| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
ED209
Joined: 17 Oct 2006
|
Posted: Fri Jul 29, 2011 6:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Bruce W Sims wrote: |
If I could have my fantasies I would relish a school solely supported by a cluster of corporations who dictated what kind of skillset they would employ and then subsidize the school to produce successful holders of that skillset. No government in between; just just private enterprise asking for tailor-trained employees who would get employment if they successfully graduated the program. FWIW.
|
Because corporation sponsorship is immune to corruption or mismanagement, and schools should focus on making little workers rather than people who think. There are colleges in korea that follow this model. They are somewhat lacking.
Sorry to the folks getting screwed by GEPIK. Plenty of jobs down south.
Wet Kisses,
ED209 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ZIFA
Joined: 23 Feb 2011 Location: Dici che il fiume..Trova la via al mare
|
Posted: Fri Jul 29, 2011 8:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| sojusucks wrote: |
I have a feeling that GEPIK has been planning this for some time. Remember Wenise Kim? She actually tried to help us the best she could. Once she was fired and they keep their bully Dain Bae, I knew that GEPIK no longer cared about NETs. This was not an accident.
You all may claim that running out of money is short sited but I think it was part of the plan for a few years now. Just look around and you can see some of the pieces that point towards a policy change. |
I vividly remember the gleam of vitriolic triumph in my supervisors eyes as she walked in to tell me (2 years+ ago) that it had been decided at the teachers union meeting to phase out NETs and replace them with KT's. Basically the KT's had voted, lobbied and forced the education board into relinquishing the programme.
Of course the teacher who told me this was the official english teacher for the school, dated from the park chung hee era, could barely speak english, hated foreigners coming into her country, and copied all my innovative teaching ideas to try and spice up her own (very dull) lessons.
Despite her opinions that foreigners should not be in Korea, she devoted all her time to setting up her son in america and calling him every day to make sure that he wasn't dating foreigners.
As far as I'm concerned gepik can sink without trace. They designed it to fail, they willed it to fail. I would never work for them again anyway. To them foreigners were a temporary necessary evil, until they figured out a way to expropriate all the vast amounts of govt. english funding purely for themselves. Now they enjoy state-sponsored english-learning holidays to the US.They must be laughing all the way to the airport. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
NohopeSeriously
Joined: 17 Jan 2011 Location: The Christian Right-Wing Educational Republic of Korea
|
Posted: Fri Jul 29, 2011 10:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| ZIFA wrote: |
| As far as I'm concerned gepik can sink without trace. They designed it to fail, they willed it to fail. I would never work for them again anyway. To them foreigners were a temporary necessary evil, until they figured out a way to expropriate all the vast amounts of govt. english funding purely for themselves. Now they enjoy state-sponsored english-learning holidays to the US.They must be laughing all the way to the airport. |
Those Korean English teachers remind me how Korean public officials regularly embezzle citizens' tax money for their own benefit.
Last edited by NohopeSeriously on Sat Jul 30, 2011 1:00 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
TheUrbanMyth
Joined: 28 Jan 2003 Location: Retired
|
Posted: Sat Jul 30, 2011 12:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
| sojusucks wrote: |
| I have a feeling that GEPIK has been planning this for some time. . |
GEPIK planned their own collapse? Maybe you should read the OP's article again. GEPIK had nothing to do with the funds not being allocated. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
TheUrbanMyth
Joined: 28 Jan 2003 Location: Retired
|
Posted: Sat Jul 30, 2011 12:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
| ZIFA wrote: |
| [ Just look around and you can see some of the pieces that point towards a policy change. |
I vividly remember the gleam of vitriolic triumph in my supervisors eyes as she walked in to tell me (2 years+ ago) that it had been decided at the teachers union meeting to phase out NETs and replace them with KT's. t.[/quote]
That has always been the plan...the first year this program was set up the foreign teachers were told this. We were never promised permanant jobs or deceived into accepting them on that basis. They were quite upfront and honest about it. We were temporary fixes. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
koreatimes
Joined: 07 Jun 2011
|
Posted: Sat Jul 30, 2011 1:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| They were quite upfront and honest about it. We were temporary fixes. |
Temporary fixes for a long term problem not solvable by using only Korean teachers. So, we might not get hired temporarily. Then, it will switch, we will go back to being hired.
I don't see this as a permanent end. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
NohopeSeriously
Joined: 17 Jan 2011 Location: The Christian Right-Wing Educational Republic of Korea
|
Posted: Sat Jul 30, 2011 1:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
NETs in public schools aren't the only people with issues. What about the thousands of Korean contract teachers?
Well, you know. The Korean public school system operates through a gigantic ponzi scheme-like fraud.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
PatrickGHBusan
Joined: 24 Jun 2008 Location: Busan (1997-2008) Canada 2008 -
|
Posted: Sat Jul 30, 2011 3:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
| koreatimes wrote: |
| Quote: |
| They were quite upfront and honest about it. We were temporary fixes. |
Temporary fixes for a long term problem not solvable by using only Korean teachers. So, we might not get hired temporarily. Then, it will switch, we will go back to being hired.
I don't see this as a permanent end. |
Why do you assume that the problem is not solvable using Korean teachers over time?
I mean are they ALL incapable of teaching the mysterious English language even after years of study?
GEPIK and EPIK are programs design to ASSIST Korean Teachers as Korea attempts to train its own teachers to effectively teach English. That by the way makes perfect sense. One should not look at ANY program that hires ASSISTANT TEACHERS as anything permanent or long term as far as work is concerned. It is to bad for the teachers that will lose their jobs or not be re-signed however. Still, staying aware of what these programs are and planning accordingly is a pretty basic career skill one should have.... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Tamada
Joined: 02 Nov 2008
|
Posted: Sat Jul 30, 2011 4:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
| PatrickGHBusan wrote: |
Why do you assume that the problem is not solvable using Korean teachers over time?
I mean are they ALL incapable of teaching the mysterious English language even after years of study? |
Because Korean teachers speak Korean 99.999999% of the time!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! <mod edit> |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
PatrickGHBusan
Joined: 24 Jun 2008 Location: Busan (1997-2008) Canada 2008 -
|
Posted: Sat Jul 30, 2011 4:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
Some do sure.
Some (more all the time) speak good to great English.
Hence the need (still for now) for assistant teachers (thats you by the way) to supplement the program and offer specific help (pronounciation and conversation).
Good luck out there Tamada.
Oh and I DID say OVER TIME not NOW.
Cheers |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
koreatimes
Joined: 07 Jun 2011
|
Posted: Sat Jul 30, 2011 4:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| Why do you assume that the problem is not solvable using Korean teachers over time? |
Teach me British or Australian English then. How about the differences between Irish and Scottish? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
silkhighway
Joined: 24 Oct 2010 Location: Canada
|
Posted: Sat Jul 30, 2011 7:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
| You guys are assuming the end product of public schooling is -- and should be -- fluency in English. That's never been realistic. Korean teachers may do a mediocre job, but attitude and installing life-long learning in their students is everything. If they fail at that, there's nothing NETs can provide. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Steelrails

Joined: 12 Mar 2009 Location: Earth, Solar System
|
Posted: Sat Jul 30, 2011 8:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Whoever made this thread not fit my browser, I hate you. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Bruce W Sims
Joined: 08 Mar 2011 Location: Illinois; USA
|
Posted: Sat Jul 30, 2011 8:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
No, personally, I am "assuming" that the product of schooling is Education. What is missing here is agreement about what the nature of that Education ought be and how it ought be brought about.
I think the project begins with understanding/determining why people have been teaching English for years in Korea and the product is so woefully deficient.
A primary tenet of Behavioral Psychology is that people tend to maintain or increase behaviors which are found to be reinforced.
Question One: What is the behavior that we are concerned with? Bad instruction? Bad management? Skewed delivery of services?
Question Two: What is the reinforcer that keeps this faulted system going?
I submit that it is the 21st Century incarnation of corrupt middle-administrative positions that have dogged Korean society for centuries. FWIW.
Best Wishes,
Bruce |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
JD_Tiberius
Joined: 16 Nov 2009 Location: Korea
|
Posted: Sat Jul 30, 2011 8:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
The big problem Korea has is the social stigma attached to speaking any language other than Korean to Koreans
You might get two Koreans, who speak brilliant English. They marry, but they never try to practice their English each each other because its not considered socially acceptable for them to speak any language other than Korean(The Japanese are to blame for this). Nor do they try to teach their son or daughter any of their fantastic English. In a few years with little to no contact with foreigners, their English degrades to the point they feel they can't speak it anymore.
Now compare that with people from other countries. I know of some white New Zealanders who will talk to each other in Japanese just because they can. Koreans don't do this with their L2 language, socially they can't because of their history.
That is precisely why any English language programme that does not include foreign teachers is bound to fail. They need us in the system to essentially keep tabs on the Korean English teachers. Without us, the system they have been working so hard to attain for years, collapses like a deck of cards. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|