View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
dogbert

Joined: 29 Jan 2003 Location: Killbox 90210
|
Posted: Sat Sep 17, 2005 5:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
Ya-ta Boy wrote: |
There was a time when religion was considered a private matter and not discussed in 'polite society'. That began to break down some time ago, largely with the rise of evangelicals and fundamentalists. Public discussion of religion has finally reached critical mass. I wonder if 9/11 had something to do with it, in that more people are starting to define themselves in religious terms as a way of identifying with the non-Moslem world. |
When was that time? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Hwajangsil Ajumma

Joined: 02 May 2005 Location: On my knees in the stall
|
Posted: Sat Sep 17, 2005 8:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
I covet thy neighbour's wife on a regular basis. Especially when she's sunbathing in the yard. Talk about impure thoughts!
Anyone care to join me for some sins of the flesh? Especially you, Rapier. I bet you're a first-class Onanist. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
rapier
Joined: 16 Feb 2003
|
Posted: Sat Sep 17, 2005 9:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hwajangsil Ajumma wrote: |
Anyone care to join me for some sins of the flesh? Especially you, Rapier. I bet you're a first-class Onanist. |
Oh, its master bates again. did you manage to locate the dry cleaners yet? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Ya-ta Boy
Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Location: Established in 1994
|
Posted: Sat Sep 17, 2005 8:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
When was that time? |
It seems to me that things started changing around '80 or so. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
desultude

Joined: 15 Jan 2003 Location: Dangling my toes in the Persian Gulf
|
Posted: Sat Sep 17, 2005 9:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I strongly agree that religion is a private matter in a secular society. If you are strong in your faith, you don't need to talk about it. If your religion is the one true religion, than your god will make it known.
Proselytizing, evangilizing, preaching and missionary gospel spreading are rude and disrespectful activities, in my humble opinion. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Rteacher

Joined: 23 May 2005 Location: Western MA, USA
|
Posted: Sun Sep 18, 2005 5:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
Historically, there has always been evangelism within the framework of secularism and religious pluralism in America. To brush up on this topic I briefly consulted on-line passages from Freethinkers: A History of American Secularism by Susan Jacoby and a pop cultural study of evangelism at www.bookrags.com/history/popculture/evagelism-bbbb-01/
I personally remember seeing "televangelists" on TV when I was a kid - certainly by the early 60's (if not the late 50's) The biggest - and most flamboyant - Protestant evangelist I remember from early TV was Oral Roberts. The Catholics had the very popular Bishop Sheen. Of course, their broadcasts aired mostly on Sunday mornings. Evangelism as practiced by mainline Christian denominations (in the U.S.) has constantly changed in response to challenges presented by increasing secularization and urbanization (and diversity) which resulted in traditional religious values having less influence over individuals and culture at large.
The seeds of American secularism was the founding fathers' skepicism vis-a-vis the more authoritarian religious sects prominant in the colonial period - mainly Calvinism - and belief in ideals propagated by Enlightenment period thinkers. One especially influencial philosophical tenet was the notion that "if God exists, he created human rationality as the supreme instrument for understanding and mastering the natural world." Accordingly, religious faith was assigned "to the realm of individual conscience rather than public duty" and civil government was based on "natural" rights of man and religious diversity - rather than being based on laws of God "promulgated by self-appointed earthly spokesmen."
Especially among Protestant sects, evangelism, or enthusiastically preaching the Christian gospel, has always played an important role in their U.S. agenda - beginning with the "Great Awakening" of the colonial period, followed by Methodist "camp meetings" on the frontier, then by elaborate "crusades" organized by such preachers as Billy Sunday (1862-1935) Oral Roberts (1918 - ) and Billy Graham (1918 - ) and continuing on through the modern "televangelists" including Pat Robertson, Jim and Tammy Faye (and Jessica Hahn) Bakker and Jerry Falwell. Beyond bringing info about Christ and his teachings to the uninformed, many evangelists now demand a "born again" experience with Jesus and provide an on-going process of keeping believers enthusiastic about their faith. Toward that end are large stadium and televison crusades "designed to give already baptized Christians a chance to reaffirm ther faith and be reassured about their salvation."
I think that both secularism and evangelism have flaws - some that can be traced back to their very roots, and some that developed in time. Enlightenment philosphopical thought positing human "mastery" over nature has promoted material progress without regard for other forms of life and has resulted in widescale man-made environmental destruction. It has also fostered an anti-"personal God" bias in its assumption that there is no God - or soul - in the absence of physical proof. Similarly, evangelists' aggressively pushing their sectarian agendas without tolerance of other belief systems and scientific inquiry (and without deep philosophical understanding...) has caused divisiveness and spawned fanaticism. Obvious corruption and charactar flaws among so-called religious and spiritual leaders has also generated a lot of cynicism and skepticism. What's needed is a government - ideally informed by enlightened, non-sectarian spiritual leaders (not just "Billy Graham" types and material scientists...) that protects the rights of all living beings - and religious institutions that philosopically understand the harmony of all living beings linked to the Supreme living being through devotional service, the practice of which (despite different traditions) is essential to all real religions.
Last edited by Rteacher on Sun Sep 18, 2005 2:10 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Corporal

