|
Korean Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
mithridates

Joined: 03 Mar 2003 Location: President's office, Korean Space Agency
|
Posted: Sun Aug 11, 2013 8:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
| World Traveler wrote: |
| Ginormousaurus wrote: |
| Incorrect. |
The Canadians I've met have said they had 10 years of mandatory French instruction in their public schools. That's why I asked/assumed. (Maybe it's just some provinces though that require that?) Care to elaborate on your comment (rather than just telling me I'm wrong)? |
In Alberta in the early 90s it was a minimum of six years (grades 4 to 9), and I think it's been reduced since then. It really depends on the province. New Brunswick for example is the only officially bilingual one, Ontario goes up to grade 13 instead of 12, etc. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ginormousaurus

Joined: 27 Jul 2006 Location: 700 Ft. Pulpit
|
Posted: Sun Aug 11, 2013 8:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
| World Traveler wrote: |
| Ginormousaurus wrote: |
| Incorrect. |
The Canadians I've met have said they had 10 years of mandatory French instruction in their public schools. That's why I asked/assumed. (Maybe it's just some provinces though that require that?) Care to elaborate on your comment (rather than just telling me I'm wrong)? |
Okay, I'll elaborate.
I am Canadian. I grew up in Alberta. I did not have 10 years of mandatory French instruction. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
robbie_davies
Joined: 16 Jun 2013
|
Posted: Sun Aug 11, 2013 8:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Some people have a talent for languages. DaShan learned Cantonese as an adult and performs 'crosstalk' Something that not even 95% of learners are going to ever aspire to doing. So there is natural talent as well all the other factors such as age, motivation, education level etc. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ginormousaurus

Joined: 27 Jul 2006 Location: 700 Ft. Pulpit
|
Posted: Sun Aug 11, 2013 8:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
| mithridates wrote: |
In Alberta in the early 90s it was a minimum of six years (grades 4 to 9), and I think it's been reduced since then. It really depends on the province. New Brunswick for example is the only officially bilingual one, Ontario goes up to grade 13 instead of 12, etc. |
That must not have been a province-wide policy. I was in grades 4 to 9 in 90s and we had the option of studying French beginning in grade 7.
For what it's worth, I grew up in a small town. If I recall, Mith, you've stated in the past that you're from Calgary, so maybe you had more options. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mithridates

Joined: 03 Mar 2003 Location: President's office, Korean Space Agency
|
Posted: Sun Aug 11, 2013 9:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Ginormousaurus wrote: |
| mithridates wrote: |
In Alberta in the early 90s it was a minimum of six years (grades 4 to 9), and I think it's been reduced since then. It really depends on the province. New Brunswick for example is the only officially bilingual one, Ontario goes up to grade 13 instead of 12, etc. |
That must not have been a province-wide policy. I was in grades 4 to 9 in 90s and we had the option of studying French beginning in grade 7.
For what it's worth, I grew up in a small town. If I recall, Mith, you've stated in the past that you're from Calgary, so maybe you had more options. |
Probably, Calgary has the CBE and I assume that was their decision. Just to clarify, grade 4 to 9 for me would have been 1988 to 1994, give or take a year. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
World Traveler
Joined: 29 May 2009
|
Posted: Mon Aug 12, 2013 5:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| andrewchon wrote: |
| I agree with the motivation thing. I've worked with former POWs and they told me that they learnt when their lives were at stake. |
How did you meet these POWs? They were Americans who were captured by North Koreans and thus learned the Korean language there? How good was their Korean? Self reported as good or did you hear it/ test it youself?
Have you heard of Charles Jenkins? He went to North Korea in 1965, and stayed there for decades (because he was not allowed to leave). He was unable to learn the Korean language (even though he had all the motivation in the world to learn it...and 40 years to do so).
| Quote: |
"For many years we lived in a one-room house that we all shared," he said in the statement. "We slept on the floor, there was most often no electricity, and we had no running water. We were allowed to bathe once a month, though in the summer we bathed more often in the river."
Jenkins said their "job" was to study in Korean the philosophy of Kim Il Sung, which they did for 10 hours a day. He said he and the other Americans called it "the study of class struggle from the perspective of a crazy man."
"If we didn't memorize enough, or were not able to recite portions of our studies on demand, we were then forced to study 16 hours a day on Sunday, which was our only day of rest," he said.
"I longed to leave that place every day." |
And look at another American defector (there for decades):
| Quote: |
| Charles Jenkins wrote in his book The Reluctant Communist that Abshier had difficulty conversing in Korean but was fascinated by words and would spend hours studying high-level vocabulary from newspapers. |
_______________________________________________________________
As people get older, they lose the ability to make and hear sounds not found in their native language. Korean has a lot of these sounds, which is why so many people have such a hard time learning the language.
http://how-to-learn-any-language.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=28128&PN=6 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ghostrider
Joined: 27 Jun 2011
|
Posted: Mon Aug 12, 2013 5:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Joseph Conrad didn't start learning English until he was 21. He became one of the greatest novelists in the English language. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
World Traveler
Joined: 29 May 2009
|
Posted: Mon Aug 12, 2013 5:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| English was his third language. His childhood bilingualism helped him learn English down the road. I've said people who learn more than one language at a young age are better able to learn other languages later in life. English was not as distant and unrelated as Korean is for us. Joseph Conrad wrote well, but (due to deficits in speech) didn't like to speak in English in front of audiences. Lastly, just because one person does something doesn't mean it is possible for everyone. Otherwise, why don't you join the NBA, ghostrider? I mean, Mugsy Bogues was in the NBA. Why don't you sign up for a team now? Playing basketball is a lot more fun than teaching English. It pays better too. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
andrewchon

