Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Religion and IQ: A Study
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Off-Topic Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Justin Hale



Joined: 24 Nov 2007
Location: the Straight Talk Express

PostPosted: Thu Apr 17, 2008 8:30 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

nicholas_chiasson wrote:
Not only a gee-whiz graph ala "How to lie with statistics" but the source is
nobelief.com
hmmm sounds impartial to me Rolling Eyes


Why are the stats lies? Have you even read the paper? Plus a pathetic ad hominem point about partiality.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Adventurer



Joined: 28 Jan 2006

PostPosted: Thu Apr 17, 2008 8:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Justin, are the only human beings on this planet to ever be "civilized" European whites or North American whites? I don't think so. The Indus Valley had an advanced civilization long before Europe did, and they were a spiritual people. They did not have the Catholic Church, but they were known to be spiritual. The same could be said about China in the past.
The Muslims also had a flowering civilization except when they became very tribal and dogmatic and then imploded. Many prominent scientists in Europe throughout the ages believed in God. You are stating that in some cases the church was against scientists, but that was the Catholic Church of the time. Certainly, some Jewish and Christian religious authorities were not necessarily the friends of scientific progress anymore than many of the imams who inhabit the Middle East. When religion seeks to be extremely controlling without allowing adequate individual expression and freedom that would, naturally, retard cultural progress.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ED209



Joined: 17 Oct 2006

PostPosted: Thu Apr 17, 2008 8:34 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Kuros wrote:

Are you familiar with Isaac Newton? Johannes Kepler? Blaise Pascal? On the shoulders of (Christian) giants . . .


One of Newton's greatest weaknesses was his faith in the bible. As was his belief in alchemy. Imagine what else he could have taught us instead of reading revelations every night. I guess it takes a Christian to believe in giants.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Justin Hale



Joined: 24 Nov 2007
Location: the Straight Talk Express

PostPosted: Thu Apr 17, 2008 8:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Adventurer wrote:
Justin, are the only human beings on this planet to ever be "civilized" European whites or North American whites? I don't think so. The Indus Valley had an advanced civilization long before Europe did, and they were a spiritual people. They did not have the Catholic Church, but they were known to be spiritual. The same could be said about China in the past.
The Muslims also had a flowering civilization except when they became very tribal and dogmatic and then imploded. Many prominent scientists in Europe throughout the ages believed in God. You are stating that in some cases the church was against scientists, but that was the Catholic Church of the time. Certainly, some Jewish and Christian religious authorities were not necessarily the friends of scientific progress anymore than many of the imams who inhabit the Middle East. When religion seeks to be extremely controlling without allowing adequate individual expression and freedom that would, naturally, retard cultural progress.


The original claim made was that the Western world owes the Englightenment and not Christianity and the Church has acted largely as a retardant on progress. Nothing you've written above even addresses the issue, much less refute the claim.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Kuros



Joined: 27 Apr 2004

PostPosted: Thu Apr 17, 2008 8:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Omkara wrote:

Yet, all three cases are from former times, when one needed not be retarded to believe.


Ahm, okay. My participation in this thread is pointless.

Quote:
I guess it takes a Christian to believe in giants.


I'm not a Christian. I just think aggressive atheism is more obnoxious than Christianity, but without any of Christianity's benefits.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Adventurer



Joined: 28 Jan 2006

PostPosted: Thu Apr 17, 2008 8:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Justin Hale wrote:


The original claim made was that the Western world owes the Englightenment and not Christianity and the Church has acted largely as a retardant on progress. Nothing you've written above even addresses the issue, much less refute the claim.


No civilization, I can think of, owes scientific progress due to a religion. It has to do with culture and the mindset of the people which influences their views on religion and other ideological issues. The Church was backward in many cases when it comes to dealing with some scientists in the past. I wouldn't disagree with that. They were part of the culture at that time where individuals did not have much rights. Remember, for a long time many peoples' ancestors were serfs, and the nobility had a lot of power and used the church to keep a stranglehold of power over the masses...
That shouldn't be ignored.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Justin Hale



Joined: 24 Nov 2007
Location: the Straight Talk Express

PostPosted: Thu Apr 17, 2008 8:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Adventurer wrote:
Remember, for a long time many peoples' ancestors were serfs, and the nobility had a lot of power and used the church to keep a stranglehold of power over the masses...
That shouldn't be ignored.


