|
Korean Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
peony

Joined: 30 Mar 2005
|
Posted: Sat Sep 17, 2005 10:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
the average yearly American salary is $39,795 per year, doesnt the average seem to have jumped a lot in the last 5 years? i think it was at 33k then |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
TheUrbanMyth
Joined: 28 Jan 2003 Location: Retired
|
Posted: Sat Sep 17, 2005 7:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
joe_doufu wrote: |
TheUrbanMyth wrote: |
To reach 1 million in ten years you would need $20,000 a year invested with a rate of return of 30%. Not only that, but with zero taxes on the interest. Let's say the person saves $10,000 a year from his job and another $10,000 in privates (can you say burn-out?). |
You love this job so much, huh? What's the obsession with staying in the same job for ten years? Nobody does that these days, in any industry. Second, it's clear that investing in a mutual fund isn't going to get you to that goal. There are ways to get 30% returns on investment, but you have to be smart and proactive. Real estate is assumed by most to be the best way to get rich. The reason is the mortgage. With your $20,000 you could buy $20,000 worth of stocks or mutual funds, OR you could buy a hundred thousand dollars worth of real estate using other people's money. Also there are tax benefits.
My point is that being rich is possible, and you can start from anywhere. At least any job in the 'middle class' range, where you're not struggling for food and basic needs. You have to want it, and you have to be driven enough to educate yourself and make plans. I haven't found out if I can do it yet, but as I said I *have* changed my mindset and reversed the money flow in my favor. Even with this "low class" job. |
You were the one who said "anybody who surfs this board." The vast majority of people who surf this board are hakwon teachers. And again the vast majority are here because this job pays better than what they could get in the West...or they wouldn't be here. Not everybody is like that, but most are. There just aren't a lot of jobs starting at 30 K in the West with medical and free housing for people fresh out of university.
$20, 000 of stocks or mutual funds isn't going to get you rich.
As for real estate that can make you rich, but first you have to invest a lot of time into becoming able to spot such deals. Most people would lose the shirt off their back. As for buying $100,000 of real estate using other people's money, first you have to get the other people to give you their money. I have a feeling that most people (including bankers) would not give that much money or anywhere near that to a college grad fresh out of university. If it were that easy, a lot more people would be rich.
Yes it is possible to become rich, but it is a lot harder today. Kiyosaki had it easier. Nor is he the only author that is writting those kind of books. There are a lot of authors out there with books very similar in material. And there are a lot of people following them, more than in Kiyosaki's day. So the competition is stronger for one. And the market rules have changed. And there are more people.
As for going into business running hakwons, many people go bankrupt doing that. Plus it takes a lot of start-up money. People have talked about this before on the boards and ultimately abandoned the idea. There's just too much competition today.
Again unless you have done this, you are not qualified to offer such advice. Period. Not a flame, simply a fact. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
TheUrbanMyth
Joined: 28 Jan 2003 Location: Retired
|
Posted: Sat Sep 17, 2005 7:25 pm Post subject: Re: Are we poorer than the average Korean? |
|
|
livinginkorea wrote: |
I read that the average wage back in 1997 was 1.4 million a month.
http://www.asianinfo.org/asianinfo/korea/eco/employment.htm
I find it hard to believe that it jumped up so much to 2.8 (if this is real) so I don't think it's real. About 40% of the workforce are no-salary workers. Many Koreans have their own (tiny) business and they are barely scrapping buy. Farmers surely don't make much.
One of the reasons why Koreans dislike foreigners is that we make more than they do. If there is any assistant or helper as the Koreans call them, they are only on about 5~700,000 a month! That's shocking. Hagwons teachers make about 1~1.5 million. Some make more but very few do. And don't forget Koreans practically live at work. They work crazy hours or spend all the time at work trying to look busy. Also things are so cheap for us here but for Koreans they aren't. Inflation is pretty low and that says a lot.
Sorry but 2.8 is very hard to believe. Maybe Samsung managers are getting that but you can be sure that the majority of the country isn't on that. |
We were both off. Actually it is 2.3 million for businesses with more than five employees. But if you look at the finance and insurance sections the average wage is 3.6 million. Here is the link for 2004/5.
http://www.koilaf.org/what_view.php?num=373
Why would you use 1997? That's the year of the crash. Of course wages are going to come down. And that's eight years ago. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
billybrobby

