|
Korean Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
wannago
Joined: 16 Apr 2004
|
Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2005 12:08 pm Post subject: Re: ... |
|
|
Nowhere Man wrote: |
OK, Wango
Let's play more than the reactionary.
"Eeeevil Bushie" sidelined Brownie.
Is that just him kowtowing to people like me, or was it justified? |
To start, I'm not defending the speed of the FEMA response. It was too slow and Brown should have been sidelined. Apparently, he wasn't the right person for the job. My whole point is that the federal government is NOT the only entity that should be scrutinized. The state and local governments need to be held accountable for not having local and state emergency plans. Part of the deal is them having their shit together too. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
EFLtrainer

Joined: 04 May 2005
|
Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2005 12:14 pm Post subject: Re: I'm close to laying blame on Ray Nagan |
|
|
wannago wrote: |
Yeah, yeah, we know you're a Bush-hater. |
Trust me, if I were that childish I'd slit my own throat. How childish do you have to be to go there? Lives were lost, a nation severely damaged, but you assume it's politics? Even when I did not initiate the post, but responded to the narrow view of someone else's post? In fact, my response didn't assign blame anywhere, it solely responded to the ridiculous contention of another post that the most liable person was mayor. THAT is reprehensible, political crap. Take the ONLY person who came anywhere near to doing a decent job and string them up? Are you kidding?
Quote: |
...Yes, I know this kind of thing flies in the face of those of you who believe the federal government is responsible for holding our hands from cradle to grave... |
No it flies in the face of those reality. At no point and at no time have I ever stated or intimated such a ridicukous claim. It is a multi-level response, with multiple levels of responsibility. Again, Nagin is the only major authority who did *anything* to prepare, but it's him?? Talk about an agenda. And the puerile response says it all.
Good job completely missing the point of my response.
Oh, and I read your *revised* version. Just to be clear, what you said in the first and then said in the revised version are contradictory. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
wannago
Joined: 16 Apr 2004
|
Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2005 12:30 pm Post subject: Re: I'm close to laying blame on Ray Nagan |
|
|
EFLtrainer wrote: |
Trust me, if I were that childish I'd slit my own throat. How childish do you have to be to go there? Lives were lost, a nation severely damaged, but you assume it's politics? |
With people like you, it's ALWAYS politics. You couldn't care less about lives and damage, you care about hating Bushie. You've proven it time and time again.
Quote: |
No it flies in the face of those reality. At no point and at no time have I ever stated or intimated such a ridicukous claim. It is a multi-level response, with multiple levels of responsibility. Again, Nagin is the only major authority who did *anything* to prepare, but it's him?? Talk about an agenda. And the puerile response says it all.
Good job completely missing the point of my response. |
Nagin didn't do jack shit. All he did was yell into a radio mic and stick his face in front of the TV cameras after the fact, probably to cover his butt for not having a legitimate plan beforehand. And, there is a reason I missed the point of your response....you didn't have one.
Quote: |
Oh, and I read your *revised* version below. Just to be clear, what you said in the first and said in the version are contradictory. |
Not contradictory at all. You seem to think being critical of a whacked mayor and being critical of a slow FEMA response are mutually exclusive. They're not...unless, of course, you hate the eeeeevil Bushie. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
EFLtrainer

