|
Korean Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Saudiman
Joined: 12 Nov 2009
|
Posted: Sat Aug 20, 2011 1:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
| I taught in Korea awhile, but was never in the subway when the sirens went off. Do they stop the subway trains during the drill (since they are underground) or do they continue running during the drill? What happens if the train is at an above-ground station at the time? Thanks, SM |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Airborne9
Joined: 01 Jun 2010
|
Posted: Sat Aug 20, 2011 1:29 am Post subject: Re: hmmm |
|
|
| The Cosmic Hum wrote: |
hmm...reading this thread....it would seem a few of you need to pick up your game a bit...Chokse is doing more than just holding his own and has what appears to be a controversial but educated way of thinking...that doesn't make him wrong...just unpopular, apparently.
In fact, his opinion on the drill seems like a standard rant...and a pretty good one, too. The drill...regardless of intent...is annoying.
I have no dog in this fight, but this thread makes for an interesting read. |
He is holding his own
But you are wrong, he is saying that the purpose of the drill is useless, not that it is annoying and that the Koreans are idiots for doing it. his reasoning behind this is that stopped cars make easier targets for North Koreans to hit, therefore the drill is pointless.
What me and others have been saying is that, what makes him think that he knows better than the Koreans on this matter? that civilian safety may not be the overall goal of the drill itself. what plan is a better one? maybe moving cars during an attack are more dangerous to peoples safety.
he has avoided really answering questions by insulting other peoples grammar, jobs, money they earn and how stupid the Korean Govt/people are.
I'd reckon that 90 percent of emergency drills that take place over the world, regarding wartime events such as air raid or attack, that the procedure is for all traffic to either stop (drivers to get out and seek shelter) or pull in and make way for emergency vehicles.
I have no issue with someone saying that the drills are annoying or maybe even pointless but as long as thy can give an educated, reasonable reason and alternative |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Steelrails

Joined: 12 Mar 2009 Location: Earth, Solar System
|
Posted: Sat Aug 20, 2011 1:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
It seems to me that while individually, it might be best for one person to get out of their car and start running around, that in a crowded urban environment this might not be the best idea.
First and foremost you need to get people conditioned and drilled so that in an event like that they do the most important thing- STOP DRIVING. Nothing would create more chaos than 1 million cars driving insane through a civil defense situation.
| Quote: |
| What's the point of an air raid "drill" if you're not actually practicing what should be done during a "real" air raid? Should we sit in our cars and wait for the bombs to drop? If not, then the drill serves no purpose. |
As another poster alluded to, it's not just an air raid drill, it's a a Civil Defense drill.
Before you get all high and mighty and call other people idiots, make sure you know what you're talking about.
Civil Defense involves any number of attacks.
| Quote: |
| What's the point of sitting inside a car for 15 minutes in the middle of the street? Does that somehow help you in a disaster or attack by the North? |
Well maybe you should learn a thing or two about explosions and ordinance before you open your unlearned mouth.
Now we all know about the fire and explosions and shrapnel of artillery shells and how they can kill you.
I for one would rather have an engine block and car doors than open air between me and that.
But just as deadly, and probably unknown to you, are the concussive air effects of artillery explosions.
The shock and vibration and pressure changes can cause massive internal tissue damage, in particular to the brain and the respiratory system.
Whether you are exhaling or inhaling at the time could be the difference between being fine and having perforated lungs.
Now being in a car would help reduce the risk of that. The car would absorb come of the waves of energy.
Now I'm sure you thought about that right?
| Quote: |
| A moving target is harder to hit than a stationary target. No two ways about it, but I'm sure you'll try to find an asinine way to prove that's not true. |
During a bombardment they aren't aiming at your car.
What you think the North Koreans are targeting your vehicle? It only makes you harder to hit if someone is aiming for you. Since the shells are falling in a somewhat haphazard manner, for all you know you might be driving into the path of one whereas if you stayed still you wouldn't have gotten hit.
Given then that one spot is as good as the next, the most important thing is to keep the roads clear and to not create greater chaos by driving around like a lunatic.
When the shells start falling you are supposed to keep your cool, not run/drive around like a chicken with your head cut off.
But yes, you are the genius advocating that approach. The "idiot Koreans" should listen to you.
I read a book once about the Gulf War where some OP was attacked and some guy there flipped out and hopped in the humvee and started driving around like a lunatic. The guy wasn't ever allowed to ever hold a gun again and sent back to base.
Congratulations Chokse. You're that guy.