Joined: 09 Dec 2004
|
Posted: Sun Sep 18, 2005 12:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
http://times.hankooki.com/cgi-bin/hkiprn.cgi?pa=/lpage/special/200311/kt2003110219005639750.htm&ur=times.hankooki.com&fo=print_kt.htm
the link says this:
The top 20 percent of households earned 5.81 million won per month in the first quarter of this year, up 3.1 percent from a year ago. But the bottom 20 percent of urban households earned just 1.06 million won per month, up 1.8 percent.
The average household income was 2.91 million won, up 4.3 percent. But the growth rate was about half that of the 8.1 percent increase recorded in the first quarter of 2002.
After adjusting for inflation, the average urban household income rose 0.2 percent to 2.65 million won per month in the first quarter of this year compared with a year ago. In the January-March period last year, the income growth rate was 5.4 percent.
*****************************8
but there's a lot of tricky little stuff in there. good luck figuring it out.
i remember reading somewhere that an english teacher earns the about the same as a unionized bus driver. but i have no idea what figures they were using to come up with that one. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
billybrobby

Joined: 09 Dec 2004
|
Posted: Sun Sep 18, 2005 12:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
i haven't read the article carefully, but says some interesting stuff:
While an average annual salary of a five-year wage-earner stood at 20-30 million won, sons and daughters of some wealthy Kangnam families spend tens of millions won at bars and hotels every day.
that's pretty much how i see korea. a five year wage earner? i guess that would be about where i fit in. 20 to 30? yeah, sounds about right. and yet there is this certain class of super-rich koreans that piques my curiosity. it is one of my unfortunate prejudices that i generally regard koreans as poorer and less classy than americans. but, hey, they (a) really are poorer and (b) use fog machines at their weddings. so, the idea of mixing korean-ness with super wealthiness intrigues me. do the super rich koreans actually get married at nice churches instead of wedding halls? or do they just choose a wedding hall with a really nice fog machine? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
joe_doufu

Joined: 09 May 2005 Location: Elsewhere
|
Posted: Sun Sep 18, 2005 1:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
TheUrbanMyth wrote: |
You were the one who said "anybody who surfs this board." |
I meant in in the sense of "anybody who reads these words", not "anybody who will remain a regular on this board for the next ten years".
Quote: |
Yes it is possible to become rich, but it is a lot harder today. Kiyosaki had it easier. Nor is he the only author that is writting those kind of books. |
Smart people have been making themselves rich by taking smart actions for ten thousand years. Are you really suggesting that sometime between the 1980s and today, it has become significantly more difficult than it was over the past ten millenia?
Quote: |
As for going into business running hakwons, many people go bankrupt doing that. Plus it takes a lot of start-up money. |
I didn't say you should start a hakwon. I haven't done the research on it, but it's a suggestion worth exploring if you really love this business as you seem to. It's clearly a profitable business, particularly in China, but is it the most profitable for the least effort? The "instructions" smart people give for becoming rich are not exact dollar amounts to invest and exact specifications of the investment. They are more general tips like: find out what works (now), start small and try out various strategies, learn from experience, be financially responsible, don't count debts as assets.
Quote: |
Again unless you have done this, you are not qualified to offer such advice. Period. Not a flame, simply a fact. |
That goes both ways. We know one thing for sure -- you'll never get rich. You've already declared it impossible and given up. I still have a chance so nya-nya. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
TheUrbanMyth
Joined: 28 Jan 2003 Location: Retired
|
Posted: Sun Sep 18, 2005 4:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
joe_doufu wrote: |
TheUrbanMyth wrote: |
You were the one who said "anybody who surfs this board." |
(1) I meant in in the sense of "anybody who reads these words", not "anybody who will remain a regular on this board for the next ten years".
Quote: |
Yes it is possible to become rich, but it is a lot harder today. Kiyosaki had it easier. Nor is he the only author that is writting those kind of books. |
(2) Smart people have been making themselves rich by taking smart actions for ten thousand years. Are you really suggesting that sometime between the 1980s and today, it has become significantly more difficult than it was over the past ten millenia?
Quote: |
As for going into business running hakwons, many people go bankrupt doing that. Plus it takes a lot of start-up money. |
(3) I didn't say you should start a hakwon. I haven't done the research on it, but it's a suggestion worth exploring if you really love this business as you seem to. It's clearly a profitable business, particularly in China, but is it the most profitable for the least effort? The "instructions" smart people give for becoming rich are not exact dollar amounts to invest and exact specifications of the investment. They are more general tips like: find out what works (now), start small and try out various strategies, learn from experience, be financially responsible, don't count debts as assets.
Quote: |
Again unless you have done this, you are not qualified to offer such advice. Period. Not a flame, simply a fact. |
(4) That goes both ways. We know one thing for sure -- you'll never get rich. You've already declared it impossible and given up. I still have a chance so nya-nya. |
(numbers are mine)
1. Well I think that most people who read these words will remain regulars...but okay I'll give you this one.
2. Today there is more competition than ever. There are many such books as Kiyosaki wrote and many more people studying them as well as there are many more smart people. Plus there are people who are not all that smart but are wealthy or becoming so because of one good idea or two. You really have to stand out in this day and age moreso than ever.
3. I really think people have to (by trial and error) find out what works for them whether it be stocks, bonds, real estate. Speaking of real estate I don't think many of Kiyosaki's strategies are going to be useful in the next few years. Houses are more over-valued than ever before and The Economist is predicting a massive housing bust in the next few years. After that, those strategies may have limited value, unless everybody who has read that book is scrambling to pick up cheap deals.
4. I didn't say it was impossible (nor have I given up), only asking for your credentials. I think that a time frame of ten years is unrealistic. It took Kiyosaki until he was 47. If you had said say 20 years that would (I feel) be more realistic and more in line with what I feel is possible. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
joe_doufu

