Korean Job Discussion Forums

[Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee]

[Gopher]

[deleted]

[ontheway]

The people of the world expect the US to be its moral leader.

No one expects anything from France, Germany or Russia.

That's one more reason the US must be a principled, moral, neutral leader in the world. Why join in with those socialistic unprincipled lands? The US has its founding fathers. F/G/R have Napoleon, Hitler and Stalin. They have had manipulative, interventionist, militaristic foreign policies and wars. They have failed. Should America follow them to defeat and dismemberment.

The world is waiting for America to lead as a free, principled, neutral, rich, growing, prosperous nation. Let them join in as states and citizens or stay outside and face the caliphate.


And why would you post the lies of Bin Laden? No one believes his lies except for the followers he has duped. They follow him because Bush and his ilk make Bin Laden's lies believable.

[Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee]

[ontheway]

Gopher, you obviously didn't read my posts. I love America and the American people. That is why I want to protect them from Bush and his evil. We should have impeached FDR before the war, LBJ, Nixon (but he resigned), Clinton (he was impeached for the wrong reasons) and Bush I and II. These presidents broke their oaths to uphold the constitution. They did great harm to the American people. They undermined the principles of liberty the US is based on.

People who follow Bush are helping Bin Laden in his efforts to destroy America. They are true anti-Americans. Bin Laden could never hurt America without the help of the US government creating victims to be his followers. The people who supported the interventionist policies of the US in the past have created Bin Laden, et al. Now the Bushies are creating the Bin Ladens of the future.

[Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee]

[ontheway]

Joo, Bush ll is only the latest incarnation of this interventionist policy. Of course George W. didn't create Bin Laden. That was his father's generation's legacy. From GHW Bush's days in the CIA. LBJ, Nixon and Kissinger. As I said, Bush and "his ilk". The interventionists have been around along time. Their first great success was the imposition of the Federal Income Tax and the Federal Reserve.

America's problems all come from interventionism and socialism.

[ontheway]

US interventionism began before Bin Laden was born. He grew up in it. He was radicalized by it. He is an engineer by training and he expects people to follow principles. (His engineering training is how he knew he could bring down the twin towers with airliners. These buildings are not like the others oft posted by conspiracy theorists. The twin towers had a different kind of support structure supported from the middle.)

People who follow these terrorists are people looking for leadership. They are looking for principled answers. They find the US lacking. America should lead by example. America should be a bright shining light for the world.

Presidents before G W Bush created Bin Laden as a terrorist. They should have been impeached. G W is creating worse future enemies for the US. He should be impeached.

[Gopher]

Ontheway, it seems as if you are simply one more person confused and bitter about America and her role in world affairs. You even seem to have at least some sympathy for bin Laden and his cause.

There is nothing I could say to you that would help you. Your mind is clearly made up, and that appears to be that.

[EFLtrainer]

[EFLtrainer]

[igotthisguitar]

Newsweek: Armitage Plays Unwitting Role In CIA Leak



The Man Who Said Too Much
A book coauthored by NEWSWEEK's Michael Isikoff details Richard Armitage's central role in the Valerie Plame leak.

Katsumi Kasahara / AP (l.) ; Lawrence Jackson / AP
According to a new book, the State Department has known for years that Armitage (left) outed Plame

� Perspectives
� O'Donnell weighs in on White House woes
� Libby defense may highlight infighting
� Cheney Notes Surface in Fitzgerald Probe
� Exec privilege in CIA case downplayed

By Michael Isikoff
Newsweek
Updated: 10:49 a.m. ET Aug. 27, 2006
Sept. 4, 2006 issue - In the early morning of Oct. 1, 2003, Secretary of State Colin Powell received an urgent phone call from his No. 2 at the State Department. Richard Armitage was clearly agitated. As recounted in a new book, "Hubris: The Inside Story of Spin, Scandal, and the Selling of the Iraq War," Armitage had been at home reading the newspaper and had come across a column by journalist Robert Novak. Months earlier, Novak had caused a huge stir when he revealed that Valerie Plame, wife of Iraq-war critic Joseph Wilson, was a CIA officer.

Ever since, Washington had been trying to find out who leaked the information to Novak. The columnist himself had kept quiet. But now, in a second column, Novak provided a tantalizing clue: his primary source, he wrote, was a "senior administration official" who was "not a partisan gunslinger."

Armitage was shaken. After reading the column, he knew immediately who the leaker was. On the phone with Powell that morning, Armitage was "in deep distress," says a source directly familiar with the conversation who asked not to be identified because of legal sensitivities. "I'm sure he's talking about me."

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/14533384/site/newsweek/

[ddeubel]

I think the Supreme Court' s own conclusion that Bush as head of state is complicit in breaking the Geneva Convention and war crimes, is enough proof....

DD

[Bulsajo]

[some waygug-in]

Actually it should be no soy Americano, soy Canadiense.

Estoy refers to a tempory state of being where as soy is a more permanent sense. Your nationality, meaning where you were born, can not change, in the sense that you can't be born in more than one country.
Hence the necessity of soy.

Soy canadiense, pero estoy en corea.

I realize you probably already know this, but I couldn't help myself.


As for anti-Americanism, it depends where you are. Some regions of Mexico are far less antagonistic towards America and Americans than others and the same can be said about people. I did notice a sharp rise in Anti-Americanism with the start of the Iraq war.