| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Which Republican will take Michigan? |
| Mitt Romney |
|
41% |
[ 5 ] |
| Mike Huckabee |
|
16% |
[ 2 ] |
| John McCain |
|
41% |
[ 5 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 12 |
|
| Author |
Message |
thepeel
Joined: 08 Aug 2004
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Tiger Beer
Joined: 07 Feb 2003
|
 Posted: Wed Jan 16, 2008 4:08 am Post subject: |
 |
|
| Ya-ta Boy wrote: |
| Translation: The more people hear about RP, the fewer like him. |
I'd disagree.
As things continue to move on, and the Revolution never happened, many of those voters are seeing their votes put better use elsewhere (as opposed to his supporters suddenly disliking him). |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Czarjorge
Joined: 01 May 2007
Location: I now have the same moustache, and it is glorious.
|
| Posted: Wed Jan 16, 2008 4:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
| I've been thinking about a Paul/Kucinich run. Would they really be able to get the money together to do it? Would they even get on the debates? There is no way in hell those two would win, but would they swing things like Nader did, or only bring out voters who would otherwise likely not vote? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
mithridates
Joined: 03 Mar 2003
Location: President's office, Korean Space Agency
|
| Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 7:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Kuros wrote: |
| Beeyee wrote: |
| Kuros wrote: |
Here are results.
So far, Romney in front.
Ron Paul is leading Giuliani.
Clinton has only 61%, Uncommitted 34%, Kucinich 4%.
C'mon, Kucinich, beat the void! You can do it! |
Why is Giuliani above Paul on that link despite it clearly saying 3%???  |
I think they are trying to put Paul down. Yup, I'm pretty sure based on no evidence that this is clear discrimination. |
Not from the same source (or the same state) but there's a glaringly obvious bias at times:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OsoSX_b4lSo
(BTW the link above now shows Ron Paul above Giuliani so that was just a glitch; I'm not linking the two) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Ya-ta Boy
Joined: 16 Jan 2003
Location: Established in 1994
|
| Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 7:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| there's a glaringly obvious bias at times |
Mith, that was FOX freakin' NEWS you gave a link to. If Fox isn't a glaringly obvious propaganda machine for the Far Right, then one doesn't exist. They're allowed to put the hate down for the Even Farther Right--they're both fighting for the wingnut vote. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
mithridates
Joined: 03 Mar 2003
Location: President's office, Korean Space Agency
|
| Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 8:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Ya-ta Boy wrote: |
| Quote: |
| there's a glaringly obvious bias at times |
Mith, that was FOX freakin' NEWS you gave a link to. If Fox isn't a glaringly obvious propaganda machine for the Far Right, then one doesn't exist. |
Yeah, I know. I'm just surprised at the brazenness of the whole thing sometimes. Even I could come up with a more subtle way of putting down candidates than that. Only mention the top two when he's in 3rd, only mention the one in first when he's in second, something like that. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
