| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
butlerian

Joined: 04 Sep 2006 Location: Korea
|
Posted: Thu Sep 06, 2007 3:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee wrote: |
| Dome Vans wrote: |
| Wait till Joo gets hold of this, there'll be plenty of copying and pasting going on. None of it will make sense though. Ramblings of a brainwashed american bush*ite along with Mr Mcgarrett. Joined at birth those two, shame the brain was missing. |
Dom Vans = apologist for everyone around the world who hates the US.
By the way Saddam did gas the Kurds- didn't he? Well?
I guess you are one of those types who trades anti US information and rumors like baseball cards cause it gives you a feeling of oneness with a group. |
Joo, you are completely out of order. Dome Vans is a good guy who genuinely believes in what he says, and is frequently spot on. The last part of your post is a pathetic, childish attack that has no merit or value whatsoever. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee

Joined: 25 May 2003
|
Posted: Thu Sep 06, 2007 5:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
He is an apologist for everyone world wide who hates the US .
Being pro America's enemies is his fashion statement.
What is his spot on about ? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
butlerian

Joined: 04 Sep 2006 Location: Korea
|
Posted: Thu Sep 06, 2007 6:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee wrote: |
He is an apologist for everyone world wide who hates the US .
Being pro America's enemies is his fashion statement.
What is his spot on about ? |
Your use of the word "apologist" is overrated and inapprppriate. Merely because he often sides with countries that are not friends with America does not make him an "apologist". You need to respect those who do not follow American propaganda. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee

Joined: 25 May 2003
|
Posted: Thu Sep 06, 2007 6:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
| butlerian wrote: |
| Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee wrote: |
He is an apologist for everyone world wide who hates the US .
Being pro America's enemies is his fashion statement.
What is his spot on about ? |
Your use of the word "apologist" is overrated and inapprppriate. Merely because he often sides with countries that are not friends with America does not make him an "apologist". You need to respect those who do not follow American propaganda. |
He says Saddam did not gas the Kurds.
and he says he opposes the Iraq was on humanitarian grounds which it self probably makes him an apologist.
He is an apologist and you probably are a moonbat.
Plus most the the counties and groups who are enemies of the US fight for a sinister cause.
If you think that is a subjective statement then answer this
What does AQ/ Jihad fight for
What do the Khomenists fight for?
What do the Bathists fight for? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
butlerian

Joined: 04 Sep 2006 Location: Korea
|
Posted: Thu Sep 06, 2007 6:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee wrote: |
| butlerian wrote: |
| Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee wrote: |
He is an apologist for everyone world wide who hates the US .
Being pro America's enemies is his fashion statement.
What is his spot on about ? |
Your use of the word "apologist" is overrated and inapprppriate. Merely because he often sides with countries that are not friends with America does not make him an "apologist". You need to respect those who do not follow American propaganda. |
He says Saddam did not gas the Kurds.
and he says he opposes the Iraq was on humanitarian grounds which it self probably makes him an apologist.
He is an apologist and you probably are a moonbat.
Plus most the the counties and groups who are enemies of the US fight for a sinister cause.
If you think that is a subjective statement then answer this
What does AQ/ Jihad fight for
What do the Khomenists fight for?
What do the Bathists fight for? |
Moonbat? What a silly, loaded and propaganda-incuded phrase. Treat your peers with respect - don't give them silly names and labels. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee

Joined: 25 May 2003
|
Posted: Thu Sep 06, 2007 6:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
You probably are a moonbat. Sorry.
| Quote: |
| You need to respect those who do not follow American propaganda. |
Yep anyone who supports the US is a follower of American proganda.
Yep you are a moonbat. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
butlerian

Joined: 04 Sep 2006 Location: Korea
|
Posted: Thu Sep 06, 2007 6:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee wrote: |
| You probably are a moonbat. Sorry. |
And, if I am, so what? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee

Joined: 25 May 2003
|
Posted: Thu Sep 06, 2007 6:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
| They your opinons are worth far less, to anyone who more or less wishes the US well |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
butlerian

Joined: 04 Sep 2006 Location: Korea
|
Posted: Thu Sep 06, 2007 7:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee wrote: |
| They your opinons are worth far less, to anyone who more or less wishes the US well |
Why would I wish them well? They're destroying the world. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee

Joined: 25 May 2003
|
Posted: Thu Sep 06, 2007 7:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
How?
Anyway you are in Korea no cold war effort from the US means you have no job. Smart guy. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
butlerian

Joined: 04 Sep 2006 Location: Korea
|
Posted: Thu Sep 06, 2007 7:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee wrote: |
How?
Anyway you are in Korea no cold war effort from the US means you have no job. Smart guy. |
I have a job...not necessarily here, but I have a job. Besides, what's that got to do with anything? Me having a job here is hardly a justification for what happened. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee

