (pragmatics, register, power relationships) rather than "local" issues of grammar. Sometimes these areas mix, in advanced levels, but (fortunately, I think) English professors are starting to realize that language courses should focus more on the sum rather than on the parts.
I've had to "do my homework" so to speak since regardless of what I might feel about social linguistics or about who has the authority to decide between "good" English and substandard English, as a white person I will be admired and hired for my presumed fluency in all things grammar. Since it will be important for me, in the eyes of parents and hagwon directors, to speak as much about English as in it, I've had to backtrack and review and learn some stuff that probably should "go without saying" for a fluent native speaker. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|