So yes, between not understanding a bombardment and not understanding some of the additional ways that artillery shells an kill and not understanding the difference between a civil defense drill and an air-raid drill, I think you should hold your tongue before you cast doubt on the judgment and expertise of others.
Now who looks like an idiot? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Tamada
Joined: 02 Nov 2008
|
Posted: Sat Aug 20, 2011 3:25 am Post subject: Re: hmmm |
|
|
| The Cosmic Hum wrote: |
hmm...reading this thread....it would seem a few of you need to pick up your game a bit...Chokse is doing more than just holding his own and has what appears to be a controversial but educated way of thinking...that doesn't make him wrong...just unpopular, apparently.
In fact, his opinion on the drill seems like a standard rant...and a pretty good one, too. The drill...regardless of intent...is annoying.
I have no dog in this fight, but this thread makes for an interesting read. |
Agree 100%.
Where did Chokse go? Maybe the apologists tried to get him banned.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Chokse
Joined: 22 May 2009
|
Posted: Sat Aug 20, 2011 4:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
Give me a break! I'll give you the part about the engine block offering a degree of protection, but the doors? Really? Not a chance! Have you ever worked on a car in your life?
The doors are hollow, with fairly thin metal on the outside (designed to crumple and absorb an impact rather than prevent projectiles from entering the car) and cheap plastic and cloth/leather on the inside. Do you not realize the speed at which shrapnel travels from a bomb? A door would never even slow it down. Every wondered why presidents travel around in armor-plated cars? They certainly don't do it for the gas mileage!
Furthermore, what about all the glass surrounding you in a car? Do you think that's going to help protect you from shrapnel and debris? What if the bomb/artillery hits the building next to your parked car? It means all that debris will come falling down onto YOUR car with YOU in it. I'm sure you'll be safe tucked inside your glass and metal womb, though.
I said it once and I'll say it again. The drill is pointless and it only wastes people's time. If the government wants to do a proper and useful drill, it should require everyone to abandon their cars and seek shelter in a designated location (underground bomb shelter). Now, we all know that's never going to happen.
Finally, I have a request for Airborne. Please, please, please... I beg you... use a period somewhere in your sentences. It's all commas and no periods. Ever hear of a run-on sentence? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Chokse
Joined: 22 May 2009
|
Posted: Sat Aug 20, 2011 4:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
TJ: Go back to the first post. Yeah, the one that started it all. Here's the direct quote from the US Embassy:
Quote: "The U.S. Embassy in Seoul is transmitting the following information as a public service to all U.S. citizens in the Republic of Korea.
Seoul Metropolitan Police authorities advised the Embassy that on Thursday, August 18, at approximately 2:00 p.m. an air-raid siren will sound for one minute to signal the start of a nationwide civil defense drill. Pedestrians in open and public areas should seek shelter in nearby buildings or subway stations. All drivers/vehicles on the road must pull over and come to a complete stop. At approximately 2:15 p.m. a second siren will sound, signaling the conclusion of the drill. Local authorities will give further instructions if necessary."
Notice where it says, "All drivers/vehicles" on the road must pull over and come to a complete stop?" That's exactly where it says people in cars must not move. I was in my car when it happened. I had to stop in the middle of the street as I, and others around me, were stopped at a red light when the sirens sounded.
I actually attempted to exit my car to seek the comfort of an air-conditioned 7-11 less than 30 meters from my car, only to have a very distressed looking man in a yellow vest run to me, brandishing a flag, and tell me to stay in my car. He would not let me leave the car.
According to the US Embassy, drivers are not permitted to leave their cars. According to a very distressed Korean man, the Korean government, too, does not want people to leave their cars.
How am I misunderstanding the idea of drivers pulling over and not being permitted to move? It seems pretty clear that's what's expected if one reads the Embassy bulletin, and it sure seemed that way when the panicked Korean man ushered me back inside my car. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
isisaredead
Joined: 18 May 2010
|
Posted: Sat Aug 20, 2011 4:52 am Post subject: Re: hmmm |
|
|
| Tamada wrote: |
| The Cosmic Hum wrote: |
hmm...reading this thread....it would seem a few of you need to pick up your game a bit...Chokse is doing more than just holding his own and has what appears to be a controversial but educated way of thinking...that doesn't make him wrong...just unpopular, apparently.
In fact, his opinion on the drill seems like a standard rant...and a pretty good one, too. The drill...regardless of intent...is annoying.
I have no dog in this fight, but this thread makes for an interesting read. |
Agree 100%.