Joined: 16 Nov 2008 Location: Back in Oz. Living in ISIS Aust.
|
Posted: Mon Aug 12, 2013 8:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| World Traveler: They were Australian WW2 veterans who survived Japanese labour camps after the fall of Singapore. You can see that they were frightened for their lives. Charles Jenkins on the other hand, didn't have to worry about his life, or food or roof over his head. Do you see the difference between their respective motivations? Granted, their level of Japanese was pretty low, but they spoke better than another group of second language learners I've come across, immigrants. There are large number of immigrants who arrived in Australia after the WW2. Their English isn't as good considering the years they've spent living in Australia. Life was pretty good in post-war Australia compared to the wreck they've left behind in Europe. Nobody starved to death, unlike the food-rationed Germany and Japan. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Fox

Joined: 04 Mar 2009
|
Posted: Mon Aug 12, 2013 9:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| World Traveler wrote: |
| mithridates wrote: |
| Hanja is good for people of certain personality types, like Fox. |
I've thought about learning the 1,800 standard hanja. I tried and it was freaking hard! A very time consuming task. So I gave up. Should I start again? Would it be worth it? What about you, mithridates? How many hanja do you know? |
If you had spent 10 minutes a day studying Hanja since the time you came to Korea, you'd know quite a few by now with no discernible loss of free time. Benefits include increased reading comprehension, easier vocabulary acquisition (no trivial thing given the huge part vocabulary acquisition plays in language learning), and even applicability to other Asian languages. Because I am learning Chinese, I do not bother with Hanja directly these days, learning Hanzi and just picking up Korean pronunciations passively if I encounter them, but my previous Hanja study gave me a huge head start in Chinese. When you see 發展 for the first time and can immediately say, "Oh, 발전!" and remember it forever, that's nice.
The first thousand or so are probably enough to get the bulk of the benefit. I know about 2200 total (some only in Korean, some only in Chinese, most in both). Some of those are really rare ones and not especially useful, like 夔 (which I just inputted by handwriting it into my phone, how OCD is that, learning to write a character you'll probably see once in your entire life?), but most are useful. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Fox

Joined: 04 Mar 2009
|
Posted: Mon Aug 12, 2013 9:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I suspect a lot of people set themselves up to fail at this endeavor:
1) One important thing is studying every (or almost every) day. Our Mithridates here, I am given to understand, say down doing a huge amount of study each day for a few months. I cannot do that, I am naturally lazy. I still studied every day though, so while I would not progress anywhere near as quickly as him, I made progress. That is what matters.
2) Good resources are important. Integrated Korean is a decent line of textbooks + audio, and not expensive. Anki SRS is free. Lang-8 is a great website for writing practice and meeting native speakers. Lingq is a terrible website (so slow) which none the less has a huge amount of tiered audio/script pairs, which is very useful for listening practice (I would not advise using their paid features, just use Anki to memorize words). Online you can find a "Korean Grammar Dictionary" which has a huge list of Korean grammatical particles with English explanations.
3) Being willing to look foolish is important. Even now, I say stupid things not uncommonly. My vice principal just the other day asked me, in a mumbling old man voice, how many students would be at our camp. I misheard and, thinking he asked what day we would start on, answered, "Oh, we start today!" He asked again in a louder voice and I corrected myself. Sure, I looked like an idiot, but the alternative is to never practice in "the wild" and never make headway. How many people stall out because they do not hold themselves out and try? A lot I suspect.
Intermittent practice, poor resources, and reticence to practice in public will make failure likely. Korean is not easy, but that just means you need good methodology. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
markness
Joined: 02 Jan 2013
|
Posted: Mon Aug 12, 2013 10:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Fox wrote: |
I suspect a lot of people set themselves up to fail at this endeavor:
1) One important thing is studying every (or almost every) day. Our Mithridates here, I am given to understand, say down doing a huge amount of study each day for a few months. I cannot do that, I am naturally lazy. I still studied every day though, so while I would not progress anywhere near as quickly as him, I made progress. That is what matters.
2) Good resources are important. Integrated Korean is a decent line of textbooks + audio, and not expensive. Anki SRS is free. Lang-8 is a great website for writing practice and meeting native speakers. Lingq is a terrible website (so slow) which none the less has a huge amount of tiered audio/script pairs, which is very useful for listening practice (I would not advise using their paid features, just use Anki to memorize words). Online you can find a "Korean Grammar Dictionary" which has a huge list of Korean grammatical particles with English explanations.
3) Being willing to look foolish is important. Even now, I say stupid things not uncommonly. My vice principal just the other day asked me, in a mumbling old man voice, how many students would be at our camp. I misheard and, thinking he asked what day we would start on, answered, "Oh, we start today!" He asked again in a louder voice and I corrected myself. Sure, I looked like an idiot, but the alternative is to never practice in "the wild" and never make headway. How many people stall out because they do not hold themselves out and try? A lot I suspect.
Intermittent practice, poor resources, and reticence to practice in public will make failure likely. Korean is not easy, but that just means you need good methodology. |
So do you practice for about an hour a day, Mr. Fox? I'm at the starting stage, don't want to burn out though because studying 3-4 hours a day had me burn out when I was studying Chinese. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Fox

