|
Korean Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Unposter
Joined: 04 Jun 2006
|
Posted: Sun Dec 13, 2009 6:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
EBS offers regular free English classes on TV and there are far too many free resources on the Internet.
There really are plenty of opportunities if students want to invest the time. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
some waygug-in
Joined: 25 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Sun Dec 13, 2009 6:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I know, but I'm thinking of something that perhaps could be offered in schools.
Something that is interactive, but interesting to children, not a bunch of grammar quizzes.
Something like kr.kids.yahoo, but with all English content perhaps. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
whome?
Joined: 13 Nov 2009
|
Posted: Mon Dec 14, 2009 2:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Unposter wrote: |
EBS offers regular free English classes on TV and there are far too many free resources on the Internet.
There really are plenty of opportunities if students want to invest the time. |
I'm quoting this post rather than the big, long other one you wrote.
In your other post nothing you wrote is new. It's a lot of rehashed information, but in saying that I'm not saying it's invalid.
The problem is that the current system is inefficient. It fails miserably on the two most fundamental means of communication: writing and speaking.
If it's simply a matter of comprehension, then that's fine, but if the aim, as stated time and again by the Korean gov and people, is to become a world player, then they need to focus on communication rather than comprehension. You spoke of reading skills improving speaking skills, well, if you have to speak AND write, then your reading will improve too.
We all have the opportunity to speak with Koreans every day. Be it at a hagwon, a public school, a university, or on the street. If they're 13 years old they have probably received no fewer than 1000 hours of english classes between hagwons and public schools. Think about that. One thousand hours. Perhaps you've read Gladwell's book "Outliers"? In it he talks about 10,000 hours to become a world class expert on something. The level of the average Korean student after 1000 hours is abysmal, for the most part. I attribute it to the system. Not the culture. Not some genetic deficiency, but the system. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Unposter
Joined: 04 Jun 2006
|
Posted: Mon Dec 14, 2009 5:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
Call me cynical because I am...
You assume, despite some limited rhetoric you may have heard, that there really is a national concensus that having a bi-linugal society is desired.
Think about what it might mean:
1) diminished use of the Korean language at best, the elimination or secondary status of the Korean language at worst
2) With the changes in language come changes in culture which would further diminish traditional Korean culture
3) the population would be able to access other forms of media and see other ways of life leading to at best personal lifestyle changes and at worst massive governmental protests
4) the population would be able to travel, see other ways of life leading to at best personal lifestyle changes and at worst massive governmental protests
5) well-educated people would have the language skills to work anywhere but Korea
6) even not-so-well educated people would have the language skills to immigrate to other countries
7) 5 and 6 would lead to massive changes in labor relations and salaries
It could lead to a multi-cultural labor force and quite possibly to a multi-cultural society where Koreans would be equal to or even less than equal to people from other cultures
9) Thousands of years of fiercly protecting Korean identity from the Chinese and the Japanese up in smoke
Now, there is no question that Korea needs some fully fluent and even some semi-fluent workers, but it does not need a bi-lingual society. It needs a system where those who want to make the efforts can master English and those who choose to not learn English know their place as "failures" of society. There are no minimum standards; it is a straight competition and the education system is geared so that some people win and most lose. Worse, your lot in life is determined by one test taken at the end of high school and its score determines your social class for the rest of your life. And, since most "lose," all the people who are supposed to educate you are "losers" too because they failed to get you into the right university.
Now, they can blame themselves (many do) or they can blame others (many do). One of the many scapegoats in Korea is English education and foreign English teachers. It could be a "perfect" curriculum staffed by Ph.D.s from Oxford, Cambridge and the Ivy Leauge and their creme de le creme bretheren from across the world but still 1% of the population is going to a SKY university (Seoul, Korea or Yonsei) and the rest of the 99% are going to be "failures" and complain about the system because the system failed to get them into the university of their choice.
Now, this strong sense of competition has propelled Korea from the ashes of the Korean War to being (I can't remember exactly) the 7th largest economy in the world. It is an impressive leap Korea has made. But, it has had very heavy social costs IMHO. Koreans are a stressed out, generally miserable population except for about four years of university where the only Instructor who makes him or her work is their die hard Basic Conversation teacher and the 5% who work the elite jobs.
