Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Theory versus Practicality
Goto page Previous  1, 2
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Job-related Discussion Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
jacl



Joined: 31 Oct 2005

PostPosted: Mon Feb 13, 2006 10:04 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Also depends on the person. Learning theory sounds like wasted time and money to me.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
khyber



Joined: 16 Jan 2003
Location: Compunction Junction

PostPosted: Tue Feb 14, 2006 5:10 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

While i was getting my ed degree, classroom management was the mentioned in EVERY SINGLE subject often times with full units devoted to the matter. There were also two ed psy classes taht dealt with them (one before AND one during our internship).
I wouldn't say that it wasn't brought up in our school.
I also found that most of my professors taught many different theories and often theories that contradicted (to an extent) each other. They did this so that the students (prospective teachers) had a chance to create our own philosophy of education: or, in terms of our pre-internship, our "ideal philosophy of education".

Generally, my experience in MY ed college seems quite different from everyone else's.

I think that some theory is certainly important.
You CAN drive a car without knowing how it works, doing the requisite tune up work; filling it with gas, check the tires, etc... . But there WILL come a time when that car is beyond your knowledge and expertise in maintenance.

Pragmatically teaching CAN be done based on experience. In fact, experience itself can create some fine teachers. HOWEVER, i do think there ARE things (times) when theory is NEEDED to create the best possible situation.

in other words, practice is the MOST important but don't underestimate the importance of theory (ESP. in school systems back home. You'll be hard pressed to find a job if your package is limited in it's ecuational terminology.)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
vox



Joined: 13 Feb 2005
Location: Jeollabukdo

PostPosted: Tue Feb 14, 2006 8:30 am    Post subject: Re: Theory versus Practicality Reply with quote

lastat06513 wrote:

Now, I want to ask; When does theory give way to practice? And can teaching practicality mean more than theory. So which is better; learning the theory of teaching or "learning as you go"?


I learned a lot of parallels to this story in the arts:

on music theory (my old teacher) "some people would have you believe that [music] theory is written in a white ivory tower and distributed like indulgences to the masses. It's exactly the opposite. Theory is written in the jungle."

The work of theorists is to record and explain the workings of that which has passed. This is the only reason I tolerated the of ESL teaching history section of my TESL certification. You know the 'Army method' is history for a reason - it was found to have limits. However, once in a while some of those old methods may be useful. But learning theory is not about enshrining theory. It's about giving you a history while you go out and carve that new path (and saving you from re-inventing the wheel if possible.) I think your Yale friend exhibits a common trend of young people hell-bent on establishing themselves: namely, without experience they cling desperately to truth of what they know, which is classroom textbook theory. What that professor should have done was empower his/her student by equipping him/her with a sense of appropriation and adaptibility because teaching, like the language of English itself, is a constantly evolving organism. In 50 years major changes will have occured in vocabulary and grammar, and teaching will be much more enlightened. Setting aside the off-the-beaten-paths (like the Berlitz schools) in the busiest teaching traffic there is no real place for people looking to vindicate their strong grasp of static theories from pages that can not change and grow with the times. To attempt this is to ignore the human condition.

It sounds like what your friend got was a good grounding but that he's got the cart before the horse. Take heart, you shouldn't hate him, you should pity him. He will be confronted with the truth and the real question is will he be able to adapt when he hits an unforeseen bump?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Job-related Discussion Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2
Page 2 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International