It certainly shouldn't be ignored; it backs my point up. The Church and serfdom and Divine Right go together like grass and green.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Unposter



Joined: 04 Jun 2006

PostPosted: Thu Apr 17, 2008 9:18 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Kind of simple, but here goes, a brief explanation why I think science is a complete rejection of Christian education (think 17th century or so)

There is a whole cosmology of the origins of the universe and man in the Bible. In addition, many Chrisitian scholars added their own interpretations about how the planets and stars moved, what was inside the human body, how the personality worked etc... It was all based upon religious teaching.

Early scientists, many of whom were people of faith, used their new methodologies and experiments to see if these ideas were correct. Basically, they were all wrong.

Now, the Church could have accepted this knowledge as an advancement of Christian understanding but instead opposed it as well, the Church is infalible and the Bible is literal.

Basically, the Romans knew much or had come to conclusions that many scientists were now coming to. Much of this Roman knowledge was lost with the sacking of Rome and the insularism of much of Europe that allowed Christianity to grow. Many historians call these the "dark ages," as little was understood, even who was over the next hill. Things started to change with the enlightenment, or the light being turned on from the dark. Learning grew again, and Europe pretty much re-learned what had been lost.

In many ways, the growth of Christianity in Europe was an anomaly or at best an over-lay of traditional beliefs. Most Christrian holidays over lap pagan holidays, taking their symbols, and substituting new words for old ideas. Even today, there are many Catholic Saints that have become representations of indigenous deities in Central and South America.

It was Saint Augustine that turned Christians away from the here and now and learning to a more inward, spiritual sect. For him, it was all about the Kingdom of Heaven. Most of the Christian Church followed.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Omkara



Joined: 18 Feb 2006
Location: USA

PostPosted: Thu Apr 17, 2008 9:29 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Kuros wrote:
Omkara wrote:

Yet, all three cases are from former times, when one needed not be retarded to believe.


Ahm, okay. My participation in this thread is pointless.

Quote:
I guess it takes a Christian to believe in giants.


I'm not a Christian. I just think aggressive atheism is more obnoxious than Christianity, but without any of Christianity's benefits.



I was a bit out of line. . .but couldn't resist.

However, if you follolw the logic of my joke exactly, it does not imply that one must be retarded to be a christian now.

I know there are intelligent christians now. However, we must admit that having a solid education is a bit rough on belief. Why is this?

What exactly are these benefits of christianity? I can see some, such a community. However, I think that there are other ways to build community and that the requirement of beleif is a major problem that prevents a lot of people from an honest search for truth. I mean, the consequence of not believing is Hell, after all.

Religion plays on our irrational fears and retards progress, as the graph indicated. I think Sam Harris made the point that without religion, we may have had the internet 200 years ago.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
KirbyMagnus



Joined: 05 Apr 2008
Location: Korea

PostPosted: Thu Apr 17, 2008 9:34 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I am an agnostic but I side with the atheists.

That said, you're using a graph to illustrate your point.

A graph I ask thee, throw in the odd statistic if you like but we are never going to bring people round to our way of thinking if we use bloody graphs.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
nicholas_chiasson



Joined: 14 Jun 2007
Location: Samcheok

PostPosted: Thu Apr 17, 2008 10:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Justin Hale wrote:
nicholas_chiasson wrote:
Not only a gee-whiz graph ala "How to lie with statistics" but the source is
nobelief.com
hmmm sounds impartial to me Rolling Eyes


Why are the stats lies? Have you even read the paper? Plus a pathetic ad hominem point about partiality.