Now, I do think we foreign teachers play a very important role in Korean society because we do give them opportunites for social mobility, freedom and alternatives.
But, don't think that other Koreans are going to be happy by our presence. Some just won't. And, don't think that our ideas and our presences are going to be welcomed into their schools regardless of the power of our ideas. We are a threat to every Korean English teacher. Our success is their loss of respect and even livelihood. If foreign teachers turned the ship around and made English education a success for everyone, than Korean English teachers everywhere would be out of job. And, I know many of you would say good riddance but don't think all those Korean teachers are going to go without a fight. And, they know the language, the culture and have ears to all the people in power and we know and got nothing.
The only way any of this is going to work is by creating a win-win situation at your schools. You need to make them believe that you are some how beneficial to them or no matter how good of a teacher you are, no matter how well liked you are by the students, no matter what your education attainment is they are going to look for ways to get you out. Koreans are competitive people. And, if you want to be a teacher you are going to have to have won a number of competitions. These are not easy going people. They have fought tooth and nail to get into good universities, to pass the teachers exam, get hired and keep their jobs. And then, you come along and ruin everything.
That is the mentality most public school teachers face daily. Of course, every school is different but as a general rule that is the crux of the problem.
And FTs can wax poetically about hiring qualified teachers and raising salaries and how if only native speakers ran things and other self-serving things. But, that is the way you look to the Koreans. This person only cares about himself. He doesn't understand the team or Korean culture. It seems like he or she only cares about the money. He or she doesn't understand me and what I have to deal with on a daily basis and probably long after he or she has gone home. And, there are all sorts of things I would love to say to him or her but I don't want to be rude to their face until they cannot take it anymore and then they just blurt out something stupid.
Anyway, I am a little off topic. The bottom line is that I just don't believe that a system which would allow everyone to win at English education serves the real underlying purpose of English education for Koreans. Now, I am all for changing the system but I am too cynical to believe that it is worth my time and effort as it would lead to massive systematic change that is opposed by entrenched, rich, powerful forces. But, I would certainly cheer on the revolution. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
littlelisa
Joined: 12 Jun 2007 Location: Seoul
|
Posted: Mon Dec 14, 2009 2:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'm not saying that Korea needs a bilingual society, but I don't think it's as bad as you are making it out to be. For example:
- Sweden (or any other Scandinavian country, I guess). Pretty much every Swede speaks perfect English, especially in Stockholm. But their default language for everything is Swedish, not English. It doesn't look like it's showing any signs of disappearing. Swedish is not spoken anywhere outside of Sweden.
- Montreal. I know that the French are always complaining that they're going to see French disappear, but anyone who's lived there knows it'll never happen. In Montreal it's not that everyone speaks perfect English, but that most people are bilingual (unless you go far East where they speak mostly French, or far West where they speak mostly English). Anyone who's lived in Montreal for a decent amount of time will tell you that contrary to some politicians' whining, French isn't going anywhere.
With Montreal as an example, I would not be worried about Korean disappearing.
I think that for anyone anywhere (this goes for English speaking people too), learning another language well is a huuuuge plus. I don't really think it matters much which one as much as it does just learning one. Language learning is a good thing. So I think a bilingual country is good because it supports people's language learning. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
some waygug-in
Joined: 25 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Mon Dec 14, 2009 4:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
If there is a "national consensus" on anything it's that they DON'T want to learn English.
Despite claims to the contrary, what they really want are jobs, money and prestige.
I think most Koreans resent having to study English, resent having foreign teachers, resent the fact the they are losing control over their own society.
I'm not saying this is really happening, but I think this is how many Koreans percieve it . |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
whome?
Joined: 13 Nov 2009
|
Posted: Tue Dec 15, 2009 2:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
I don't know if the idea that they don't want to be bilingual for fear of losing their culture is legitimate, but if it is it is the craziest piece of K-nationalism I've yet to come across.
But I highly doubt it's valid. Bad policy and methodology is a far more likely explanation. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
some waygug-in
Joined: 25 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Tue Dec 15, 2009 3:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
Really? what if you were living in your home country and suddenly the gov't started telling everyone they HAD to learn Korean. To get a decent job, you'd have to learn Korean. For your children to get a decent shot at a future, they'd have to learn Korean.