Joined: 04 Mar 2009
|
Posted: Mon Aug 12, 2013 10:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I practice somewhere between 20 minutes and one hour a day, not counting actual use of the language in day to day circumstances. Like I said, I'm lazy. As a corollary, this means that if someone whose "floor" is 20 minutes a day can make progress, so can you.
There's a finite amount to be learned here; it's a skill, not magic. If you want to learn faster, obviously you'll have to study harder, but if you are willing to pick away at it for years, just make sure you do a bit every day and you'll get somewhere. It also gets easier to be lazy about it as time goes on. Being able to sit down and read a few pages out of a book on a topic in which you are actually interested when you have a moment is luxurious compared to studying out of a textbook, and to the extent that I would ever recommend anyone actually try to hurry things up, it's for the sake of getting to that stage faster. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mithridates

Joined: 03 Mar 2003 Location: President's office, Korean Space Agency
|
Posted: Tue Aug 13, 2013 3:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Fox wrote: |
| 3) Being willing to look foolish is important. Even now, I say stupid things not uncommonly. My vice principal just the other day asked me, in a mumbling old man voice, how many students would be at our camp. I misheard and, thinking he asked what day we would start on, answered, "Oh, we start today!" He asked again in a louder voice and I corrected myself. Sure, I looked like an idiot, but the alternative is to never practice in "the wild" and never make headway. How many people stall out because they do not hold themselves out and try? A lot I suspect. |
Here's a good example of that:
https://fourththing.wordpress.com/the-lernen-to-talk-show/
That's a 'show' done by a guy who spent a year in Germany (he's back there again now) recording himself every week as he makes progress, and it is of course full of mistakes. And he got very good after a year of this. After each episode he would analyze what he said right and wrong:
| Quote: |
0:52 – Wrong preposition here… you don’t “freuen für” things. You “freuen auf” them.
1:02 – I was very close on this one. Speaking in the past tense usually involves conjugating the verb “to be” or “to have”, then using the past participle of the actual verb you want to use, putting it at the end. Here I used “to have” when I should have used “to be”. Sein vs. haben. The struggle continues.
1:21 – If I say “I don’t know”, it’s usually a good sign that I tried to think of something to say and then gave up. In this case I was going to make a remark about how time seems to go faster as one gets older and then I thought better of it.
1:36 – I seem to have fused the masculine article “der” and the neutral article “das” into a new and innovative masceutral article, “ders”. It turns out the correct article is “der”. |
The comment at 1:36 is my favourite. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
PatrickGHBusan
Joined: 24 Jun 2008 Location: Busan (1997-2008) Canada 2008 -
|
Posted: Wed Aug 14, 2013 6:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
You posted threads on this topic a few times WT and it usually results in you getting the same basic answer (ignoring the trolls and snark comments): learning a language is mostly based on motivation.
If an adult is highly motivated by what I will call core motivations then he will learn a new language. If not, he will likely fail to learn due to lack of interest.
It is that simple in my experience.
Why did I become fluent in Korean? Because I was driven by core motivations that kept me going when I hit the various learning walls. Also because when you have such core motivation, you tend to make the time sacrifices that are needed more readily (practice, study, oh and more practice).
The same would be true of my brother who has lived in Japan for longer than I was in Korea and who also became fluent in Japanese: core motivation.
My opinion is that if a person starts studying Korean but has low motivation, he or she will likely fail once they hit the first or second learning wall (typically when progress slows down and the first setbacks occur). That is simply because low motivation will lead that person to see the challenge as bigger and more daunting and interest will wane.
Setting realistic goals will be key as well! I mean expecting to have fluid convo in Korean after a couple of months of study may be unrealistic. Failing to reach this goal would then sap motivation.
Also, when you are highly motivated to learn, you tend to deal far better with the setbacks (ex: ntrying to communicate with a Korean shop keeper and falling flat on your face after you were sure you were capable).
So..motivation is the key.
I will agree with you one one thing WT: knowing a second language will typically mean (in my experience) that a person finds it easier to learn a third language. This would be because the mental process is similar and the learner theoretically has gone through the various learning statges, setbacks and through the mental process required. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|