Where did Chokse go? Maybe the apologists tried to get him banned.  |
so calling someone out for being a smug idiot who doesn't know what they're talking about makes me an apologist?
nice. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Steelrails

Joined: 12 Mar 2009 Location: Earth, Solar System
|
Posted: Sat Aug 20, 2011 10:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| The doors are hollow, with fairly thin metal on the outside (designed to crumple and absorb an impact rather than prevent projectiles from entering the car) and cheap plastic and cloth/leather on the inside. Do you not realize the speed at which shrapnel travels from a bomb? A door would never even slow it down. Every wondered why presidents travel around in armor-plated cars? They certainly don't do it for the gas mileage! |
Better than air.
And better those crumple resistant panels than nothing when it comes to the concussive effects, which it is clear that you had no clue about and failed to consider.
| Quote: |
| Furthermore, what about all the glass surrounding you in a car? Do you think that's going to help protect you from shrapnel and debris? What if the bomb/artillery hits the building next to your parked car? It means all that debris will come falling down onto YOUR car with YOU in it. I'm sure you'll be safe tucked inside your glass and metal womb, though. |
If the bomb hits next to your car you are dead anyway.
Anyways better to be hit by glass that has alread absorbed some of the energy of the blast than by the shrapnel full on. Duh.
But fine, go in a gunfight/bombardment and rather than taking cover behind/in a car, prance around in the open.
You said that it's better to be a moving target. But we're talking about a bombardment, not aimed fire. You clearly failed to consider the concussive impact of artillery fire. And you are the one that confused an air raid drill with a civil defense drill.
Can you just admit that you don't have the slightest clue what you're talking about? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Chokse
Joined: 22 May 2009
|
Posted: Sat Aug 20, 2011 4:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
A car is not going to offer any degree of protection from a concussion, unless it is far enough away from the source to not suffer serious damage anyway. A concussion strong enough to harm you (read close enough) will cause nearby objects (telephone poles, trees, parts of buildings) to collapse or fall. You, and your car, will be under these falling items. You, and your car, will be crushed, especially if you are parked and unable to maneuver.
The advice you are giving is as stupid as telling someone to park on the side of the road and stay in a car during a tornado. You seem to think that cheap metal and glass will somehow protect you.
The best course of action would be for drivers to exit their vehicles and seek shelter in approved bomb shelters, don't you think? Perhaps you have a better suggestion? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Steelrails

Joined: 12 Mar 2009 Location: Earth, Solar System
|
Posted: Sat Aug 20, 2011 7:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| A car is not going to offer any degree of protection from a concussion, unless it is far enough away from the source to not suffer serious damage anyway. A concussion strong enough to harm you (read close enough) will cause nearby objects (telephone poles, trees, parts of buildings) to collapse or fall. You, and your car, will be under these falling items. |
I'm not just talking being lifted up by the blast and thrown down. I'm talking that the air moving can cause your lungs to be shredded if you are inhaling when the explosion occurs. If you are in the open, which walking to the bomb shelter would entail, you going to be susceptible to that. If you are in a car, you are not.
Yes, a round might land close to you. That happens.
That might happen. It might not. The car will help protect you from your lungs being perforated and your brain being rattled by a nearby explosion. Not that you even knew about those things happening.
Besides those things you mention might be farther away from the blast radius.
But you say if you're in a car, you'll be automatically struck by falling things.
But if we do as you say and exit the car and run somewhere, the person absolutely will not be struck?
Dude, it's a bombardment. It's random chance. You could be in a foxhole and die. You could stand up in one spot and live. Sometimes stuff might fall. Sometimes it won't.
| Quote: |
| You seem to think that cheap metal and glass will somehow protect you. |
Cheap metal and glass? It is better than air.
Or an object that has been meticulously designed to prevent injury to the occupant during high speed collisions.
But you want people to leave the added layer of protection and walk the 5-10 minutes it would take them to get to the bomb shelter, completely exposed and at risk of all of the things you mentioned.
When walking from your car to the bomb shelter. Trees and parts of buildings as you say, could strike you. As could the fragments of the actual rounds. And you would be more susceptible to getting your brain rattled and having you lungs shredded.
But you seem to be under the impression that you will be able to exit your car and magically be in a bomb shelter in 20 seconds.
| Quote: |
| The best course of action would be for drivers to exit their vehicles and seek shelter in approved bomb shelters, don't you think? Perhaps you have a better suggestion? |
Yes, because no matter where you are driving there will be an approved bomb shelter. Those things are on every block
And again, it is a civil defense drill. A bombardment is one scenario. Another scenario may be a chemical or terrorist incident.
