|
Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
12ax7
Joined: 07 Nov 2009
|
 Posted: Sat Apr 20, 2013 4:11 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
| Underwaterbob wrote: |
From the article:
| Quote: |
"This amendment is for cases like public nudity and public indecency," Inspector Ko Jun-ho of the National Police Agency told CNN.
"Any reports that we will be regulating what people are wearing are completely false." |
I was in on another debate on some other forum over this very same thing. It was only an article in the Korea Times then.
The law is designed to target babarimen (literally trenchcoat-men: flashers) and probably public urinators; just like any other public indecency law in existence. It has nothing to do with miniskirts.
This is a non-story blown completely out of proportion by the uninformed and those looking to generate controversy to get site hits/sell newspapers (like anyone buys those anymore!) |
Phew!
And from the article linked in the original post...
"Is the overexposure fine for real? I'm so dead"
She's awesome in every possible way...well, except for her alleged plagiarism.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
