Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Freedom of Speech...War over cartoons?
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Off-Topic Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  

Did the cartoons go too far?
Yes, like Clinton said, they were appalling!
13%
 13%  [ 5 ]
Yes, but the cartoons weren't that bad
8%
 8%  [ 3 ]
No, the Muslims overreacted!
63%
 63%  [ 23 ]
No, the Cartoons didn't go far enough in depicting Mohammad
13%
 13%  [ 5 ]
Total Votes : 36

Author Message
jinju



Joined: 22 Jan 2006

PostPosted: Mon Feb 06, 2006 4:45 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Seriously, this is hat I keep hearing but I just dont know anymore. I may be wrong but Afghanis are not arabs and yet the worst violence over this has been in Afghanistan. People keep saying Islam is a religion of peace. It sort of makes me laugh. Before I believe it I think its up to the Muslims to SHOW us how peaceful their religion is.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Mills



Joined: 07 Jan 2006
Location: Incheon

PostPosted: Mon Feb 06, 2006 5:45 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

diablo3 wrote:
uhmm, I wish I could see what the fuss was all about. Does anyone have a website or something where these cartoons can be seen?


Jyllands-Posten Muhammad Cartoons

@ everyone,
You have to understand that any depiction of Muhammad (good or bad) is considered blasphemy in Islam. Wouldn't Christians freak out if Jesus was portrayed as a bomb toting terrorist by some Muslim nation's news agency?

FYI, dulouz uses the worst cartoon as his avatar.

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Wangja



Joined: 17 May 2004
Location: Seoul, Yongsan

PostPosted: Mon Feb 06, 2006 6:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jinju



Joined: 22 Jan 2006

PostPosted: Mon Feb 06, 2006 6:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Mills wrote:
diablo3 wrote:
uhmm, I wish I could see what the fuss was all about. Does anyone have a website or something where these cartoons can be seen?


Jyllands-Posten Muhammad Cartoons

@ everyone,
You have to understand that any depiction of Muhammad (good or bad) is considered blasphemy in Islam. Wouldn't Christians freak out if Jesus was portrayed as a bomb toting terrorist by some Muslim nation's news agency?

FYI, dulouz uses the worst cartoon as his avatar.



blasphemuy? Theres no such crime in the west. Muslims should remember that. As far as "blasphemous" depictions of Jesus, there have been tons. Christians dont go ape-shit and behave like backwards lunatics from 1000 years ago.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Troll_Bait



Joined: 04 Jan 2006
Location: [T]eaching experience doesn't matter much. -Lee Young-chan (pictured)

PostPosted: Mon Feb 06, 2006 6:15 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Your Taboo, Not Mine

http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1156609,00.html

Quote:
Since Ayatullah Khomeini declared a death sentence against Salman Rushdie for how he depicted Muhammad in his book The Satanic Verses, Islamic radicals have been essentially threatening the free discussion of their religion and politics in the West. Rushdie escaped with his life. But Pim Fortuyn, a Dutch politician who stood up against Muslim immigrant hostility to equality for women and gays, was murdered on the street. Theo van Gogh, a Dutch filmmaker who offended strict Muslims, was killed thereafter. Several other Dutch politicians who have dared to criticize the intolerance of many Muslims live with police protection.


Quote:
You can respect a religion without honoring its taboos. I eat pork, and I'm not an anti-Semite. As a Catholic, I don't expect atheists to genuflect before an altar. If violating a taboo is necessary to illustrate a political point, then the call is an easy one. Freedom means learning to deal with being offended.


Quote:
In America, Christians have become accustomed to artists' offending their religious symbols. They can protest, and cut off public funding--but the right of the individual to say or depict offensive messages or symbols is not really in dispute. Blasphemy, moreover, is common in the Muslim world, and sanctioned by Arab governments. The Arab media run cartoons depicting Jews and the symbols of the Jewish faith with imagery indistinguishable from that used in the Third Reich. But I have yet to see Jews or Israelis threaten the lives of Muslims because of it.


Quote:
And there is, of course, the other blasphemy. It occurred on Sept. 11, 2001, when fanatics murdered thousands of innocents in the name of Islam. Surely, nothing could be more blasphemous. So where were the Muslim boycotts of Saudi Arabia or Afghanistan after that horrifying event? Since 9/11 mosques have been bombed in Iraq by Islamic terrorists. Where was the rioting condemning attacks on the holiest of shrines? These double standards reveal something quite clear: this call for "sensitivity" is primarily a cover for intolerance of others and intimidation of free people.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Wangja



Joined: 17 May 2004
Location: Seoul, Yongsan

PostPosted: Mon Feb 06, 2006 6:22 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

It is not correct that there are no blasphemy laws in the west. England at least (for now) has such ancient laws ....

Quote:
In England, the blasphemy law exists for two reasons:

1. Because blasphemy is intended to cause a breach of peace between the blasphemer and those outraged

2. Because Christianity was part of common law, blasphemy tended to undermine the law

The second reason has been null for a long time, whilst the first is the topic of this page.


http://www.dpjs.co.uk/blasphemy.html

Much debate continues about repealing the laws.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/3753408.stm

Since American law is founded on English law, it is possible that the same laws exist (or existed) in USA.

edit: unless since repealed, the US used blasphemy laws as recently as

Quote:
1957 Michigan man convicted of blasphemy for cursing at police

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jinju



Joined: 22 Jan 2006

PostPosted: Mon Feb 06, 2006 7:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Wangja wrote:
It is not correct that there are no blasphemy laws in the west. England at least (for now) has such ancient laws ....