Joined: 04 May 2005
|
Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2005 8:06 pm Post subject: Re: I'm close to laying blame on Ray Nagan |
|
|
wannago wrote: |
EFLtrainer wrote: |
Trust me, if I were that childish I'd slit my own throat. How childish do you have to be to go there? Lives were lost, a nation severely damaged, but you assume it's politics? |
With people like you, it's ALWAYS politics. You couldn't care less about lives and damage, you care about hating Bushie. You've proven it time and time again.
Quote: |
No it flies in the face of those reality. At no point and at no time have I ever stated or intimated such a ridicukous claim. It is a multi-level response, with multiple levels of responsibility. Again, Nagin is the only major authority who did *anything* to prepare, but it's him?? Talk about an agenda. And the puerile response says it all.
Good job completely missing the point of my response. |
Nagin didn't do jack *beep*. All he did was yell into a radio mic and stick his face in front of the TV cameras after the fact, probably to cover his butt for not having a legitimate plan beforehand. And, there is a reason I missed the point of your response....you didn't have one.
Quote: |
Oh, and I read your *revised* version below. Just to be clear, what you said in the first and said in the version are contradictory. |
Not contradictory at all. You seem to think being critical of a whacked mayor and being critical of a slow FEMA response are mutually exclusive. They're not...unless, of course, you hate the eeeeevil Bushie. |
Not worth the moments it's taken to respond. Just to point out the immaturity of your post, what do you know of my response to every Bush action during his presidency? Not a damned thing. Thus, you cannot make the statments you make with making yourself out to be illogical, flame-baiting participant. Soooo easy to just say, "Bushie hater!!!", so difficult to engage. You're wasting everyone's time.
Last edited by EFLtrainer on Mon Sep 12, 2005 11:11 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
wannago
Joined: 16 Apr 2004
|
Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2005 8:20 pm Post subject: Re: I'm close to laying blame on Ray Nagan |
|
|
EFLtrainer wrote: |
wannago wrote: |
EFLtrainer wrote: |
Trust me, if I were that childish I'd slit my own throat. How childish do you have to be to go there? Lives were lost, a nation severely damaged, but you assume it's politics? |
With people like you, it's ALWAYS politics. You couldn't care less about lives and damage, you care about hating Bushie. You've proven it time and time again.
Quote: |
No it flies in the face of those reality. At no point and at no time have I ever stated or intimated such a ridicukous claim. It is a multi-level response, with multiple levels of responsibility. Again, Nagin is the only major authority who did *anything* to prepare, but it's him?? Talk about an agenda. And the puerile response says it all.
Good job completely missing the point of my response. |
Nagin didn't do jack *beep*. All he did was yell into a radio mic and stick his face in front of the TV cameras after the fact, probably to cover his butt for not having a legitimate plan beforehand. And, there is a reason I missed the point of your response....you didn't have one.
Quote: |
Oh, and I read your *revised* version below. Just to be clear, what you said in the first and said in the version are contradictory. |
Not contradictory at all. You seem to think being critical of a whacked mayor and being critical of a slow FEMA response are mutually exclusive. They're not...unless, of course, you hate the eeeeevil Bushie. |
Not worth the moments it's taken to respond. Just to point out the immaturity of your post, what do you know of my response to every Bush action during his presidency? Not a damned thing. Thus, you cannot make the statments you make with making ourself out to be illogical, flame-baiting participant. Soooo easy to just say, "Bushie hater!!!", so difficult to engage. You're wasting everyone's time. |
That's right, run away from someone that takes you head-on and sees through your BS. I've seen enough of your "we must fight harder so someone like Bush doesn't get into the White House again" comments to know EXACTLY who and what you are. I'm sure its hard to take. As far as immaturity in posts? Let's see these fine examples from one post by you on this very thread:
EFLtrainer wrote: |
This nearly utter BS. Give me a freaking break. |
EFLtrainer wrote: |
Your post wasn't worth a response, but it got one anyone for the sheer depth of.... #$%^@#$^!!!! |
Looks to me like you've been running away from people besides me. Now, go be a good liberal and sit on Ray Nagin's lap. Maybe he'll give you some of his "candy." |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
EFLtrainer

