Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Hilarious clip on stem cell research (Jon Stewart)
Goto page Previous  1, 2
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Off-Topic Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
red dog



Joined: 31 Oct 2004

PostPosted: Tue Jul 25, 2006 1:54 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Delirium's Brother wrote:
@ Red Dog:

I don't see a category error here at all. If you are going to defend a Culture of Life, then defend it everywhere. Selectively defending a Culture of Life is like not defending it at all. There was no logical error in Stewart's comedic presentation, and it was damn funny too.


I don't like buzzwords such as "culture of life," but I personally disagree with all wars, period, including the war in Iraq. However, it's perfectly possible to defend war under some circumstances and still condemn fatal experiments on people. I think most of the population would support that position, actually -- but of course Stewart feels embryos aren't people worthy of protection. If he'd just said so instead of bringing up Iraq and using bizarre "snowflake baby" clips to ridicule his opponents, I probably wouldn't have bothered commenting on his show at all.

This isn't the most important issue in the world to me but it would be nice if commentators like Stewart would just address one issue at a time: Iraq one day, embryo experiments the next, Bush's personal philosophy of life the day after that. Maybe that's too much to expect of a comedy show, but it's irritating to see people swallow this sort of crap and then congratulate themselves on their supposed superiority to the rest of us. Some things aren't funny.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Woland



Joined: 10 May 2006
Location: Seoul

PostPosted: Tue Jul 25, 2006 2:26 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

red dog wrote:
This isn't the most important issue in the world to me but it would be nice if commentators like Stewart would just address one issue at a time: Iraq one day, embryo experiments the next, Bush's personal philosophy of life the day after that. Maybe that's too much to expect of a comedy show, but it's irritating to see people swallow this sort of crap and then congratulate themselves on their supposed superiority to the rest of us. Some things aren't funny.


I believe Stewart was addressing one issue - Bush's smarmy hypocrisy about "defending life".
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Delirium's Brother



Joined: 08 May 2006
Location: Out in that field with Rumi, waiting for you to join us!

PostPosted: Tue Jul 25, 2006 2:56 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

red dog wrote:
Delirium's Brother wrote:
@ Red Dog:

I don't see a category error here at all. If you are going to defend a Culture of Life, then defend it everywhere. Selectively defending a Culture of Life is like not defending it at all. There was no logical error in Stewart's comedic presentation, and it was damn funny too.


I don't like buzzwords such as "culture of life," but I personally disagree with all wars, period, including the war in Iraq.

I agree with you, war is bad; but the "buzzword," Culture of Life, is specifically relevant because it's being championed by the Bush junta. Furthermore, the irony is that anti-war discourses don't seem to fit under the rubric of Bush's Culture of Life ideology. That's Stewart's point.

red dog wrote:
However, it's perfectly possible to defend war under some circumstances and still condemn fatal experiments on people.

No, life is life, it's all equally valuable: embryonic and Iraqis. If you march under a Culture of Life banner, as Bush does, you can't selectively choose. Under what circumstances is war just, when you've committed yourself to the sanctity of life?

red dog wrote:
I think most of the population would support that position, actually -- but of course Stewart feels embryos aren't people worthy of protection.

You are wrong here, I think Stewart is pointing out that Bush feels that some lives aren't worthy of protection.

red dog wrote:
If he'd just said so instead of bringing up Iraq and using bizarre "snowflake baby" clips to ridicule his opponents, I probably wouldn't have bothered commenting on his show at all.

I can't believe you are so pedantic. Comedy is mainly about juxtaposition. The "snowflake babies" and Iraq, are absolutely fair-game in the contexts of a comedy sketch that questions the president's commitments to a Culture of Life.

red dog wrote:
This isn't the most important issue in the world to me but it would be nice if commentators like Stewart would just address one issue at a time: Iraq one day, embryo experiments the next, Bush's personal philosophy of life the day after that.

Wrong again, the real world isn't serial! Life is complexity and complication. Given that, I expect logical consistency from politicians and I expect my social commentators to draw conclusion and develop insights when politicians want to obfuscate and compartmentalize the issues.

red dog wrote:
Maybe that's too much to expect of a comedy show, but it's irritating to see people swallow this sort of crap and then congratulate themselves on their supposed superiority to the rest of us.

They are superior if, in laughing with Stewart, they can see through the Bush junta's logical inconsistencies and ideological contradictions.

red dog wrote:
Some things aren't funny.

Your lack of imagination for one.

Wow, I know that a lot of people teaching in Korea get stuck with a raw deal, but I hope they're at least giving you oxygen for your brain.


edit: fixed a typo and grammar error


Last edited by Delirium's Brother on Tue Jul 25, 2006 6:01 pm; edited 2 times in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Qinella



Joined: 25 Feb 2005
Location: the crib

PostPosted: Tue Jul 25, 2006 7:12 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Who would make serious complaints about the ethical news analysis of a self-proclaimed FAKE NEWS COMEDY SHOW?

Laughing

Btw, the "snowflake kids" term was devised by Rove, not Jon Stewart. The bit about them being all white was, surprise surprise, a JOKE!

Man Comedy Central is really failing to live up to its promise of providing a forum for serious, intellectual debate and current event analysis. Rolling Eyes
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
blaseblasphemener



Joined: 01 Jun 2006
Location: There's a voice, keeps on calling me, down the road, that's where I'll always be

PostPosted: Tue Jul 25, 2006 7:20 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
" but I personally disagree with all wars, period, including the war in Iraq.


By definition, a war is two or more country's fighting. So, if country A invades country B, and Country B decides not to fight, then there is no war. So, if you personally disagree with all wars, then if you were, say, the Allied nations from 1939 onwards, you would have just let Hitler roll on through all countries and take over the world? Really? That's your opinion?

If not, please clarify.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
canuckistan
Mod Team
Mod Team


Joined: 17 Jun 2003
Location: Training future GS competitors.....

PostPosted: Tue Jul 25, 2006 7:37 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Pretty hilarious clip and bang on about the moral hypocrisy!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Salty T



Joined: 23 Jul 2006
Location: Happy Suwon

PostPosted: Fri Jul 28, 2006 8:08 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Bush's stance on stem cell research is hyprocritical, not because of Iraq but because of in-vitro fertilization.

During in-vitro fertilization, dozens of embryos are created and then whittled down to a select "cream of the crop." The rest are simply discarded. These select few embryos are then implanted, with the expectation that all but one of them will die. In about half of all implantations, none of the embryos will survive. So whenever a couple decides to undergo IVF, dozens of embryos are killed. Yet this is a common and accepted practice in America, while stem-cell research is getting all the talk about "moral ambiguity." Why is Bush pressing so hard against stem-cell research while all this embryo-killing has been going on under his nose for the past twenty-five years?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
red dog



Joined: 31 Oct 2004

PostPosted: Fri Jul 28, 2006 7:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Probably because it's new and depends on government funding.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Off-Topic Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2
Page 2 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International