Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Is this normal? or legit?
Goto page Previous  1, 2
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Job-related Discussion Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Mr. Pink



Joined: 21 Oct 2003
Location: China

PostPosted: Sun Jan 08, 2006 12:06 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Grotto wrote:
I agree. Tell them you want the deposit removed from the contract or remove it yourself and tell them that this is the contract you are willing to sign.

Deposits are illegal and the labour board will back you up if you fight it(even if you signed the contract first)


I'd really like to see some hard evidence that deposits are illegal.

Considering that most employers who provide housing deduct a deposit, I can't see the 10,000s of these employers doing something that is illegal. The contract should be legal before immigration and the ministry of education gives the okay.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Homer
Guest




PostPosted: Sun Jan 08, 2006 5:32 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

For the one-millionth time Grotto...if the deposit clause is included in the contract and the contract is signed by both parties...then it is not illegal as it becomes a contractual agreement.

The law you are refering to but never quote concerns a school taking a deposit from a teachers' pay without any previous written agreement.
Back to top
Grotto



Joined: 21 Mar 2004

PostPosted: Sun Jan 08, 2006 8:28 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

It becomes illegal the second you fight it.
Throughout GEPIK there is a clause in the contract deducting 900,000 won from your pay, 300,000 won a month.

Now they all refused to remove it from the contract(no surprise there). When I recieved my first paycheque they deducted the 300,000 I contacted the labour board and complained.....they contacted the school and told them: Deposits are illegal...I got my money back the very next day and that was the end of that.

If you dont say anything and let them take your money then its a non issue.

If you stand up for yourself, instead of taking it up the ass like a good little foriegner, then it is illegal.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Mr. Pink



Joined: 21 Oct 2003
Location: China

PostPosted: Sun Jan 08, 2006 2:05 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Grotto wrote:
It becomes illegal the second you fight it.
Throughout GEPIK there is a clause in the contract deducting 900,000 won from your pay, 300,000 won a month.

Now they all refused to remove it from the contract(no surprise there). When I recieved my first paycheque they deducted the 300,000 I contacted the labour board and complained.....they contacted the school and told them: Deposits are illegal...I got my money back the very next day and that was the end of that.

If you dont say anything and let them take your money then its a non issue.

If you stand up for yourself, instead of taking it up the ass like a good little foriegner, then it is illegal.


I want hard evidence it is the law. Perhaps the labor board just scared them. There is a difference.

I am with Homer on once you sign the conditions of your contract, it then becomes legally binding.

I will actually look into this myself. I really hate how people take what is on Dave's as the truth without hard evidence.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Cheonmunka



Joined: 04 Jun 2004

PostPosted: Sun Jan 08, 2006 3:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I wonder if government departments recognize English worded contracts anyway?
I would presume that common law supercedes a contract written between two people.
It makes sense that national law is more important than between two parties.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
TheUrbanMyth



Joined: 28 Jan 2003
Location: Retired

PostPosted: Mon Jan 09, 2006 12:32 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Cheonmunka wrote:
I wonder if government departments recognize English worded contracts anyway?
I would presume that common law supercedes a contract written between two people.
It makes sense that national law is more important than between two parties.



I believe that in public school contracts it states that the governing language shall be Korean, but maybe that's just GEPIK?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
peppermint



Joined: 13 May 2003
Location: traversing the minefields of caddishness.

PostPosted: Mon Jan 09, 2006 12:52 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

My contract has a clause that says the governing language is Korean, but the school can be held liable if there's a difference in the English and Korean versions.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Pak Yu Man



Joined: 02 Jun 2005
Location: The Ida galaxy

PostPosted: Mon Jan 09, 2006 6:30 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Mr. Pink wrote:


I want hard evidence it is the law. Perhaps the labor board just scared them. There is a difference.

I am with Homer on once you sign the conditions of your contract, it then becomes legally binding.

I will actually look into this myself. I really hate how people take what is on Dave's as the truth without hard evidence.


Anything they put into a contract that you sign your name on is probably legal by Korean standards.

"you see right hee...you agreed to donate half your pay. You signed it...tough luck waygook"

You sign it...tough shiat.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
blackjack



Joined: 04 Jan 2006
Location: anyang

PostPosted: Mon Jan 09, 2006 1:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

i haven't moved to korea yet but i had a look at korean employment law web page, and it appears that a contract can't violate the employment law, if it does that section which does becomes void.

I think it is the same in most countries. The employment law lays down a base standard (eg pay, holidays, etc) and if the contract violates these, then, you get the minimium allowed by law. Thats why this is the first contract which i have ever read. I never bothered reading any of my NZ ones.

Well that was my understanding (but i am a newbe)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Job-related Discussion Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2
Page 2 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International