Joined: 04 May 2005
|
Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2005 11:13 pm Post subject: Re: I'm close to laying blame on Ray Nagan |
|
|
wannago wrote: |
EFLtrainer wrote: |
wannago wrote: |
EFLtrainer wrote: |
Trust me, if I were that childish I'd slit my own throat. How childish do you have to be to go there? Lives were lost, a nation severely damaged, but you assume it's politics? |
With people like you, it's ALWAYS politics. You couldn't care less about lives and damage, you care about hating Bushie. You've proven it time and time again.
Quote: |
No it flies in the face of those reality. At no point and at no time have I ever stated or intimated such a ridicukous claim. It is a multi-level response, with multiple levels of responsibility. Again, Nagin is the only major authority who did *anything* to prepare, but it's him?? Talk about an agenda. And the puerile response says it all.
Good job completely missing the point of my response. |
Nagin didn't do jack *beep*. All he did was yell into a radio mic and stick his face in front of the TV cameras after the fact, probably to cover his butt for not having a legitimate plan beforehand. And, there is a reason I missed the point of your response....you didn't have one.
Quote: |
Oh, and I read your *revised* version below. Just to be clear, what you said in the first and said in the version are contradictory. |
Not contradictory at all. You seem to think being critical of a whacked mayor and being critical of a slow FEMA response are mutually exclusive. They're not...unless, of course, you hate the eeeeevil Bushie. |
Not worth the moments it's taken to respond. Just to point out the immaturity of your post, what do you know of my response to every Bush action during his presidency? Not a damned thing. Thus, you cannot make the statments you make with making ourself out to be illogical, flame-baiting participant. Soooo easy to just say, "Bushie hater!!!", so difficult to engage. You're wasting everyone's time. |
That's right, run away from someone that takes you head-on and sees through your BS. I've seen enough of your "we must fight harder so someone like Bush doesn't get into the White House again" comments to know EXACTLY who and what you are. I'm sure its hard to take. As far as immaturity in posts? Let's see these fine examples from one post by you on this very thread:
EFLtrainer wrote: |
This nearly utter BS. Give me a freaking break. |
EFLtrainer wrote: |
Your post wasn't worth a response, but it got one anyone for the sheer depth of.... #$%^@#$^!!!! |
Looks to me like you've been running away from people besides me. Now, go be a good liberal and sit on Ray Nagin's lap. Maybe he'll give you some of his "candy." |
You're an idiot. Your post said that in itself. I already said so. Pointless, illogical, political flame-baiting. You have nothign to add. We ignore the village idiot. Consider yourself ignored. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Gopher

Joined: 04 Jun 2005
|
Posted: Tue Sep 13, 2005 1:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
Amended text in bold print:
BBE: I agree with you that the list of factors that contributed to this mess is growing, if that was your thinking when you posted your message in the context of all the other Katrina-related postings here:
Start with settlement patterns and city planning over time, particularly the encroaching onto the so-called buffer lands, as Rapier points out;
add Bush's slashing of the funding of the levees, at least as far as maybe this might have mitigated some of the damage;
add the destructive nature of this highly powerful storm itself;
add the mayor's disorganization and lack of preparedness (claims he couldn't find drivers for buses...and now CNN is reporting that AmTrack offered a train, he refused, and 900 empty seats pulled away just a day or two before the storm hit);
add the no-fault chaos and confusion that goes hand-in-hand with events of this magnitude; and
add the Bush Administration's slow and incomptent response, particularly the President's failure to personally energize the system...given the nature of this disaster, he should have got involved immediately...
and you've got a tentative -- but far from complete -- explanation for why many suffered, apparently uneccesarily.
Brown, of couse, being the scapegoat of the week, allows Bush to brush off some of the mud that was on his hands, at least for the moment, but it still does not change the nature of this administration one iota.
I'll expect the commissions to produce more complex (and of course, politically charged) explanations. But this would seem to be a good start.
Last edited by Gopher on Tue Sep 13, 2005 4:12 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
EFLtrainer