Joined: 25 May 2003
|
Posted: Thu Sep 06, 2007 7:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
during the cold war? You people were against that too.
Daegu or ChungChun Nam Do is in Korea .
You are easy. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dome Vans Guest
|
Posted: Thu Sep 06, 2007 7:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
He says Saddam did not gas the Kurds.
and he says he opposes the Iraq was on humanitarian grounds which it self probably makes him an apologist.
He is an apologist and you probably are a moonbat.
Plus most the the counties and groups who are enemies of the US fight for a sinister cause.
If you think that is a subjective statement then answer this
What does AQ/ Jihad fight for
What do the Khomenists fight for?
What do the Bathists fight for? |
Your derision of Peltiere is your opinion, Joo. You choose your blinkered sources for your blinkered opinion, that's fine.
I oppose the war as being the final argument for Bush and his illegal war. As mentioned before at least the fifth choice after the prev. four were not true and not good enough to get legitimate backing.
The US is fighting for a unilateral, selfish cause. Why shoudn't the US be included in this band of crusading, capitalist monkeys? What cause does the US fight for, Joo, please enlighten me?
The US invaded Iraq illegally and without reason (humanitarian no reason as stated above, no credibility) so anything that they do to defend their territory cannot be deemed extreme. You'd do the same!
Nope Joo you're easy. Keep reading that propaganda, it might turn into a magic eye picture and you may see santa claus in it.
| Quote: |
| Yeah and freedom lovin' GOPers were all over that atrocity...too bad it took 'em 20 f*cking years to deal with it. During the Iran-Iraq War, Neo-cons like Rumsfeld and the posse had no qualms or shame in dealing with Hussein as long as he served his purpose. The second he stopped serving them, he becomes the devil incarnate. |
Well put PCOC, state funded terrorism is fine, until they defect. Never really see it coming do they.
I do however find moonbat to be quite a nice name, conjures up images of nature and nice things. Thank you Joo for that. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee

Joined: 25 May 2003
|
Posted: Thu Sep 06, 2007 8:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
[quote="Dome Vans"][q
| Quote: |
Your derision of Peltiere is your opinion, Joo. You choose your blinkered sources for your blinkered opinion, that's fine.
|
No he was ripped apart
DIA said that Saddam could make that gas
| Quote: |
I oppose the war as being the final argument for the Bush and his illegal war. As mentioned before at least the fifth choice after the prev. four were not true. |
The war was not illegal cause Saddam never gave up his war.
And anyone who opposes the war on humanitarian grouds is either ignorant or disinegenous but in your case it is possible that it is both.
| Quote: |
The US is fighting for a unilateral, selfish cause. Why shoudn't the US be included in this band of crusading, capitalist monkeys? What cause does the US fight for, Joo, please enlighten me |
?
No it is moral to go against Bathists Khomeni followers and Al Qaedists an (For the record Klansman too they have a thing enemies of the US too. )
The Klan = white supremacist
Bathists = Arab superpremist
Al Qaeda = Sunni supremist
Khomeni followers = Shia supremist.
| Quote: |
| The US invaded Iraq illegally |
Not Saddam never gave up his war.
His regime was illegitimate
| Quote: |
| and without reason |
Strategic reasons
Saddam never gave up his war.
Saddam was a serial aggressor
Saddam's regime was illegitmate
Bathists, Khomeni followers and Al Qaedists were out to get the US.
| Quote: |
(humanitarian no reason as stated above, no credibility) |
that is not the reason but US actions saved lives which makes in moral
| Quote: |
so anything that they do to defend their territory cannot be deemed extreme. You'd do the same!
|
They are not defending their territory they are trying to conquer it from other groups
but more than that.
Bathists , Khomeni followers and Al Qaedists don't have the right to defend themselves from the consequnces of there sinister war and agenda.
Anymore than world war Japan had a right to defend itself from the US.
| Quote: |
Nope Joo you're easy. Keep reading that propaganda, it might turn into a magic eye picture and you may see santa claus in i |
t.
Says the guy who sucks up the alternative media that is written for no other purpose but to go after the US and those who are sympathetic to it.
| Quote: |
| Yeah and freedom lovin' GOPers were all over that atrocity...too bad it took 'em 20 f*cking years to deal with it. During the Iran-Iraq War, Neo-cons like Rumsfeld and the posse had no qualms or shame in dealing with Hussein as long as he served his purpose. The second he stopped serving them, he becomes the devil incarnate. |
That is cause Khomeni was also a fascist bigot.
The US supported Stalin against Hitler. Was more or less the same as that.
| Quote: |
Well put PCOC, state funded terrorism is fine, until they defect. Never really see it coming do they. |
Whatever it takes to force Bathists , Khomeni followers or Al Qaedists is ok.
| Quote: |
I do however find moonbat to be quite a nice name, conjures up images of nature and nice things. Thank you Joo for that. |
Yes it also reminds one of lunar which the word lunitic comes from.
And that describes your politics and views.
Another one is immoral. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Alias

Joined: 24 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Thu Sep 06, 2007 6:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
And anyone who opposes the war on humanitarian grouds is either ignorant or disinegenous but in your case it is possible that it is both.
|
Considering you've already been owned several times in your debates I would have to say that Dome cannot be ignorant. I guess that makes him disingenuous.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|