Then how crazy would it sound to you to feel your language and culture are being threatened? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
whome?
Joined: 13 Nov 2009
|
Posted: Tue Dec 15, 2009 3:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
| some waygug-in wrote: |
Really? what if you were living in your home country and suddenly the gov't started telling everyone they HAD to learn Korean. To get a decent job, you'd have to learn Korean. For your children to get a decent shot at a future, they'd have to learn Korean.
Then how crazy would it sound to you to feel your language and culture are being threatened? |
well, the analogy would only hold if Korean was the dominant international language capable of improving economic performance among many other things.
But the key thing is no one is saying they HAVE TO learn english. Immersion would be an optional/potential choice in education.
And if EVERYONE still spoke English, but also learned Korean, I wouldn't feel threatened at all.
Not sure where your paranoia/insecurity is coming from. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
some waygug-in
Joined: 25 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Tue Dec 15, 2009 4:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
Are you even in Korea? Geeze, look around you.
No one says they have to learn English? Really?
I think you need to think on that some more. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
son of coco
Joined: 14 Mar 2008
|
Posted: Tue Dec 15, 2009 4:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
| some waygug-in wrote: |
Really? what if you were living in your home country and suddenly the gov't started telling everyone they HAD to learn Korean. To get a decent job, you'd have to learn Korean. For your children to get a decent shot at a future, they'd have to learn Korean.
Then how crazy would it sound to you to feel your language and culture are being threatened? |
Pretty crazy, but then I've been outside my own country and seen how other countries have adapted to learning English en masse. Someone mentioned Scandinavia and it's true, these countries have adopted an efficient method of learning the language and haven't lost their own language or culture in the process.
I think if you come from a country though where not a lot of people have travelled extensively and nationalism seems born out of a lack of knowledge about the outside world then it would be perfectly natural.
I think part of the problem here lies in the social structure and who gets to have the most say. In some cases you almost know the answer will be "Yes, but we have always done it this way", regardless of whether it works or not.
It's quite nice to watch as a tourist, seeing old men pull carts down the street and people farming in the middle of the city. But it's frustrating when you're working and you have to deal with old ideas for a new language.
I think the culture is what holds kids back from learning another language more than anything else here. Cultures change over time, that's the way it goes. Rigidly holding on to old ideas that don't work now doesn't help anyone. I also don't think everyone should have to learn English if they don't want to. And finally, I really, really don't think we should get the blame! haha |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
maingman
Joined: 26 Jan 2008 Location: left Korea
|
Posted: Sun Oct 03, 2010 12:53 am Post subject: , |
|
|
PRagic wrotte :
[i]1) Make learning English optional. A second/third language fluency should be mandatory for high school and university graduation, but the language shouldn't have to be English. Kindergarten? Elementary school? Give the kids a break! Let supply and demand have a shot at motivating the students. Of course, this opens up the whole new bag of worms that is 'other languages'. yes
2) Decrease the number of students in foreign language classrooms (15-20 max, fewer when possible). ?? how manny 3-5?
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2010/10/01/EDET1FLK8J.DTL |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SinclairLondon
Joined: 17 Sep 2010
|
Posted: Sun Oct 03, 2010 1:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
| The greatest hindrance to producivity in Korea is fatigue. Kids are tired, parents are tired, Korean teachers are tired. In order to get a week vacation from whiny Kkids, demanding mothers and idiotic bosses, my girlfriend must work 36 consectutive months! 36! When she started work, she was motivated, creatived and innovative. Designed several immersion classes, which brought both productive learning to the classroom and good money into the school during the summer and winters sessions. Now, she can't be bothered. Like everyone else in Korea, she just goes through the motions. [/b] |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
maingman
Joined: 26 Jan 2008 Location: left Korea
|
Posted: Sun Oct 03, 2010 2:02 am Post subject: . |
|
|
SinclairLondon
China? / |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jvalmer

Joined: 06 Jun 2003
|
Posted: Sun Oct 03, 2010 2:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
| PRagic wrote: |
| A second/third language fluency should be mandatory for high school and university graduation |
This is a ridiculous idea if you want to make this a universal national requirement. How many on this board can honestly say that they are fluent in a second language? 10%? 20%? Fluency in the language, or languages, that the institution's program requires should be sufficient enough. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|