You need people to react calmly and keep the streets clear for emergency/military vehicles.
Can you accept for a minute the idea that you might be wrong? And perhaps you don't have the expertise to make such a judgment? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Chokse
Joined: 22 May 2009
|
Posted: Sat Aug 20, 2011 11:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
First, I have yet to see a building or vehicle in this country with windows and doors that seal tightly enough to prevent chemical gasses from entering. I live in a fairly new apartment building with "insulated" windows and you can feel the air leaking in around them. This has been true of every place I've lived or worked in here.
Furthermore, cars are open to the outside air through the heating and cooling system, so a car will not offer any degree of protection against a chemical attack. The gas will get inside the car and you will die in your car.
Maybe (and it's a big maybe), one could suffer from heat concussion if one were outside one's vehicle. This begs the question, what about those who drive convertibles or motorcycles. Shouldn't the drill instruct those in convertibles or on motorcycles to leave their vehicles and go inside a building?
I'm back to my original point. There is no point to this drill because it does not actually make people practice what should be done during a "civil defense" emergency.
Finally, if anyone is dumb enough to sit on the road and allow the military to move in position, while you remain a sitting duck for whatever may come your way, then you deserve whatever happens to you. The smart people will say, as they turn their cars and start heading toward Busan, "Screw the K-military... I'm saving myself."
Last edited by Chokse on Sun Aug 21, 2011 2:11 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Chokse
Joined: 22 May 2009
|
Posted: Sat Aug 20, 2011 11:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| By the way, I did consider it for a minute, but found it to be absolutely unacceptable. Happy now? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Steelrails

Joined: 12 Mar 2009 Location: Earth, Solar System
|
Posted: Sun Aug 21, 2011 4:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
First, I have yet to see a building or vehicle in this country with windows and doors that seal tightly enough to prevent chemical gasses from entering. I live in a fairly new apartment building with "insulated" windows and you can feel the air leaking in around them. This has been true of every place I've lived or worked in here.
Furthermore, cars are open to the outside air through the heating and cooling system, so a car will not offer any degree of protection against a chemical attack. The gas will get inside the car and you will die in your car. |
no one said that cars were safe from chemical weapons. If you are in the lethal radius you're dead either way. But a car might help in terms of low level exposure caused by air and wind.
| Quote: |
| Maybe (and it's a big maybe), one could suffer from heat concussion if one were outside one's vehicle. |
You really don't know what I'm talking about do you?
A bomb could go off near you, you don't get burned or hit by shrapnel, but the waves and pressure from it could A) Shred your lungs if you happen to be inhaling at the time. B)Cause your brain to rattle in your head and over a period of 6 months of worsening symptoms you turn into a special needs person.
These are actual combat injuries. Being in a car would absorb the shock waves that would lead to those two injuries. And the shockwaves from that often are not enough to knock down a tree or building. They are enough however to slightly rattle your brain and shred your soft lung tissue.
Now if you actually knew what you were talking about you'd have known about this. Clearly you don't know about this, and clearly you don't know what you're talking about.
| Quote: |
| There is no point to this drill because it does not actually make people practice what should be done during a "civil defense" emergency. |
Clearing the roads for emergency vehicles is priority number one.
There's a reason in emergencies emergency vehicles have sirens and laws require us to give them the right of way.
You are advocating everyone running around like a bunch of chickens with their head's cut off.
| Quote: |
| Finally, if anyone is dumb enough to sit on the road and allow the military to move in position, while you remain a sitting duck for whatever may come your way, then you deserve whatever happens to you. The smart people will say, as they turn their cars and start heading toward Busan, "Screw the K-military... I'm saving myself." |
Yeah, great attitude to have. Work to the detriment of those who are the line of defense between you and the norks.
No, you're not smart. You're someone who is panicking and has lost their cool and is putting other people at risk.
People like you are going to panic, run over some innocent people, smash into someone else's car and then block emergency vehicles and the military.
Your plan is panicky and unfeasible. It might work for one person, but for 20 million people it will not. In fact it would make things much much worse.
Oh and by the way if some whathaveyou is really going down and the streets need to be cleared for military vehicles because of some sort of terrorist incident or something, you might want to think twice about driving like a madman and ignoring the instructions. The police/military might regard you as a threat and not have their usual indifference to such driving.
If it is "The Big One" I'm willing to bet that they'd shoot your car to make you stop. They have to set an example and can't have 20 million people clogging the streets and acting all stupid.