Joined: 04 May 2005
|
Posted: Tue Sep 13, 2005 3:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
Gopher wrote: |
BBE: I agree with you that the list of factors that contributed to this mess is growing: |
Quote: |
But this would seem to be a good start. |
I think you're letting BBE off the hook in that your characterization of his remarks does not seem to me to reflect what he said.
First, he didn't say Nagin was a place to start, he said he's ready to place the blame on Nagin. His comment about Bush was a toss-off, used to disregard or completely diminish the preceding phrase with the use of, "if you want." Kind of like, "You can blame me if you want, but I think you're full of it." So, what are you agreeing with? He suggested no starting point, but only an endpoint.
And I disagree with the implication, by the use of starting point, that Nagin is primarily to blame. (Perhaps you meant it literally as a starting point, rather than to indicate primary blame?)
For one, the Federal emergency was declared a day before the hurricane struck but there was *no* federal involvement in evacuation procedures.
Two, I'm fairly certain no city could, on it's own, evacuate 200,000 plus people in the time provided. The armed services are the only organizations with that kind of capability. Those two hundred buses? No more than 28,000 people... and that's allowing for *two* trips for each bus. What about the other 220,000?
Of course there is blame/responsibility (the former aplies when people don't do their jobs, the latter when a plan simply doesn't work or unexpected events occur) to go around, but I completely reject going after and placing primary blame on the one person who was responsible for getting over a million people to get to safety while everyone else sat on their arses.
That stinks of partisanship and trolling. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Gopher

Joined: 04 Jun 2005
|
Posted: Tue Sep 13, 2005 5:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
EFL Trainer: Exchanging views is not about "putting people on hooks" or "letting them off the hook."
It's just about exchanging views. So please relax.
I might point out that if we're going to say that these levees, which I'm hearing totally failed -- CNN is reporting 90% failure in the levee system -- might have held back the flooding had Bush but funded more studies or better funded the levees, and that this might have mitigated the suffering (and I think there might actually be something there, by the way, but not much), then we also need to acknowledge that had the mayor used those buses and taken advantage of AmTrack's offer, then that, too, might have mitigated the suffering -- that is, it's not about saving all of the people who suffered as much as saving as many as you can, and he seems to have failed to do this...
Of course, the primary "bad guy" here is still Katrina, however, and not Bush or the New Orleans mayor, in spite of the fact that, if we were going to point fingers, again, we wouldn't have enough fingers to point at all of the guilty or liable parties...it seems to have been a system-wide failure: local, state, and federal. It supercedes the regular partisan bickering. The die-hard partisans just don't know this yet. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
EFLtrainer

Joined: 04 May 2005
|
Posted: Tue Sep 13, 2005 6:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
[quote="Gopher"]EFL Trainer: Exchanging views is not about "putting people on hooks" or "letting them off the hook."
It's just about exchanging views. So please relax. |
Please tellmeyou didn'ttake that literally.... my god, man. How can you have a conversation when you nitpick silly things like that? Are you being intentionally irritating, or do you truly not understand the use of the phrase in that context? Sometimes your comments are like a high school student who just discovered the Reasoning and Rhetoric class...
Quote: |
I might point out that if we're going to say that these levees, which I'm hearing totally failed -- CNN is reporting 90% failure in the levee system -- might have held back the flooding had Bush but funded more studies or better funded the levees, and that this might have mitigated the suffering (and I think there might actually be something there, by the way, but not much), then we also need to acknowledge that had the mayor used those buses and taken advantage of AmTrack's offer, then that, too, might have mitigated the suffering -- that is, it's not about saving all of the people who suffered as much as saving as many as you can, and he seems to have failed to do this...
Of course, the primary "bad guy" here is still Katrina, however, and not Bush or the New Orleans mayor, in spite of the fact that, if we were going to point fingers, again, we wouldn't have enough fingers to point at all of the guilty or liable parties...it seems to have been a system-wide failure: local, state, and federal. It supercedes the regular partisan bickering. The die-hard partisans just don't know this yet. |
Can you not answer a question? Simple form: Were you agreeing that Nagin is primarily responsible for the human responsibility for the situation in New Orleans, or were you previously unclear? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Gopher

