|
Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
stonepepe1
Joined: 02 Jul 2008
|
 Posted: Tue Sep 02, 2008 7:45 am Post subject: |
 |
|
| the false prophet in the bible ur crazy!! its the pope whos the false prophet |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
fiveeagles
Joined: 19 May 2005
Location: Vancouver
|
| Posted: Tue Sep 02, 2008 10:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| endo wrote: |
The Bible is all about drug use and star worship hidden in code.
It's awesome!
And I'm f-ing serious too!
The arrival of Jesus signified the Age of Pices (Jesus fish), and his return (roughly 2,200 years later when the axis of the Earth tilts and we are directed away from the North Star) will signify the Age of Aquarius (the water bearer).
Ezekial was doing mushrooms on the top of the mountain when the ngle came to him in his psychedelic stupor.
Moses did the same with the burning bush. Again going up the mountain where the mushrooms grow and comming down high as f-uck. By the way Moses represented the end of the Age of Taurus (stop worshiping that golden bull!) and the beginning of the Age of Ares (symbolozied by his use the the ram horn in his clothing.
The Forbidden Fruit and the "snake" that delivered it represents the mushroom emerging from the tree base under the groud, surfacing, and openinging its mount while delivering its fruit, "the cap of the mushroom".
The Bible is f-ing awesome!!!!!!
 |
When I used to minister down in Vancouver, there was a group of people who believed this stuff. They believed that God created the tree of life to be smoked. haha. They were so funny, but they were so serious about the mary jane being smoked. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
fiveeagles
Joined: 19 May 2005
Location: Vancouver
|
| Posted: Tue Sep 02, 2008 11:01 pm Post subject: Re: The Dali Lama; the false prophet of the bible? |
|
|
| deadman wrote: |
| fiveeagles wrote: |
You are right and that's why we have the separation of church and state. Thus giving the state the power to remove hateful groups from society. For example, England is requiring all immigrants to have a new level of English before they can come in. This in essence removes most of the hateful types. Generally, those who want to kill westerners are not going to want to learn English.
However, it's not the governments right to determine what is truth. That is the people's right. It's one of our strongest rights. When a government decides this then it becomes totalitarian. Which will lead us to the one world government. Governments deciding on what they know as truth. Very evil. |
My understanding of the article is not that they said what the truth is. but simply that any particular religious cannot be taught as "the truth", as "fact", in school.
Do you expect the school system to adopt a position that holds that several mutually exclusive religions are all the completely true inviolable Word of God? That's obviously absurd, especially to a child.
Do you want special treatment for your religion? Then what about freedom of religion?
The only reasonable position, from the perspective of all of humanity, is to allow all to be taught, none to be touted as the "one true faith" to vulnerable children ("Believe this or suffer in hell").
I appreciate you taking the time to debate. A few (loaded, admittedly!) questions if I may, to help clarify our common ground and differences:
1. Is your faith the one true faith or are there many?
2. Will people who follow other religions go to hell?
3. If an individual has a conflict between what they experience of God, and what they are taught of God (at your church), then which is more important, the experience or the Word of God?
4. Does "freedom of religion" extend to individuals within your church (ie freedom to disagree without penalty)?
Re Q4: A nazi or communistmay say "You have absolute freedom to do and practice as you wish. There are penalties for not doing what we tell you, but we won't make you suffer for eternity!" |
Basically what's happening is that Christian schools, or religious schools, are being told that they can't preach what they perceive is truth.
Do you agree with this statement? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
deadman
Joined: 27 May 2006
Location: Suwon
|
| Posted: Wed Sep 03, 2008 12:57 am Post subject: Re: The Dali Lama; the false prophet of the bible? |
|
|
| fiveeagles wrote: |
| deadman wrote: |
| fiveeagles wrote: |
You are right and that's why we have the separation of church and state. Thus giving the state the power to remove hateful groups from society. For example, England is requiring all immigrants to have a new level of English before they can come in. This in essence removes most of the hateful types. Generally, those who want to kill westerners are not going to want to learn English.
However, it's not the governments right to determine what is truth. That is the people's right. It's one of our strongest rights. When a government decides this then it becomes totalitarian. Which will lead us to the one world government. Governments deciding on what they know as truth. Very evil. |
My understanding of the article is not that they said what the truth is. but simply that any particular religious cannot be taught as "the truth", as "fact", in school.
Do you expect the school system to adopt a position that holds that several mutually exclusive religions are all the completely true inviolable Word of God? That's obviously absurd, especially to a child.
Do you want special treatment for your religion? Then what about freedom of religion?
The only reasonable position, from the perspective of all of humanity, is to allow all to be taught, none to be touted as the "one true faith" to vulnerable children ("Believe this or suffer in hell").
I appreciate you taking the time to debate. A few (loaded, admittedly!) questions if I may, to help clarify our common ground and differences:
1. Is your faith the one true faith or are there many?
2. Will people who follow other religions go to hell?
3. If an individual has a conflict between what they experience of God, and what they are taught of God (at your church), then which is more important, the experience or the Word of God?
4. Does "freedom of religion" extend to individuals within your church (ie freedom to disagree without penalty)?
Re Q4: A nazi or communistmay say "You have absolute freedom to do and practice as you wish. There are penalties for not doing what we tell you, but we won't make you suffer for eternity!" |
Basically what's happening is that Christian schools, or religious schools, are being told that they can't preach what they perceive is truth.
Do you agree with this statement? |
Yes. Schools are for teaching, not preaching. Save it for Church.
They can teach their history, beliefs and traditions as history, beliefs and traditions
This rule gives the student the ability to decide for themselves what is "truth". Would you take that decision away?
If you have time, I'd still like you to address those questions in my previous post. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