A 'gee-whiz' graph is any graph which doesn't have a scale, or that cuts itself off to exagerate the level of something. I hardly feel like a thread on statistics and 'honest' graphing right now.
-As for the attack being an ad hom, you are not using the word right. If one wants to argue the level of education/advancement during the dark ages, one could do a LOT better than posting a graph from nobelief.com. That was one of the things that drove me crazy about Dawkins and "The God Delusion" Everytime he had a good point, he'd ruin it by writing some agit-prop crazy conjecture next to it. Please attack theism on rational grounds, and not subjective People today are Smarter than Ever!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Omkara



Joined: 18 Feb 2006
Location: USA

PostPosted: Fri Apr 18, 2008 4:31 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Me spoked too soonly! Here's a pretty fart smeller. . .uh, I mean, pretty smart feller!

Really, a rare case of christian intelligence:

http://www.ted.com/index.php/talks/view/id/112

His position is finally far closer to that which spinoza might advocate. . .
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Justin Hale



Joined: 24 Nov 2007
Location: the Straight Talk Express

PostPosted: Fri Apr 18, 2008 3:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

KirbyMagnus wrote:
I am an agnostic but I side with the atheists.

That said, you're using a graph to illustrate your point.

A graph I ask thee, throw in the odd statistic if you like but we are never going to bring people round to our way of thinking if we use bloody graphs.


nicholas_chiasson wrote:
A 'gee-whiz' graph is any graph which doesn't have a scale, or that cuts itself off to exagerate the level of something. I hardly feel like a thread on statistics and 'honest' graphing right now.
-As for the attack being an ad hom, you are not using the word right. If one wants to argue the level of education/advancement during the dark ages, one could do a LOT better than posting a graph from nobelief.com. That was one of the things that drove me crazy about Dawkins and "The God Delusion" Everytime he had a good point, he'd ruin it by writing some agit-prop crazy conjecture next to it. Please attack theism on rational grounds, and not subjective People today are Smarter than Ever!


The graph makes the point of the paper intuitive and very well. The Middle Ages saw stunningly little scientific progress, total theocracy being sheer coincidence of course, and the Middle Ages coming to an end saw rapid scientific progress - again, sheer coincidence, because the West is based on Christianity, eh Kuros? Laughing The graph also takes place within the context of a paper dealing with the very theme (so if you wanna know more, read the damn paper already) and every claim is borne out by the evidence.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Kuros



Joined: 27 Apr 2004

PostPosted: Fri Apr 18, 2008 4:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Justin Hale wrote:


The graph makes the point of the paper intuitive and very well. The Middle Ages saw stunningly little scientific progress, total theocracy being sheer coincidence of course, and the Middle Ages coming to an end saw rapid scientific progress - again, sheer coincidence, because the West is based on Christianity, eh Kuros? Laughing The graph also takes place within the context of a paper dealing with the very theme (so if you wanna know more, read the damn paper already) and every claim is borne out by the evidence.


The Middle Ages saw stunningly little scientific progress b/c it was pre-Renaissance, pre-Reformation Europe.

For the ubermensch, your arguments against Christianity are for shit.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Justin Hale



Joined: 24 Nov 2007
Location: the Straight Talk Express

PostPosted: Fri Apr 18, 2008 4:24 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Kuros, your arguments on this matter make as much sense as 2+2=46 and reading them reminds me - not that I need reminding - how grateful I am that my parents didn't tell me what yours told you when you were a kid (and how I don't live in Kentucky). When Christianity took over Europe, scientific and engineering advancement virtually stopped. During the Black Death in the 1300s, the masses turned to the Church instead of medicine. The Church explained that the plague came as an act of God, not nature, as a punishment for sins of not obeying Church authority. Every one of the the scientists that Christians love to cite lived during the Renaissance or the Age of Enlightenment when the Church began to lose its power and the populace began to wake up from its religious stupor. None of them lived during the Dark Ages. You acknowlefe this and yet believe science, progress, modernity was Christianity-motivated!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Off-Topic Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Page 3 of 5

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International