Good grief. Your plan is "Turn your car around and head to Busan". Yeah great plan. Present that one to the military guys or disaster experts back home. Sure they'd see things just as you.
Chokse, just admit that A)You don't know what you're talking about. And B) Your plan is crap.
It's obvious to anyone with a brain that both of those are true.
I know it can be hard to be honest with yourself and admit when you're wrong and admit that you don't know what you're talking about, but it's important for you that you do it.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Chokse
Joined: 22 May 2009
|
Posted: Sun Aug 21, 2011 4:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
You, Steelrails, were the one who said the drill was not only for the case of a bombardment, but also for a chemical or terrorist incident. Therefore, it is you who implied that stopping in a car can somehow offer a degree of protection against a chemical attack. Look back at your post.
Here's your direct quote:
"And again, it is a civil defense drill. A bombardment is one scenario. Another scenario may be a chemical or terrorist incident."
You opened the door to it being about chemical weapons and when I said a car would offer no protection from a chemical weapon attack, you said:
"no one said that cars were safe from chemical weapons. If you are in the lethal radius you're dead either way."
First you say the point of staying in the car is to protect against concussion blasts or chemical gasses, but then you say if there really is a chemical attack, a person in the car is dead anyway.
Pick one dude!
Also, thanks for making my point. You said, "It might work for one person, but for 20 million people it will not. In fact it would make things much much worse."
Everyone in Korea has been conditioned to stop their cars and wait, so I'll be that one person you speak of who is able to get out. Thanks for proving my plan will work. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Steelrails

Joined: 12 Mar 2009 Location: Earth, Solar System
|
Posted: Sun Aug 21, 2011 7:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| Therefore, it is you who implied that stopping in a car can somehow offer a degree of protection against a chemical attack. |
Yes and I stand by that.
Here is what you said:
| Quote: |
| when I said a car would offer no protection from a chemical weapon attack |
I made it clear that what I was talking about was exposure not in the "kill zone" but from the chemicals being dispersed by the air in a dose not sufficient to kill, but enough to cause health problems.
| Quote: |
First you say the point of staying in the car is to protect against concussion blasts or chemical gasses, but then you say if there really is a chemical attack, a person in the car is dead anyway.
Pick one dude! |
This is why you don't even know what you're talking about.
It's a civil defense drill. It encompasses a broad range of acts, from an air raid to a chemical attack to a terrorist incident to some sort of disaster (not necessarily natural).
It is not just one. It is a whole range of things.
| Quote: |
| Everyone in Korea has been conditioned to stop their cars and wait, so I'll be that one person you speak of who is able to get out. Thanks for proving my plan will work. |
First off, you were calling the plan stupid as a plan for 20 million people. Since it's pretty hard to justify you're alternative plan of 20 million people trying to drive to Busan, I think we can say that the plan is not stupid, and your counter-plan is stupid. After all we aren't talking about what works best for you. We are talking about what works best for 20 million people.
Given the fact that you can't differentiate what works for 1 person, and what works for 20 million, and that your alternative plan for 20 million is so pathetically ill-conceived, maybe the dumb person in this one is not the planners. Maybe, get this, just maybe, YOU sir, might be the one who is not thinking things out.
So yeah your plan works great......up until you hit the military roadblock/convoy coming through and they run you over/shoot you because you're in the way and they're about to head into a warzone.
Or some panicky fear-mongerer like you causes the panic to spread and suddenly there is chaos.
Seriously dude, you're idea is to basically "freak out" and start driving around like a lunatic.
You're going to be like that guy you read about who gets shot up in Iraq/Afghanistan because he tries to drive through the U.S. Army road checkpoint.
In case you haven't realized over the last 10 years, people in the Army tend to not take a kindly view of out of control vehicles tearing through the streets and ignoring military orders regarding their operation and conduct. You typically read it in some blurb of "Family of four killed in Kabul after driving through checkpoint."
But yes, as artillery rounds are falling, I'm sure we can rely on the soldiers to ask questions first and shoot later in regards to some unidentified vehicle ignoring orders to stop.
| Quote: |
| There is no point to this drill because it does not actually make people practice what should be done during a "civil defense" emergency. |
So did you practice your plan when the sirens went off? I mean, a plan practiced is a plan that goes well.
Did you hope in your car and start tearing off to Busan?
| Quote: |
| The smart people will say, as they turn their cars and start heading toward Busan, "Screw the K-military... I'm saving myself." |
Aren't you married? So with the bombs falling you're going to just head off to Busan?
Jeez, you love to flee don't you? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|