| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Bulsajo

Joined: 16 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Sun May 28, 2006 6:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Thanks for posting that in this thread- it's so very apropos. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
igotthisguitar

Joined: 08 Apr 2003 Location: South Korea (Permanent Vacation)
|
Posted: Sun May 28, 2006 10:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Bulsajo wrote: |
| Thanks for posting that in this thread- it's so very apropos. |
You mean this?
| igotthisguitar wrote: |
FOX inexplicably decided to cancel The Lone Gunmen after only 13 episodes, even though the first season of The Lone Gunmen actually had better ratings than the first season of The X-Files.
The cancellation of the well-rated Lone Gunmen has thus led to conspiracy theories that the Bush administration pulled strings with the Republican-friendly owner of FOX, Rupert Murdoch, to have The Lone Gunmen cancelled in order to have full control of the nation's emotions with no questions asked, because the Administration was actually aware of the plots to attack The Towers and Pentagon before September 11 yet had wanted them to happen, just as people have long argued that FDR willingly let the Japanese attack Pearl Harbor because he wanted it to happen in order to get into the War
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Lone_Gunmen
http://www.rense.com/1.imagesD/lonegunmanpilo.WMV |
Sure. No problem. Did you watch the WMV segment?
Clearly the whole 9/11 thing was a very sophisticated & carefully planned military operation.
FOX's LONE GUNMAN even predicted it a few months before the fact, as of course did ALEX JONES.
Imagine that. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Bulsajo

Joined: 16 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Mon May 29, 2006 6:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Well, clearly.
It simply goes without saying, doesn't it?
I mean, if the networks make a show about it then it stands to reason that it must be based on fact, just like x-files was. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
igotthisguitar

Joined: 08 Apr 2003 Location: South Korea (Permanent Vacation)
|
Posted: Wed May 31, 2006 2:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Bulsajo wrote: |
Well, clearly.
It simply goes without saying, doesn't it?
I mean, if the networks make a show about it then it stands to reason that it must be based on fact, just like x-files was. |
Actually the Lone Gunman episode was not so much based on "fact" as it proved all-too prophetic.
The episode in question came out months prior to 9/11.
Still, the official line remains "THEY" had no idea "terrorists" could ever have considered using aircraft to wreak mass confusion, fear, destruction, & HEGELIAN SHOCK  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee

Joined: 25 May 2003
|
Posted: Thu Jun 01, 2006 6:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| igotthisguitar wrote: |
| Bulsajo wrote: |
| Thanks for posting that in this thread- it's so very apropos. |
You mean this?
| igotthisguitar wrote: |
FOX inexplicably decided to cancel The Lone Gunmen after only 13 episodes, even though the first season of The Lone Gunmen actually had better ratings than the first season of The X-Files.
The cancellation of the well-rated Lone Gunmen has thus led to conspiracy theories that the Bush administration pulled strings with the Republican-friendly owner of FOX, Rupert Murdoch, to have The Lone Gunmen cancelled in order to have full control of the nation's emotions with no questions asked, because the Administration was actually aware of the plots to attack The Towers and Pentagon before September 11 yet had wanted them to happen, just as people have long argued that FDR willingly let the Japanese attack Pearl Harbor because he wanted it to happen in order to get into the War
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Lone_Gunmen
http://www.rense.com/1.imagesD/lonegunmanpilo.WMV |
Sure. No problem. Did you watch the WMV segment?
Clearly the whole 9/11 thing was a very sophisticated & carefully planned military operation.
FOX's LONE GUNMAN even predicted it a few months before the fact, as of course did ALEX JONES.
Imagine that. |
[Home] [Stand down]
| Quote: |
According to the official story, fighters failed to intercept any of the hijacked jets on 9/11. Is this really plausible? Many conspiracy sites say no, but the information they use to support this isn�t always reliable.
Payne Stewart and the story of the �speedy� interception
Fighter intercepts are routine, with 67 taking place in 9 months before 9/11
Eye-witness testimony casts doubt on the time NORAD claimed they scrambled jets to intercept Flight 11
Intercepts of suspect planes normally happen within 10 minutes. Why not on 9/11?
The hijacked planes should still have been tracked on radar, even if their transponders were turned off
War games involving hijacked planes on 9/11 precisely mirrored the WTC and Pentagon attacks
False blips related to Air Force war games were used to delay the military response
Why were fighters not launched from Andrews Air Force Base, closest to Washington?
When fighters were launched, they flew at suspiciously slow speeds
General Myers initial story was that no fighters were launched until after the Pentagon was hit
Links to related sites |
http://www.911myths.com/html/stand_down.html |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Bulsajo

