Korean Job Discussion Forums

[Kuros]

[huffdaddy]

[Justin Hale]

[Kuros]

[thepeel]

I've long known about that, and never found motivation to care. People with "faith" do not respect people without because they fear that in the absence of god, all is permissible. This is nonsense, of course.

That's the second time huffnpuff has used a wildly childish mindset to explain something.

Kuros, I think maybe you need to give the bible another read.

And huffnpuff, I'm in favour of 'values immigration' that would as easily reject a Mississippi Baptist as it would a Pakistani muslim. If you think a poorly written and hate filled old book is the inerrant word of god, go somewhere else. We've had a hard enough time in Canada dragging our religious nuts into the 18th century without needing to revitalize their base by increasing the numbers.

[thepeel]

So, now the muslims in the UK can import scores of woman as their (liberated, we're sure) wives and the government will extend to them welfare. The UK is paying for her colonization.

Multiple wives will mean multiple benefits

[wannago]

[thepeel]

[huffdaddy]

[Ya-ta Boy]

[On the other hand]

[thepeel]

Naturally, of course.

If you believe these:
http://skepticsannotatedbible.com/int/long.html
Then the press should expose this and people adjust their votes accordingly.

I do not tolerate intolerance. If you are in favor of individual rights and don't try to control the private lives of others than I have absolutely no problem. If you want to use the power of the state to enfore your anchient desert religion then I do not tolerate you. Simple simple.

Tolerating intolerance will just encourage and ensure more intolerance. These little tribal ideas about "god" and their perverted moralities are the opposite of tolerance.

But an embarrassment.. Speaking of:

Ya-ta, tell me again about how a homosexual muslim women who uses art to protest the Iranian government killing homosexuals is similar to a "slave master"..

http://forums.eslcafe.com/korea/viewtopic.php?p=1515982&highlight=#1515982

ya-ta spat:
It's a fascinating situation. On the one hand, you have hypersensitive religious immigrants (or the children of immigrants) and on the other hand, you have bigots who want to provoke them into displays of anger so they appear to want to change the traditional tolerant nature of Dutch society.
ya-ta continued
It's not that far from the thinking of the slave masters who prevented slaves from being educated or earning any reward for their labor and then pointing at them and saying, "See, they're too lazy and stupid to be free."

I corrected the old bigot:
The artist is an Iranian muslim who was protesting the treatment of homosexuals in Iran. She was trying to use the Dutch tradition of freedom to protest the thugs in her home country. But the thugs followed her, and ya-ta compares her to a slave master.


You're right. This is fascinating. A muslim protesting Iranian treatment of gays gets called out for being a "slave master" by a lefty white American man.


See, I defend the rights of people to speak out, even rudely/aggressively against those who want to undo the advances of the West. You defend the rights of the poeple who want to return to a "West" of stoning homosexuals. If I'm an embarrassment to the "West", and that is your idea of the West, then I very gladly accept that label.

[thepeel]

[On the other hand]

[thepeel]

There is just no end to how absurd this gets: