| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| What is this? |
| A Bigfoot |
|
53% |
[ 8 ] |
| A Bear |
|
33% |
[ 5 ] |
| A human in costume |
|
6% |
[ 1 ] |
| Other (please explain) |
|
6% |
[ 1 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 15 |
|
| Author |
Message |
anyway
Joined: 22 Oct 2005
|
 Posted: Wed Dec 05, 2007 6:47 am Post subject: |
 |
|
| Oh, and good luck with the schizophrenia... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mindmetoo
Joined: 02 Feb 2004
|
| Posted: Wed Dec 05, 2007 6:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
| anyway wrote: |
| Oh, and good luck with the schizophrenia... |
Errr. Racetraitor and I are two different people. Yes more than one person can look at the evidence you're looking at and arrive at the same skeptical position.
Let me ask you this, what evidence would you require to accept this is a bear? Here is what I would accept as evidence it's not a bear:
- a scientist who offers some good peer reviewed lines of evidence that the photo cannot be a bear (for example, the leg dimensions are incorrect)
- hair samples from the scene turn up hair from an unknown creature
Show me that and I'll eat crow. Hell, someone finds a bigfoot body in Oregon or Washington, I'll even grant you then this photo is of a bigfoot and still eat crow. Happily. I'd love it if they really found a bigfoot.
Now time for you to put your nickel down. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
RACETRAITOR
Joined: 24 Oct 2005
Location: Seoul, South Korea
|
| Posted: Wed Dec 05, 2007 7:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Hey, you said we met one time, right? Just gotta cover all possibilities, no matter how totally retardedly improbable they may be. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Junior
Joined: 18 Nov 2005
Location: the eye
|
| Posted: Wed Dec 05, 2007 8:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
At first glance it appears to have the posture and shape of a bear.
A skinny, mangy, diseased or injured bear on the scavenge. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
mindmetoo
Joined: 02 Feb 2004
|
| Posted: Wed Dec 05, 2007 3:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| RACETRAITOR wrote: |
| Hey, you said we met one time, right? Just gotta cover all possibilities, no matter how totally retardedly improbable they may be. |
I met you? No no. I've your friend who wrote that friendship club ad that banned Canadians  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
RACETRAITOR
Joined: 24 Oct 2005
Location: Seoul, South Korea
|
| Posted: Wed Dec 05, 2007 6:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| mindmetoo wrote: |
| RACETRAITOR wrote: |
| Hey, you said we met one time, right? Just gotta cover all possibilities, no matter how totally retardedly improbable they may be. |
I met you? No no. I've your friend who wrote that friendship club ad that banned Canadians |
Then maybe we are the same person. I'll keep believing that until I see poor photographic evidence. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
mindmetoo
Joined: 02 Feb 2004
|
| Posted: Wed Dec 05, 2007 9:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| RACETRAITOR wrote: |
| mindmetoo wrote: |
| RACETRAITOR wrote: |
| Hey, you said we met one time, right? Just gotta cover all possibilities, no matter how totally retardedly improbable they may be. |
I met you? No no. I've your friend who wrote that friendship club ad that banned Canadians |
Then maybe we are the same person. I'll keep believing that until I see poor photographic evidence. |
There is such a poor unfocused example of me at my podcast page (www.gokorea.info), the host section. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