Joined: 04 Jun 2005
|
Posted: Tue Sep 13, 2005 7:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
On your first issue: if you stopped behaving like an angry district attorney who wants to be governor next year, it would be much easier to exchange views with you. (this is delivered half-seriously, and half-joking, and in a friendly way... )
I feel extremely confident that others here would second this recommendation. Indeed, they already have elsewhere.
Here's your second issue:
EFLtrainer wrote: |
Can you not answer a question? Simple form: Were you agreeing that Nagin is primarily responsible for the human responsibility for the situation in New Orleans, or were you previously unclear? |
gopher wrote: |
Of course, the primary "bad guy" here is still Katrina, however, and not Bush or the New Orleans mayor, in spite of the fact that, if we were going to point fingers, again, we wouldn't have enough fingers to point at all of the guilty or liable parties...it seems to have been a system-wide failure: local, state, and federal. It supercedes the regular partisan bickering. The die-hard partisans just don't know this yet. |
I do not agree that any agency other than Mother Nature is primarily responsible for the human situation in New Orleans.
That being said, Bush has mud and blood all over his hands (not Brown), and the mayor of New Orleans -- as well as several others at his level and between them and Bush -- does too. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
BigBlackEquus
Joined: 05 Jul 2005 Location: Lotte controls Asia with bad chocolate!
|
Posted: Tue Sep 13, 2005 7:56 am Post subject: Re: I'm close to laying blame on Ray Nagan |
|
|
EFLtrainer wrote: |
BigBlackEquus wrote: |
I've decided the one we can blame the New Orleans mess on is Ray Nagan, the mayor, and the local government there...
...You can blame the national government and Bush for the slow response, if you want, but the reason this mess involved so many displaced people with nowhere to go is because the local government had no solid plan of action. |
This nearly utter BS. Give me a freaking break. the ONLY entitiy that did a damned thing before the hurricane hit was Nagin. He ordered an unprecedented MANDATORY evacuation and opened centers in the city for those that could not get out. Could he have done more? I'm sure time will bear out. HOWEVER, of all the entities bearing blame to focus on the ONE person who came closest to actually doing their job is sickening. And based on ONE PICTURE???
Open your eyes! Remember that once the national emergency response kicks in the Feds are in charge. Enough of this, "the local government is supposed to do it, boo hoo." When was the last time you EVER saw the Feds not ride rouhshod over a local gov't? Seriously! This is the first and *only* case in which a federal disaster was proclaimed that I've heard the state and local governments described as being responsible. And why? Because the freaking response *itself* was a disaster.
Your post wasn't worth a response, but it got one anyone for the sheer depth of.... #$%^@#$^!!!! |
Far be it from me to want to feed someone's obsessive behavior.........................
According to news reports (Tim Russert video), Bushie ordered an evacuation of N.O. before Nagan did. The evacuation order came from the Federal level, and as I understood it, Nagan waited another day after that to issue it locally. Snopes gets into the whole "disaster area" argument, which really isn't the same thing. I'm looking for more evidence about the feds issuing the actual evacuation order first, but can't seem to find much at the moment. It was a question posed to Nagan by Russert on his show. Nagan side-stepped it with the usual "it was the Feds fault" spiel.
Besides, even if Nagan had give the order first, the issue at hand is that no evacuation plan was made available for everyone. Perhaps a good excuse is that Nagan, "hates black people?" Well, I suppose it sounds better to pick on the Federal government for not having evacuation plans and buses on the ready for every possible natural disaster that could hit the USA.
Nagan and his local gov't had the buses, they could have had a drill and plans to have drivers there, if needed. They didn't. Big mistake. People couldn't get out (a massive number of people), and died. End of story. That part of the issue is not a Federal one. Local and State governments are supposed to function at that level. The Federal side comes in with FEMA and stuff like that (which was a separate screw-up entirely).
Please don't make me look as if I am defending Bush in this one. I really don't care to take issue with you, but your tunnel-vision in this matter leaves me no choice. As I stated, I am placing the blame on Nagan for not getting the people out. That is not a Federal problem.
You can go wherever you want to with the FEMA response.
BBE tries to be fair when he can. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
EFLtrainer