Quote:
In England, the blasphemy law exists for two reasons:

1. Because blasphemy is intended to cause a breach of peace between the blasphemer and those outraged

2. Because Christianity was part of common law, blasphemy tended to undermine the law

The second reason has been null for a long time, whilst the first is the topic of this page.


http://www.dpjs.co.uk/blasphemy.html

Much debate continues about repealing the laws.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/3753408.stm

Since American law is founded on English law, it is possible that the same laws exist (or existed) in USA.

edit: unless since repealed, the US used blasphemy laws as recently as

Quote:
1957 Michigan man convicted of blasphemy for cursing at police



Yeah, even if he law is on the books, like all stupid laws from long ago, doesnt mean anyone is actually going to be found guilty of it.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
SPINOZA



Joined: 10 Jun 2005
Location: $eoul

PostPosted: Mon Feb 06, 2006 8:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

SPINOZA wrote:
Quote:
And whats funniest is that their reaction shows that the cartoons were correct in how they depicted Islam.


The only thing missing from her thesis is the need to put all concerned into an industrial incinerator.


Oh dear, apologies for the above. I had one too many last night and wanted to vent.

However, more seriously and straightheaded now, there's one huge positive that's gonna come from all this, aside from us all having a good chuckle at Muslim nutters. That positive is this: everybody, and I mean everybody (except Bill Clinton, it would seem Rolling Eyes ), has commented on how ridiculous the reaction was. Overnight, it's become socially acceptable to criticize Islam and its right wing idiot followers, even amongst the looney, ultra-PC, so-liberal-they're-practically-Nazis left. Islam is no longer a peace-loving faith and that's the end of it and anyone who holds a different view is a racist. The vast majority of Muslims clearly aren't absolute saints and the hardline extremists in the minority as Tony Blair has been saying since 9/11 (it's total crap, but liberals genuinely believe it). The whole world, even liberals like my mother who's been an apologist for Islam for many years, have come out and gone "Oh come on, World War III, bombing Danish embassies, withdrawing Middle Eastern diplomats from Denmark and other countries supposedly involved, taking human lives.....over some cartoons? Are you out of your MINDS??".

People are starting to get sick of Muslims. They're becoming a giant pain in the arse. I'm sick to death of all the religions. Friends and family back home email me and ask me things like "are there any Jews or Muslims in Seoul?" and my reply is "no, thank goodness. Plenty of Christians, sadly, but I suppose you can't have everything". That's not to say there aren't any nice Muslims or Jews in the world, because, TOTALLY F--KING OBVIOUSLY, there are and that is a trivial argument.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Wangja



Joined: 17 May 2004
Location: Seoul, Yongsan

PostPosted: Mon Feb 06, 2006 8:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

That may be true, jinju, but if the law exists, it can be invoked, even by an individual with a private prosecution.

That the law might be considered stupid is not the point: that the law might be better repealed is not the point. For now, it is the law.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
diablo3



Joined: 11 Sep 2004

PostPosted: Mon Feb 06, 2006 8:22 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

oh, why are adults fighting over cartoons?

cartoons are for kids you know.

makes us wonder what the real definition of a kid is.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
TheUrbanMyth



Joined: 28 Jan 2003
Location: Retired

PostPosted: Mon Feb 06, 2006 10:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

SPINOZA wrote:
[. Overnight, it's become socially acceptable to criticize Islam and its right wing idiot followers, even amongst the looney, ultra-PC, so-liberal-they're-practically-Nazis left. Islam is no longer a peace-loving faith and that's the end of it and anyone who holds a different view is a racist. .


Not sure how this follows. Are you saying people who say that Islam is a peace-loving faith are racists? Doesn't sound like something that racists would say, and anyway Islam is not a race and has nothing to do with racism.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
indiercj



Joined: 30 Jan 2003
Location: Seoul

PostPosted: Tue Feb 07, 2006 12:14 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I guess the only solution to this is that the cartoonist put a piece where Jesus fu*ks Maria, publish it on most of the major western newpapers and then they will be over it. Laughing

If they don't. Ok, they are overreacting.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
SPINOZA



Joined: 10 Jun 2005
Location: $eoul

PostPosted: Tue Feb 07, 2006 6:17 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
Not sure how this follows.

1.

Are you saying people who say that Islam is a peace-loving faith are racists? Doesn't sound like something that racists would say,

2. and anyway Islam is not a race and has nothing to do with racism.


(numbers are mine, all mine - I own numbers)

(just kidding)

1. Believe it or not, there are many people who say that any other belief about Islam other than Islam is a peace-loving faith; all Muslims are lovely people save for a tiny minority = racism.

2. Islam isn't a race? I agree. Doesn't deter them. Welcome to European liberalism.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
panchotino



Joined: 16 Jan 2006
Location: scotland for now.

PostPosted: Tue Feb 07, 2006 8:30 am    Post subject: kick off Reply with quote

great!the cartoons were published in an isreali paper today.as if hamas need more reasons.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Gord



Joined: 25 Feb 2003

PostPosted: Tue Feb 07, 2006 8:40 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Mills wrote:
@ everyone,
You have to understand that any depiction of Muhammad (good or bad) is considered blasphemy in Islam.


Only it's not. Worshipping of idols is what's not allowed, not images of the man. In recent years, clerics have increasingly been saying that "do not worship idols" means no pictures, but that's a pretty big jump which I would not agree with.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Off-Topic Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Page 2 of 3

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International