Joined: 09 May 2005 Location: Elsewhere
|
Posted: Sun Sep 18, 2005 6:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
TheUrbanMyth wrote: |
Today there is more competition than ever. There are many such books as Kiyosaki wrote and many more people studying them as well as there are many more smart people. You really have to stand out in this day and age moreso than ever. |
Wealth is not finite, and business is not a zero-sum game. "There are more people" is not a reason to think it will be difficult to succeed.
Other than that, okay. Though I dispute your assertion that most regulars on the board will remain in Korea for the next decade! You won't see me here beyond May 2006, that's fer sure. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
forgesteel

Joined: 30 Aug 2005 Location: Earth
|
Posted: Tue Sep 20, 2005 4:15 am Post subject: pay numbers |
|
|
The Korea Herald published some rough figures recently (within the past month or two, so you could probably visit their site and do a search) which I've corroborated with the Koreans I know:
College-educated people straight outta school get about 1.8- 2 million won a month. Engineers, managers, doctors and other high profile people make 3-4 million won after not too long. Most other people make *beep* (not The Korea Herald's words, mine).
Since we get free housing, I guess we are about average or a little higher than college educated Koreans (of the non-doctor, non-manager, non-engineer stripe), depending on how long they've been outta school and how long they've stayed with one company, etc.
I figure its pretty easy to see we're solidly middle class. If we get lucky with a bunch of private classes, we're still only gonna be solidly upper middle class at best, of course. The wealthy here (as everywhere) have more money than God, so it's no use comparing oneself to them.
Interesting article today (21 September 2005) in KH regarding inequality of pay between men and women in Korea:
http://www.koreaherald.co.kr/SITE/data/html_dir/2005/09/21/200509210020.asp
Cheers, |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Veronica

Joined: 29 Aug 2005
|
Posted: Wed Sep 21, 2005 11:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I am just happy to see, especially as I am neither Candian, American or Korean, that I am earning well above all of those countires average yearly salaries. Infact, almost double Canada's GDP. And I am a mere teacher of English.... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Wangja

Joined: 17 May 2004 Location: Seoul, Yongsan
|
Posted: Wed Sep 21, 2005 11:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Interesting thread this.
I have long pondered why many from the "land of the free" and "free enterprise" and "where-everyone-wants-to-be-be" would find a salary of 24,000 USD so attractive.
My Korean brother-in-law recently joined that exodus and emigrated to USA: I tried hard to dissuade him, but his wife was adamant. He is an electrical engineer and his last Korean pay-slip showed annual earnings of >70,000 USD.
I still do not understand why he went and he still does not understand why he has not found a better job in such a wonderful land. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
forgesteel

Joined: 30 Aug 2005 Location: Earth
|
Posted: Thu Sep 22, 2005 2:16 am Post subject: America |
|
|
America is great- when there's a Democrat in office. Otherwise, all the money goes to the bankers, the military, etc. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
forgesteel

Joined: 30 Aug 2005 Location: Earth
|
Posted: Thu Sep 22, 2005 2:21 am Post subject: why 24K isn't so bad |
|
|
> find a salary of 24,000 USD so attractive.
First of all, the job is usually for people just outta college. Second, the standard of living here is such that it is actually possible to SAVE MONEY on a wage that you mention. Even if you make $50K or more, it is sometimes nigh impossible to save anything in America. I live in Southern California, so it is a special case. One practically needs a car in S. CA. Therefore, one needs car insurance. The cost of living in Southern CA is ridiculously high. The rent plus car insurance plus gas costs almost your whole pay check if you make anything less than $25K. Then there's food and cell phones etc. etc. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
forgesteel

Joined: 30 Aug 2005 Location: Earth
|
Posted: Thu Sep 22, 2005 2:23 am Post subject: why he went |
|
|
> I still do not understand why he went
Come on now, it's not that hard to figure out. Here in Korea, the Family Corporation runs everything. So if you don't work for Samsung or somesuch, you ain't really making it, now are you?
Cheers, |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ubum

Joined: 23 Aug 2005 Location: Gwangju
|
Posted: Thu Sep 22, 2005 2:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
Veronica
Quote: |
I am just happy to see, especially as I am neither Candian, American or Korean, that I am earning well above all of those countires average yearly salaries. Infact, almost double Canada's GDP. And I am a mere teacher of English.... |
Are you doing a ton of privates? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|