Joined: 16 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Fri Jun 02, 2006 9:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
| igotthisguitar wrote: |
Clearly the whole 9/11 thing was a very sophisticated & carefully planned military operation.
|
Clearly. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
igotthisguitar

Joined: 08 Apr 2003 Location: South Korea (Permanent Vacation)
|
Posted: Sun Jul 23, 2006 4:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
Former Two-Star General Decries
Official Government Version Of 911 Attacks
7-19-6
The fifth anniversary of September 11, as well as the first anniversary of the reauthorization of the USA "PATRIOT" Act, is looming around the corner and there are still many unanswered questions concerning the horrendous tragedy inflicted upon New York City and the United States of America
One question, however, seems to have been answered quite clearly by retired Major General Albert Stubblebine. The question: Did a Boeing 757 hit the Pentagon on September 11, 2001?
The answer is astonishing.
Major General Stubblebine admits, "I measured pieces of Soviet equipment from photographs? I look at the hole in the Pentagon and I look at the size of an airplane that was supposed to have hit the Pentagon. The plane does not fit in that hole. So what DID hit the Pentagon? What hit it? Where is it? What's going on?"
Major General Stubblebine, at one point in his distinguished military career, was in charge of Imagery Interpretation for Scientific and Technical Intelligence. He can be seen visibly angered while speaking about the Pentagon and the supposed airplane crash in the newly released documentary, "One Nation Under Siege."
The clip is available at www.undersiegemovie.com/moreinfo.html
http://www.undersiegemovie.com/moreinfo.html
Other questions about the September 11 attacks are raised in the BridgeStone Media Group/Power Hour Production DVD expose' "9-11 In Plane Site."
The loss of our civil liberties as a direct result of the USA PATRIOT Act is addressed in the newest documentary, "One Nation Under Siege."
For more information, please go to
www.undersiegemovie.com
http://www.undersiegemovie.com/
Contact
BridgeStone Media Group,
PO Box 30576, Columbia MO 65202
Contact Information: Debbie Lewis 573-378-9123
[email protected] |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee

Joined: 25 May 2003
|
Posted: Sun Jul 23, 2006 3:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
http://www.lolloosechange.co.nr/
go the videos
| Quote: |
911 case study: pentagon flight 77
A computer simulation showing how Pentagon Flight 77 crashed occurred, including a small clip comparing the blurry pentagon video and the simulation. Many people might be skeptical about computer simulations, but this one shows photos of the damaged poles and a damaged generator, which begs the question: How can a missile do that? Simple, it can't. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Bulsajo

Joined: 16 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Thu Aug 10, 2006 8:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Well it looks like IGTG went and changed the title of this thread AGAIN. No wonder no one can find it using the search function.
Stubblebine has a bit of a reputation...
| Quote: |
| Stubblebine gave a lecture at the International Symposium on UFO Research, sponsored by the International Association for New Science, in Denver, Colorado (May 22-25, 1992). This gives a good example of Stubblebine's coherence (or lack there of) and paranoia (he often threatened to destroy the tape). Stubblebine claimed that none of the members of the remote viewing program had prior psychic abilities or interests (all other sources state that they did). |
http://www.mindcontrolforums.com/hambone/people1.html |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
some waygug-in
Joined: 25 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Thu Aug 10, 2006 8:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yet again...the no-jet theory is a red herring. It is disinformation meant to discredit the real research into the events of 9/11.
http://www.oilempire.us/911.html#best |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Bulsajo

Joined: 16 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Thu Aug 10, 2006 9:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yes, and I'm starting to believe that IGTG is in fact a US federal agent paid to spread disinformation... OH MY GOD! THAT MAKES PERFECT SENSE!
or not... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
some waygug-in
Joined: 25 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Thu Aug 10, 2006 9:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Exactly...or not?
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
wylies99

Joined: 13 May 2006 Location: I'm one cool cat!
|
Posted: Fri Aug 11, 2006 12:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It's good to believe EVERYTHING you read on the internet.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
some waygug-in
Joined: 25 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Fri Aug 11, 2006 4:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Believing everything on the internet...? Sure why not?
It's better than believing the lies that the government is spewing.
www.oilempire.us
http://www.oiltruth.com/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
igotthisguitar

Joined: 08 Apr 2003 Location: South Korea (Permanent Vacation)
|
Posted: Fri Aug 11, 2006 10:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| wylies99 wrote: |
It's good to believe EVERYTHING you read on the internet.  |
Better to doubt everything that's alleged, claim wise?
KEEP ON ROCKIN' IN THE FREE WORLD  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|