Joined: 25 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Sun Sep 18, 2005 6:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
rapier wrote: |
I would not dream of making the sort of comments i've just read- not in a million years. |
Maybe not, but you do make other, equally childish and equally ridiculous ones. So step down from that immaculate charger. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Rteacher

Joined: 23 May 2005 Location: Western MA, USA
|
Posted: Sun Sep 18, 2005 2:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'll accept the lack of response (especially by the "big thinkers" on this forum) to my thesis as acquiescence to my views...  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
guangho

Joined: 19 Jan 2005 Location: a spot full of deception, stupidity, and public micturation and thus unfit for longterm residency
|
Posted: Mon Sep 19, 2005 2:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
Is belief in G-d innate? That is, are you born a believer or do you become one? And if the latter, how did you become one? I'm up in the air about it- believing would be nice but I have seen and experienced too much to really accept the idea. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Rteacher

Joined: 23 May 2005 Location: Western MA, USA
|
Posted: Mon Sep 19, 2005 4:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
Any spiritual progress you make in one life, you pick up from that point in your next life...So, if you've already made a lot of progress (over God knows how many lifetimes...) then you will likely more readily take to it in this life. Many people lose faith due to experiences with individuals and organizations cheating in the name of religion. Associating with people with stronger faith and avoiding the influence of people heading in the wrong direction always helps... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
magicwolfman
Joined: 01 Sep 2005
|
Posted: Tue Sep 20, 2005 4:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
desultude wrote: |
I strongly agree that religion is a private matter in a secular society. If you are strong in your faith, you don't need to talk about it. If your religion is the one true religion, than your god will make it known.
Proselytizing, evangilizing, preaching and missionary gospel spreading are rude and disrespectful activities, in my humble opinion. |
Ya, damn them for trying to save your eternal soul |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Demonicat

Joined: 18 Nov 2004 Location: Suwon
|
Posted: Tue Sep 20, 2005 7:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Actually, I agree with you MW. Nothing makes me closer to god than being awoken at 6 am to someone banging on my door,
me: Yo, what in the *beep* do you want?
Stranger: Have you accepted jehovah into your heart?
and nothing makes me take a religion more seriously than a dude with long hair and a beard playing folk songs in public talking about his love for another man...who is actually Jesus.
Honestly though, I do L-O-V-E the pamphlets that are comic books that describe in detail how everthing from being Catholic, to playing D&D, to reading Harry Potter, to glorifying magic or werewolves will land you a first class ticket to firey torment and damnation...because of God's love for you.
In fact, I am absolutely enthralled by the idea that a benevolant super being would do things like create billions of people to burn and suffer (all those born before Christ or in non-christian areas). The idea that an all-knowing God would send his son down to be crucified, thus leading to such horrors as the holocaust, the inquistion, the crusades, or just about any war that has ever happened that isn't about money. That is the religion for me!!!
In seriousness though, I do appreciate missionaries who go to third world countries to give medicine and dig wells, they are awesome humanitarians and their work should be praised. The jackasses who run around yelling about how everyone who isn't Demonination of the Second Baptist Awakening of the Blood denomination of the 1st Baptist Church of Mississippi is going to hell- yeah, they piss me off. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
magicwolfman
Joined: 01 Sep 2005
|
Posted: Tue Sep 20, 2005 7:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The Jehovah witnesses, and the mormons are NOT Christians. They are a cult. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Demonicat

Joined: 18 Nov 2004 Location: Suwon
|
Posted: Tue Sep 20, 2005 7:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
magicwolfman Posted:
The Jehovah witnesses, and the mormons are NOT Christians. They are a cult.
|
Yet, they consider themselves as Christian. So then I must ask, out of severe curiosity not animosity, who ARE christian? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Freezer Burn

Joined: 11 Apr 2005 Location: Busan
|
Posted: Tue Sep 20, 2005 9:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
magicwolfman wrote: |
The Jehovah witnesses, and the mormons are NOT Christians. They are a cult. |
Said from a hater like you, all religion is a cult to varying degrees its just easy to swallow when your in the position to hate everything that has a different view or lifestyle to your own.
What makes your religion the be-all and end-all, no-one, you do, and judging from your bigotted, hatefull and close minded, mod arse-kissing posts you're wrong, anyone who has the religion to be intolerant and hateful is the wrong religion period.
I think the increase in religious posts is due to the bad moon rising and the incresed visability of socks on the washing line. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|