Joined: 04 May 2005
|
Posted: Tue Sep 13, 2005 9:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
EFLtrainer wrote: |
Can you not answer a question? Simple form: Were you agreeing that Nagin is primarily responsible for the human responsibility for the situation in New Orleans, or were you previously unclear? |
Quote: |
I do not agree that any agency other than Mother Nature is primarily responsible for the human situation in New Orleans. |
Non-responsive. Question had nothing to do with natural elements.
Quote: |
That being said, Bush has mud and blood all over his hands (not Brown), and the mayor of New Orleans -- as well as several others at his level and between them and Bush -- does too. |
I live for the day you don't equivocate. I said the HUMAN portion of any blame and you roundly ignore that simple fact. Again. Non-answer...
I will have to imply from your "answer" that you do not believe that Nagin is principally responsible for the portion of damages and death attributable to human error or failing. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Gopher

Joined: 04 Jun 2005
|
Posted: Tue Sep 13, 2005 9:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
EFLtrainer wrote: |
EFLtrainer wrote: |
Can you not answer a question? Simple form: Were you agreeing that Nagin is primarily responsible for the human responsibility for the situation in New Orleans, or were you previously unclear? |
Quote: |
I do not agree that any agency other than Mother Nature is primarily responsible for the human situation in New Orleans. |
Non-responsive. Question had nothing to do with natural elements.
Quote: |
That being said, Bush has mud and blood all over his hands (not Brown), and the mayor of New Orleans -- as well as several others at his level and between them and Bush -- does too. |
I live for the day you don't equivocate. I said the HUMAN portion of any blame and you roundly ignore that simple fact. Again. Non-answer...
I will have to imply from your "answer" that you do not believe that Nagin is principally responsible for the portion of damages and death attributable to human error or failing. |
I answered you in good faith, it was an honest answer, and you still try to deliver a knock-out blow, you're still looking to uncover the lie, still looking to score your debate points (whose keeping score, by the way?).
The truth is, you don't have me against the ropes -- I'm not even sparring with you.
In any case, that will certainly be the last time I attempt to communicate with you on this board. You have the worst kind of myopia that a person can have. And it's disappointing. Still...as Lord Macaulay says: "Let them be. Their reward is to be what they are." |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
EFLtrainer

Joined: 04 May 2005
|
Posted: Tue Sep 13, 2005 10:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
Gopher wrote: |
I answered you in good faith, it was an honest answer, and |
Good faith or not - and believe me, I always answer in good faith regardless of your many posts to the contrary - you didn't answer the question clearly and directly. You rarely ever do. Just an observation, and not one only have made. Debate points? Gopher, you're in need of a mirror.
Quote: |
...you still try to deliver a knock-out blow, you're still looking to uncover the lie, still looking to score your debate points (whose keeping score, by the way?).... The truth is, you don't have me against the ropes -- I'm not even sparring with you. |
Your perception of things; never even crossed my mind. Throughout all our debates, it has never been a childish attempt to score points. Your style of answering simple questions with reams of evidence that often don't answer the question, equivocating at every direct point.... maddening. You really have no idea just how evasive your answers are. Your perception of it as a pissing context is yours alone.
I asked for a simple answer. Still waiting.
Quote: |
In any case, that will certainly be the last time I attempt to communicate with you on this board. You have the worst kind of myopia that a person can have. And it's disappointing. Still...as Lord Macaulay says: "Let them be. Their reward is to be what they are." |
What sort would that be? Wanting a direct answer? You started your post with an insult, yet, got as straight-line a response as I could give - and intentionally so to avoid this kind of foolishness! - and this is what comes back? Myopia, indeed.
(Edited repeatedly becuase I simply cannot type!!!) |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|